Premature BirthSOFTNCT04400175
Effects of a Valved Feeding System in Late-preterm Newborns: the Safe Oral Feeding Trial
A study testing Valved ergonomic teat and Standard silicon teat in people with Premature Birth and Feeding; Difficult, Newborn, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Comparing with a randomized controlled trial two different feeding systems in two groups of late-preterm newborns for evaluating which is more efficient in promoting the coordination in the process of sucking-swallowing-breathing and better cardiorespiratory stability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 day to 5 days
- Conditions the study is for
- Premature Birth, Feeding; Difficult, Newborn, Feeding, Bottle
- What is being tested?
- Valved ergonomic teat and Standard silicon teat
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2020to 31 May 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 day to 5 days
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Gestational age 34+0 - 36+6 weeks at birth;
- Exclusive oral feeding;
- Bottle-feeding for at least a meal a day;
Who cannot join
- Newborns with exclusive breastfeeding;
- Newborns with congenital anomalies, perinatal asphyxia, respiratory or neurological issues, genetic syndromes, infections, metabolic diseases;
- Ongoing administration of medication able to interfere with esophageal or respiratory function;
- Newborns who require respiratory support, including oxygen-therapy via nasal-cannula;
- Newborns who require oral or nasal feeding tube;
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin
Turin, 10126
About this study
Official title: Effects on Coordination of Sucking, Swallowing and Breathing Process of a Valved Feeding System in Late-preterm Newborns. The Safe Oral Feeding Trial (SOFT)
Comparing with a randomized controlled trial two different feeding systems in two groups of late-preterm newborns for evaluating which is more efficient in promoting the coordination in the process of sucking-swallowing-breathing and better cardiorespiratory stability.
The B-ESP group will be fed with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat; the B-STD with a standard feeding system.
Read the detailed description
The swallowing patterns are still immature in the newborn, especially if preterm. An incomplete synchronization in the process of sucking, swallowing and breathing could lead to some difficulty during feedings with desaturations and risk of milk inhalation in the upper airway tract. Moreover, a dysfunctional or immature pattern of sucking, swallowing and breathing also affect the post-prandial period, tiring the newborn and increasing the cardio-respiratory instability.
Breastfeeding promote the development of a physiological coordination of the process of sucking, swallowing and breathing, guaranteeing high and stable values of oxygenation during feedings. On the other hand, bottle-feeding could be responsible of a difficult coordination among the phases of swallowing and breathing. In an healthy, at term, brestfed newborn is observed a typical pattern of sucking-swallowing-expiration with a ratio of 1:1:1. In a bottlefed newborn this ratio is 2-12:1:4, with a relative increase of the period of sucking compared to the swallowing one, that could lead to apnoeas and desaturations.
The differences between the two feedings modality are more accentuated in the late-preterm newborn, which is more prone to cardio-respiratory instability compared to the healthy at term newborn, because of the immaturity of the respiratory centers in the brainstem, and of the processes responsible for the coordination of the sucking, swallowing and breathing .
However breastfeeding, in spite of the fact that is crucial for the development of the correct process of sucking, can be challenging in the premature infant because it requires a considerable physical effort.
Therefore, disposing of devices for nutrition able to facilitate oral feeding, simulating the physiologic breastfeeding, is necessary. In this way, we can contribute to the development of the proper sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern and to improve cardio-respiratory stability.
In literature there are multiple studies carried out on term newborns demonstrating the importance of the negative pressure or air vacuum created in the oral cavity, in order to promote the emptying of the lactiferous ducts and/or of the teat and simultaneously promote the maintainance of the right respiratory pattern. An ergonomic feeding system with a valve able to create vacuum could be able to respond to the demands of late preterm newborns.
Aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of a trial with an experimental feeding system with a teat with a valve able to facilitate the vacuum in the oral cavity on the pattern of sucking-swallowing and breathing in late preterm newborns.
NUMBER OF PATIENTS Precise data regarding swallowing/respiration rate in bottle-fed late preterm infants in the first 3 days of life are lacking in the literature. Considering a mean swallow/respiration ratio of 1.5 and a variance of 0.5, obtained from surveys performed at our center prior to the study, a sample size of 38 infants per arm was estimated to achieve 80% power to detect a 30% difference on the primary outcome with a significance level of 0.05.
STUDY DESIGN Late preterm newborns eligible to enter in the study, prior obtaining the informed consent from parents, will be assigned in the "B-ESP" or "B-STD" group through a process of block randomisation, controlled by a software.
Newborns included in the randomisation, after a training of 3 meals with the feeding bottle assigned from the randomisation, can be entered in the study.
Newborns included in the study will be monitored for the entire duration of a meal and the subsequent 3-hours period. This monitoring will be collected in two different times (T1 and T2): in the second day of life (24-48 hours of life) and in the fourth day of life (72-96 hours of life). The study includes an audio recording of the swallowings through a microphone in the room and the recordings of the process of sucking and swallowing through a cutaneous sensor.
In addition, a cardiorespiratory monitoring with a poligraph will be made, considering oxygen saturation, cardiac and respiratory frequency and electrocardiography. The meal's video recording will permit a subsequent classification of the sucking movements and the evaluation of any possible interference in the polygraphic recording.
FEEDING DEVICES
Newborns of the B-STD group will be fed using a classic disposable feeding device, which is actually in use in our centre and provided by our hospital, composed of:
- a 150 mL feeding bottle in polypropylene, devoid of BPA;
- a silicon teat, devoid of BPA, available in two types, (a slow graduated flow and a standard flow) depending on the necessities and suction abilities of the baby;
- a protective plug.
Newborns of the B-ESP group will be fed using a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat, composed of:
- a slow-flow ergonomic silicon teat
- polipropilene bottle with a capacity of 150 mL, with a ventilation valve on the bottom
- silicon valve
Newborns will be fed with defined quantities of maternal milk or bank donated milk, based on weight and gestational age.
The meal will be administered by the caregiver (a parent or a nurse) previously trained. The meal's administration will be performed keeping the baby in the caregivers's arms in the ESL position (semielevated side-lying). At the end of the feeding process the newborn will be repositioned in his cradle in the supine position.
The cardiosaturimetric evaluation will be performed using a system of polygraphic monitoring, which allows a simultaneous non-invasive recording of cardiorespiratory parameters, noises and movements associated to the sucking and swallowing processes combined to video recordings.
The evaluation of the sucking process will be carried out using a structured questionnaire composed by 31 items, which allows to distinguish normal suction (mature) from disorganized and dysfunctional ones.
Considering simultaneously the cardiosaturimetric parameters, video, audio and cutaneous sensor's recordings, it is possible to obtain a more accurate evaluation of the processes of swallowing, sucking and breathing of the newborn during meal administration. It is also possible to identify the exact moment of the breathing process assigned to the newborn's swallowing.
CLINICAL DATA
At birth:
- gestational age;
- weight in grams;
- z-score;
- sex;
- type of delivery;
- peri-partum condition, including possible administration of prenatal corticosteroids;
- type of support provided at birth;
At T1 and T2:
- hours from birth;
- weight;
- z-score;
- number of meals in a day;
- type of milk administered;
- overall volume administered expressed in mL in a day;
- duration of a meal expressed in minutes;
- number of regurgitation or vomit during the administration of a meal;
- number of regurgitation or vomit after the admninistration of a meal;
At discharge:
- weight;
- z-score;
- number of meals in a day;
- type of feeding (exclusive breastfeeding; exckusive bottlefeeding or mixed)
- overall volume administered expressed in mL in a day;
INSTRUMENTAL DATA
- Number of suctions;
- Number of swallowings;
- Number of apnoeas;
- Average duration of apnoeas;
- Number of oxygen desaturations
- Minimal oxygen saturation;
- Number of reduction of cardiac frequency (bradycardia);
- Minimal cardiac frequency. The definition of apnoea, oxygen desaturation and bradycardia applied in this study are the ones defined by literature (Di Fiore JM, Arko MK, Miller MJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory Events in Preterm Infants Referred for Apnea Monitoring Studies. PEDIATRICS. 2001;108(6):1304-1308.)
- APNOEA: arrest of the breathing acts for a period of at least 20 seconds or arrest of the breathing acts for a period of at least 5 seconds associated with bradycardia and/or desaturations;
- OXYGEN DESATURATIONS: reduction of the oxygen saturation (SpO2) <80% or of at least 5% compared to the baseline, for at least 4 seconds.
- BRADYCARDIA: reduction of the cardiac frequency under 80 bpm for at least 4 seconds
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis will be carried out using the STATISTICA software package for Windows (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Every newborn in the experimental group will be matched with a newborn of the control group similar for gestational age and weight. For the normal distribution, data will be tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and with the exploratory data analysis. Data will be expressed as statistical mean and standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquantile range depending on the relative distribution. The differences between the polisonnographic data will be evaluated with the Student's T test or through a similar non-parametric test depending on the distribution: Fisher test for comparison between categorical data and regression tests (linear and non-linear) for comparison between continuous variables. Statistical significance is set as p<0.05.
EXPECTED RESULTS
The more physiological administration of milk with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat, could better promote the development of coordination in the process of sucking-swallowing-breathing. Therefore inhalation and cardiosaturimetric events during a meal and immediately after will be reduced and therefore the newborn's oral feeding tolerance will increase, making it more similar to physiological breastfeeding.
Bottle-feeding milk administration with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat in the first days of life, the period when exclusive breastfeeding is more difficult, could also promote the transition between bottle-feeding to breastfeeding, because this mechanism is more similar to the physiological one.
If the results of this study will support this hypotesis, feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat could be chosen as a non-pharmacological treatment for late-preterm newborns who encounter difficulty in the oral feeding, such as cardio-respiratory instability during the sucking process and risk of milk inhalation when the breastfeeding is not possible.
- Being tested
- Valved ergonomic teat, Standard silicon teat
- Keywords
- late-preterm newborns, valved feeding system
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth, Bottle Feeding
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Valved ergonomic teatDevice
Administration of milk with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat in late preterm newborns.
Standard silicon teatDevice
Administration of milk with a feeding system with a standard silicon teat
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| B-ESP | Experimental | B-ESP group will be fed with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat. Receives: Device: Valved ergonomic teat |
| B-STD | Sham comparator | B-STD will be fed with a standard feeding system. Receives: Device: Standard silicon teat |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluating the level of coordination in the sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern in the B-ESP group compared with the B-STD
This evaluation will be recorded at 24 and 72 hours of life and defined from the suckings/swallowings ratio.
The literature describes this parameter as strongly associated to a higher maturity of the sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern; in fact, a ratio of sucking-swallowing-breathing of 1:1:1 describes the mature pattern, typical of the breastfeeding and considered the optimum for a newborn.
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Coefficient of variation of time between sucking and swallowing
This coefficient is expressed in seconds. a lower coefficient corresponds to breastfeeding
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Mean percentage of incidence of breaths that precede and follow the swallowings
This percentage is classified by Lau et al. (the average interval between two breathing acts monitored during a meal of an healthy at term newborn varies between 1.2-2 seconds)
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of the sucking processes
This evaluation is made through the a structured questionnaire composed by 31 items
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of cardiorespiratory stability
This evaluation is made considering frequency and characteristics of cardiorespiratory events (during and after meal administration)
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of meal tolerance
This evaluation is carried out considering the number of vomiting and regurgitations during and after the meal, volume in mL per meal, number of meals per day
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Number of breastfed newborns at the time of dimission
Measured: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 May 2020
- Study start1 Dec 2020
- Primary completion31 May 2023
- Study completion31 May 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Premature BirthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Turin, Italy
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Francesco Cresi, MD, PhD, University of Turin, Italy
- Investigators
- Francesco Cresi, MD; PhD, Principal investigator, Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04400175
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SOFT-study
- Acronym
- SOFT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 25 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Joshi R, van Pul C, Sanders A, Weda H, Bikker JW, Feijs L, Andriessen P. A Strategy to Reduce Critical Cardiorespiratory Alarms due to Intermittent Enteral Feeding of Preterm Neonates in Intensive Care. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Oct 20;6(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.7756.
PubMed 29054835Poets CF, Langner MU, Bohnhorst B. Effects of bottle feeding and two different methods of gavage feeding on oxygenation and breathing patterns in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1997 Apr;86(4):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb09034.x.
PubMed 9174231Gross RD, Trapani-Hanasewych M. Breathing and Swallowing: The Next Frontier. Semin Speech Lang. 2017 Apr;38(2):87-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599106. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
PubMed 28324898Chen CH, Wang TM, Chang HM, Chi CS. The effect of breast- and bottle-feeding on oxygen saturation and body temperature in preterm infants. J Hum Lact. 2000 Feb;16(1):21-7. doi: 10.1177/089033440001600105.
PubMed 11138220Goldfield EC, Richardson MJ, Lee KG, Margetts S. Coordination of sucking, swallowing, and breathing and oxygen saturation during early infant breast-feeding and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res. 2006 Oct;60(4):450-5. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000238378.24238.9d. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
PubMed 16940236Simmer K, Kok C, Nancarrow K, Hepworth AR, Geddes DT. Novel feeding system to promote establishment of breastfeeds after preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2016 Mar;36(3):210-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.184. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
PubMed 26658121Mizuno K, Ueda A. Changes in sucking performance from nonnutritive sucking to nutritive sucking during breast- and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res. 2006 May;59(5):728-31. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000214993.82214.1c.
PubMed 16627890Mathew OP. Respiratory control during nipple feeding in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1988;5(4):220-4. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950050408.
PubMed 3237449Ward, N. Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Infancy: Assessment and Management. J. Hum. Lact. 11, 147-147 (1995)
Sakalidis VS, Geddes DT. Suck-Swallow-Breathe Dynamics in Breastfed Infants. J Hum Lact. 2016 May;32(2):201-11; quiz 393-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334415601093. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
PubMed 26319112Dalgleish SR, Kostecky LL, Blachly N. Eating in "SINC": Safe Individualized Nipple-Feeding Competence, a Quality Improvement Project to Explore Infant-Driven Oral Feeding for Very Premature Infants Requiring Noninvasive Respiratory Support. Neonatal Netw. 2016;35(4):217-27. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.35.4.217.
PubMed 27461200Whyte R. Safe discharge of the late preterm infant. Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Dec;15(10):655-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/15.10.655.
PubMed 22131865Meier P, Patel AL, Wright K, Engstrom JL. Management of breastfeeding during and after the maternity hospitalization for late preterm infants. Clin Perinatol. 2013 Dec;40(4):689-705. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
PubMed 24182956Lau C. Development of infant oral feeding skills: what do we know? Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Feb;103(2):616S-21S. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.109603. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
PubMed 26791183Geddes DT, Sakalidis VS, Hepworth AR, McClellan HL, Kent JC, Lai CT, Hartmann PE. Tongue movement and intra-oral vacuum of term infants during breastfeeding and feeding from an experimental teat that released milk under vacuum only. Early Hum Dev. 2012 Jun;88(6):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.10.012. Epub 2011 Nov 26.
PubMed 22119233
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects on Coordination of Sucking, Swallowing and Breathing Process of a Valved Feeding System in Late-preterm Newborns. The Safe Oral Feeding Trial (SOFT)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04400175
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOFT / SOFT-study
- Keywords
- late-preterm newborns, valved feeding system
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Turin, ItalyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 May 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Comparing with a randomized controlled trial two different feeding systems in two groups of late-preterm newborns for evaluating which is more efficient in promoting the coordination in the process of sucking-swallowing-breathing and better cardiorespiratory stability.
The B-ESP group will be fed with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat; the B-STD with a standard feeding system.
Detailed description
The swallowing patterns are still immature in the newborn, especially if preterm. An incomplete synchronization in the process of sucking, swallowing and breathing could lead to some difficulty during feedings with desaturations and risk of milk inhalation in the upper airway tract. Moreover, a dysfunctional or immature pattern of sucking, swallowing and breathing also affect the post-prandial period, tiring the newborn and increasing the cardio-respiratory instability.
Breastfeeding promote the development of a physiological coordination of the process of sucking, swallowing and breathing, guaranteeing high and stable values of oxygenation during feedings. On the other hand, bottle-feeding could be responsible of a difficult coordination among the phases of swallowing and breathing. In an healthy, at term, brestfed newborn is observed a typical pattern of sucking-swallowing-expiration with a ratio of 1:1:1. In a bottlefed newborn this ratio is 2-12:1:4, with a relative increase of the period of sucking compared to the swallowing one, that could lead to apnoeas and desaturations.
The differences between the two feedings modality are more accentuated in the late-preterm newborn, which is more prone to cardio-respiratory instability compared to the healthy at term newborn, because of the immaturity of the respiratory centers in the brainstem, and of the processes responsible for the coordination of the sucking, swallowing and breathing .
However breastfeeding, in spite of the fact that is crucial for the development of the correct process of sucking, can be challenging in the premature infant because it requires a considerable physical effort.
Therefore, disposing of devices for nutrition able to facilitate oral feeding, simulating the physiologic breastfeeding, is necessary. In this way, we can contribute to the development of the proper sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern and to improve cardio-respiratory stability.
In literature there are multiple studies carried out on term newborns demonstrating the importance of the negative pressure or air vacuum created in the oral cavity, in order to promote the emptying of the lactiferous ducts and/or of the teat and simultaneously promote the maintainance of the right respiratory pattern. An ergonomic feeding system with a valve able to create vacuum could be able to respond to the demands of late preterm newborns.
Aim of the study is to evaluate the effects of a trial with an experimental feeding system with a teat with a valve able to facilitate the vacuum in the oral cavity on the pattern of sucking-swallowing and breathing in late preterm newborns.
NUMBER OF PATIENTS Precise data regarding swallowing/respiration rate in bottle-fed late preterm infants in the first 3 days of life are lacking in the literature. Considering a mean swallow/respiration ratio of 1.5 and a variance of 0.5, obtained from surveys performed at our center prior to the study, a sample size of 38 infants per arm was estimated to achieve 80% power to detect a 30% difference on the primary outcome with a significance level of 0.05.
STUDY DESIGN Late preterm newborns eligible to enter in the study, prior obtaining the informed consent from parents, will be assigned in the "B-ESP" or "B-STD" group through a process of block randomisation, controlled by a software.
Newborns included in the randomisation, after a training of 3 meals with the feeding bottle assigned from the randomisation, can be entered in the study.
Newborns included in the study will be monitored for the entire duration of a meal and the subsequent 3-hours period. This monitoring will be collected in two different times (T1 and T2): in the second day of life (24-48 hours of life) and in the fourth day of life (72-96 hours of life). The study includes an audio recording of the swallowings through a microphone in the room and the recordings of the process of sucking and swallowing through a cutaneous sensor.
In addition, a cardiorespiratory monitoring with a poligraph will be made, considering oxygen saturation, cardiac and respiratory frequency and electrocardiography. The meal's video recording will permit a subsequent classification of the sucking movements and the evaluation of any possible interference in the polygraphic recording.
FEEDING DEVICES
Newborns of the B-STD group will be fed using a classic disposable feeding device, which is actually in use in our centre and provided by our hospital, composed of:
- a 150 mL feeding bottle in polypropylene, devoid of BPA;
- a silicon teat, devoid of BPA, available in two types, (a slow graduated flow and a standard flow) depending on the necessities and suction abilities of the baby;
- a protective plug.
Newborns of the B-ESP group will be fed using a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat, composed of:
- a slow-flow ergonomic silicon teat
- polipropilene bottle with a capacity of 150 mL, with a ventilation valve on the bottom
- silicon valve
Newborns will be fed with defined quantities of maternal milk or bank donated milk, based on weight and gestational age.
The meal will be administered by the caregiver (a parent or a nurse) previously trained. The meal's administration will be performed keeping the baby in the caregivers's arms in the ESL position (semielevated side-lying). At the end of the feeding process the newborn will be repositioned in his cradle in the supine position.
The cardiosaturimetric evaluation will be performed using a system of polygraphic monitoring, which allows a simultaneous non-invasive recording of cardiorespiratory parameters, noises and movements associated to the sucking and swallowing processes combined to video recordings.
The evaluation of the sucking process will be carried out using a structured questionnaire composed by 31 items, which allows to distinguish normal suction (mature) from disorganized and dysfunctional ones.
Considering simultaneously the cardiosaturimetric parameters, video, audio and cutaneous sensor's recordings, it is possible to obtain a more accurate evaluation of the processes of swallowing, sucking and breathing of the newborn during meal administration. It is also possible to identify the exact moment of the breathing process assigned to the newborn's swallowing.
CLINICAL DATA
At birth:
- gestational age;
- weight in grams;
- z-score;
- sex;
- type of delivery;
- peri-partum condition, including possible administration of prenatal corticosteroids;
- type of support provided at birth;
At T1 and T2:
- hours from birth;
- weight;
- z-score;
- number of meals in a day;
- type of milk administered;
- overall volume administered expressed in mL in a day;
- duration of a meal expressed in minutes;
- number of regurgitation or vomit during the administration of a meal;
- number of regurgitation or vomit after the admninistration of a meal;
At discharge:
- weight;
- z-score;
- number of meals in a day;
- type of feeding (exclusive breastfeeding; exckusive bottlefeeding or mixed)
- overall volume administered expressed in mL in a day;
INSTRUMENTAL DATA
- Number of suctions;
- Number of swallowings;
- Number of apnoeas;
- Average duration of apnoeas;
- Number of oxygen desaturations
- Minimal oxygen saturation;
- Number of reduction of cardiac frequency (bradycardia);
- Minimal cardiac frequency. The definition of apnoea, oxygen desaturation and bradycardia applied in this study are the ones defined by literature (Di Fiore JM, Arko MK, Miller MJ, et al. Cardiorespiratory Events in Preterm Infants Referred for Apnea Monitoring Studies. PEDIATRICS. 2001;108(6):1304-1308.)
- APNOEA: arrest of the breathing acts for a period of at least 20 seconds or arrest of the breathing acts for a period of at least 5 seconds associated with bradycardia and/or desaturations;
- OXYGEN DESATURATIONS: reduction of the oxygen saturation (SpO2) <80% or of at least 5% compared to the baseline, for at least 4 seconds.
- BRADYCARDIA: reduction of the cardiac frequency under 80 bpm for at least 4 seconds
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Statistical analysis will be carried out using the STATISTICA software package for Windows (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Every newborn in the experimental group will be matched with a newborn of the control group similar for gestational age and weight. For the normal distribution, data will be tested with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and with the exploratory data analysis. Data will be expressed as statistical mean and standard deviation (SD) or as median and interquantile range depending on the relative distribution. The differences between the polisonnographic data will be evaluated with the Student's T test or through a similar non-parametric test depending on the distribution: Fisher test for comparison between categorical data and regression tests (linear and non-linear) for comparison between continuous variables. Statistical significance is set as p<0.05.
EXPECTED RESULTS
The more physiological administration of milk with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat, could better promote the development of coordination in the process of sucking-swallowing-breathing. Therefore inhalation and cardiosaturimetric events during a meal and immediately after will be reduced and therefore the newborn's oral feeding tolerance will increase, making it more similar to physiological breastfeeding.
Bottle-feeding milk administration with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat in the first days of life, the period when exclusive breastfeeding is more difficult, could also promote the transition between bottle-feeding to breastfeeding, because this mechanism is more similar to the physiological one.
If the results of this study will support this hypotesis, feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat could be chosen as a non-pharmacological treatment for late-preterm newborns who encounter difficulty in the oral feeding, such as cardio-respiratory instability during the sucking process and risk of milk inhalation when the breastfeeding is not possible.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| B-ESP | Experimental | Device: Valved ergonomic teatB-ESP group will be fed with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat. |
| B-STD | Sham comparator | Device: Standard silicon teatB-STD will be fed with a standard feeding system. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 day to 5 days
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Gestational age 34+0 - 36+6 weeks at birth;
- Exclusive oral feeding;
- Bottle-feeding for at least a meal a day;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Newborns with exclusive breastfeeding;
- Newborns with congenital anomalies, perinatal asphyxia, respiratory or neurological issues, genetic syndromes, infections, metabolic diseases;
- Ongoing administration of medication able to interfere with esophageal or respiratory function;
- Newborns who require respiratory support, including oxygen-therapy via nasal-cannula;
- Newborns who require oral or nasal feeding tube;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Valved ergonomic teatAdministration of milk with a feeding system with a valved ergonomic teat in late preterm newborns. | Device | B-ESP |
| Standard silicon teatAdministration of milk with a feeding system with a standard silicon teat | Device | B-STD |
Primary outcome
Evaluating the level of coordination in the sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern in the B-ESP group compared with the B-STD
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
This evaluation will be recorded at 24 and 72 hours of life and defined from the suckings/swallowings ratio. The literature describes this parameter as strongly associated to a higher maturity of the sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern; in fact, a ratio of sucking-swallowing-breathing of 1:1:1 describes the mature pattern, typical of the breastfeeding and considered the optimum for a newborn.
6 secondary outcomes
Coefficient of variation of time between sucking and swallowing
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Mean percentage of incidence of breaths that precede and follow the swallowings
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of the sucking processes
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of cardiorespiratory stability
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Evaluation of meal tolerance
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Number of breastfed newborns at the time of dimission
Time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2023.
- Background: PubMed 29054835Joshi R, van Pul C, Sanders A, Weda H, Bikker JW, Feijs L, Andriessen P. A Strategy to Reduce Critical Cardiorespiratory Alarms due to Intermittent Enteral Feeding of Preterm Neonates in Intensive Care. Interact J Med Res. 2017 Oct 20;6(2):e20. doi: 10.2196/ijmr.7756.
- Background: PubMed 9174231Poets CF, Langner MU, Bohnhorst B. Effects of bottle feeding and two different methods of gavage feeding on oxygenation and breathing patterns in preterm infants. Acta Paediatr. 1997 Apr;86(4):419-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb09034.x.
- Background: PubMed 28324898Gross RD, Trapani-Hanasewych M. Breathing and Swallowing: The Next Frontier. Semin Speech Lang. 2017 Apr;38(2):87-95. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599106. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 11138220Chen CH, Wang TM, Chang HM, Chi CS. The effect of breast- and bottle-feeding on oxygen saturation and body temperature in preterm infants. J Hum Lact. 2000 Feb;16(1):21-7. doi: 10.1177/089033440001600105.
- Background: PubMed 16940236Goldfield EC, Richardson MJ, Lee KG, Margetts S. Coordination of sucking, swallowing, and breathing and oxygen saturation during early infant breast-feeding and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res. 2006 Oct;60(4):450-5. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000238378.24238.9d. Epub 2006 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 26658121Simmer K, Kok C, Nancarrow K, Hepworth AR, Geddes DT. Novel feeding system to promote establishment of breastfeeds after preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2016 Mar;36(3):210-5. doi: 10.1038/jp.2015.184. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
- Background: PubMed 16627890Mizuno K, Ueda A. Changes in sucking performance from nonnutritive sucking to nutritive sucking during breast- and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res. 2006 May;59(5):728-31. doi: 10.1203/01.pdr.0000214993.82214.1c.
- Background: PubMed 3237449Mathew OP. Respiratory control during nipple feeding in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1988;5(4):220-4. doi: 10.1002/ppul.1950050408.
- BackgroundWard, N. Feeding and Swallowing Disorders in Infancy: Assessment and Management. J. Hum. Lact. 11, 147-147 (1995)
- Background: PubMed 26319112Sakalidis VS, Geddes DT. Suck-Swallow-Breathe Dynamics in Breastfed Infants. J Hum Lact. 2016 May;32(2):201-11; quiz 393-5. doi: 10.1177/0890334415601093. Epub 2015 Aug 28.
- Background: PubMed 27461200Dalgleish SR, Kostecky LL, Blachly N. Eating in "SINC": Safe Individualized Nipple-Feeding Competence, a Quality Improvement Project to Explore Infant-Driven Oral Feeding for Very Premature Infants Requiring Noninvasive Respiratory Support. Neonatal Netw. 2016;35(4):217-27. doi: 10.1891/0730-0832.35.4.217.
- Background: PubMed 22131865Whyte R. Safe discharge of the late preterm infant. Paediatr Child Health. 2010 Dec;15(10):655-66. doi: 10.1093/pch/15.10.655.
Related trials for Premature Birth
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Recruiting
Study of the Influence of Intraperitoneal Insufflation of CO2 by Laparoscopy on the Short-term Evolution of Premature Infants With Ulcerative Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Preterm Birth, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
RecruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Dynamic Early Warning System for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Multicenter Clinical Study
NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
RecruitingObservational study
Growing Little PEAPODS Study
Premature Birth, Premature Infant
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francesco Cresi, MD; PhD principal investigator
Città della Salute e della Scienza - Ospedale S.Anna - University of Turin
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Valved ergonomic teat and Standard silicon teat in people with Premature Birth and Feeding; Difficult, Newborn, run by University of Turin, Italy at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluating the level of coordination in the sucking-swallowing-breathing pattern in the B-ESP group compared with the B-STD (time frame: Calculated throughout 72 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04400175, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2023.