AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle Injuries and DisordersNCT04390048

Balance Training With tDCS for CAI

A study testing Anodal tDCS in people with Ankle Injuries and Disorders, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this research study is to examine the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in addition to balance exercise for chronic ankle instability (CAI), a condition that develops following an initial ankle sprain, usually because of loose or unstable ankle joints. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Injuries and Disorders
What is being tested?
Anodal tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
20 Sep 2021to 20 Dec 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects should be neurologically sound
  • Subjects should have abilities to maintain a single-leg stance at least for 10 seconds.
  • A history of ankle sprain
  • A history of ankle joint giving ways
  • Current feelings of ankle joint instability

Who cannot join

  • Individuals with a clinically defined neurological disorder, with an increased risk of seizure for any reason, with a history of treatment with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation for any disorder will be excluded.
  • Patients with cardiac pacemakers, implanted medication pumps, intracardiac lines, or acute, unstable cardiac disease, with intracranial implants (e.g. aneurysm clips, shunts, stimulators, cochlear implants, or electrodes) or any other metal object within or near the head, excluding the mouth, that cannot be safely removed will be excluded.
  • A history of balance or vestibular disorder
  • A history of previous surgeries to the musculoskeletal structures in either limb of the lower extremity
  • A history of a fracture in either limb of the lower extremity requiring realignment
  • A history of acute injuries to the lower extremity joints in the previous 3 months, which impacted joint integrity and function (i.e., sprains, fractures) resulting in at least 1 interrupted day of desired physical activity
Show all 13Show fewer
  • A history of herniated disc
  • Poorly controlled headache
  • Hypersensitivity to electrical or magnetic stimulation
  • Adults unable to consent
  • Individuals who are not yet adults (infants, children, teenagers)
  • Pregnant women
  • Prisoner

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Miami

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33146

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Balance Training With Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI)

The purpose of this research study is to examine the efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation in addition to balance exercise for chronic ankle instability (CAI), a condition that develops following an initial ankle sprain, usually because of loose or unstable ankle joints.

Being tested
Anodal tDCS, Sham tDCS
Keywords
Chronic Ankle Instability
Medical subject headings
Ankle Injuries, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anodal tDCSDevice

    An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Anodal tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 milliamps (mA). Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.

  • Sham tDCSDevice

    An anodal surface electrode will be attached to the contralateral motor cortex (M1) of the CAI-involved side and the reference electrode will be placed on the ipsilateral side of the supraorbital ridge. Sham tDCS will deliver a low electrical current stimulation at 2 mA and will be turned off 30 seconds following the application. Participants will undergo 3 sessions per week for a total of 12 sessions and each session will last approximately 20 minutes.

Study groups in NCT04390048
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anodal tDCS and Balance Training (BT) GroupExperimentalParticipants will undergo 4 weeks of BT under anodal tDCS treatment.
Receives: Device: Anodal tDCS
Sham tDCS and BT GroupSham comparatorParticipants will undergo 4 weeks of BT under sham tDCS.
Receives: Device: Sham tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Static Postural Balance

    Center of Pressure (COP) velocity (cm/s)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Static Postural Balance

    Center of Pressure (COP) velocity (cm/s)

    Measured: Week 4

  3. Active Motor Threshold (AMT)

    The active motor threshold (AMT) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a computation program, Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). AMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to elicit an adequate motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle. A lower AMT reflects greater corticospinal excitability. The unit of measure is Percentage of Maximum Stimulus Output (MSO)

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Active Motor Threshold (AMT)

    The active motor threshold (AMT) was measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) using a computation program, Parameter Estimation by Sequential Testing (PEST). AMT was defined as the minimum TMS intensity required to elicit an adequate motor-evoked potential (MEP) in the soleus muscle. A lower AMT reflects greater corticospinal excitability. The unit of measure is Percentage of Maximum Stimulus Output (MSO)

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Self-reported Functional Scores

    The percentage score of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The total percentage score ranges from 0-100. The higher score indicates a better ankle function.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Self-reported Functional Scores

    The percentage score of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). The total percentage score ranges from 0-100. The higher score indicates a better ankle function.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  3. Spinal Reflex Excitability

    The maximal peak-to-peak amplitude ratios of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and the motor response (M-wave) of the soleus muscle were calculated by normalizing the maximal H-reflex amplitude to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Hmax/Mmax ratio). A higher Hmax/Mmax indicates a greater spinal reflex excitability.

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Spinal Reflex Excitability

    The maximal peak-to-peak amplitude ratios of the Hoffman reflex (H-reflex) and the motor response (M-wave) of the soleus muscle were calculated by normalizing the maximal H-reflex amplitude to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Hmax/Mmax ratio). A higher Hmax/Mmax indicates a greater spinal reflex excitability.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  5. Corticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)

    The soleus active muscle response, due to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the motor cortex, will be used for quantifying the motor evoked potential.

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Corticospinal Excitability as Evaluated by the Peak-to-peak Amplitude of Motor Evoked Potential (MEP)

    The soleus active muscle response, due to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses over the motor cortex, will be used for quantifying the motor evoked potential.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Dynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance

    The anterior reach distance (cm) was measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Dynamic Postural Control as Measured by the Reach Distance

    The anterior reach distance (cm) was measured by the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

    Measured: 4 weeks

  9. Dynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop

    The completion time (seconds) for the lateral hop will be measured. Each trial consists of 10 lateral hops. The average completion time of 3 trials will be reported. The completion time will be recorded using a stopwatch in seconds.

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Dynamic Postural Balance as Measured by the Time to Complete the Lateral Hop

    The completion time (seconds) for the lateral hop will be measured. Each trial consists of 10 lateral hops. The average completion time of 3 trials will be reported. The completion time will be recorded using a stopwatch in seconds.

    Measured: 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 May 2020
  2. Study start20 Sep 2021
  3. Primary completion20 Dec 2023
  4. Study completion20 Dec 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04390048
Sponsor's protocol ID
20200090
Status last verified
Feb 2025
First submitted
12 May 2020
Last updated
6 Mar 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Anodal tDCS in people with Ankle Injuries and Disorders, run by University of Miami at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Static Postural Balance (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in