Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)Phase 3EoE KIDSNCT04394351
Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 27 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 11 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 102 participants
- Where
- 27 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 14 May 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 11 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- A documented diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)
- Baseline endoscopic biopsies with a demonstration on central reading of intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration
Who cannot join
- Body weight <5 kg or ≥60 kg at screening
- Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia
- Active Helicobacter pylori
- History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, or prior esophageal surgery
- Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening
- Treatment with swallowed topical corticosteroids within 8 weeks prior to baseline standard of care endoscopy
Show all 16Show fewer
- History of bleeding disorders or esophageal varices that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the patient at undue risk for significant complications from an endoscopy procedure
- Active parasitic infection or suspected parasitic infection
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency disorder
- Key Exclusion for Patients Re-Entering the Study (for Entry into Part C, as defined in protocol):
- Patients who are ≥12 years old, weigh ≥40 kg (or minimum weight for which dupilumab is approved for EoE), and dupilumab is commercially available for the treatment of EoE in their country
- Patients who, during their previous participation in this clinical trial, developed an SAE and/or AE deemed related to dupilumab, which in the opinion of the investigator or of the medical monitor could indicate that continued treatment with dupilumab may present an unreasonable risk for the patient
- Patients who did not undergo endoscopy with biopsies at week 16 and/or week 52 or prior to receiving rescue treatment Note: If the endoscopy with biopsies could not occur due to COVID-19 restrictions and rescue treatment was needed to be initiated without delay, these patients will be eligible to participate in Part C
- Patients who became pregnant during their previous participation in this dupilumab clinical trial
- Patients who, during their previous participation in this trial, were prematurely withdrawn because of a protocol violation, poor compliance, or inability to complete required study assessments
- NOTE: Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply
Trial locations and contacts
27 sites in 2 countries.
27 sites in 2 countries
United States26 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Regeneron Study Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
Regeneron Study Site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Regeneron Study Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111
Regeneron Study Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Regeneron Study Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Regeneron Study Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Regeneron Study Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Regeneron Study Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
Regeneron Study Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Regeneron Study Site
Dallas, Texas, 75207
Regeneron Study Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Regeneron Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77030
Regeneron Study Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Regeneron Study Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Regeneron Study Site
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68510
Regeneron Study Site
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72202
Regeneron Study Site
Los Angeles, California, 90027
Regeneron Study Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Regeneron Study Site
New York, New York, 10029
Regeneron Study Site
New York, New York, 10032
Regeneron Study Site
New York, New York, 10065
Regeneron Study Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Regeneron Study Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Regeneron Study Site
San Francisco, California, 94143
Regeneron Study Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33701
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria.
The Secondary objectives are:
- To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to placebo in pediatric patients with active EoE after 16 weeks of treatment as assessed by endoscopic visual measurements of disease activity using the Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) and histologic abnormalities as measured by the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS)
- To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dupilumab treatment for up to 16 weeks in pediatric patients with active EoE
- To evaluate the effects of dupilumab on transcriptomic signatures associated with EoE and type 2 inflammation
- To study the effects of dupilumab on the type 2 inflammation gene expression signature
- To evaluate the concentration-time profile of functional dupilumab in serum in this population
- To assess efficacy of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To assess the impact of dupilumab treatment on changes in weight and growth during the extended active period and open-label extension period of the study
- To assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on EoE signs and symptoms
Read the detailed description
This is a 3-part study:
- Part A: Double-blind 16-week treatment period
- Part B: 36-week extended active treatment period
- Part C: Up to108 weeks open-label extension period
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
- Being tested
- Dupilumab, Matching Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DupilumabDrug
Also called •DUPIXENT, •REGN668, •SAR231893
Single-use, prefilled syringe
Matching PlaceboDrug
Matching formulation and regimen (depending on the weight tier) as dupilumab without the active substance
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part A - High Dose | Experimental | Part A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo |
| Part A - Low Dose | Experimental | Part A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo |
| Part B - High Dose | Experimental | Part B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo |
| Part B - Low Dose | Experimental | Part B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight Receives: Drug: Dupilumab; Drug: Matching Placebo |
| Part C - High Dose | Experimental | Part C consists of up to 108-week open-label extension period. All patients will receive higher exposure dupilumab subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight. No matching placebo administered in Part C. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Measured: At Week 16
Secondary outcomes (68)
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 16
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Measured: At Week 16
Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 16
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available. Least squared (LS) mean and standard error (SE) from analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with Baseline measurement as covariate and the treatment, baseline weight group strata as fixed factors.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 16
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 16
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 16
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have a minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 16
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at Week 16 relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 16
The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 16 (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measures the signs of EoE observed by the caregiver, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE derived from ANCOVA model.
Measured: Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 16
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food. The PESQ-P score was calculated based on the daily responses over a 14-day period (i.e., the 14 days prior to the baseline visit and the week 16 visit). The score ranges from 0 to 1. WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the multiple imputations approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS Mean SE from ANCOVA.
Measured: Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Score as Measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS) Version 2.0 Caregiver Version (PEESSv2.0-C) at Week 16
The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants. Values after first rescue treatment use were set to missing (censoring). WOCF approach was used for imputing the missing data due to rescue treatment/AE/lack of efficacy, and the MI approach was used for the missing data due to other reasons. LS mean SE from ANCOVA model.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16 was reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Measured: At Week 52
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Measured: At Week 52
Part B: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 52
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 52
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean grade scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean grade score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 52
EoE-HSS is a validated histologic scoring system that measures other histological abnormalities in addition to density of eosinophilic infiltration. Severity (grade) and extent (stage) of abnormalities will be scored using a 4-point scale (0 normal; 3 maximum change). Higher total score indicated greater severity \& extent of histological abnormalities. For each of 3 esophageal regions (proximal, mid, and distal), the ratio of the sum of assigned score for each evaluated feature divided by maximum possible score (maximum value is 24) was calculated. The mean stage scores summed over the 3 regions was the final score used in primary analysis, the mean stage score ranged from 0 to 3, with higher score indicating more severe.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 52
The EoE-EREFS is a validated endoscopic scoring system for inflammatory and remodeling features of EoE including edema, rings, exudates, furrows, and stricture. The score was assessed in the proximal and distal esophageal regions with each region scored from 0 to 9 with total scores possibly ranging from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate worse endoscopic inflammatory and remodeling findings.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 52
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study.
Measured: Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 52
PESQ-C is a novel, observer-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by caregivers of all pediatric EoE participants in the study. The PESQ-C measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the proportion of days with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measures the signs of EoE, including stomach pain, heartburn, acid reflux, regurgitation, vomiting, food refusal, and trouble swallowing food.
Measured: Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
The PESQ-P was a participant-reported outcome measure intended to be completed independently by EoE participants ≥8 to <12 years of age. The PESQ-P measured the occurrence of signs of EoE and was completed once daily via an electronic diary. Data from a 14-day period preceding the baseline visit and a 14-day period preceding week 16 will be used to calculate the total time segments within a day (night, morning, afternoon, evening) with 1 or more EoE symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 52
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 52
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for T2INF reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of the pre-specified gene set as a way to evaluate normalization of type 2 inflammation with treatment. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Percentile at Week 52
Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to <12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years (for ages 1 to <2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age Z-score for Participants ≥2 Years of Age at Week 52
BMI for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's BMI for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in BMI for age z-score (ie, increase in the standard deviation [SD] from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in BMI for age relative to the reference.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-score at Week 52
Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight From Height Z-score at Week 52
Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 32 and 52
Concentration of functional dupilumab in serum at Week 32 and 52 was reported in this outcome measure.
Measured: Week 32 and 52
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation patient administered with a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious AE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, life-threatening, initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or a medically important event. The term TEAE is defined as AEs starting or worsening after the first intake of the study drug. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. An AESI was defined as one of scientific and medical concern specific to the Sponsor's product or program, for which ongoing monitoring and rapid communication by the Investigator to the Sponsor was appropriate.
Measured: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response and Titer
Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as a negative result or missing result at baseline with at least one positive post baseline result in the ADA assay. Samples positive in the dupilumab ADA assay were characterized for ADA titers (low, moderate and high). The low treatment-emergent ADA titer as defined as titer level <1000, moderate as 1000 to 10000 and high as >10000.
No participant exhibited a treatment-emergent ADA response in Part B and titer was not reported.
Measured: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 100
Measured: At Week 100
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 160
Measured: At Week 160
Part C: Percent Change in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count (Eos/Hpf) From Baseline to Week 100
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: Percent Change in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count (Eos/Hpf) From Baseline to Week 160
Measured: Baseline to Week 160
Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 100
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: Absolute Change in Mean EoE-HSS From Baseline to Week 160
Measured: Baseline to Week 160
Part C: Absolute Change in EoE-EREFS From Baseline to Week 100
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: Absolute Change in EoE-EREFS From Baseline to Week 160
Measured: Baseline to Week 160
Part C: Change in Total Score as Measured by the PEESSv2.0- Caregiver Version Questionnaire From Baseline to Week 100
The PEESSv2.0-C is a caregiver-reported outcome measure that assesses the frequency and severity of EoE symptoms among pediatric participants. The PEESSv2.0-C consists of 20 items and has a one-month recall period. Each item had a 0-4 scale, which was transformed to 0-100 as follows: 0 = 0, 1 = 25, 2 = 50, 3 = 75, 4 = 100. The mean total PEESSv2.0 score was computed as the sum of all the item scores over the number of items answered. The total PEESSv2.0-C score ranges from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate greater symptom burden among pediatric EoE participants.
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the EDP Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 100
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the EDP Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 160
A Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) is a way to generate a single numerical value to represent a complex gene expression signature. Changes in NES score represented the overall changes in the expression of that molecular phenotype. The NESs calculated for the EDP reflect the expression at post-baseline relative to Baseline of a gene set that is differentially expressed between esophageal biopsies from EoE participants compared to healthy controls as a way to evaluate normalization of the molecular pathology. For each subject, an NES of 0 indicates no change from baseline, a negative score shows a reduction in disease score (more like normal) and positive score shows worsening (more active disease). NES does not have minimum/maximum score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 160
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the Type 2 Inflammation Transcriptome Signature Baseline to Week 100
Measured: Baseline to Week 100
Part C: NES for the Relative Change in the Type 2 Inflammation Transcriptome Signature From Baseline to Week 160
Measured: Baseline to Week 160
Part C: Change in Body Weight for Age Percentile From Baseline up to Week 100
Body weight for age percentile was calculated based on the growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for ages 0 to 20 years (for ages 2 to <12 years) and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years (for ages 1 to <2 years). These charts included a set of smoothed percentiles along with CDC LMS (Lambda-Mu-Sigma) parameters to allow the calculation of percentiles.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 100
Part C: Change in Body Mass Index for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in BMI-for-age Z-score. BMI-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 100
Part C: Change in Weight for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in weight-for-age Z-score. Weight-for-age Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 100
Part C: Change in Weight for Age Z-score From Baseline up to Week 160
Weight for age z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for age is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and World Health Organization (WHO) growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). An increase in the mean change in weight for age z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for age relative to the reference.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 160
Part C: Change in Weight for Height Z-score From Baseline up to Week 100
Difference in the 100-week change from baseline in Weight for height Z-score. Weight for height Z-scores are based on a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years]. A z-score of "0" represents the population mean. The Z-score indicates the number of standard deviations away from the mean of the reference population. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the population mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the population mean.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 100
Part C: Change in Weight for Height Z-score From Baseline up to Week 160
Weight for height z-score indicates how much higher or lower a participant's weight for height is relative to a reference growth chart (based on the growth charts from CDC for ages 0 to 20 years [for ages 2 to <12 years] and WHO growth charts for ages 0 to <2 years [for ages 1 to <2 years]). An increase in the mean change in weight for height z-score (increase in the SD from the reference growth chart) indicates an increase in weight for height relative to the reference.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 160
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eos/Hpf (400×) at Week 100
Measured: At Week 100
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eos/Hpf (400×) at Week 160
Measured: At Week 160
Part C: Percentage of Participants (With Food Elimination Diet Regimens at Baseline) That Have a Re-introduction of a Previously Eliminated Food Group From Baseline up to Week 100
Measured: Baseline up to Week 100
Part C: Percentage of Participants (With Food Elimination Diet Regimens at Baseline) That Have a Re-introduction of a Previously Eliminated Food Group From Baseline up to Week 160
Measured: Baseline up to Week 160
Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs
Measured: Up to Week 152
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent SAEs
Measured: Up to Week 152
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent AESIs
Measured: Up to Week 152
Part C: Number of Participants With TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Treatment
Measured: Up to Week 152
Part C: Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent ADA Responses
Measured: From Week 52 up to Week 152
Part C: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 100
Measured: At Week 100
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion2 Jun 2022
- Study completion14 May 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04394351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R668-EE-1877
- Other IDs
- 2019-003078-24, 2019
- Acronym
- EoE KIDS
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 7 May 2020
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All Individual Patient Data that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Publications
Chehade M, Spergel JM, Oliva S, Dellon ES, Ashok D, Rothenberg ME, Liu R, Louisias M, Radin A, Tilton ST, McCann E. Dupilumab improves clinical outcome assessments in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized phase 3 study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2026 Jul 29;26(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12876-026-05017-8.
PubMed 42928144Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hamon SC, Chehade M, Spergel JM, Gayvert KM, Ehmann PJ, Horowitz JE, Farrell AB, Dellon ES, Maloney J, Radin A, Louisias M, Wolfe K, Akinlade B, Ajithdoss DK, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD, Hamilton JD. Dupilumab normalizes the eosinophilic esophagitis disease transcriptome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Aug;158(2):542-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2026.01.033. Epub 2026 Apr 22.
PubMed 42031097Nguyen JH, Chehade M, Dellon ES, Radin A, Chittenden J, Kamal MA, Louisias M, Xu C, Kosloski MP. Population Pharmacokinetics of Dupilumab in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Jun;119(6):1555-1564. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70233. Epub 2026 Feb 26.
PubMed 41749054Chehade M, McCann E, Spergel J, Yaworsky A, Lamoureux RE, Litcher-Kelly L, Burbridge C, Sutter C, Newton L, Liu R, Tilton ST, Kamat S, Dellon ES. Validation of the Novel Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Sign/Symptom Questionnaire-Caregiver Version in EoE KIDS. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2026 Apr;14(4):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2026.01.001. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
PubMed 41534558Chehade M, Dellon ES, Spergel JM, Collins MH, Rothenberg ME, Pesek RD, Hirano I, Liu R, Laws E, Mortensen E, Martincova R, Shabbir A, McCann E, Kamal MA, Kosloski MP, Hamilton JD, Samuely C, Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Farrell A, Patel N, Yancopoulos GD, Glotfelty L, Maloney J. Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jun 27;390(24):2239-2251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312282.
PubMed 38924731
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Pediatric Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04394351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EoE KIDS / R668-EE-1877
- Conditions
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 102 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 May 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 27 Aug 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The Primary objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab treatment compared with placebo in pediatric patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) based on histologic improvement meeting validated histologic criteria.
The Secondary objectives are:
- To demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab compared to placebo in pediatric patients with active EoE after 16 weeks of treatment as assessed by endoscopic visual measurements of disease activity using the Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) and histologic abnormalities as measured by the EoE Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS)
- To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dupilumab treatment for up to 16 weeks in pediatric patients with active EoE
- To evaluate the effects of dupilumab on transcriptomic signatures associated with EoE and type 2 inflammation
- To study the effects of dupilumab on the type 2 inflammation gene expression signature
- To evaluate the concentration-time profile of functional dupilumab in serum in this population
- To assess efficacy of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To assess the impact of dupilumab treatment on changes in weight and growth during the extended active period and open-label extension period of the study
- To assess safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of long-term (up to 160 weeks) dupilumab treatment
- To evaluate the impact of dupilumab treatment on EoE signs and symptoms
Detailed description
This is a 3-part study:
- Part A: Double-blind 16-week treatment period
- Part B: 36-week extended active treatment period
- Part C: Up to108 weeks open-label extension period
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part A - High Dose | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Drug: Matching PlaceboPart A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight |
| Part A - Low Dose | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Drug: Matching PlaceboPart A consists of a 16-week double-blind treatment period. Patients will be randomized to receive dupilumab or placebo subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight |
| Part B - High Dose | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Drug: Matching PlaceboPart B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight |
| Part B - Low Dose | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab, Drug: Matching PlaceboPart B consists of a 36-week extended active treatment period. All patients to receive subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight |
| Part C - High Dose | Experimental | Drug: DupilumabPart C consists of up to 108-week open-label extension period. All patients will receive higher exposure dupilumab subcutaneous (SC) administration at tiered dosing regimens based on body weight. No matching placebo administered in Part C. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 11 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- A documented diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE)
- Baseline endoscopic biopsies with a demonstration on central reading of intraepithelial eosinophilic infiltration
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Body weight <5 kg or ≥60 kg at screening
- Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia
- Active Helicobacter pylori
- History of Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, or prior esophageal surgery
- Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DupilumabAlso: •DUPIXENT, •REGN668, •SAR231893Single-use, prefilled syringe | Drug | Part A - High Dose, Part A - Low Dose, Part B - High Dose, Part B - Low Dose, Part C - High Dose |
| Matching PlaceboMatching formulation and regimen (depending on the weight tier) as dupilumab without the active substance | Drug | Part A - High Dose, Part A - Low Dose, Part B - High Dose, Part B - Low Dose |
Primary outcome
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count was measured from esophageal biopsies. A total of at least 9 mucosal pinch biopsies were collected from 3 esophageal regions: 3 proximal, 3 mid, and 3 distal. The peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count at each visit was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils in the most inflamed hpfs across the 3 regions. If the quantity of eosinophils was missing for 1 or 2 esophageal regions, the peak eosinophil count was the maximum of the quantities of eosinophils from the region(s) where eosinophil quantities were available.
68 secondary outcomes
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 16
Time frame: At Week 16
Part A: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 16 (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
Time frame: Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 16 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
Time frame: Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Change From Baseline in Total Score as Measured by the Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Symptom Score (PEESS) Version 2.0 Caregiver Version (PEESSv2.0-C) at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Part A: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and 16
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of ≤6 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Part B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eosinophils/High Power Field at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Part B: Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Grade Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Mean Eosinophilic Esophagitis Histology Scoring System (EoE-HSS) Stage Score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Absolute Change From Baseline in EoE Endoscopic Reference Total Score (EoE-EREFS) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs Measured by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Caregiver Version (PESQ-C) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Number of Sign-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-C (for Participants Aged ≥1 to <12 Years)
Time frame: Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-C at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Days With 1 or More EoE Signs by Pediatric EoE Sign/Symptom Questionnaire - Participant Version (PESQ-P) (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Number of Symptom-free Days During the 14-day Period Preceding Week 52 as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years)
Time frame: Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in the Proportion of Total Segments Within a Day (Night, Morning, Afternoon, Evening) With 1 or More EoE Signs as Measured by the PESQ-P (for Participants Aged ≥8 to <12 Years) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the EoE Diagnostic Panel (EDP) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Normalized Enrichment Score (NES) for the Relative Change From Baseline in the Type 2 Inflammation Signature (T2INF) at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Percentile at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age Z-score for Participants ≥2 Years of Age at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Weight for Age Z-score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Change From Baseline in Body Weight From Height Z-score at Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Part B: Concentration of Functional Dupilumab in Serum at Week 32 and 52
Time frame: Week 32 and 52
Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part B: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and TEAEs Leading to Permanent Discontinuation of Study Drug
Time frame: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part A: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) by Maximum Titer Category
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 16 in Part A
Part B: Number of Participants With Positive Treatment-emergent Antidrug Antibodies (ADA) Response and Titer
Time frame: From Week 16 up to Week 52 in Part B
Part C: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of <15 Eos/Hpf At Week 100
Time frame: At Week 100
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42928144Chehade M, Spergel JM, Oliva S, Dellon ES, Ashok D, Rothenberg ME, Liu R, Louisias M, Radin A, Tilton ST, McCann E. Dupilumab improves clinical outcome assessments in children with eosinophilic esophagitis in a randomized phase 3 study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2026 Jul 29;26(1):696. doi: 10.1186/s12876-026-05017-8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42031097Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Rothenberg ME, Collins MH, Hamon SC, Chehade M, Spergel JM, Gayvert KM, Ehmann PJ, Horowitz JE, Farrell AB, Dellon ES, Maloney J, Radin A, Louisias M, Wolfe K, Akinlade B, Ajithdoss DK, Herman G, Yancopoulos GD, Hamilton JD. Dupilumab normalizes the eosinophilic esophagitis disease transcriptome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2026 Aug;158(2):542-554. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2026.01.033. Epub 2026 Apr 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41749054Nguyen JH, Chehade M, Dellon ES, Radin A, Chittenden J, Kamal MA, Louisias M, Xu C, Kosloski MP. Population Pharmacokinetics of Dupilumab in Adults, Adolescents, and Children With Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Jun;119(6):1555-1564. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70233. Epub 2026 Feb 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41534558Chehade M, McCann E, Spergel J, Yaworsky A, Lamoureux RE, Litcher-Kelly L, Burbridge C, Sutter C, Newton L, Liu R, Tilton ST, Kamat S, Dellon ES. Validation of the Novel Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis Sign/Symptom Questionnaire-Caregiver Version in EoE KIDS. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2026 Apr;14(4):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2026.01.001. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38924731Chehade M, Dellon ES, Spergel JM, Collins MH, Rothenberg ME, Pesek RD, Hirano I, Liu R, Laws E, Mortensen E, Martincova R, Shabbir A, McCann E, Kamal MA, Kosloski MP, Hamilton JD, Samuely C, Lim WK, Wipperman MF, Farrell A, Patel N, Yancopoulos GD, Glotfelty L, Maloney J. Dupilumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis in Patients 1 to 11 Years of Age. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jun 27;390(24):2239-2251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2312282.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All Individual Patient Data that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Related trials for Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial of Upadacitinib for Non-responsive Eosinophilic Esophagitis
EoE, Eosinophilic Esophagitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Dupilumab in Small Children With an Allergic Condition of the Esophagus (Food Pipe): Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Recruiting
Impact of Body Positioning on EndoFLIP Measurements: A Comparative Study of Supine and Left Lateral Decubitus Positions
Dysphagia, Esophageal Stricture
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A U.S. Registry of Eosinophilic Esophagitis Pediatric, Adolescent and Adult Patients Treated With DUPIXENT® As Standard of Care
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
The DiNAM-EoE-C Study: Esophageal Distensibility and Novel Assessment of Motility in Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), Dysphagia, Esophageal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
27 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab in people with Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE), run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 27 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 27 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Aug 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Part A: Percentage of Participants Achieving Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophil Count of Less Than or Equal to (≤) 6 Eosinophils/High Power Field (Eos/Hpf) at Week 16 (time frame: At Week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04394351, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.