AzTrials
AzTrials

Spasticity, MuscleNCT04365478

Early Radial Shock Waves Treatment on Spasticity in Patients With Stroke in Sub-acute Phase

A study testing Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Conventional physiotherapy in people with Spasticity, Muscle and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, run by Stefano Brunelli at 1 site in Italy.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Hands and wrist spasticity are a common post stroke complication and often lead to restrictions in daily living activities. Spasticity causes changes in muscle composition such as accumulation of collagenous connective tissue and progressive loss of skeletal muscle fibres and these changes start almost immediately… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Conventional physiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
2 May 2020to 27 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of hemiparesis after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Onset of spasticity within 3 months from acute stroke
  • First-stroke survivors with confirmed brain lesions by tomography or magnetic resonance imaging
  • Adults (age between 18 and 80 years)
  • Post-stroke upper limb spasticity ranging 1-4 according to the Modified Ashworth Scale

Who cannot join

  • No treatment of the limb spasticity with botulinum toxin, phenol, alcohol, or surgery in the last 6 months
  • Presence of an unstable medical condition
  • Contraindications to shock waves treatment (pregnancy, cancer, coagulopathies, pacemakers, skin pathologies)
  • Global aphasia
  • All subjects who scored above 25 on the Mini-Mental State Examination

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Stefano Brunelli

    Roma, 00179

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effects of an Early Radial Shock Waves Therapy on Spasticity of the Upper Limb and on Functional Outcome in Patients With Stroke in Subacute Phase

Hands and wrist spasticity are a common post stroke complication and often lead to restrictions in daily living activities. Spasticity causes changes in muscle composition such as accumulation of collagenous connective tissue and progressive loss of skeletal muscle fibres and these changes start almost immediately after a vascular event. Radial Shock Wave Therapy (rSWT) is a valid alternative rehabilitating tool in managing chronic spasticity but no study has so far investigated the effect in a recently onset hemiparesis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an early radial shock wave therapy in improving spasticity of the upper limb in patients with a recent onset stroke. The secondary outcome is to investigate the improvement of upper limb motor functionality, passive range of motion and joint pain and to determine if it can lead to a better performance in daily living activities. This study is a randomized controlled trial double arm single blind. The investigators plan to enrol 40 hemiplegic patients with sub-acute stroke and randomly assign them to an experimental or control group. The experimental group (EG) will perform one radial shock wave therapy session a week for 8 weeks administered during the daily morning 40 minutes of conventional rehabilitation treatment. The control group (CG) 40-minutes of conventional rehabilitation treatment for 5 days per week in the morning for 8 weeks. All patients performed in the afternoon a second daily session of 40 minutes of conventional rehabilitation therapy 5 days per week. The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (with motricity, Passive Range of Motion (PROM) and pain sub-scores of upper extremity part of the scale), Modified Barthel Index and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for patient's benefit perceived, will be evaluated before and a week after the last intervention. MAS will be administered once a week, before rSWT treatment. The investigators plan to have a 1 month follow up during which every outcome measure will be administered. The investigators hypothesize that radial shock waves therapy, started early and associated with traditional physiotherapy, may be more effective in promoting the reduction of spasticity and pain of the upper limb, improve its functionality and therefore a reduction in disability, compared to conventional rehabilitation treatment. A reduction in the use of analgesic and muscle relaxants drugs is also conceivable

Being tested
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Conventional physiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Muscle Spasticity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave TherapyProcedure or surgery

    rSWT group: One radial shock wave therapy session a week for 8 weeks (parameters: 1.5 bar, 10 Hz, 2000 shots for each muscle group treated) administered daily during the morning for 40 minutes of conventional rehabilitation treatment.

  • Conventional physiotherapyProcedure or surgery

    Control group: 40-minutes of conventional rehabilitation treatment 5 days per week in the morning (strength exercise, trunk control exercise, stretching exercise, occupational therapy, and neurodevelopmental facilitation techniques) for 8 weeks

Study groups in NCT04365478
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
rSWT groupExperimentalRadial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on spastic muscles of upper limb
Receives: Procedure: Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy
Control groupActive comparatorconventional physiotherapy
Receives: Procedure: Conventional physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 9 weeks and at 13 weeks

    A 6-point scale grading the resistance of a relaxed limb to rapid passive stretch

    Measured: baseline the first rSWT treatment, at 9 weeks (1 week after the last treatment) and at 13 weeks (follow up at 4 weeks after the last treatment)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Change from baseline FUGL-MEYER ASSESSMENT UPPER EXTREMITY (FMA-UE) at 9 weeks and at 13 weeks

    It is designed to assess motor functioning, sensation, pain and joint functioning in patients with post-stroke hemiplegia.

    Measured: baseline the first rSWT treatment, at 9 weeks (1 week after the last treatment) and at 13 weeks (follow up at 4 weeks after the last treatment)

  2. Change from baseline Barthel Index at 9 weeks and at 13 weeks

    it is a 10-item ordinal scale that cover mobility and self-care domains; scores range from 0 (total dependence in ADL) to 100 (complete independence)

    Measured: baseline the first rSWT treatment, at 9 weeks (1 week after the last treatment) and at 13 weeks (follow up at 4 weeks after the last treatment)

  3. visual analogue scale (VAS)

    to rate their degree of perceived benefit from treatment

    Measured: at 9 weeks (at the end of the last rESWT treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Apr 2020
  2. Study start2 May 2020
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2021
  4. Study completion27 Sep 2021

Why it stopped: The study was suspended due to difficulties in recalling participants to follow up due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04365478
Sponsor's protocol ID
Prot. CE/PROG.768 FSL
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
20 Apr 2020
Last updated
1 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

Publications

  • Sommerfeld DK, Eek EU, Svensson AK, Holmqvist LW, von Arbin MH. Spasticity after stroke: its occurrence and association with motor impairments and activity limitations. Stroke. 2004 Jan;35(1):134-9. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000105386.05173.5E. Epub 2003 Dec 18.

    PubMed 14684785
  • Lee SS, Spear S, Rymer WZ. Quantifying changes in material properties of stroke-impaired muscle. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2015 Mar;30(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 21.

    PubMed 25638688
  • Manganotti P, Amelio E. Long-term effect of shock wave therapy on upper limb hypertonia in patients affected by stroke. Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1967-71. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000177880.06663.5c. Epub 2005 Aug 18.

    PubMed 16109905

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Conventional physiotherapy in people with Spasticity, Muscle and Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy, run by Stefano Brunelli at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was suspended due to difficulties in recalling participants to follow up due to restrictions related to the COVID-19 pandemic). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change from baseline Modified Ashworth Scale at 9 weeks and at 13 weeks (time frame: baseline the first rSWT treatment, at 9 weeks (1 week after the last treatment) and at 13 weeks (follow up at 4 weeks after the last treatment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04365478, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in