Autoimmune EncephalitisPhase 2ExTINGUISHNCT04372615
The ExTINGUISH Trial of Inebilizumab in NMDAR Encephalitis
A Phase 2 study testing Inebilizumab in people with Autoimmune Encephalitis and Encephalitis, run by University of Utah at 39 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
Determine the difference in the modified Rankin score at 16 weeks in participants with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis treated with "first-line" immunomodulatory therapies provided as standard-of-care, and either inebilizumab (investigational agent) or placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Autoimmune Encephalitis, Encephalitis
- What is being tested?
- Inebilizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 116 participants
- Where
- 39 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 30 Mar 2022to 30 Sep 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of NMDAR encephalitis, defined by both a and b:
- A subacute onset of change in mental status consistent with autoimmune encephalitis,
- A positive cell-based assay for anti-NMDA receptor IgG antibody in the CSF confirmed in study-specified laboratories.
- Participants, ≥ 12 years of age at the time of informed consent. Participants under 18 years of age must weigh ≥40 kilograms.
- Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] in the United States of America [USA], European Union [EU] Data Privacy Directive in the EU) obtained from the participant/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations.
- Non-sterilized participants who are sexually active with a partner capable of becoming pregnant must use a condom with spermicide from Day 1 through to the end of the study and must agree to continue using such precautions for at least 6 months after the final dose of IP. A recommendation will be made that the partners (capable of becoming pregnant) of study participants (capable of getting their partner pregnant) should use a highly effective method of contraception other than a physical method.
Show all 31Show fewer
- Participants of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized partner capable of getting their partner pregnant must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception beginning at screening or upon discharge from hospitalization/inpatient rehabilitation (for participants who were incapacitated at the time of screening), and to continue precautions for 12 months after the final dose of IP.
- Participants of childbearing potential are defined as those who are not surgically sterile (e.g., bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or complete hysterectomy) or those who are not postmenopausal (per ICH M3 (R2) 11.2: defined as 12 months with no menses without an alternative medical cause).
- A highly effective method of contraception is defined as one that results in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. Periodic abstinence, the rhythm method, and the withdrawal method do not qualify as "highly effective" or acceptable methods of contraception for study purposes. Acceptable methods of contraception are listed in the table below:
- Physical Methods Hormonal Methods e
- Intrauterine device (IUD)
- Intrauterine hormone-releasing system, also known as drug-eluting IUD a
- Bilateral tubal occlusion
- Vasectomized partner b
- Sexual abstinence c • Combined (estrogen and progestogen-containing hormonal contraception)
- Oral (combined pill)
- Injectable
- Transdermal (patch)
- Progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation d
- Implantable
- Intravaginal a This is also considered to be a hormonal method. b With appropriate post-vasectomy documentation of surgical success (absence of sperm in ejaculate).
- c Sexual abstinence is considered to be a highly effective method only if defined as refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of the study and if it is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the participant.
- d Progestogen-only hormonal contraception, where inhibition of ovulation is not the primary mode of action (minipill) is not accepted as a highly effective method.
- e These methods are only considered highly effective and therefore acceptable when used in conjunction with a barrier method (i.e., diaphragm with spermicide, sponge with spermicide, cervical cap with spermicide, condoms, spermicide alone.)
- Willing to forgo other immunomodulatory therapies (investigational or otherwise) for NMDAR encephalitis during the study.
- Participant must have received at least 3 days of methylprednisolone 1000 mg IV or equivalent corticosteroid within 90 days prior to randomization (Day 1). In addition, participants must have received EITHER of the following treatments within 90 days before randomization.
- IVIg, at a dose range between 1.2 and 2 g/kg
- Plasma exchange or plasmapheresis, (defined as 5 to 6 exchanges).
- NOTE: These treatments may be provided during the screening period but must be completed prior to randomization. Participants who receive methylprednisolone and BOTH IVIg and plasma exchange are not excluded from participating in the trial, however, this treatment course with both IVIg and plasma exchange is not encouraged, and enrollment and randomization should not be delayed in order to complete additional first line treatments.
- Modified Rankin Score of ≥3 at the screening visit, indicating at least moderate disability. The baseline mRS must be confirmed by Site Investigators at screening and confirmed / adjudicated before randomization.
- Ability and willingness to attend study visits and complete the study. *All inclusion criteria must be met during the screening period, prior to randomization, except where noted.
Who cannot join
- Any of the following excludes an individual from participation in the study:
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the evaluation or administration of the IP, interpretation of participant safety or study results, or would make participation in the study an unacceptable risk. This specifically includes recent history (last 5 years) of herpes simplex virus encephalitis or known central nervous system demyelinating disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis).
- Presence of an active or chronic infection that is serious in the opinion of the Investigator.
- History of solid organ or cell-based transplantation.
- <!-- -->
- Concurrent/previous enrollment in another clinical study involving an investigational treatment within 4 weeks or 5 published half-lives of the investigational treatment, whichever is longer, prior to randomization.
Show all 44Show fewer
- Lactating or pregnant individuals, or individuals who intend to become pregnant anytime from study enrollment to 12 months following last dose of investigational agent.
- Known history of allergy or reaction to any component of the investigational agent formulation or history of anaphylaxis following any biologic therapy.
- Receipt of the following at any time prior to randomization:
- Alemtuzumab b. Total lymphoid irradiation c. Bone marrow transplant d. T-cell vaccination therapy
- Receipt of any biologic B cell-depleting therapy (e.g., rituximab, ocrelizumab, obinutuzumab, ofatumumab, inebilizumab) in the 6 months prior to screening. Receipt of such a B cell-depleting agent in the period 6-12 months prior to screening is exclusionary unless B cell counts have returned to ≥ age-based LLN by central laboratory. For EU participants, B cell counts at screening will be determined by the laboratories of the participating sites. Receipt of non-depleting B cell-directed therapy (e.g., belimumab), abatacept, or other biologic immunomodulatory agent within 6 months prior screening.
- Treatment at therapeutic doses/durations with any of the following within 3 months prior to randomization
- Natalizumab (Tysabri®) b. Cyclosporine c. Methotrexate d. Mitoxantrone e. Cyclophosphamide* f. Azathioprine g. Mycophenolate mofetil
- Cyclophosphamide is only permitted as rescue therapy to be administered as outlined in Section 5.4.1 no earlier than the week 6 visit.
- Severe drug allergic history or anaphylaxis to two or more food products or medicines (including known sensitivity to acetaminophen/paracetamol, diphenhydramine (cetirizine in EU) or equivalent antihistamine, and methylprednisolone or equivalent glucocorticoid).
- Known history of a primary immunodeficiency (congenital or acquired) or an underlying condition such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or splenectomy that predisposes the participant to infection.
- Active malignancy or history of malignancy that was active within the last 10 years, apart from ovarian or extra-ovarian teratoma (also known as a dermoid cyst) or germ cell tumor, or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that in the opinion of the Medical Safety Monitor (MSM) would preclude enrollment due to safety concerns. Squamous cell and basal cell carcinomas should be treated with documented success of curative therapy > 3 months prior to randomization.
- At screening (repeat testing may be conducted to confirm results within the same screening period, prior to randomization), any of the following:
- Total white blood count <2,500 cells/mm3 (or < 2.5 × 109/L) b. Total immunoglobulin < 600 mg/dL (or 6 µmol/L; 400 mg/dL for participants <18 years)* c. Absolute neutrophil count < 1200 cells/μL (or < 1.2 × 109/L) d. CD4 T lymphocyte count < 300 cells/µL (or < 0.3 × 109/L)
- Baseline levels of IgG prior to first line treatments (methylprednisolone, plasmapheresis/plasma exchange) should be used to determine eligibility.
- Active hepatitis B or C established with positive hepatitis B serology (hepatitis B surface antigen and core antigen) and/or positive hepatitis C PCR testing and confirmed by the MSM
- Any live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Day 1 (administration of killed vaccines is acceptable).
- Bacillus of Calmette and Guérin (BCG) vaccine within 1 year of enrollment.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse that, in the opinion of the Investigator, might affect participant safety or compliance with visits or interfere with safety or other study assessments.
- Recurrence of previously treated NMDAR encephalitis within the last 5 years, or suspicion of symptomatic untreated NMDAR encephalitis of greater than 3 months duration at the time of screening.
- Evidence of active tuberculosis* (TB) or being at high risk for TB based on:
- History of active TB or untreated/incompletely treated latent TB. Participants with a history of active or latent TB who have documentation of completion of treatment according to local guidelines may be enrolled.
- History of recent (≤ 12 weeks of screening) close contact with someone with active TB (close contact is defined as ≥ 4 hours/week OR living in the same household OR in a house where a person with active TB is a frequent visitor).
- Signs or symptoms that could represent active TB by medical history or physical examination.
- Positive, indeterminate, or invalid interferon-gamma release assay test result at screening, unless previously treated for TB. Participants with an indeterminate test result can repeat the test once, but if the repeat test is also indeterminate, the participant is excluded.
- Chest radiograph, chest computed tomography or MRI scan that suggests a possible diagnosis of TB or suggests that a work-up for TB should be considered; all participants must have had lung imaging with an acceptable reading within 6 months prior to consent, or during screening.
- Active, clinically significant (CS) infection at the time of randomization (IP administration may be delayed until recovery, if within 14-day screening window, otherwise participant may be rescreened).
- Exclusion criteria are applied at time of screening and are applicable throughout the study.
- Participants will undergo QuantiFERON®-TB Gold testing or equivalent TB testing during screening as standard of care. A positive result will not exclude patients from participation; thus, enrollment should not be delayed awaiting this result. If positive, an appropriate course of anti-TB treatment will need to be documented. If results are in indeterminate, participants may still be eligible for randomization if history is not suggestive of active / latent TB and a chest x-ray shows no evidence of active or latent TB.
- 1.1 Additional Eligibility Considerations
- The following criteria are not necessarily exclusionary but require review from the MSM to determine if a participant should be excluded due to safety concerns:
- At screening (out of range lab values may be reviewed with the MSM to determine whether a potential participant should be excluded for safety reasons; repeat testing may be conducted to confirm results within the same screening period, prior to randomization), any of the following:
- Aspartate transaminase (AST) > 2.5 × age-based upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Alanine transaminase (ALT) > 2.5 × age-based ULN
- Total bilirubin > 1.5 × age-based ULN (unless due to Gilbert's syndrome)
- Platelet count < 75,000/μL (or < 75 × 109/L)
- Hemoglobin < 8 g/dL (or < 80 g/L or 5 mmol/L)
- History of untreated hepatitis C infection. Participants who are considered cured following antiviral therapy with an HCV load below the limit of detection may be enrolled pending confirmation from the MSM that there are no safety concerns for inclusion.
- Patients with coexistent autoantibodies should not immediately be excluded but should be reviewed with the MSM to determine eligibility.
Trial locations and contacts
39 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
39 sites in 3 countries
United States35 sites, 35 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Michigan Health System
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Amanda Rasnake, 734-232-2452, arasnake@med.umich.edu
Craig Williamson, MD
- Recruiting
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Connor McMillan, 404-727-3818, connor.logan.mcmillan@emory.edu
Erika Sigman
- Recruiting
Children's Hospital Colorado Main Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Diana Rodriguez, 720-777-9214, Diana.Rodriguez@childrenscolorado.org
Ryan Kammeyer, MD
- Recruiting
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Jordan Hood, 720-240-1329, jordan.j.hood@cuanschutz.edu
Amanda Piquet
- Recruiting
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Melanie Benge, melaniebenge@uabmc.edu
Louis Nabors
- Recruiting
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Rina Dhawlikar, 908-601-8967, rdhawlikar@mgh.harvard.edu
Santiago Pardo, 410-926-6248, SPARDO1@mgh.harvard.edu
- Recruiting
SUNY Downstate
Brooklyn, New York, 11203
Nadege Gilles, 718-270-7786, Nadege.Gilles@Downstate.edu
Sofya Glazman, Sofya.Glazman@downstate.edu
- Recruiting
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Kay Maupin, 434-982-6961, klm8a@hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu
Meena Kannan, MD
- Recruiting
Ann and Robert H. Lurie Childrens Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Alexandra Byrd, 312-227-4000, albyrd@luriechildrens.org
Kavita Thakkar, MD
- Recruiting
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Monika Szela, monika.szela@northwestern.edu
Elena Grebenciucova, MD
- Recruiting
University of Cincinnati
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Tiffany Rupert, 513-558-0269, rupertts@ucmail.uc.edu
Angela Molloy, 513-558-7118, angela.molloy@uc.edu
- Recruiting
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Casey Mitchell, 614-685-9906, casey.mitchell@osumc.edu
Marina Rodriguez, 614-366-2840, marina.rodriguez@osumc.edu
- Recruiting
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Amy Conger, 214-645-8208, amy.conger@utsouthwestern.edu
Kyle Blackburn, MD
- Recruiting
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030
Navjot Sandhu, 832-824-1000, Navjot.Sandhu@bcm.edu
Kristen Fisher
- Recruiting
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Loraine Brenner, 319-356-4361, loraine-brenner@uiowa.edu
Tracey Cho, MD
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224
Pamela Desaro, 904-953-7720, Desaro.Pamela@mayo.edu
Gregory Day, MD
- Recruiting
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Julie Steele, 305-775-9502, jsteele@med.miami.edu
Danielle Bass, 305-243-6320, dhb55@med.miami.edu
- Recruiting
Vanderbilt University
Nashville, Tennessee, 37212
Ryann Gardner, 615-322-4085, ryann.gardner@vumc.org
Kehaunani Hubbard, 615-322-4322, kehaunani.m.hubbard@vumc.org
- Recruiting
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Danielle Paquette, danielle.paquette@yale.edu
Erin Longbrake, MD
- Recruiting
Mount Sinai
New York, New York, 10029
Kevin Van Geem, 347-804-3699, kevin.vangeem@mssm.edu
Pojen Deng
- Recruiting
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10033
Jennie Mata, jmm2220@cumc.columbia.edu
Sarah Wesley, MD
- Recruiting
Children's Hospital of Orange County
Orange, California, 92868
Linda Do, 714-997-3000, Linh.Do@choc.org
Janetta Arellano, MD
- Recruiting
UC Irvine
Orange, California, 92868
Isela Hernandez, 714-509-2664, iselah@uci.edu
Xiao-Tang Kong, MD
- Recruiting
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Priyanka Kalyani, 215-820-2726, priyanka.kalyani@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
Eric Lancaster, MD
- Recruiting
St. Joseph Hospital and Medical Center Barrow Neurological Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
Mary Thornton, 602-406-6287, mary.thornton@dignityhealth.org
Michael Robers, MD
- Recruiting
University of Pittsburgh
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Kerry Oddis, 412-692-4918, kmoddis@upmc.edu
Dane Prince, 262-490-6818, princede2@upmc.edu
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Morgan Mohler, 507-284-2511, mohler.morgan@mayo.edu
Anastasia Zekeridou
- Recruiting
University of Rochester
Rochester, New York, 14618
Christine Anne, 585-276-3037, Christine_annis@urmc.rochester.edu
Andrew Goodman, MD
- Recruiting
UC Davis
Sacramento, California, 95816
Lynea Kaethler, 916-734-3993, lbkaethler@ucdavis.edu
Erica Goude, 916-734-0384, emgoude@ucdavis.edu
- Recruiting
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108
Stacey L Clardy, MD, PhD, 801-585-7575, stacey.clardy@hsc.utah.edu
Ka-Ho Wong, MBA, 8015857575, ka-ho.wong@hsc.utah.edu
- Recruiting
Mayo Clinic in Arizona
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Erica Boyd, 480-301-8000, Boyd.Erica@mayo.edu
Marie Grill
- Recruiting
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington, 98195
Ashtyn Winter, 206-598-7688, ashtynw@uw.edu
Yujie Wang, MD
- Recruiting
Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Mengesha Teshome, 314-747-8420, teshomem@wustl.edu
Steven Dunham, MD
- Recruiting
SUNY Buffalo
Williamsville, New York, 14221
Annemarie Crumlish, 716-829-5046, ac35@buffalo.edu
Kara Patrick, 716-829-5037, KPatrick@buffalo.edu
- Recruiting
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27101
Carolina Burgos, caguilar@wakehealth.edu
Roy Strowd, MD
Netherlands2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Erasmus Medical University Center
Rotterdam
Wendy Hamerslag-de Groot, 29066799230, w.degroot.1@erasmusmc.nl
Maarten Titulaer, MD
- Recruiting
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rotterdam
Anne-Marieke Vegter, +31 10 704 01 30, a.vegter@erasmusmc.nl
Maarten Titulaer
Spain2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínic Barcelona
Barcelona
Montse Artola, +34 93 227 54 00 (Ext. 3271), martola@clinic.cat
Mar Guasp
- Recruiting
Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona
Barcelona
Dalmau Josep, 93 227 99 51, ope@clinic.cat
Josep Dalmau
About this study
Official title: A Phase-2b, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Activity and Safety of Inebilizumab in Anti-Nmda Receptor Encephalitis and Assess Markers of Disease
Determine the difference in the modified Rankin score at 16 weeks in participants with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis treated with "first-line" immunomodulatory therapies provided as standard-of-care, and either inebilizumab (investigational agent) or placebo.
Read the detailed description
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most common causes of autoimmune encephalitis, with prevalence exceeding herpes encephalitis in industrialized nations. Typically, the disease affects patients age 10-50 causing prominent psychiatric symptoms, altered consciousness, seizures, movement disorders and life-threatening dysautonomia. Intensive care, including cardiorespiratory support is required in 75% of cases. The diagnosis is confirmed by detection of IgG autoantibodies against central nervous system NMDAR in the cerebrospinal fluid. Despite the severity of the illness, NMDAR encephalitis is a treatable neurological disease, with retrospective case series establishing the benefit of off-label intravenous steroids and immunoglobulins. These treatments are presumed to work through effects on IgG NMDAR autoantibody levels in the CSF, although prospective data informing predictors of treatment responses are limited. Even with prompt treatment, ~50% of patients remain disabled, requiring prolonged hospital admissions. Various off-label therapies have been proposed as "second-line" treatments in NMDAR encephalitis. The majority of second-line treatments target circulating B-cells with various degrees of blood brain penetrance and efficacy, and poor consensus on the timing, dose and route of delivery of candidate agents. High-quality evidence is needed to inform the treatment of NMDAR encephalitis. Inebilizumab is a promising therapeutic monoclonal antibody for the treatment of NMDAR encephalitis. This humanized monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface antigen CD19 was recently shown to be safe and efficacious in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-another antibody-mediated disorder of the central nervous system. Compared to other off label B-cell depleting therapies, such as rituximab, inebilizumab not only depletes CD20+ B-cells, but also CD20- plasmablasts and plasma cells, resulting in robust and sustained suppression of B-cell expression. The ExTINGUISH Trial will randomize 116 participants with moderate-to-severe NMDAR encephalitis to receive either inebilizumab or placebo in addition to first-line therapies. Patient outcomes will be ascertained at standard intervals using the modified Rankin scale and accepted safety measures (primary outcomes at 16 weeks), together with comprehensive validated neuropsychological tests, bedside cognitive screening tools, quality of life/ functional indices, and outcome prediction measures. Clinical data will be combined with quantitative measures of NMDAR autoantibody titers and cytokines implicated in B-cell activation and antibody production within the intrathecal compartment to identify treatment responders, inform the biologic contributors to outcomes, and evaluate for biomarkers that may serve as early predictors of favorable outcomes in future clinical trials in NMDAR encephalitis. The ExTINGUISH Trial will prospectively study an optimized B-cell depletion therapy to promote better long-term outcomes in NMDAR encephalitis, to determine more meaningful cognitive endpoints, and to identify better biologic biomarkers to predict outcome.
- Conditions
- Autoimmune Encephalitis, Encephalitis
- Being tested
- Inebilizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Inebilizumab, NMDAR encephalitis, Autoimmune Encephalitis, Rare Disease
- Medical subject headings
- Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Encephalitis, Rare Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
InebilizumabDrug
Also called UPLIZNA
RCP: Blinded treatment on Day 1, Day 15,
- Inebilizumab group: Inebilizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV)
- Placebo group: IV matching placebo Prior to enrollment, all participants will receive standard of care, including high-dose corticosteroids (minimum of 3 days of treatment, 1 g methylprednisolone daily or equivalent) AND either IVIg (total dose range between 1.2 and 2 g/kg) OR plasmapheresis (defined as 5 or 6 exchanges).
Rescue therapy will be given to participants in either treatment group based on the results of the Week 6 assessments. Rescue therapy is cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV followed by additional doses every 28-30 days until the mRS score is ≤ 3 (at site Principal Investigator's discretion under standard of care).
PlaceboDrug
The placebo group will receive IV matching placebo on Day 1 and Day 15,
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Inebilizumab | Active comparator | Approximately 58 patients will receive Inebilizumab in addition to first line immunotherapy.
(Approximately 116 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment groups; approximately 58 participants to each treatment group).
All participants will also receive a 3 day course of IVIg. Receives: Drug: Inebilizumab |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Approximately 58 patients will receive placebo in addition to first line immunotherapy.
(Approximately 116 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment groups; approximately 58 participants to each treatment group).
All participants will also receive a 3 day course of IVIg. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of modified Rankin score at 16 weeks
Change in modified Rankin score (mRS) (0 to 6; 0=normal and 6=death) at 16 weeks determined by rank analyses, integrating need for rescue therapy and time to achievement of the mRS.
Measured: 16 weeks
Inebilizumab safety measures by the number of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events
Inebilizumab safety, as measured by the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)
Measured: 96 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Time to mRS ≤ 2, corrected for baseline value.
Time to mRS ≤ 2, corrected for baseline value.
Measured: 96 weeks
Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) Score (continuous logistic regression), corrected from baseline value to week 24 (weeks 6 and 16).
Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) Score (ranges of 0 to 27 with 0 being normal and 27 being worse)(continuous logistic regression), corrected from baseline value to week 24 (weeks 6 and 16).
Measured: 16 weeks
mRS at week 6 as measured by proportional odds logistic regression/shift analysis.
mRS at week 6 as measured by proportional odds logistic regression/shift analysis.
Measured: 6 weeks
Proportion of participants who meet the protocol-defined criteria for needing rescue therapy at week 6.
Proportion of participants who meet the protocol-defined criteria for needing rescue therapy at week 6.
Measured: 6 weeks
Cognitive outcome at week 24 as measured by mean scaled score on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) + components of Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).
Cognitive outcome at week 24 as measured by mean scaled score on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) + components of Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).
Measured: 24 weeks
Survival as measured by a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Survival as measured by a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Measured: 96 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2020
- Study start30 Mar 2022
- Primary completion30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (39)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Autoimmune EncephalitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of UtahThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Utah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Stacey Clardy MD PhD, University of Utah
- Investigators
- Stacey L Clardy, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Utah
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04372615
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 143461
- Acronym
- ExTINGUISH
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 30 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data from this study will only be shared with the researchers and organizations listed in the application and consent form. Participants can opt to have their excess biosamples banked as part of an optional substudy. Any samples shared in the future will be deidentified.
Publications
Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N, Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F, Dalmau J. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
PubMed 23290630Gabilondo I, Saiz A, Galan L, Gonzalez V, Jadraque R, Sabater L, Sans A, Sempere A, Vela A, Villalobos F, Vinals M, Villoslada P, Graus F. Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology. 2011 Sep 6;77(10):996-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc6b. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
PubMed 21865579Dalmau J, Tuzun E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, Baehring JM, Shimazaki H, Koide R, King D, Mason W, Sansing LH, Dichter MA, Rosenfeld MR, Lynch DR. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol. 2007 Jan;61(1):25-36. doi: 10.1002/ana.21050.
PubMed 17262855Dubey D, Pittock SJ, Kelly CR, McKeon A, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Lennon VA, Gadoth A, Smith CY, Bryant SC, Klein CJ, Aksamit AJ, Toledano M, Boeve BF, Tillema JM, Flanagan EP. Autoimmune encephalitis epidemiology and a comparison to infectious encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2018 Jan;83(1):166-177. doi: 10.1002/ana.25131.
PubMed 29293273Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, Dessain SK, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Lynch DR. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70224-2. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
PubMed 18851928Gresa-Arribas N, Titulaer MJ, Torrents A, Aguilar E, McCracken L, Leypoldt F, Gleichman AJ, Balice-Gordon R, Rosenfeld MR, Lynch D, Graus F, Dalmau J. Antibody titres at diagnosis and during follow-up of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13(2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70282-5. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
PubMed 24360484Guasp M, Modena Y, Armangue T, Dalmau J, Graus F. Clinical features of seronegative, but CSF antibody-positive, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jan 3;7(2):e659. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000659. Print 2020 Mar.
PubMed 31900318Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R. Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jan;10(1):63-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70253-2.
PubMed 21163445Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HJ, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Wingerchuk DM, Fujihara K, Paul F, Cutter GR, Marignier R, Green AJ, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, Drappa J, Barron G, Madani S, Ratchford JN, She D, Cimbora D, Katz E; N-MOmentum study investigators. Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1352-1363. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31817-3. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
PubMed 31495497Hara M, Martinez-Hernandez E, Arino H, Armangue T, Spatola M, Petit-Pedrol M, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Graus F, Dalmau J. Clinical and pathogenic significance of IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against the NMDA receptor. Neurology. 2018 Apr 17;90(16):e1386-e1394. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005329. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
PubMed 29549218Warikoo N, Brunwasser SJ, Benz A, Shu HJ, Paul SM, Lewis M, Doherty J, Quirk M, Piccio L, Zorumski CF, Day GS, Mennerick S. Positive Allosteric Modulation as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;38(13):3218-3229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3377-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
PubMed 29476014Hughes EG, Peng X, Gleichman AJ, Lai M, Zhou L, Tsou R, Parsons TD, Lynch DR, Dalmau J, Balice-Gordon RJ. Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 28;30(17):5866-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0167-10.2010.
PubMed 20427647Tuzun E, Zhou L, Baehring JM, Bannykh S, Rosenfeld MR, Dalmau J. Evidence for antibody-mediated pathogenesis in anti-NMDAR encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Acta Neuropathol. 2009 Dec;118(6):737-43. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0582-4.
PubMed 19680671Matute C, Palma A, Serrano-Regal MP, Maudes E, Barman S, Sanchez-Gomez MV, Domercq M, Goebels N, Dalmau J. N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Antibodies in Autoimmune Encephalopathy Alter Oligodendrocyte Function. Ann Neurol. 2020 May;87(5):670-676. doi: 10.1002/ana.25699. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
PubMed 32052483Planaguma J, Leypoldt F, Mannara F, Gutierrez-Cuesta J, Martin-Garcia E, Aguilar E, Titulaer MJ, Petit-Pedrol M, Jain A, Balice-Gordon R, Lakadamyali M, Graus F, Maldonado R, Dalmau J. Human N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antibodies alter memory and behaviour in mice. Brain. 2015 Jan;138(Pt 1):94-109. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu310. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
PubMed 25392198
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase-2b, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Activity and Safety of Inebilizumab in Anti-Nmda Receptor Encephalitis and Assess Markers of Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04372615
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ExTINGUISH / 143461
- Conditions
- Autoimmune Encephalitis, Encephalitis
- Keywords
- Inebilizumab, NMDAR encephalitis, Autoimmune Encephalitis, Rare Disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 116 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of UtahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Mar 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Determine the difference in the modified Rankin score at 16 weeks in participants with anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis treated with "first-line" immunomodulatory therapies provided as standard-of-care, and either inebilizumab (investigational agent) or placebo.
Detailed description
N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is one of the most common causes of autoimmune encephalitis, with prevalence exceeding herpes encephalitis in industrialized nations. Typically, the disease affects patients age 10-50 causing prominent psychiatric symptoms, altered consciousness, seizures, movement disorders and life-threatening dysautonomia. Intensive care, including cardiorespiratory support is required in 75% of cases. The diagnosis is confirmed by detection of IgG autoantibodies against central nervous system NMDAR in the cerebrospinal fluid. Despite the severity of the illness, NMDAR encephalitis is a treatable neurological disease, with retrospective case series establishing the benefit of off-label intravenous steroids and immunoglobulins. These treatments are presumed to work through effects on IgG NMDAR autoantibody levels in the CSF, although prospective data informing predictors of treatment responses are limited. Even with prompt treatment, ~50% of patients remain disabled, requiring prolonged hospital admissions. Various off-label therapies have been proposed as "second-line" treatments in NMDAR encephalitis. The majority of second-line treatments target circulating B-cells with various degrees of blood brain penetrance and efficacy, and poor consensus on the timing, dose and route of delivery of candidate agents. High-quality evidence is needed to inform the treatment of NMDAR encephalitis. Inebilizumab is a promising therapeutic monoclonal antibody for the treatment of NMDAR encephalitis. This humanized monoclonal antibody against the B-cell surface antigen CD19 was recently shown to be safe and efficacious in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-another antibody-mediated disorder of the central nervous system. Compared to other off label B-cell depleting therapies, such as rituximab, inebilizumab not only depletes CD20+ B-cells, but also CD20- plasmablasts and plasma cells, resulting in robust and sustained suppression of B-cell expression. The ExTINGUISH Trial will randomize 116 participants with moderate-to-severe NMDAR encephalitis to receive either inebilizumab or placebo in addition to first-line therapies. Patient outcomes will be ascertained at standard intervals using the modified Rankin scale and accepted safety measures (primary outcomes at 16 weeks), together with comprehensive validated neuropsychological tests, bedside cognitive screening tools, quality of life/ functional indices, and outcome prediction measures. Clinical data will be combined with quantitative measures of NMDAR autoantibody titers and cytokines implicated in B-cell activation and antibody production within the intrathecal compartment to identify treatment responders, inform the biologic contributors to outcomes, and evaluate for biomarkers that may serve as early predictors of favorable outcomes in future clinical trials in NMDAR encephalitis. The ExTINGUISH Trial will prospectively study an optimized B-cell depletion therapy to promote better long-term outcomes in NMDAR encephalitis, to determine more meaningful cognitive endpoints, and to identify better biologic biomarkers to predict outcome.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Inebilizumab | Active comparator | Drug: InebilizumabApproximately 58 patients will receive Inebilizumab in addition to first line immunotherapy. (Approximately 116 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment groups; approximately 58 participants to each treatment group). All participants will also receive a 3 day course of IVIg. |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboApproximately 58 patients will receive placebo in addition to first line immunotherapy. (Approximately 116 participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 2 treatment groups; approximately 58 participants to each treatment group). All participants will also receive a 3 day course of IVIg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Diagnosis of NMDAR encephalitis, defined by both a and b:
- Participants, ≥ 12 years of age at the time of informed consent. Participants under 18 years of age must weigh ≥40 kilograms.
- Written informed consent and any locally required authorization (e.g., Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act [HIPAA] in the United States of America [USA], European Union [EU] Data Privacy Directive in the EU) obtained from the participant/legal representative prior to performing any protocol-related procedures, including screening evaluations.
- Non-sterilized participants who are sexually active with a partner capable of becoming pregnant must use a condom with spermicide from Day 1 through to the end of the study and must agree to continue using such precautions for at least 6 months after the final dose of IP. A recommendation will be made that the partners (capable of becoming pregnant) of study participants (capable of getting their partner pregnant) should use a highly effective method of contraception other than a physical method.
- Participants of childbearing potential who are sexually active with a non-sterilized partner capable of getting their partner pregnant must agree to use a highly effective method of contraception beginning at screening or upon discharge from hospitalization/inpatient rehabilitation (for participants who were incapacitated at the time of screening), and to continue precautions for 12 months after the final dose of IP.
Key exclusion criteria (44 listed)
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would interfere with the evaluation or administration of the IP, interpretation of participant safety or study results, or would make participation in the study an unacceptable risk. This specifically includes recent history (last 5 years) of herpes simplex virus encephalitis or known central nervous system demyelinating disease (e.g., multiple sclerosis).
- Presence of an active or chronic infection that is serious in the opinion of the Investigator.
- History of solid organ or cell-based transplantation.
- <!-- -->
- Concurrent/previous enrollment in another clinical study involving an investigational treatment within 4 weeks or 5 published half-lives of the investigational treatment, whichever is longer, prior to randomization.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| InebilizumabAlso: UPLIZNARCP: Blinded treatment on Day 1, Day 15, * Inebilizumab group: Inebilizumab 300 mg intravenous (IV) * Placebo group: IV matching placebo Prior to enrollment, all participants will receive standard of care, including high-dose corticosteroids (minimum of 3 days of treatment, 1 g methylprednisolone daily or equivalent) AND either IVIg (total dose range between 1.2 and 2 g/kg) OR plasmapheresis (defined as 5 or 6 exchanges). Rescue therapy will be given to participants in either treatment group based on the results of the Week 6 assessments. Rescue therapy is cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 IV followed by additional doses every 28-30 days until the mRS score is ≤ 3 (at site Principal Investigator's discretion under standard of care). | Drug | Inebilizumab |
| PlaceboThe placebo group will receive IV matching placebo on Day 1 and Day 15, | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change of modified Rankin score at 16 weeks
Time frame: 16 weeks
Change in modified Rankin score (mRS) (0 to 6; 0=normal and 6=death) at 16 weeks determined by rank analyses, integrating need for rescue therapy and time to achievement of the mRS.
Inebilizumab safety measures by the number of treatment-emergent adverse events and serious adverse events
Time frame: 96 weeks
Inebilizumab safety, as measured by the number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)
6 secondary outcomes
Time to mRS ≤ 2, corrected for baseline value.
Time frame: 96 weeks
Clinical Assessment Scale in Autoimmune Encephalitis (CASE) Score (continuous logistic regression), corrected from baseline value to week 24 (weeks 6 and 16).
Time frame: 16 weeks
mRS at week 6 as measured by proportional odds logistic regression/shift analysis.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Proportion of participants who meet the protocol-defined criteria for needing rescue therapy at week 6.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Cognitive outcome at week 24 as measured by mean scaled score on the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) + components of Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS).
Time frame: 24 weeks
Survival as measured by a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Time frame: 96 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 23290630Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangue T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, Honig LS, Benseler SM, Kawachi I, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aguilar E, Gresa-Arribas N, Ryan-Florance N, Torrents A, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Graus F, Dalmau J. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Feb;12(2):157-65. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 21865579Gabilondo I, Saiz A, Galan L, Gonzalez V, Jadraque R, Sabater L, Sans A, Sempere A, Vela A, Villalobos F, Vinals M, Villoslada P, Graus F. Analysis of relapses in anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Neurology. 2011 Sep 6;77(10):996-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc6b. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 17262855Dalmau J, Tuzun E, Wu HY, Masjuan J, Rossi JE, Voloschin A, Baehring JM, Shimazaki H, Koide R, King D, Mason W, Sansing LH, Dichter MA, Rosenfeld MR, Lynch DR. Paraneoplastic anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis associated with ovarian teratoma. Ann Neurol. 2007 Jan;61(1):25-36. doi: 10.1002/ana.21050.
- Results publication: PubMed 29293273Dubey D, Pittock SJ, Kelly CR, McKeon A, Lopez-Chiriboga AS, Lennon VA, Gadoth A, Smith CY, Bryant SC, Klein CJ, Aksamit AJ, Toledano M, Boeve BF, Tillema JM, Flanagan EP. Autoimmune encephalitis epidemiology and a comparison to infectious encephalitis. Ann Neurol. 2018 Jan;83(1):166-177. doi: 10.1002/ana.25131.
- Results publication: PubMed 18851928Dalmau J, Gleichman AJ, Hughes EG, Rossi JE, Peng X, Lai M, Dessain SK, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R, Lynch DR. Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodies. Lancet Neurol. 2008 Dec;7(12):1091-8. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70224-2. Epub 2008 Oct 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 24360484Gresa-Arribas N, Titulaer MJ, Torrents A, Aguilar E, McCracken L, Leypoldt F, Gleichman AJ, Balice-Gordon R, Rosenfeld MR, Lynch D, Graus F, Dalmau J. Antibody titres at diagnosis and during follow-up of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Feb;13(2):167-77. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70282-5. Epub 2013 Dec 18.
- Results publication: PubMed 31900318Guasp M, Modena Y, Armangue T, Dalmau J, Graus F. Clinical features of seronegative, but CSF antibody-positive, anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jan 3;7(2):e659. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000659. Print 2020 Mar.
- Results publication: PubMed 21163445Dalmau J, Lancaster E, Martinez-Hernandez E, Rosenfeld MR, Balice-Gordon R. Clinical experience and laboratory investigations in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jan;10(1):63-74. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70253-2.
- Results publication: PubMed 31495497Cree BAC, Bennett JL, Kim HJ, Weinshenker BG, Pittock SJ, Wingerchuk DM, Fujihara K, Paul F, Cutter GR, Marignier R, Green AJ, Aktas O, Hartung HP, Lublin FD, Drappa J, Barron G, Madani S, Ratchford JN, She D, Cimbora D, Katz E; N-MOmentum study investigators. Inebilizumab for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (N-MOmentum): a double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled phase 2/3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Oct 12;394(10206):1352-1363. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31817-3. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
- Results publication: PubMed 29549218Hara M, Martinez-Hernandez E, Arino H, Armangue T, Spatola M, Petit-Pedrol M, Saiz A, Rosenfeld MR, Graus F, Dalmau J. Clinical and pathogenic significance of IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies against the NMDA receptor. Neurology. 2018 Apr 17;90(16):e1386-e1394. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005329. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 29476014Warikoo N, Brunwasser SJ, Benz A, Shu HJ, Paul SM, Lewis M, Doherty J, Quirk M, Piccio L, Zorumski CF, Day GS, Mennerick S. Positive Allosteric Modulation as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy in Anti-NMDA Receptor Encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2018 Mar 28;38(13):3218-3229. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3377-17.2018. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 20427647Hughes EG, Peng X, Gleichman AJ, Lai M, Zhou L, Tsou R, Parsons TD, Lynch DR, Dalmau J, Balice-Gordon RJ. Cellular and synaptic mechanisms of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis. J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 28;30(17):5866-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0167-10.2010.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data from this study will only be shared with the researchers and organizations listed in the application and consent form. Participants can opt to have their excess biosamples banked as part of an optional substudy. Any samples shared in the future will be deidentified.
Related trials for Autoimmune Encephalitis
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingObservational study
Natural History Study of Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study in Participants With Anti-NMDAR Encephalitis and Anti-NMDAR Autoantibody-Associated Psychiatric Disease
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Encephalitis (ANRE), Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor (NMDAR) Antibody-associated Psychiatric Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
A Safety and Efficacy Study Evaluating CTX112 in Subjects With Refractory Neurologic Autoimmune Disease
Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (PMS), Neuromyelitis Optica
Recruiting
OPM- MEG in Non-immune And iMmune-medIated Neurological Disease
Autoimmune Encephalitis (AE), Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Stacey L Clardy, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of Utah
39 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Inebilizumab in people with Autoimmune Encephalitis and Encephalitis, run by University of Utah at 39 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 31 inclusion and 44 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 39 sites in United States, Netherlands, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Stacey L Clardy, MD, PhD (8015857575, stacey.clardy@hsc.utah.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of modified Rankin score at 16 weeks (time frame: 16 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04372615, which also lists 39 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2025.