AzTrials
AzTrials

Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)Phase 3EoE KIDSNCT04394351

Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 27 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 11 years
Conditions the study is for
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
What is being tested?
Dupilumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
102 participants
Where
27 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Sep 2020to 14 May 2024
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 11 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • A documented diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)
  • Baseline endoscopic biopsies with a demonstration on central reading of intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration

Who cannot join

  • Body weight <5 kg or ≥60 kg at screening
  • Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia
  • Active Helicobacter pylori
  • History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, or prior esophageal surgery
  • Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening
  • Treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to baseline standard of care endoscopy
Show all 16Show fewer
  • History of bleeding disorders or esophageal varices that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at undue risk for significant complications from an endoscopy procedure
  • Active parasitic infection or suspected parasitic infection
  • Known or suspected immunodeficiency disorder
  • Key Exclusion for Patients Re-Entering the Study (for Entry into Part C, as defined in protocol):
  • Patients who are ≥12 years old, weigh ≥40 kg (or minimum weight for which dupilumab is approved for EoE), and dupilumab is commercially available for the treatment of EoE in their country
  • Patients who, during their previous participation in this clinical trial, developed an SAE and/or AE deemed related to dupilumab, which in the opinion of the investigator or of the medical monitor could indicate that continued treatment with dupilumab may present an unreasonable risk for the patient
  • Patients who did not undergo endoscopy with biopsies at week 16 and/or week 52 or prior to receiving rescue treatment Note: If the endoscopy with biopsies could not occur due to COVID-19 restrictions and rescue treatment was needed to be initiated without delay, these patients will be eligible to participate in Part C
  • Patients who became pregnant during their previous participation in this dupilumab clinical trial
  • Patients who, during their previous participation in this trial, were prematurely withdrawn because of a protocol violation, poor compliance, or inability to complete required study assessments
  • NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Trial locations and contacts

27 sites in 2 countries.

27 sites in 2 countries

United States26 sites
  • Regeneron Study Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30322

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Atlanta, Georgia, 30342

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02111

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44106

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75207

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Fort Worth, Texas, 76104

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Los Angeles, California, 90027

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Regeneron Study Site

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Regeneron Study Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Regeneron Study Site

    New York, New York, 10065

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104

  • Regeneron Study Site

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85016

  • Regeneron Study Site

    San Francisco, California, 94143

  • Regeneron Study Site

    St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701

Other trials in United States

Canada1 site
  • Regeneron Study Site

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis

The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria.

The Secondary objectives are:

  • To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to placebo in pediatric patients with active EoE after 16 weeks of treatment as assessed by endoscopic visual measurements of disease activity using the Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) and histologic abnormalities as measured by the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS)
  • To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dupilumab treatment for up to 16 weeks in pediatric patients with active EoE
  • To evaluate the effects of dupilumab on transcriptomic signatures associated with EoE and type 2 inflammation
  • To study the effects of dupilumab on the type 2 inflammation gene expression signature
  • To evaluate the concentration-time profile of functional dupilumab in serum in this population
  • To assess efficacy of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
  • To assess the impact of dupilumab treatment on changes in weight and growth during the extended active period and open-label extension period of the study
  • To assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
  • To evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on EoE signs and symptoms
Read the detailed description

This is a 3-part study:

  • Part A: Double-blind 16-week treatment period
  • Part B: 36-week extended active treatment period
  • Part C: Up to108 weeks open-label extension period
Being tested
Dupilumab, Matching Placebo
Medical subject headings
Eosinophilic Esophagitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DupilumabDrug

    Also called •DUPIXENT, •REGN668, •SAR231893

    Single-use, prefilled syringe

  • Matching PlaceboDrug

    Matching formulation and regimen (depending on the weight tier) as dupilumab without the active substance

Study groups in NCT04394351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Part A - High DoseExperimentalPart A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo
Part A - Low DoseExperimentalPart A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo
Part B - High DoseExperimentalPart B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo
Part B - Low DoseExperimentalPart B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo
Part C - High DoseExperimentalPart C consists of up to 108-week open-label extension period. All patients will receive higher exposure dupilumab subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight. No matching placebo administered in Part C.
Receives: Drug: Dupilumab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.

    Measured: At Week 16

Secondary outcomes (68)
  1. Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 16

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.

    Measured: At Week 16

  2. Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 16

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available. Least squared (LS) mean and standard error (SE) from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline measurement as covariate and the treatment, baseline weight group strata as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 16

    EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  4. Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 16

    EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  5. Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 16

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have a minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 16

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  7. Part A: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 16

    The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  8. Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 16 (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Part A: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE derived from ANCOVA model.

    Measured: Week 16

  10. Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 16

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  11. Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  12. Part A: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. The PESQ-P score was calculated based on the daily responses over a 14-day period (i.e., the 14 days prior to the baseline visit and the week 16 visit). The score ranges from 0 to 1. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS Mean SE from ANCOVA.

    Measured: Week 16

  13. Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  14. Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Score as Measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS) Version 2.0 Caregiver Version (PEESSv2.0-C) at Week 16

    The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants. Values after first rescue treatment use were set to missing (censoring). WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the MI approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE from ANCOVA model.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  15. Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16

    Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and 16

  16. Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.

    Measured: At Week 52

  17. Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.

    Measured: At Week 52

  18. Part B: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 52

    Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  19. Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 52

    EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  20. Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 52

    EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  21. Part B: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 52

    The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores possibly ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  22. Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 52

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  23. Part B: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.

    Measured: Week 52

  24. Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 52

    PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  25. Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  26. Part B: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food.

    Measured: Week 52

  27. Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52

    The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  28. Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 52

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  29. Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 52

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  30. Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Percentile at Week 52

    Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to <12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years (for ages 1 to <2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  31. Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age Z-score for Participants ≥2 Years of Age at Week 52

    BMI for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's BMI for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in BMI for age z-score (ie, increase in the standard deviation [SD] from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in BMI for age relative to the reference.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  32. Part B: Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-score at Week 52

    Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  33. Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight From Height Z-score at Week 52

    Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 52

  34. Part B: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 32 and 52

    Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Week 32 and 52 was reported in this outcome measure.

    Measured: Week 32 and 52

  35. Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.

    Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A

  36. Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug

    An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.

    Measured: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B

  37. Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response

    Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.

    Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A

  38. Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category

    Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.

    Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A

  39. Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response and Titer

    Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.

    No participant exhibited a treatment-emergent ADA response in Part B and titer was not reported.

    Measured: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B

  40. Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 100

    Measured: At Week 100

  41. Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 160

    Measured: At Week 160

  42. Part C: Percent Change in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count (Eos/Hpf) From Baseline to Week 100

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  43. Part C: Percent Change in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count (Eos/Hpf) From Baseline to Week 160

    Measured: Baseline to Week 160

  44. Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 100

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  45. Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 160

    Measured: Baseline to Week 160

  46. Part C: Absolute Change in EoE-EREFS From Baseline to Week 100

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  47. Part C: Absolute Change in EoE-EREFS From Baseline to Week 160

    Measured: Baseline to Week 160

  48. Part C: Change in Total Score as Measured by the PEESSv2.0- Caregiver Version Questionnaire From Baseline to Week 100

    The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  49. Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the EDP Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 100

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  50. Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the EDP Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 160

    A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 160

  51. Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the Type 2 Inflammation Transcriptome Signature Baseline to Week 100

    Measured: Baseline to Week 100

  52. Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the Type 2 Inflammation Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 160

    Measured: Baseline to Week 160

  53. Part C: Change in Body Weight for Age Percentile From Baseline up to Week 100

    Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to <12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years (for ages 1 to <2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 100

  54. Part C: Change in Body Mass Index for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100

    Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score. BMI-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 100

  55. Part C: Change in Weight for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100

    Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in weight-for-age Z-score. Weight-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 100

  56. Part C: Change in Weight for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 160

    Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 160

  57. Part C: Change in Weight for Height Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100

    Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in Weight for height Z-score. Weight for height Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 100

  58. Part C: Change in Weight for Height Z-score From Baseline up to Week 160

    Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 160

  59. Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eos/Hpf (400×) at Week 100

    Measured: At Week 100

  60. Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eos/Hpf (400×) at Week 160

    Measured: At Week 160

  61. Part C: Percentage of Participants (With Food Elimination Diet Regimens at Baseline) That Have a Re-introduction of a Previously Eliminated Food Group From Baseline up to Week 100

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 100

  62. Part C: Percentage of Participants (With Food Elimination Diet Regimens at Baseline) That Have a Re-introduction of a Previously Eliminated Food Group From Baseline up to Week 160

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 160

  63. Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs

    Measured: Up to Week 152

  64. Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent SAEs

    Measured: Up to Week 152

  65. Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AESIs

    Measured: Up to Week 152

  66. Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment

    Measured: Up to Week 152

  67. Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent ADA Responses

    Measured: From Week 52 up to Week 152

  68. Part C: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 100

    Measured: At Week 100

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 May 2020
  2. Study start1 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion2 Jun 2022
  4. Study completion14 May 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04394351
Sponsor's protocol ID
R668-EE-1877
Other IDs
2019-003078-24, 2019
Acronym
EoE KIDS
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
7 May 2020
Last updated
27 Oct 2025
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All Individual Patient Data that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing

Publications

  • Chehade M, Spergel JM, Oliva S, Dellon ES, Ashok D, Rothenberg ME, Liu R, Louisias M, Radin A, Tilton ST, McCann E. Dupilumab improves clinical outcome assessments in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized phase 3 study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2026 Jul 29;26(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12876-026-05017-8.

    PubMed 42928144
  • Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hamon SC, Chehade M, Spergel JM, Gayvert KM, Ehmann PJ, Horowitz JE, Farrell AB, Dellon ES, Maloney J, Radin A, Louisias M, Wolfe K, Akinlade B, Ajithdoss DK, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD, Hamilton JD. Dupilumab normalizes the eosinophilic esophagitis disease transcriptome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Aug;158(2):542-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2026.01.033. Epub 2026 Apr 22.

    PubMed 42031097
  • Nguyen JH, Chehade M, Dellon ES, Radin A, Chittenden J, Kamal MA, Louisias M, Xu C, Kosloski MP. Population Pharmacokinetics of Dupilumab in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Jun;119(6):1555-1564. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70233. Epub 2026 Feb 26.

    PubMed 41749054
  • Chehade M, McCann E, Spergel J, Yaworsky A, Lamoureux RE, Litcher-Kelly L, Burbridge C, Sutter C, Newton L, Liu R, Tilton ST, Kamat S, Dellon ES. Validation of the Novel Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Sign/Symptom Questionnaire-Caregiver Version in EoE KIDS. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2026 Apr;14(4):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2026.01.001. Epub 2026 Jan 12.

    PubMed 41534558
  • Chehade M, Dellon ES, Spergel JM, Collins MH, Rothenberg ME, Pesek RD, Hirano I, Liu R, Laws E, Mortensen E, Martincova R, Shabbir A, McCann E, Kamal MA, Kosloski MP, Hamilton JD, Samuely C, Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Farrell A, Patel N, Yancopoulos GD, Glotfelty L, Maloney J. Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jun 27;390(24):2239-2251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312282.

    PubMed 38924731

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 27 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 27 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16 (time frame: At Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04394351, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in