Wrist InjuriesC3PONCT04370626
The Canadian Prospective Pragmatic Perilunate Outcomes Trial
An observational study of Wrist Injuries and Carpal Bone Fracture, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
This is a unique three-fold prospective and retrospective study. With this approach, all previous and current PLIs presented at participating study sites will have the potential to be included in the study. Our goal is to collect all relevant injury and surgical parameters of the Perilunate spectrum. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 120 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Wrist Injuries, Carpal Bone Fracture, Dislocation of Wrist
- How many people
- 450 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 31 Dec 2026
- How long will I take part?
- 10 Years
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 120 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who sustain a perilunate spectrum injury including dislocation and/or fracture.
Who may be able to join
- The subject is 14 years of age or older
- The subject has been clinically diagnosed with a perilunate injury
- The subject is willing to adhere to the study protocol including required post-operative therapy, all scheduled follow-up visits, evaluations, and questionnaires (if applicable).
Who cannot join
- There will be no limiting exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
South Health Campus
Calgary, Alberta, T3M1M4
Tina Samuel, MBBS, 4039563687
Neil J White, MD
About this study
Official title: The Canadian Prospective Pragmatic Perilunate Outcomes Trial (The C3PO Trial)
This is a unique three-fold prospective and retrospective study. With this approach, all previous and current PLIs presented at participating study sites will have the potential to be included in the study. Our goal is to collect all relevant injury and surgical parameters of the Perilunate spectrum. The investigators plan to identify each hospital within Canada that normally treats PLIs and to record injury and demographic information on each PLI that occurs in this country over a two to three-year period. Our protocol includes scheduled two, five, and 10-year follow-up intervals.
Read the detailed description
Perilunate injuries commonly occur from high-energy sporting or automobile accidents and require urgent surgical intervention. Although these wrist injuries are commonly encountered in the population, their complexity often goes unrecognized. In fact, some perilunate dislocations (PLDs) or perilunate fracture-dislocations (PLFDs) may be missed in spite of critical clinical and radiographic examination, leading to a delay in treatment. If left untreated for an extended period of time the outcomes of surgical repair are significantly compromised. The recovery process is very long, often with poor prognosis (a high incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and chronic wrist pain).
Early surgical management with the restoration of normal carpal anatomy is the gold standard for surgical repair of perilunate injuries. Surgical repair may involve an open reduction of the carpal bones, repair or reconstruction of the ligaments, and internal fixation of the fractures for PLDs and PLFDs. However, there is a huge variability with respect to approach and a lot to be desired with respect to outcomes. Open surgical procedures have been reported to lead to capsular scarring and joint stiffness and further interfere with the tenuous blood supply to the scaphoid and the torn ligaments. Another treatment options, which may aid in healing with reduced stiffness, is a combination of fluoroscopy and wrist arthroscopy which allows for anatomic reduction and fixation of the carpal bones with minimal tissue dissection. Injury variability and a wide array of surgical strategies make it difficult to treat and/or make improvements on specific techniques. Given the varied nature of the injury to this joint and varied outcomes, it is important to categorize the injury characteristics, the subsequent treatment options and the long-term outcomes of different clinical interventions. Many different surgical techniques have been advocated with a variety of reduction and fixation maneuvers, but unfortunately, the literature is sparse. There are disagreements with respect to volar, dorsal or combined surgical approaches. There is no consensus on the value of prophylactic carpal tunnel release. Some surgeons advocate direct ligament repair, while others feel it is unnecessary. A third group advocates for augmentation of the scapholunate ligament with screws or a graft. While most surgeons use smooth k-wires to hold the carpal reduction, there is no agreement on direction, number, size and position of k-wires. Further, there is no agreement on how long these k-wires should be left in place or on any aspect of rehabilitation.
Globally these injuries have been poorly studied and ideal timing for surgical intervention, optimal treatment and rehabilitation are unknown. The investigators hope to establish best-evidence clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of perilunate injuries including recommendations on the timing of reduction, the timing of surgery, best-practice surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols. The C3PO Trial will represent the single largest prospective dataset ever accrued on perilunate injuries with the support of both Canadian hand and trauma-fellowshipped trained orthopaedic surgeons and corresponding research societies. This project has the potential to create a paradigm shift in the way surgeons think about the perilunate injuries from identification through to prognosis which would be beneficial to all orthopaedic traumatologists managing these patients.
The study has 3 major nested arms. The investigators have designed a national prospective registry intended to capture all perilunate injuries suffered in Canada over a 2 year period. Within this registry, the investigators have an embedded cohort to capture all injuries that present to registered trial centres. These patients will be consented to the cohort and subsequently have extensive perioperative data recorded as well as both short and long-term follow-up (with no modification of treatment). All data collection (i.e. relevant demographics, injury characteristics, surgical and management parameters) will be obtained and managed by a customized REDCap database housed at the trial coordinating centre. The third arm of this trial is a retrospective cohort in which patients previously treated for PLIs will be contacted as asked if they would be willing come back to clinic and be follow for the remaining period of the 10-year study.
Participants, 14 years of age or older, clinically diagnosed with a perilunate injury and willing to adhere to the study protocol will be included for study participation. They must be willing and able to attend all recommended post-operative follow-up visits based on the advice of their surgeon. All participants will complete questionnaires and undergo both clinical and radiographic evaluations. These evaluations will begin at baseline, continue at the first post-operative visit, and the following intervals: 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. Individuals will be excluded if they have cognitive impairment or unable to understand what participation in this study entails, a known alcohol or drug abuser, or anticipated to be non-compliant. The investigators anticipate overall 150 patients entered into the cohort, an additional 150 in the registry arm, and 150 patients identified retrospectively.
- Conditions
- Wrist Injuries, Carpal Bone Fracture, Dislocation of Wrist, Trauma
- Medical subject headings
- Wrist Injuries, Wrist Fractures, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Registry Group | Patients who sustain and present with a PLI injury will have two options for participating in the study. This first arm will evaluate clinical presentations, patient demographic, treatment methods and baseline patient-rated and radiographic outcomes. However, no research-related follow up visits will be conducted. Ongoing data from these participants will be collected from chart reviews of clinical follow-ups alone. | |
| Prospective Group | Participants who choose to enroll in the prospective arm will experience the same baseline data collection as those in the registry, with the addition of research-related follow up appointments that will allow research staff to measure and assess patient-rated and clinical outcomes, such as questionnaires and range of motion data. | |
| Retrospective Group | In this group, a chart review will be conducted to identify previously treated patients with perilunate injuries. Once identified, the patient will be contacted and ask if they are willing to come in for a long-term follow up visit where clinical, patient-rated, and radiographic data will be collected. If patients are unwilling to attend a long-term visit, our analysis will still include data collected from their chart reviews and electronic questionnaires. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
The upper extremity scoring scale DASH is a validated tool for disorders of the elbow with a range from 0 (least disability) to 100 (most disability). Ten is the average score in the general population and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 10. DASH contains 30 questions asking participants about their ability to perform activities and their symptoms. Each question ranges from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (unable). There is also optional work and sports/performing arts modules.
Measured: Enrollment - 10 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Radiographs
Radiographic evaluation for fracture healing and/or nonunion, and the number of participants requiring re-operation for contracture and also composite re-operation for all perilunate fractures and/or dislocations related causes. This will be completed by a radiologist.
Measured: Enrollment - 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 May 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Wrist InjuriesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Target duration
- 10 Years
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Alberta
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Neil J White, MD, FRCSC, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370626
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB19-1565
- Acronym
- C3PO
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Publications
Garg B, Goyal T, Kotwal PP. Triple jeopardy: transscaphoid, transcapitate, transtriquetral, perilunate fracture dislocation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Sep;14(3):223-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0195-x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
PubMed 22476357Massoud AH, Naam NH. Functional outcome of open reduction of chronic perilunate injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
PubMed 22854256Vitale MA, Seetharaman M, Ruchelsman DE. Perilunate dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Feb;40(2):358-62; quiz 362. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 15. No abstract available.
PubMed 25459380Stanbury SJ, Elfar JC. Perilunate dislocation and perilunate fracture-dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Sep;19(9):554-62. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201109000-00006.
PubMed 21885701Capo JT, Corti SJ, Shamian B, Nourbakhsh A, Tan V, Kaushal N, Debkowska M. Treatment of dorsal perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations using a standardized protocol. Hand (N Y). 2012 Dec;7(4):380-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9452-y.
PubMed 24294157Kozin SH. Perilunate injuries: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;6(2):114-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199803000-00006.
PubMed 9682074Perron AD, Brady WJ, Keats TE, Hersh RE. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: lunate and perilunate injuries. Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;19(2):157-62. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.21306.
PubMed 11239263Weil WM, Slade JF 3rd, Trumble TE. Open and arthroscopic treatment of perilunate injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:120-32. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000205889.11824.03.
PubMed 16601413Sotereanos DG, Mitsionis GJ, Giannakopoulos PN, Tomaino MM, Herndon JH. Perilunate dislocation and fracture dislocation: a critical analysis of the volar-dorsal approach. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Jan;22(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80179-0.
PubMed 9018612Adkison JW, Chapman MW. Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Apr;(164):199-207.
PubMed 7067286Souer JS, Rutgers M, Andermahr J, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist: comparison of temporary screw versus K-wire fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Mar;32(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.01.008.
PubMed 17336837Muppavarapu RC, Capo JT. Perilunate Dislocations and Fracture Dislocations. Hand Clin. 2015 Aug;31(3):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.04.002.
PubMed 26205701Hildebrand KA, Ross DC, Patterson SD, Roth JH, MacDermid JC, King GJ. Dorsal perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations: questionnaire, clinical, and radiographic evaluation. J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Nov;25(6):1069-79. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.17868.
PubMed 11119665Krief E, Appy-Fedida B, Rotari V, David E, Mertl P, Maes-Clavier C. Results of Perilunate Dislocations and Perilunate Fracture Dislocations With a Minimum 15-Year Follow-Up. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Nov;40(11):2191-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.07.016. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
PubMed 26328900Mitchell EC, Tottenham I, Grewal R, Curran MWT, White NJ. The Canadian Prospective Pragmatic Perilunate Outcomes (C3PO) trial; a protocol. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jan 31;26(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-08227-x.
PubMed 39891160
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Canadian Prospective Pragmatic Perilunate Outcomes Trial (The C3PO Trial)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04370626
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C3PO / REB19-1565
- Conditions
- Wrist Injuries, Carpal Bone Fracture, Dislocation of Wrist, Trauma
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 450 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Alberta
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 May 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a unique three-fold prospective and retrospective study. With this approach, all previous and current PLIs presented at participating study sites will have the potential to be included in the study. Our goal is to collect all relevant injury and surgical parameters of the Perilunate spectrum. The investigators plan to identify each hospital within Canada that normally treats PLIs and to record injury and demographic information on each PLI that occurs in this country over a two to three-year period. Our protocol includes scheduled two, five, and 10-year follow-up intervals.
Detailed description
Perilunate injuries commonly occur from high-energy sporting or automobile accidents and require urgent surgical intervention. Although these wrist injuries are commonly encountered in the population, their complexity often goes unrecognized. In fact, some perilunate dislocations (PLDs) or perilunate fracture-dislocations (PLFDs) may be missed in spite of critical clinical and radiographic examination, leading to a delay in treatment. If left untreated for an extended period of time the outcomes of surgical repair are significantly compromised. The recovery process is very long, often with poor prognosis (a high incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis and chronic wrist pain).
Early surgical management with the restoration of normal carpal anatomy is the gold standard for surgical repair of perilunate injuries. Surgical repair may involve an open reduction of the carpal bones, repair or reconstruction of the ligaments, and internal fixation of the fractures for PLDs and PLFDs. However, there is a huge variability with respect to approach and a lot to be desired with respect to outcomes. Open surgical procedures have been reported to lead to capsular scarring and joint stiffness and further interfere with the tenuous blood supply to the scaphoid and the torn ligaments. Another treatment options, which may aid in healing with reduced stiffness, is a combination of fluoroscopy and wrist arthroscopy which allows for anatomic reduction and fixation of the carpal bones with minimal tissue dissection. Injury variability and a wide array of surgical strategies make it difficult to treat and/or make improvements on specific techniques. Given the varied nature of the injury to this joint and varied outcomes, it is important to categorize the injury characteristics, the subsequent treatment options and the long-term outcomes of different clinical interventions. Many different surgical techniques have been advocated with a variety of reduction and fixation maneuvers, but unfortunately, the literature is sparse. There are disagreements with respect to volar, dorsal or combined surgical approaches. There is no consensus on the value of prophylactic carpal tunnel release. Some surgeons advocate direct ligament repair, while others feel it is unnecessary. A third group advocates for augmentation of the scapholunate ligament with screws or a graft. While most surgeons use smooth k-wires to hold the carpal reduction, there is no agreement on direction, number, size and position of k-wires. Further, there is no agreement on how long these k-wires should be left in place or on any aspect of rehabilitation.
Globally these injuries have been poorly studied and ideal timing for surgical intervention, optimal treatment and rehabilitation are unknown. The investigators hope to establish best-evidence clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of perilunate injuries including recommendations on the timing of reduction, the timing of surgery, best-practice surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols. The C3PO Trial will represent the single largest prospective dataset ever accrued on perilunate injuries with the support of both Canadian hand and trauma-fellowshipped trained orthopaedic surgeons and corresponding research societies. This project has the potential to create a paradigm shift in the way surgeons think about the perilunate injuries from identification through to prognosis which would be beneficial to all orthopaedic traumatologists managing these patients.
The study has 3 major nested arms. The investigators have designed a national prospective registry intended to capture all perilunate injuries suffered in Canada over a 2 year period. Within this registry, the investigators have an embedded cohort to capture all injuries that present to registered trial centres. These patients will be consented to the cohort and subsequently have extensive perioperative data recorded as well as both short and long-term follow-up (with no modification of treatment). All data collection (i.e. relevant demographics, injury characteristics, surgical and management parameters) will be obtained and managed by a customized REDCap database housed at the trial coordinating centre. The third arm of this trial is a retrospective cohort in which patients previously treated for PLIs will be contacted as asked if they would be willing come back to clinic and be follow for the remaining period of the 10-year study.
Participants, 14 years of age or older, clinically diagnosed with a perilunate injury and willing to adhere to the study protocol will be included for study participation. They must be willing and able to attend all recommended post-operative follow-up visits based on the advice of their surgeon. All participants will complete questionnaires and undergo both clinical and radiographic evaluations. These evaluations will begin at baseline, continue at the first post-operative visit, and the following intervals: 3, 6, 12, 24, 60 and 120 months. Individuals will be excluded if they have cognitive impairment or unable to understand what participation in this study entails, a known alcohol or drug abuser, or anticipated to be non-compliant. The investigators anticipate overall 150 patients entered into the cohort, an additional 150 in the registry arm, and 150 patients identified retrospectively.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Other
- Target follow-up
- 10 Years
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Registry Group | – | –Patients who sustain and present with a PLI injury will have two options for participating in the study. This first arm will evaluate clinical presentations, patient demographic, treatment methods and baseline patient-rated and radiographic outcomes. However, no research-related follow up visits will be conducted. Ongoing data from these participants will be collected from chart reviews of clinical follow-ups alone. |
| Prospective Group | – | –Participants who choose to enroll in the prospective arm will experience the same baseline data collection as those in the registry, with the addition of research-related follow up appointments that will allow research staff to measure and assess patient-rated and clinical outcomes, such as questionnaires and range of motion data. |
| Retrospective Group | – | –In this group, a chart review will be conducted to identify previously treated patients with perilunate injuries. Once identified, the patient will be contacted and ask if they are willing to come in for a long-term follow up visit where clinical, patient-rated, and radiographic data will be collected. If patients are unwilling to attend a long-term visit, our analysis will still include data collected from their chart reviews and electronic questionnaires. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 120 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who sustain a perilunate spectrum injury including dislocation and/or fracture.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- The subject is 14 years of age or older
- The subject has been clinically diagnosed with a perilunate injury
- The subject is willing to adhere to the study protocol including required post-operative therapy, all scheduled follow-up visits, evaluations, and questionnaires (if applicable).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There will be no limiting exclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
Time frame: Enrollment - 10 years
The upper extremity scoring scale DASH is a validated tool for disorders of the elbow with a range from 0 (least disability) to 100 (most disability). Ten is the average score in the general population and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is 10. DASH contains 30 questions asking participants about their ability to perform activities and their symptoms. Each question ranges from 1 (no difficulty) to 5 (unable). There is also optional work and sports/performing arts modules.
1 secondary outcome
Radiographs
Time frame: Enrollment - 10 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2022.
- Background: PubMed 22476357Garg B, Goyal T, Kotwal PP. Triple jeopardy: transscaphoid, transcapitate, transtriquetral, perilunate fracture dislocation. J Orthop Traumatol. 2013 Sep;14(3):223-6. doi: 10.1007/s10195-012-0195-x. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
- Background: PubMed 22854256Massoud AH, Naam NH. Functional outcome of open reduction of chronic perilunate injuries. J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Sep;37(9):1852-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.06.009. Epub 2012 Jul 31.
- Background: PubMed 25459380Vitale MA, Seetharaman M, Ruchelsman DE. Perilunate dislocations. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Feb;40(2):358-62; quiz 362. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 15. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21885701Stanbury SJ, Elfar JC. Perilunate dislocation and perilunate fracture-dislocation. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2011 Sep;19(9):554-62. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201109000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 24294157Capo JT, Corti SJ, Shamian B, Nourbakhsh A, Tan V, Kaushal N, Debkowska M. Treatment of dorsal perilunate dislocations and fracture-dislocations using a standardized protocol. Hand (N Y). 2012 Dec;7(4):380-7. doi: 10.1007/s11552-012-9452-y.
- Background: PubMed 9682074Kozin SH. Perilunate injuries: diagnosis and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998 Mar-Apr;6(2):114-20. doi: 10.5435/00124635-199803000-00006.
- Background: PubMed 11239263Perron AD, Brady WJ, Keats TE, Hersh RE. Orthopedic pitfalls in the ED: lunate and perilunate injuries. Am J Emerg Med. 2001 Mar;19(2):157-62. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2001.21306.
- Background: PubMed 16601413Weil WM, Slade JF 3rd, Trumble TE. Open and arthroscopic treatment of perilunate injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:120-32. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000205889.11824.03.
- Background: PubMed 9018612Sotereanos DG, Mitsionis GJ, Giannakopoulos PN, Tomaino MM, Herndon JH. Perilunate dislocation and fracture dislocation: a critical analysis of the volar-dorsal approach. J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Jan;22(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80179-0.
- Background: PubMed 7067286Adkison JW, Chapman MW. Treatment of acute lunate and perilunate dislocations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982 Apr;(164):199-207.
- Background: PubMed 17336837Souer JS, Rutgers M, Andermahr J, Jupiter JB, Ring D. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist: comparison of temporary screw versus K-wire fixation. J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Mar;32(3):318-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.01.008.
- Background: PubMed 26205701Muppavarapu RC, Capo JT. Perilunate Dislocations and Fracture Dislocations. Hand Clin. 2015 Aug;31(3):399-408. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2015.04.002.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Wrist Injuries
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postural Control and Balance Performance in Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Postural Assessment
Recruiting
No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older
Distal Radius Fracture, Casting
Recruiting
Comparison of Wrist Splint Positions in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS), Peripheral Neuropathies
Active, not recruiting
Immediate Mobilization Versus 2 Weeks Cast Immobilization After Distal Radius Fracture Treated With Volar Locking Plate
Distal Radius Fracture
Recruiting
Effects of Repetitive Peripheral Magnetic Stimulation(rPMS) on CTS(Carpal Tunnel Syndrome)
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Neil J White, MD, FRCSC principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Wrist Injuries and Carpal Bone Fracture, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Adina Tarcea, BMSc (4039563687, adina.tarcea@ucalgary.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) (time frame: Enrollment - 10 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04370626, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2022.