Breast CancerNCT04397029
Assessing the Sensitivity of "SureTouch™" in Women Undergoing Diagnostic and Screening Mammography
A study testing SureTouch in people with Breast Cancer, run by George Washington University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 80 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- SureTouch
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 213 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 Jan 2019to 10 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 80 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Arm 1:
- Female Subject presenting for screening mammography
- 30-80 years of age, inclusive
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Arm 2:
- Female Subject presenting for diagnostic appointment and/or biopsy
Show all 9Show fewer
- 30-80 years of age, inclusive
- 1-3 masses per breast
- Masses between 0.5 cm and 3.5 cm only
Who cannot join
- Individuals who are unable to comprehend or unwilling to sign an informed consent form
- Women younger than 30 or older than 80
- Pregnant women
- Women who have undergone bilateral mastectomies
- Males
- Prisoners
- Masses which are larger than 3.5 cm or smaller than 0.5 cm in size
- Individuals with more than 3 masses per breast will be excluded due to the complexity of these cases
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
George Washington University - Medical Faculty Associates
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
About this study
Official title: Assessing the Sensitivity of "SureTouch™" in Identifying Clinically Significant Masses in Women Undergoing Diagnostic and Screening Mammography
Prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
Read the detailed description
This is a single-center, prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
Results of the mammography will be compared to the SureTouch examination results.
Subjects will have between 1 and 3 research visits and 3 follow-up surveys, up to two years from the initial visit. The number of visits will be based upon comparison of the SureTouch examination to conventional breast screening techniques (mammogram and ultrasound).
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- SureTouch
- Keywords
- Breast, Screening, Elastography
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SureTouchDevice
The first group will consist of 70 women who are believed to be free of masses, recruited during a screening mammography appointment.
The second group will include 125 women presenting for diagnostic mammography and/or biopsy appointment with known masses identified on mammogram, ultrasound or both.
Both groups will receive breast cancer screening with mammography and SureTouch.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects without messes | Experimental | Subjects who are believed to be free of masses. Receives: Device: SureTouch |
| Subjects with known masses | Experimental | Subjects with known masses. Receives: Device: SureTouch |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary
- This study examines the sensitivity of the SureTouch™ system, compared with methods that are the current standard of care (screening and diagnostic mammography with ultrasound), to detect clinically significant mass lesions in the breast.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary
The study will determine the patient acceptance of and satisfaction with the SureTouch devise. Outcome measure will use an original 8 question Likert-scale survey to assess patient perception of the comfort, duration, and acceptance of the device. A higher score indicates a better outcome.
Brief Survey Monkey adapted from Press Ganey Patient Satisfaction Survey for Radiography and US Performed in the Outpatient Setting. Itri JN. Patient-centered Radiology. RadioGraphics 2015; 35:1835-1848
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 May 2020
- Study start4 Jan 2019
- Primary completion10 Feb 2021
- Study completion10 Feb 2021
Why it stopped: The benefit of completing the study was not worth exposing subjects to the risk during COVID. Delaying the return visits would make it difficult to analyze the changes in data overtime.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by George Washington UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- George Washington University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sure, Inc.
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rebecca Kaltman, MD, Principal investigator, The George Washington University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397029
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GW10029
- Status last verified
- May 2020
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Cancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html#skipnav. Accessed July 2, 2018.
National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2017 May. Report No.: 2017-1232. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453378/
PubMed 28910066Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, Kim WH, Bae MS, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, Cho N, Moon WK. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2450-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2866-2. Epub 2013 May 15.
PubMed 23673574Michaelson, James & Satija, Sameer & Moore, Richard & Weber, Griffin & Halpern, Elkan & Garland, Andrew & Kopans, Daniel & Hughes, Kevin. (2003). Estimates of the Sizes at Which Breast Cancers Become Detectable on Mammographic and Clinical Grounds. Journal of Women's Imaging. 5. 10.1097/00130747-200302000-00002.
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, Jordan L, Baker L, Thompson A. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
PubMed 21122101Skovorda AR, Klishko AN, Gusakian DA, Maevskii EI, Ermilova VD, Oranskaia GA, Sarvazian AP. [Quantitative analysis of mechanical characteristics of pathologically altered soft biological tissues]. Biofizika. 1995 Nov-Dec;40(6):1335-40. Russian.
PubMed 8590726Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74. doi: 10.1177/016173469802000403.
PubMed 10197347Sarvazyan A, Egorov V, Son JS, Kaufman CS. Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2008;1:91-9. doi: 10.4137/bcbcr.s774. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
PubMed 19578481Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman BA, Kaufman LB. Digital documentation of the physical examination: moving the clinical breast exam to the electronic medical record. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.006.
PubMed 16978946Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, Kern KA, Howe RD. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch Surg. 2001 Feb;136(2):204-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.2.204.
PubMed 11177142Kaufman CS, et al., Objective measurement of the physical exam using a new device: reproducible triage of palpable masses. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2004; 88; supp 1:S223-4- SABCS 2004.
Kaufman CS, Son JS, Yered E, Sarvazyan A. Cancer Res May 1 2015 (75) (9 Supplement) P1- 02-09; DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS14-P1-02-09
Hunt CH, Hartman RP, Hesley GK. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Oct;193(4):1124-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2520.
PubMed 19770337Heshmatzadeh Behzadi A, Farooq Z, Newhouse JH, Prince MR. MRI and CT contrast media extravasation: A systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(9):e0055. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010055.
PubMed 29489663
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Sensitivity of "SureTouch™" in Identifying Clinically Significant Masses in Women Undergoing Diagnostic and Screening Mammography
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04397029
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GW10029
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- Breast, Screening, Elastography
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The benefit of completing the study was not worth exposing subjects to the risk during COVID. Delaying the return visits would make it difficult to analyze the changes in data overtime.
- Enrolment
- 213 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- George Washington UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sure, Inc.
- Study start
- 4 Jan 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
Detailed description
This is a single-center, prospective, case-control study being conducted to determine the sensitivity of the SureTouch device in detecting known masses at a pre-determined level of specificity.
Results of the mammography will be compared to the SureTouch examination results.
Subjects will have between 1 and 3 research visits and 3 follow-up surveys, up to two years from the initial visit. The number of visits will be based upon comparison of the SureTouch examination to conventional breast screening techniques (mammogram and ultrasound).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects without messes | Experimental | Device: SureTouchSubjects who are believed to be free of masses. |
| Subjects with known masses | Experimental | Device: SureTouchSubjects with known masses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 80 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Female Subject presenting for screening mammography
- 30-80 years of age, inclusive
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Female Subject presenting for diagnostic appointment and/or biopsy
- 30-80 years of age, inclusive
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Individuals who are unable to comprehend or unwilling to sign an informed consent form
- Women younger than 30 or older than 80
- Pregnant women
- Women who have undergone bilateral mastectomies
- Males
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SureTouchThe first group will consist of 70 women who are believed to be free of masses, recruited during a screening mammography appointment. The second group will include 125 women presenting for diagnostic mammography and/or biopsy appointment with known masses identified on mammogram, ultrasound or both. Both groups will receive breast cancer screening with mammography and SureTouch. | Device | Subjects with known masses, Subjects without messes |
Primary outcome
Primary
Time frame: 2 years
1. This study examines the sensitivity of the SureTouch™ system, compared with methods that are the current standard of care (screening and diagnostic mammography with ultrasound), to detect clinically significant mass lesions in the breast.
1 secondary outcome
Secondary
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The benefit of completing the study was not worth exposing subjects to the risk during COVID. Delaying the return visits would make it difficult to analyze the changes in data overtime.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2022.
- BackgroundCancer Stat Facts: Female Breast Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html#skipnav. Accessed July 2, 2018.
- Background: PubMed 28910066National Center for Health Statistics (US). Health, United States, 2016: With Chartbook on Long-term Trends in Health. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics (US); 2017 May. Report No.: 2017-1232. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK453378/
- Background: PubMed 23673574Chang JM, Park IA, Lee SH, Kim WH, Bae MS, Koo HR, Yi A, Kim SJ, Cho N, Moon WK. Stiffness of tumours measured by shear-wave elastography correlated with subtypes of breast cancer. Eur Radiol. 2013 Sep;23(9):2450-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2866-2. Epub 2013 May 15.
- BackgroundMichaelson, James & Satija, Sameer & Moore, Richard & Weber, Griffin & Halpern, Elkan & Garland, Andrew & Kopans, Daniel & Hughes, Kevin. (2003). Estimates of the Sizes at Which Breast Cancers Become Detectable on Mammographic and Clinical Grounds. Journal of Women's Imaging. 5. 10.1097/00130747-200302000-00002.
- Background: PubMed 21122101Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, McLean D, Brauer K, Purdie C, Jordan L, Baker L, Thompson A. Quantitative shear wave ultrasound elastography: initial experience in solid breast masses. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R104. doi: 10.1186/bcr2787. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
- Background: PubMed 8590726Skovorda AR, Klishko AN, Gusakian DA, Maevskii EI, Ermilova VD, Oranskaia GA, Sarvazian AP. [Quantitative analysis of mechanical characteristics of pathologically altered soft biological tissues]. Biofizika. 1995 Nov-Dec;40(6):1335-40. Russian.
- Background: PubMed 10197347Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, Garra BS, Hall T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging. 1998 Oct;20(4):260-74. doi: 10.1177/016173469802000403.
- Background: PubMed 19578481Sarvazyan A, Egorov V, Son JS, Kaufman CS. Cost-effective screening for breast cancer worldwide: current state and future directions. Breast Cancer (Auckl). 2008;1:91-9. doi: 10.4137/bcbcr.s774. Epub 2008 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 16978946Kaufman CS, Jacobson L, Bachman BA, Kaufman LB. Digital documentation of the physical examination: moving the clinical breast exam to the electronic medical record. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct;192(4):444-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.006.
- Background: PubMed 11177142Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, Kern KA, Howe RD. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch Surg. 2001 Feb;136(2):204-8. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.136.2.204.
- BackgroundKaufman CS, et al., Objective measurement of the physical exam using a new device: reproducible triage of palpable masses. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2004; 88; supp 1:S223-4- SABCS 2004.
- BackgroundKaufman CS, Son JS, Yered E, Sarvazyan A. Cancer Res May 1 2015 (75) (9 Supplement) P1- 02-09; DOI:10.1158/1538-7445.SABCS14-P1-02-09
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rebecca Kaltman, MD principal investigator
The George Washington University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SureTouch in people with Breast Cancer, run by George Washington University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The benefit of completing the study was not worth exposing subjects to the risk during COVID. Delaying the return visits would make it difficult to analyze the changes in data overtime.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04397029, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2022.