AzTrials
AzTrials

Hemodialysis Access FailureNCT04388397

Immediate-access Arteriovenous Versus Standard Arteriovenous Grafts in Hemodialysis Patients

A study testing Arteriovenous Grafts in people with Hemodialysis Access Failure, run by Egyptian Biomedical Research Network at 2 sites in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are considered the main access for hemodialysis (HD). Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative access modality in patients with exhausted native venous access. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Hemodialysis Access Failure
What is being tested?
Arteriovenous Grafts
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
477 participants
Where
2 sitesEgypt
Study dates
15 Aug 2017to 10 Apr 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult hemodialysis patients

Who cannot join

  • Significant cardiorespiratory comorbidities.
  • Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Severe bleeding disorders.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Egypt2 sites
  • Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University

    Zagazig

  • Faculty of Medicine

    Zagazig

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Immediate-access Arteriovenous Versus Standard Arteriovenous Grafts in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Clinical Study

Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are considered the main access for hemodialysis (HD). Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative access modality in patients with exhausted native venous access. Immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) is a new modality in which dialysis can be started immediately to avoid complications of central venous catheters.

Read the detailed description

The study aimed to evaluate and compare patency rate and complications of standard arteriovenous grafts (SAVGs) and immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients for one year after the intervention. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: SAVGs group and IAAVGs group. Patients with ESRD with no chance for native AVF were examined clinically and by duplex ultrasonography preoperatively. Follow up was for one year. Primary end points were the success rate, complications rate (hematoma, pseudo-aneurysm, graft site infection, systemic bacteremia), time of first cannulation. Secondary end points were primary and secondary patency within one year.

Being tested
Arteriovenous Grafts

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Arteriovenous GraftsProcedure or surgery

    Arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) are considered the main access for hemodialysis (HD). Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are an alternative access modality in patients with exhausted native venous access. Immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) is a new modality in which dialysis can be started immediately to avoid complications of central venous catheters.

Study groups in NCT04388397
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate-access Arteriovenous GraftsExperimentalImmediate-access Arteriovenous Grafts as a vascular access for hemodialysis patients
Receives: Procedure: Arteriovenous Grafts
Standard Arteriovenous GraftsActive comparatorStandard Arteriovenous Grafts as a vascular access for hemodialysis patients
Receives: Procedure: Arteriovenous Grafts

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Primary Patency

    Patency of hemodialysis access

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Success rate

    successful graft procedure

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Complications rate

    Any graft complications

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 May 2020
  2. Study start15 Aug 2017
  3. Primary completion10 Apr 2020
  4. Study completion10 Apr 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
477 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04388397
Sponsor's protocol ID
02090520
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
9 May 2020
Last updated
23 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Tawfik AM, Zidan MH, Salem A, Salem A. A randomized controlled study of early versus standard cannulation of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.08.106. Epub 2021 Sep 30.

    PubMed 34601044

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Arteriovenous Grafts in people with Hemodialysis Access Failure, run by Egyptian Biomedical Research Network at 2 sites in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Primary Patency (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04388397, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in