Stroke, ComplicationNCT04397133
The Optimal Treatment Duration for Inspiratory Muscle Strengthening Exercises in Stroke Patients
A study testing inspiratory muscle training in people with Stroke, Complication and Respiratory Complication, run by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The first aim of this study is if there is any difference between 4 or 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training ( IMT ) exercises groups and control groups in stroke survivors. The secondary aims of this study is if there is any difference in walking capacity (in 8th, 12th, 24th weeks) and pulmonary complications… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Complication, Respiratory Complication
- What is being tested?
- inspiratory muscle training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 23 Dec 2019to 1 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Ischemic/ hemorrhagic stroke
- Stroke duration> 3 months
- Age> 18 years old
- Baseline maximal inspiratory pressure below 80 cmH2O
Who cannot join
- Cognitive deficiency
- Facial paralysis
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Congestive heart disease
- Myocardial infarction in last three months
- Angina pectoris
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Traning and Research Hospital
Istanbul, 34100
About this study
Official title: The Optimal Treatment Duration for Inspiratory Muscle Strengthening Exercises in Stroke Patients: A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial
The first aim of this study is if there is any difference between 4 or 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training ( IMT ) exercises groups and control groups in stroke survivors. The secondary aims of this study is if there is any difference in walking capacity (in 8th, 12th, 24th weeks) and pulmonary complications (pneumonia incidences) in long term follow-ups (6 months) in these aforementioned groups
Read the detailed description
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability. It is not only because of loss of extremity motions but also loss of inspiratory muscle strength. In this study we aimed to determine the optimum duration for inspiratory muscle training exercises for stroke survivors since there is not enough data about it in the literature.
The study will include at least 54 patients in total and 18 in each groups ( two intervention and one control) . The patients will be evaluated for angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart disease; in these conditions the patients will be excluded from the study. Also in first examinations we will evaluate the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) of patients, of them the ones with MIP measurements above 80 mmH2O will also be excluded since it is the expected value in normal people.
After admission and randomizing the patients, baseline measurements of MIP, 6-minutes walking test will be done. In intervention groups the patients will get 30 minutes of inspiratory muscle training exercises ( 15 minutes of two session each day) with threshold IMT device every weekday. And in control group, the patients will get sham intervention for 8 weeks. The MIP and 6-minutes walking test will be done in 8th,12th and 24th weeks. And also in 24th week we will record the pneumonia incidence if occured.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Complication, Respiratory Complication
- Being tested
- inspiratory muscle training, sham intervention
- Keywords
- Breathing exercises, Cerebrovascular disease, Muscle strength, Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Cerebrovascular Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
inspiratory muscle trainingOther
inspiratory muscle training will be done with Philips Respironics Threshold IMT device starting with resistance of % 50 of MIP value
sham interventionOther
in these group the patients will get sham intervention with Philips Respironics Threshold IMT device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention 1 | Experimental | in this group patients will get 4 week of inspiratory muscle training exercise 30 minutes every weekday ( 15 minutes of two session in each day) Receives: Other: inspiratory muscle training |
| intervention 2 | Experimental | in this group patients will get 8 week of inspiratory muscle training exercise 30 minutes every weekday ( 15 minutes of two session in each day) Receives: Other: inspiratory muscle training |
| control group | Sham comparator | this group will get sham intervention with 0 to 5 cmH2O resistance Receives: Other: sham intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The change in maximal inspiratory pressure
Measured with MicroRPM (respiratory pressure meter) pressurometer device orally
Measured: Baseline and week 8,12, 24
Secondary outcomes (2)
The change in walking capacity
The change in walking capacity wil be measured with Six Minute Walk Test
Measured: Baseline and week 8,12, 24
Pneumonia incidence
Number of participants with Pneumonia will be determined at week 24
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2020
- Study start23 Dec 2019
- Primary completion15 Mar 2021
- Study completion1 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stroke, ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- three armed study with two interventions and one control group intervention group 1: inspiratory muscle training applied for 4 week intervention group 2: inspiratory muscle training applied for 8 week control group : will get sham intervention
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Collaborators
- Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yunus Emre Doğan, MD, Principal investigator, Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Traning and Research HospitalBurak Kütük, MD, Principal investigator, Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Traning and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397133
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IstPMRTRH-IMT-H
- Status last verified
- Jan 2024
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Jan 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Pollock RD, Rafferty GF, Moxham J, Kalra L. Respiratory muscle strength and training in stroke and neurology: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00811.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
PubMed 22568454Britto RR, Rezende NR, Marinho KC, Torres JL, Parreira VF, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Inspiratory muscular training in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.029.
PubMed 21272713Guillen-Sola A, Messagi Sartor M, Bofill Soler N, Duarte E, Barrera MC, Marco E. Respiratory muscle strength training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subacute dysphagic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jun;31(6):761-771. doi: 10.1177/0269215516652446. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
PubMed 27271373Billinger SA, Coughenour E, Mackay-Lyons MJ, Ivey FM. Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: biological consequences and exercise-induced adaptations. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:959120. doi: 10.1155/2012/959120. Epub 2011 Aug 14.
PubMed 21876848Sutbeyaz ST, Koseoglu F, Inan L, Coskun O. Respiratory muscle training improves cardiopulmonary function and exercise tolerance in subjects with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Mar;24(3):240-50. doi: 10.1177/0269215509358932. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
PubMed 20156979Katzan IL, Cebul RD, Husak SH, Dawson NV, Baker DW. The effect of pneumonia on mortality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke. Neurology. 2003 Feb 25;60(4):620-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000046586.38284.60.
PubMed 12601102
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jan 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Optimal Treatment Duration for Inspiratory Muscle Strengthening Exercises in Stroke Patients: A Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397133
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IstPMRTRH-IMT-H
- Conditions
- Stroke, Complication, Respiratory Complication
- Keywords
- Breathing exercises, Cerebrovascular disease, Muscle strength, Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research HospitalOther government
- Collaborators
- Istanbul Saglik Bilimleri University
- Study start
- 23 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The first aim of this study is if there is any difference between 4 or 8 weeks of inspiratory muscle training ( IMT ) exercises groups and control groups in stroke survivors. The secondary aims of this study is if there is any difference in walking capacity (in 8th, 12th, 24th weeks) and pulmonary complications (pneumonia incidences) in long term follow-ups (6 months) in these aforementioned groups
Detailed description
Stroke is one of the leading causes of death and disability. It is not only because of loss of extremity motions but also loss of inspiratory muscle strength. In this study we aimed to determine the optimum duration for inspiratory muscle training exercises for stroke survivors since there is not enough data about it in the literature.
The study will include at least 54 patients in total and 18 in each groups ( two intervention and one control) . The patients will be evaluated for angina, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart disease; in these conditions the patients will be excluded from the study. Also in first examinations we will evaluate the maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) of patients, of them the ones with MIP measurements above 80 mmH2O will also be excluded since it is the expected value in normal people.
After admission and randomizing the patients, baseline measurements of MIP, 6-minutes walking test will be done. In intervention groups the patients will get 30 minutes of inspiratory muscle training exercises ( 15 minutes of two session each day) with threshold IMT device every weekday. And in control group, the patients will get sham intervention for 8 weeks. The MIP and 6-minutes walking test will be done in 8th,12th and 24th weeks. And also in 24th week we will record the pneumonia incidence if occured.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- three armed study with two interventions and one control group intervention group 1: inspiratory muscle training applied for 4 week intervention group 2: inspiratory muscle training applied for 8 week control group : will get sham intervention
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention 1 | Experimental | Other: inspiratory muscle trainingin this group patients will get 4 week of inspiratory muscle training exercise 30 minutes every weekday ( 15 minutes of two session in each day) |
| intervention 2 | Experimental | Other: inspiratory muscle trainingin this group patients will get 8 week of inspiratory muscle training exercise 30 minutes every weekday ( 15 minutes of two session in each day) |
| control group | Sham comparator | Other: sham interventionthis group will get sham intervention with 0 to 5 cmH2O resistance |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Ischemic/ hemorrhagic stroke
- Stroke duration> 3 months
- Age> 18 years old
- Baseline maximal inspiratory pressure below 80 cmH2O
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Cognitive deficiency
- Facial paralysis
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Congestive heart disease
- Myocardial infarction in last three months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| inspiratory muscle traininginspiratory muscle training will be done with Philips Respironics Threshold IMT device starting with resistance of % 50 of MIP value | Other | intervention 1, intervention 2 |
| sham interventionin these group the patients will get sham intervention with Philips Respironics Threshold IMT device | Other | control group |
Primary outcome
The change in maximal inspiratory pressure
Time frame: Baseline and week 8,12, 24
Measured with MicroRPM (respiratory pressure meter) pressurometer device orally
2 secondary outcomes
The change in walking capacity
Time frame: Baseline and week 8,12, 24
Pneumonia incidence
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jan 2024.
- Background: PubMed 22568454Pollock RD, Rafferty GF, Moxham J, Kalra L. Respiratory muscle strength and training in stroke and neurology: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2013 Feb;8(2):124-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00811.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 21272713Britto RR, Rezende NR, Marinho KC, Torres JL, Parreira VF, Teixeira-Salmela LF. Inspiratory muscular training in chronic stroke survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Feb;92(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.029.
- Background: PubMed 27271373Guillen-Sola A, Messagi Sartor M, Bofill Soler N, Duarte E, Barrera MC, Marco E. Respiratory muscle strength training and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in subacute dysphagic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jun;31(6):761-771. doi: 10.1177/0269215516652446. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
- Background: PubMed 21876848Billinger SA, Coughenour E, Mackay-Lyons MJ, Ivey FM. Reduced cardiorespiratory fitness after stroke: biological consequences and exercise-induced adaptations. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:959120. doi: 10.1155/2012/959120. Epub 2011 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 20156979Sutbeyaz ST, Koseoglu F, Inan L, Coskun O. Respiratory muscle training improves cardiopulmonary function and exercise tolerance in subjects with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2010 Mar;24(3):240-50. doi: 10.1177/0269215509358932. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
- Background: PubMed 12601102Katzan IL, Cebul RD, Husak SH, Dawson NV, Baker DW. The effect of pneumonia on mortality among patients hospitalized for acute stroke. Neurology. 2003 Feb 25;60(4):620-5. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000046586.38284.60.
Related trials for Stroke, Complication
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Longitudinal Cohort Study to Evaluate Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease in Haiti
Hypertension, Diabetes
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron (LY3502970) on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and/or Chronic Kidney Disease (ATTAIN-Outcomes)
Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Neurogenic Overactive Bladder Symptoms Among People With Stroke
Stroke, Neurogenic Overactive Bladder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prospective Observational Multimodal Neuromonitoring in Adult NSICU Patients
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal, Brain Injuries, Traumatic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yunus Emre Doğan, MD principal investigator
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Traning and Research Hospital
Burak Kütük, MD principal investigator
Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Traning and Research Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing inspiratory muscle training in people with Stroke, Complication and Respiratory Complication, run by Istanbul Physical Medicine Rehabilitation Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jan 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The change in maximal inspiratory pressure (time frame: Baseline and week 8,12, 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04397133, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jan 2024.