Prevention of Esophageal VaricesPhase 2/3NAVIGATENCT04365868
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Belapectin for the Prevention of Esophageal Varices in NASH Cirrhosis
A Phase 2/3 study testing belapectin in people with Prevention of Esophageal Varices and NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Galectin Therapeutics Inc. at 156 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Prevention of Esophageal Varices, NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, Cirrhosis
- What is being tested?
- belapectin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 357 participants
- Where
- 156 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 25 Jun 2020to 10 Apr 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Each subject must meet all of the following criteria to be enrolled in this study:
- Is male or female, ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age at the time of Screening.
- Is willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study-specific procedures.
- Has evidence of portal hypertension, with either one of the following:
- platelet count <150,000/mm3
- OR
Show all 38Show fewer
- documented hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) measurement >6 mmHg
- OR
- at least two of the following:
- spleen size ≥14 cm (documented by ultrasound, MRI, or CT scan)
- abdominal collateral circulation (documented by ultrasound, MRI, or CT scan or physical examination, ie, caput medusae)
- documented liver transient elastography (eg, FibroScan) ≥20 kilopascals (kPa).
- aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.
- Has a history confirming nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis, with at least one of the following:
- There is a historical liver biopsy showing cirrhosis with steatohepatitis. There is no evidence for a competing etiology for the cirrhosis.
- There is a historical liver biopsy showing steatohepatitis, and there is evidence of cirrhosis from clinical or imaging data or a second liver biopsy showing cirrhosis without all features of NASH (as the histological NASH lesions may have burnt out). There is no evidence for a competing etiology. There is at least 1 co-existing metabolic comorbidity at Screening: obesity (with either body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2 or waist circumference ≥102 cm [40 in, men] or ≥88 cm [35 in, women], or by ethnically appropriate cutpoints); hypertension (either on anti hypertensive drug therapy for at least 1 year or systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) >140/80 mm Hg); Type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] ≥6.5%, or on anti-diabetic medication for at least 1 year); or dyslipidemia (triglycerides ≥150 mg/dL or on drug therapy for hypertriglyceridemia for at least 6 months; high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ≤40 mg/dL [men] or ≤50 mg/dL [women]) to corroborate a diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
- There is a historical liver biopsy showing cirrhosis with steatosis but not steatohepatitis. There is no evidence for a competing etiology. There are at least 2 co-existing (or history of) metabolic comorbidities (with obesity or diabetes being one of them) to corroborate a diagnosis of NAFLD.
- There is a historical liver biopsy showing steatosis but now with cirrhosis either by clinical examination, imaging, or biopsy. If there is a current biopsy, it does not show evidence of steatosis or steatohepatitis as histological lesions may have burned out. There is no evidence for a competing etiology. There are at least 2 co existing (or history of) metabolic comorbidities (with obesity or diabetes being one of them) to corroborate a diagnosis of NAFLD.
- Patient with cirrhosis with current or previous imaging showing steatosis. There is no liver histology available. There is no evidence for a competing etiology. There are at least two co-existing or history of metabolic comorbidities with obesity or diabetes being one of them to corroborate a diagnosis of NAFLD.
- For patients not meeting the above mentioned criteria, a screening liver biopsy is necessary.
- Note: All liver biopsy blocks and/or slides for eligibility assessments (including those from historical biopsies) will be reviewed by the central study pathologist while the subject is in Screening. Results from the central study pathologist must be available before the subject is randomized.
- Absence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by valid imaging (eg, ultrasound, CT scan, or MRI) within 6 months prior to randomization. If no such imaging result is available, then ultrasound imaging should be performed as part of standard of care.
- Patients with diabetes mellitus can be enrolled, if they are adequately controlled on a stable dose or doses of antidiabetic medication(s) for at least 3 months before Screening, and their screening HbA1c is ≤9.5%.
- Patients on vitamin E or pioglitazone can be enrolled if they are on a stable dose and regimen for at least 3 months before screening, and the dose is expected to be held constant during the trial.
- Patients on a statin can be enrolled if they are on a stable regimen for at least 3 months before Screening, and expected to be held stable during the trial.
- Is not pregnant and must have a negative serum pregnancy test result prior to randomization.
- Is of non-childbearing potential or if a fertile man or woman participating in heterosexual relations, agrees to use two acceptable means of contraception (ie, 2 effective methods of contraception, one of which must be a physical barrier method [eg, male or female condom, diaphragm] when combined with a highly effective method of contraception [ie, a method with a failure rate of <1% per year when used consistently and correctly]) throughout his/her participation in this study and for 90 days after discontinuation of study treatment.
- Highly effective forms of contraception include:
- combined (estrogen and progestogen containing) hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (such as oral, intravaginal, transdermal) methods
- progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (such as oral, injectable, implantable)
- hormone-releasing intrauterine system (IUS)
- intrauterine device (IUD)
- bilateral tubal occlusion
- a vasectomized partner, provided that partner is the sole sexual partner of the women of childbearing potential trial participant and that the vasectomized partner has received medical assessment of the surgical success
- sexual abstinence (ie, a refraining from heterosexual intercourse during the entire period of the clinical trial, if it is the preferred and usual lifestyle of the subject).
- Surgically sterile males and females are not required to use contraception provided they have been considered surgically sterile for at least 6 months. Surgical sterility includes history of surgically successful vasectomy, hysterectomy, or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Postmenopausal women who have been amenorrheic for at least 2 years at the time of Screening will be considered sterile.
- If a lactating woman, agrees to discontinue nursing before the start of study treatment and refrain from nursing until 90 days after the last dose of study treatment.
- If a man, agrees to refrain from sperm donation throughout the study period and for a period of 90 days following the last dose of investigational medicinal product (IMP). Female subjects may not begin a cycle of ova donation or harvest throughout the study period and for a period of 90 days following the last dose of IMP.
Who cannot join
- Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study:
- Presence of esophageal, gastroesophageal, or isolated gastric varices, based on an upper gastrointestinal (GI) esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) exam conducted during Screening. Patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy could be enrolled.
- History of hepatic cirrhosis decompensation including any episode of variceal bleeding, ascites not controlled by medication, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or overt hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven grade ≥2 as assessed by the principal investigator), OR develops signs of hepatic cirrhosis decompensation during Screening.
- Known or suspected abuse of alcohol (>20 g/day for women or >30 g/day for men [on average per day]), as per medical history. Significant alcohol consumption is defined as more than 20 grams per day in females and more than 30 grams per day in males. On average, a standard drink in the United States is considered to be 14 grams of alcohol, equivalent to 12 fluid ounces of regular beer (5% alcohol), 5 fluid ounces of table wine (12% alcohol), or 1.5 fluid ounces of 80 proof spirits (40% alcohol).
- Alcohol dependence (ie, a score >8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test)
- Narcotics or any other drug abuse or dependence in the last 5 years
Show all 45Show fewer
- Prior trans-jugular intrahepatic portal-systemic (TIPS) shunt procedure
- Documented causes of liver disease other than NASH, including but not restricted to:
- Viral hepatitis, unless eradicated at least 3 years prior to Screening
- acute hepatitis A infection (presence of hepatitis A immunoglobulin M [IgM] at Screening)
- positive hepatitis B surface antigen
- positive hepatitis C virus (HCV) ribonucleic acid (to be performed prior to randomization in case of positive HCV antibody)
- Documented drug-induced liver disease
- Alcoholic liver disease
- Autoimmune hepatitis
- Wilson's disease
- Hemochromatosis
- Primary biliary cholangitis
- Primary sclerosing cholangitis
- Genetic hemochromatosis
- History or planned liver transplantation
- Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or positive HIV test at Screening
- Any of the following test or score:
- serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 5 × upper limit of normal (ULN)*
- serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) > 5 × ULN*
- Screening values will be obtained at Screening Visit 1 (SV1) and Screening Visit 2(SV2) (which will be separated by 2 to 4 weeks). A second screening value that is >50% higher than the first value should prompt re-evaluation of the severity of the underlying liver disease and eligibility for this trial. If a transaminase level at SV2 is >33% different from the level at SV1, then additional measurements should be performed at Screening Visit 3 (SV3). In such cases, the baseline transaminase levels will be established for subjects using the mean value of 4 evaluations [ie, at SV1, SV2, SV3, and Baseline (ie, pre-dose during Visit 1)].
- serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) > 2 × ULN
- mean platelet count < 50,000/mm3
- total bilirubin ≥ 2.0 mg/dL (subjects with a documented history of Gilbert's syndrome can be enrolled if the direct bilirubin is within normal reference range)
- model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥12
- Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Score ≥7 Note: Following Phase 2b, subjects with CTP scores ≥7 may be enrolled if recommended* by the Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) and approved by the Trial Steering Committee (TSC), based on the planned interim analysis (IA). [*based on DSMB review of preliminary results from a separate hepatic impairment clinical trial (Study GT-032) which is assessing belapectin safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) in cirrhotic subjects with CTP scores ≥7.
- estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min* *Note: per Modification of Diet in Renal Disease algorithm
- Taking an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, angiotensin II receptor blocker, or β-1 selective adrenergic receptor inhibitor, unless on a stable regimen for at least 3 months prior to Screening and no changes in the regimen are anticipated during the study. Subjects taking a non-selective beta blocker are not eligible to be enrolled (Investigators are encouraged to substitute another medication, if clinically warranted).
- History of major surgery during Screening.
- History of a solid organ transplant requiring immunosuppressive therapy.
- History of bariatric surgery within 1 year of randomization, or plan to undergo bariatric surgery during the study.
- Has positive screening test for illicit drugs of abuse at Screening.
- Has participated in an investigational new drug study within 30 days or 5 half-lives whichever is longer, prior to randomization.
- Has a history of malignancy within 5 years of randomization, except for basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and adequately treated in situ uterine cervical cancer.
- Has clinically significant cardiovascular disease (eg, uncontrolled hypertension, myocardial infarction, unstable angina), New York Heart Association Grade II or greater congestive heart failure, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention (eg, pacemaker/ablation) or Grade II or greater peripheral vascular disease.
- Has a history of clinically significant hematologic, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, neurological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, systemic inflammatory, metabolic or endocrine disorder or any other condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, renders the subject a poor candidate for inclusion into the study.
- Has known allergies to the IMP or any of its excipients.
- Has previously received belapectin within 6 months of randomization.
- Is an employee or family member of the Investigator or study center personnel.
Trial locations and contacts
156 sites in 15 countries.
156 sites in 15 countries
United States81 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Texas Clinical Research Institute, LLC
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Digestive Healthcare of Georgia, P.C.
Atlanta, Georgia, 30309
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Liver Specialists of Texas
Austin, Texas, 78757
Mercy Medical Center - The Institute for Digestive Health and Liver Disease
Baltimore, Maryland, 21202
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111-1552
Hope Clinical Research, Inc.
Canoga Park, California, 91303
The Institute for Liver Health
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
UNC-Chapel Hill School of Medicine
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 273302
Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC)
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
University of Virginia School of Medicine
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908
Galen Medical Group - Ziegler Plaza
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37343-5470
University Diabetes & Endocrine Consultants
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37411
Consultants for Clinical Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45249
University of Cincinnati Physicians Company, LLC
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0595
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44016
Peak Gastroenterology Associates
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80907-6262
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Southern California GI & Liver Centers
Coronado, California, 92118
Methodist Transplant Physicians
Dallas, Texas, 75203
Texoma Liver Center PLLC. - Denison
Denison, Texas, 75020
Henry Ford Health System - Hemophilia and Thrombosis Treatment Center
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Integrity Clinical Research, LLC (ICR SITES) - Doral
Doral, Florida, 33166
Digestive Health Specialists
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
South Texas Research Institute
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Cumberland Research Associates, LLC
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304-3571
Gastroenterology Associates of Fredericksburg
Fredericksburg, Virginia, 22401-8425
Gastro One - GI Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy Center - 1310 Wolf Park
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Arizona Liver Health - Glendale
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Associates in Gastroenterology
Hermitage, Tennessee, 37067
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Baylor College of Medicine - Baylor Clinic - Abdominal Transplant & Liver Disease Clinic
Houston, Texas, 77030
Pioneer Research Solutions Inc - Houston - Stancliff Rd
Houston, Texas, 77099
IU Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Nature Coast Clinical Research, LLC
Inverness, Florida, 34452
Southern Therapy and Advanced Research (STAR) - Jackson
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Mayo Clinic Hospital - Florida
Jacksonville, Florida, 32224-1865
East Tennessee Research Institute - Gastrointestinal Associates of Northeast Tennessee, P.C.
Johnson City, Tennessee, 37604-6063
Kansas City Research Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
University of California San Diego Medical Center -La Jolla Multi-Specialty Clinics- Perlman Offices
La Jolla, California, 92037
Florida Research Institute
Lakewood Rch, Florida, 34211
Om Research LLC
Lancaster, California, 93534
Excel Clinical Research - Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109-6209
Liver Wellness Center - Little Rock
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-6414
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
University of Louisville Physicians - Cardiovascular Medicine Physicians Outpatient Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202-2046
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC
Macon, Georgia, 31201
ClinCloud LLC
Maitland, Florida, 32751-3320
Gastrointestinal Specialists of Georgia, PC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Tandem Clinical Research, LLC
Marrero, Louisiana, 70072
Loyola University Health System
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Advanced Pharma CR, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33147
Genoma Research Group, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33165
Lucas Research
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Tulane Cancer Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112-2600
Mount Sinai Beth Israel
New York, New York, 10003
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, 10016-6402
NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center
New York, New York, 10021
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Bon Secours Liver Institute of Virginia - Newport News
Newport News, Virginia, 23602
Sensible Healthcare
Ocoee, Florida, 34761
inSite Digestive Health Care - Orange
Orange, California, 92868
California Liver Research Institute
Pasadena, California, 91105
The Jefferson Digestive Health Institute - Thomas Jefferson University
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) - The Center for Liver Diseases
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Inland Empire Liver Foundation
Rialto, California, 92377
Bon Secours Liver Institute of Virginia - Richmond
Richmond, Virginia, 23226
Hunter Holmes McGuire VA Medical Center
Richmond, Virginia, 23249-0001
University of Utah Health Care - UUHC - Kidney & Liver Clinic
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132-0001
The Texas Liver Institute, Inc.
San Antonio, Texas, 78215
Pinnacle Clinical Research
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Michiana Gastroenterology, Inc.
South Bend, Indiana, 46635
Velocity Clinical Research, Spokane
Spokane, Washington, 99202-3462
Guardian Angel Health Services, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33614
Kansas Medical Clinic PA
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Institute for Liver Health - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Impact Research Institute
Waco, Texas, 76710-2582
Gastroenterology Associates of Western Michigan
Wyoming, Michigan, 49519
Florida Medical Center & Research
Zephyrhills, Florida, 33542
Mexico13 sites
CICPA Centro de Investigación Clinica del Pacifico
Acapulco de Juárez, Guerrero, 39670
Centro de Investigación Medica de Aguascalientes
Aguascalientes, Aguascalientes, 20116
Investigacion Biomedica para el desarrollo de farmacos SA de CV
Benito Juárez, Mexico City, 03103
MEDIVEST Centro de Investigacion integral
Chihuahua City, Chihuahua, 31203
Consultorio Medico
Ciudad de Mexico, State of Mexico, 6700
CEMDEC SA de CV Centro Mexicano de Desarrollo de Estudios Clinicos
Cuauhtémoc, Mexico City, 06100
Centro de Investigacion Medico Biologica y Terapia Avanzada SC
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44130
Medical Care and Research SA de CV
Mérida, Yucatán, 97070
Centro Especializado en Diabetes, Obesidad y Pevencion de enfermedades Cadiovasculares SC.
Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City, 11650
Hospital Universitario Dr. Jose Eleuterio Gonzalez Servicio de Gastroenterología
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Oaxaca Site Management Organization SC.
Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, 68000
Centro de Investigacion Clinica de Oaxaca
Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, 68020
Investigacion Biomedica para el desarrollo de farmacos SA de CV
Zapopan, Jalisco, 45070
France10 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Amiens
Amiens, France, 80054
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, France, 93000
CHU Hôpital Henri Mondor
Créteil, France, 94000
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, France, 38043
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
Lyon, France, 69004
CHRU Montpellier - Saint Eloi
Montpellier, France, 34090
CHU Nancy - Hôpital Brabois
Nancy, France, 54511
CHU de Nice - L'Archet
Nice, France, 6202
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, France, 75014
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg - Hôpital Civil
Strasbourg, France, 67091
Israel8 sites
Soroka Medical Center
Beersheba, 84101
Rambam Medical Center
Haifa, 3109601
Carmel Medical Center
Haifa, 34362
Hadassah Ein Karem Hospital
Jerusalem, 91120
Holy Family Hospital
Nazareth, 16100
Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital
Petah Tikva, 4941492
The Chaim Sheba Medical Center - The Center for Liver Diseases
Ramat Gan, 52621
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, 64239
Spain8 sites
Hospital del Mar Research Institute
Barcelona, Spain, 8003
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Madrid, ESP, 28041
Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal
Madrid, Spain, 28034
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, Spain, 28046
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Spain, 28222
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra
Pontevedra, Spain, 36071
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
Santander, Spain, 39008
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío
Seville, Spain, 41013
Australia5 sites
Royal Adelaide Hospital
Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Box Hill Hospital
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Monash Medical Centre Clayton
Clayton, Victoria, 3168
Nepean Hospital
Kingswood, New South Wales, 2750
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Belgium5 sites
Clinique Universitaire De Bruxelles Hôpital Erasme VZW
Brussels, BEL, 1070
Antwerp University Hospital
Edegem, Antwerpen, 2650
AZ Maria Middelares
Ghent, VOV, 9000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, VOV, 9000
Groupe sante CHC - Clinique du MontLegia
Liège, WLG, 4000
Canada5 sites
Brampton Civic Hospital
Brampton, Ontario, L6R 3J7
University of Calgary - Heritage Medical Research Clinic - Foothills Hospital Center
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9
Toronto Liver Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M6H 3M1
Pacific Gastroenterology Associates
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5
Chile4 sites
Hospital de La Serena
La Serena, CHL, 1710216
Clínica Universidad de los Andes
Santiago, CHL, 7550000
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile
Santiago, 8380000
Centro de Investigaciones Clinicas Vina del Mar
Viña del Mar, CHL, 07081-2221
Poland4 sites
SP CSK im Prof. Kornela Gibińskiego Śląskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-752
Medical University of Lodz
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 91-347
ID Clinic
Mysłowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-400
Medyczny Katedra i Klinika Chorób Zakaźnych, Chorób Wątroby i Nabytych Niedoborów Odpornościowych
Wroclaw, Poland, 50-220
South Korea4 sites
Digestive Research Alliance of Michiana, LLC
Incheon, 400-711
Hanyang University Seoul Hospital
Seoul, KOR, 4763
Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Seoul, KOR, 8308
Yonsei University, Wonju Severance Christian Hospital
Wŏnju, KOR, 26426
Argentina3 sites
Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, ARG, C1181ACH
Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires
Buenos Aires, ARG, C1280AEB
Centro de Investigaciones Metabólicas (CINME)
Capital Federal, ARG, C1056ABJ
Germany3 sites
Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main
Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 60590
EUGASTRO GmbH
Leipzig, Saxony, 4103
Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universitat Mainz
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131
United Kingdom2 sites
King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
London, GBR, SE5 9RS
The University of Nottingham - Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre Biomedical Research Unit
Nottingham, NGM, NG7 2UH
Puerto Rico1 site
Fundacion de Investigacion de Diego
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00927
About this study
Official title: A Seamless, Adaptive, Phase 2b/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, International Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Belapectin (GR MD-02) for the Prevention of Esophageal Varices in NASH Cirrhosis
This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension but without esophageal varices at baseline.
- Being tested
- belapectin, Placebo
- Keywords
- esophageal varices, belapectin, GR-MD-02, portal hypertension, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis, NASH, cirrhosis
- Medical subject headings
- Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Fibrosis, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Hypertension, Portal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
belapectinDrug
Also called GR-MD-02, galactoarabino rhamnogalacturonate
intravenous
PlaceboDrug
intravenous
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| belapectin 2 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM) | Experimental | Phase 2b: Belapectin 2 mg/kg lean body mass administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months)
Phase 3: The patient will be switched to the optimal dose Receives: Drug: belapectin |
| belapectin 4 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM) | Experimental | Phase 2b: Belapectin 4 mg/kg lean body mass administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months)
Phase 3: The patient will be switched to the optimal dose Receives: Drug: belapectin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Phase 2b: Placebo, administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months)
Phase 3:Placebo, administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months) Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups Who Develop New Esophageal Varices at 78 Weeks [18 Months] of Treatment Compared to Placebo
Proportion of patients in the belapectin treatment groups who develop new esophageal varices at 78 weeks [18 months] of treatment compared to placebo.
Measured: At 78 weeks [18 months]
Secondary outcomes (18)
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Varices (Esophageal or Gastric) Requiring Treatment
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop varices (esophageal or gastric) requiring treatment.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Variceal Bleed Requiring Hospitalization
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop variceal bleed requiring hospitalization.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Clinically Significant Ascites Requiring Hospitalization
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Hepatic Encephalopathy (West Haven Score ≥2 and Requiring Hospitalization)
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization).
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Mortality (All-cause)
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop mortality (all-cause).
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Liver Transplant
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop liver transplant.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin treatment groups, compared to placebo, who develop model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Phase 3 Treatment Group Who Progress to Large Varices (Gastric or Esophageal) or Develop Red Wales Compared to Placebo.
Efficacy: Cumulative incidence rate of patients in the belapectin Phase 3 treatment group who progress to large varices (gastric or esophageal) or develop red wales compared to placebo.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Progression to Large Varices or Red Wales
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, progression to large varices or red wales by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Requiring Hospitalization
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, esophageal variceal hemorrhage requiring hospitalization by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Clinically Significant Ascites Requiring Hospitalization
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, clinically significant ascites requiring hospitalization by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy (West Haven Score ≥2 and Requiring Hospitalization)
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, overt hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven score ≥2 and requiring hospitalization) by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Score Increase of ≥2 Points (From Baseline)
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score increase of ≥2 points (from baseline) by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score Increase to ≥15 as Measured on 2 Consecutive Occasions
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score increase to ≥15 as measured on 2 consecutive occasions by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Liver Transplant
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver transplant by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Liver-related Death
Number of participants who experienced first cirrhosis related clinical event, liver-related death by week 78.
Measured: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Apr 2020
- Study start25 Jun 2020
- Primary completion11 Mar 2025
- Study completion10 Apr 2025
Why it stopped: Based on FDA feedback, Stage 1 of NAVIGATE was analyzed as a stand-alone trial. Study was not prematurely terminated for safety reasons.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Prevention of Esophageal VaricesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 357 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Khurram Jamil, M.D., Study director, Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04365868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GT-031
- Acronym
- NAVIGATE
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Seamless, Adaptive, Phase 2b/3, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, International Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Belapectin (GR MD-02) for the Prevention of Esophageal Varices in NASH Cirrhosis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04365868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NAVIGATE / GT-031
- Keywords
- esophageal varices, belapectin, GR-MD-02, portal hypertension, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis, NASH, cirrhosis
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Based on FDA feedback, Stage 1 of NAVIGATE was analyzed as a stand-alone trial. Study was not prematurely terminated for safety reasons.
- Enrolment
- 357 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Galectin Therapeutics Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 25 Jun 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Apr 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 30 Jun 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This seamless, adaptive, two-stage, Phase 2b/3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel-groups, placebo-controlled study will assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of belapectin compared with placebo in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) cirrhosis and clinical signs of portal hypertension but without esophageal varices at baseline.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| belapectin 2 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM) | Experimental | Drug: belapectinPhase 2b: Belapectin 2 mg/kg lean body mass administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months) Phase 3: The patient will be switched to the optimal dose |
| belapectin 4 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM) | Experimental | Drug: belapectinPhase 2b: Belapectin 4 mg/kg lean body mass administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months) Phase 3: The patient will be switched to the optimal dose |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPhase 2b: Placebo, administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months) Phase 3:Placebo, administered intravenously (IV) every other week for 78 weeks (18 months) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (38 listed)
- Is male or female, ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years of age at the time of Screening.
- Is willing and able to provide written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study-specific procedures.
- Has evidence of portal hypertension, with either one of the following:
- OR
- OR
Key exclusion criteria (45 listed)
- Presence of esophageal, gastroesophageal, or isolated gastric varices, based on an upper gastrointestinal (GI) esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) exam conducted during Screening. Patients with portal hypertensive gastropathy could be enrolled.
- History of hepatic cirrhosis decompensation including any episode of variceal bleeding, ascites not controlled by medication, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis or overt hepatic encephalopathy (West Haven grade ≥2 as assessed by the principal investigator), OR develops signs of hepatic cirrhosis decompensation during Screening.
- Known or suspected abuse of alcohol (>20 g/day for women or >30 g/day for men [on average per day]), as per medical history. Significant alcohol consumption is defined as more than 20 grams per day in females and more than 30 grams per day in males. On average, a standard drink in the United States is considered to be 14 grams of alcohol, equivalent to 12 fluid ounces of regular beer (5% alcohol), 5 fluid ounces of table wine (12% alcohol), or 1.5 fluid ounces of 80 proof spirits (40% alcohol).
- Alcohol dependence (ie, a score >8 on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test)
- Narcotics or any other drug abuse or dependence in the last 5 years
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| belapectinAlso: GR-MD-02, galactoarabino rhamnogalacturonateintravenous | Drug | belapectin 2 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM), belapectin 4 mg/kg lean body mass (LBM) |
| Placebointravenous | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups Who Develop New Esophageal Varices at 78 Weeks [18 Months] of Treatment Compared to Placebo
Time frame: At 78 weeks [18 months]
Proportion of patients in the belapectin treatment groups who develop new esophageal varices at 78 weeks [18 months] of treatment compared to placebo.
18 secondary outcomes
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Varices (Esophageal or Gastric) Requiring Treatment
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Variceal Bleed Requiring Hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Clinically Significant Ascites Requiring Hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Hepatic Encephalopathy (West Haven Score ≥2 and Requiring Hospitalization)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Mortality (All-cause)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Liver Transplant
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups, Compared to Placebo, Who Develop Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score ≥15
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Cumulative Incidence Rate of Patients in the Belapectin Phase 3 Treatment Group Who Progress to Large Varices (Gastric or Esophageal) or Develop Red Wales Compared to Placebo.
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Progression to Large Varices or Red Wales
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Requiring Hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Clinically Significant Ascites Requiring Hospitalization
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy (West Haven Score ≥2 and Requiring Hospitalization)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) Score Increase of ≥2 Points (From Baseline)
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) Score Increase to ≥15 as Measured on 2 Consecutive Occasions
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Liver Transplant
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Efficacy: Event-free Survival by Time to First Cirrhosis Related Clinical Event, Liver-related Death
Time frame: Through study end, 78 weeks or 156 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Hepatology Journal Article- Efficacy and safety of belapectin for the prevention of esophageal varices in patients with MASH cirrhosis: The randomized, placebo-controlled NAVIGATE trialLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Prevention of Esophageal Varices
Not yet recruiting
Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Gastric Varices
Gastric Varices Bleeding, Gastric Varices
Not yet recruiting
Underdilated VCX-TIPS Versus EVL Plus NSBB for Secondary Prophylaxis of Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis
Liver Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Beta-blockers or Placebo for Primary Prophylaxis (BOPPP) of Oesophageal Varices Trial.
Cirrhosis, Liver, Portal Hypertension
Recruiting
Carvedilol for Pre-primary Prophylaxis of Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis
Cirrhosis
Recruiting
Esophageal Varices Prophylaxis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab
Esophageal and/or Gastric Varices, Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Khurram Jamil, M.D. study director
Galectin Therapeutics Inc.
156 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing belapectin in people with Prevention of Esophageal Varices and NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Galectin Therapeutics Inc. at 156 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 38 inclusion and 45 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 156 sites in United States, Mexico, France, Israel, Spain and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Jun 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Patients in the Belapectin Treatment Groups Who Develop New Esophageal Varices at 78 Weeks [18 Months] of Treatment Compared to Placebo (time frame: At 78 weeks [18 months]). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2026.