Chronic SinusitisPhase 2NCT04362501
Efficacy of Dupilumab for Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP)
A Phase 2 study testing dupilumab in people with Chronic Sinusitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Sinusitis
- What is being tested?
- dupilumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 33 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 15 Oct 2020to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-75 with history of chronic sinusitis without polyps
- SNOT-22 score of at least 30 at baseline
- Bilateral Lund-Mackay CT score 4 or more and/or MLK endoscopy score 4 or more
- Blood eosinophil count of at least 300/ul and/or SPT positive to at least 5/30 allergens, or eosinophil less than 300/ul and SPT negative (Th2 low group).
- Prior oral steroid or antibiotic use is acceptable but not required for entry
- Informed Consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- Effective birth control (with <1% failure rate), post menopausal or documented abstinence
- Women ≥50 years old would be considered postmenopausal if they have been amenorrheic for 12 months or more following cessation of all exogenous hormonal treatment.
- All male subjects who are sexually active must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception (condom or vasectomy) from V1-V16
Who cannot join
- Immunosuppression other than oral steroids in the past 3 months
- History of nasal polyps within the past 3 years or noted at screening by CT or endoscopy
- Acute sinusitis at the time of entry
- Acute fungal sinusitis at the time of entry
- Uncontrolled asthma
- Cystic fibrosis
Show all 31Show fewer
- Primary immune deficiency including CVID
- Other; serious concomitant illness or sinus disease that the investigator determines to disqualify
- A history of known immunodeficiency disorder including HIV
- History of hepatitis B or C
- Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD)
- Use of any biologic medication within the last 5 months or 5 half-lives whichever is longer
- Receipt of any investigational non-biologic within 5 half-lives prior to visit 0
- Receipt of immunoglobulin or blood products within 30 days prior to V1
- Scheduled sinus surgery
- Significant structural abnormalities or severe septal deviation
- Symptomatic or untreated life threatening cardiopulmonary disorders
- History of cancer not in remission at least 5 years prior to the date informed consent
- Subjects who are febrile (≥38°C; ≥100.4°F);
- Untreated helminth parasitic infection within 24 weeks prior to informed consent
- Pregnant or nursing
- Any other medical illness that precludes study involvement
- History of anaphylaxis to any biologic therapy or vaccine
- The following medications are excluded:
- Any type of anti-interleukin therapy (e.g. Omalizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab mepolizumab, reslizumab, lebrikizumab etc.) within the last 5 months or 5 half-lives whichever is longer
- Receipt of any investigational non-biologic within 30 days or 5 half-lives prior to visit 0, whichever is longer.
- Immunosuppressive medications such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tacrolimus
- Receipt of immunoglobulin or blood products within 30 days prior to the date informed consent is obtained.
- Daily high dose aspirin greater than 81mg daily
- Allergen Immunotherapy during build-up phase during the last three months
- Other medications that could interfere with the action of dupilumab or suppress eosinophils
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Dupilumab for Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP): a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Phase II Study
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. The additional information gained from secondary and exploratory outcomes will help provide important insight for applied research studies and may also provide practical guidance to clinicians on how to select patients for treatment.
Read the detailed description
Approximately 12% of adults in the United States, United Kingdom and other industrialized nations suffer from chronic sinus disease. Corticosteroids and antibiotic regimens are often used to treat the condition but the level of evidence to justify this approach is limited and at best offers only a transient solution. Furthermore, adverse side effects from the use of long-term oral steroids and concerns about skewing of the mucosal microbiota from overuse of antibiotics make these options problematic.
Currently, there are insufficient options for the approximately 30 million patients in the US suffering from chronic sinus disease. Recent phase 3 clinical trials found that dupilumab, an anti-IL4α receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces symptoms and polyp size in individuals with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Similarly anti-IL5 antibodies have also been shown to have modest efficacy in this group of patients. However, for the approximately 65% of individuals with non-polyp related chronic sinus disease, these agents were not evaluated and there remains few viable options for therapy.
Chronic rhinosinusitis is defined as symptoms of nasal obstruction, facial pain or pressure, and mucopurulent drainage for at least 12 weeks along with evidence of mucosal disease by radiographic evidence or rhinoscopy. At least ten endotypes have been described although there is considerable overlap in terms of mucosal morphology, allergic status, the presence of polypoid tissue, and expression of biomarkers such as cytokines, specific IgE and other proteins. It may be incorrect to assume that the effectiveness of dupilumab demonstrated for those suffering with nasal polyps is exclusive to this CRS cluster alone.
One aspect to explain the differential effects of certain drugs and biologics on the treatment of CRS relates to host nasal and sinus microbial environment. The microbiome of CRS patients has been found to have reduced diversity, increased bacterial populations, and ultimately to have less stable bacterial networks. This imbalance of the microbiome may be a potential cause for sinus inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that Propionibacterium acnes for example, acts as an important stabilizing organism in the bacterial networks. Removal of this bacterial species e.g. from antibiotic use, may allow for more pathogenic organisms such as Staphylococcus or Streptococcus to flourish leading to increased inflammation.
An example of how Staphylococcus aureus may increase inflammation is through the production of superantigen that is thought to skew nasal inflammatory responses towards a Th2 dominated disease endotype. Other groups, have concluded that the host mucosal microbiota helps predict disease severity and might also predict susceptibility to certain therapies. Indeed, treatment with certain antibiotics has shown to modulate mucosal bacterial populations leading to clinical improvement and reduced polyp formation in some patients. It is not known whether host microbial and inflammatory milieu adequately predicts polyp formation or helps predict treatment success in the presence of dupilumab. The current study will include investigation of this important exploratory outcome.
The investigators have previously shown that modulation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses can impact dendritic cell and basophil responses in vitro and that these changes correlate with treatment success of patients with chronic allergic rhinosinusitis. The investigators also more recently discovered that IL-4 and IL-13 secreted by human basophils upregulates CD20 (mannose receptor), CD23 (FcεRII) and pSTAT6 expression on monocytes, while also promoting CCL17 (TARC) production by these cells. Other investigators have shown that the mannose receptor on monocytes negatively modulates TLR-4 innate immune signaling on dendritic cells that in turn affects T-cell polarization and response to allergens. The investigators might expect dupilumab to help attenuate this pathway resulting in a reduction of local sIgE production in the mucosa for example. It is already known that dupilumab reduces the expression of other inflammatory mediators such as CCL17 in asthma and atopic dermatitis. These aspects will be examined in the exploratory investigations using cell culture assays, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence pre and post treatment.
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. The additional information gained from secondary and exploratory outcomes will help provide important insight for applied research studies and may also provide practical guidance to clinicians on how to select patients for treatment.
- Conditions
- Chronic Sinusitis
- Being tested
- dupilumab, placebo
- Keywords
- sinusitis, chronic, treatment, non-polyposis
- Medical subject headings
- Sinusitis, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dupilumabBiological
Also called Dupixent
300mg dupixent SC every two weeks for six months
placeboDrug
placebo SC injection every two weeks for six months
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumab treatment group | Experimental | dupilumab treatment group Receives: Biological: dupilumab |
| placebo group | Placebo comparator | placebo group Receives: Drug: placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
SNOT-22
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey score after six months treatment (range 0-110). Higher score means worse symptoms.
Measured: Every two weeks for six months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Mini-RQLQ
Mini-RQLQ (Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life) validated survey (0-84). Higher score means worse symptoms.
Measured: Every two weeks for six months
UPSIT
University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) smell test (0-40). Higher score means better sense of smell.
Measured: Every two weeks for six months
Rescue medication
Rescue medication use of corticosteroids. Specifically, prednisone mg use total over six month period.
Measured: Every two weeks for six months
CT Score
Sinus CT Lund-Mackay (LM) score (0-24). Higher score means larger polyps.
Measured: Once at screening and then at six month final visit
Rhinoscopy Score
Rhinoscopy modified Lund-Kennedy (MLK) score (0-12). Higher score means worse sinus disease.
Measured: Once at screening and then at six month final visit
Drop out rate rate
Number of patients who leave the study. Individual participants will be considered to have dropped out if they leave the study for any reason during the six month treatment period. A total count will be collected over the entire study length estimated to be three years. This number will be divided by the total enrollment number to determine the rate of drop out.
Measured: Continuous during entire length of study which is three years.
Adverse event rate
Significant Adverse Reactions (SAE). Individual participants will be monitored for serious adverse events during the six month treatment period. A total count will be collected over the entire study length estimated to be three years. This number will be divided by the total enrollment number to determine the rate of adverse events.
Measured: Continuous during entire length of study which is three years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Apr 2020
- Study start15 Oct 2020
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025
- Study completion30 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic SinusitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- double blind randomized placebo controlled
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jody Tversky, Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04362501
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00229130
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 3 Nov 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Nov 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Dupilumab for Patients With Chronic Rhinosinusitis Without Nasal Polyps (CRSsNP): a Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04362501
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00229130
- Conditions
- Chronic Sinusitis
- Keywords
- sinusitis, chronic, treatment, non-polyposis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 33 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 15 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. The additional information gained from secondary and exploratory outcomes will help provide important insight for applied research studies and may also provide practical guidance to clinicians on how to select patients for treatment.
Detailed description
Approximately 12% of adults in the United States, United Kingdom and other industrialized nations suffer from chronic sinus disease. Corticosteroids and antibiotic regimens are often used to treat the condition but the level of evidence to justify this approach is limited and at best offers only a transient solution. Furthermore, adverse side effects from the use of long-term oral steroids and concerns about skewing of the mucosal microbiota from overuse of antibiotics make these options problematic.
Currently, there are insufficient options for the approximately 30 million patients in the US suffering from chronic sinus disease. Recent phase 3 clinical trials found that dupilumab, an anti-IL4α receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces symptoms and polyp size in individuals with CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Similarly anti-IL5 antibodies have also been shown to have modest efficacy in this group of patients. However, for the approximately 65% of individuals with non-polyp related chronic sinus disease, these agents were not evaluated and there remains few viable options for therapy.
Chronic rhinosinusitis is defined as symptoms of nasal obstruction, facial pain or pressure, and mucopurulent drainage for at least 12 weeks along with evidence of mucosal disease by radiographic evidence or rhinoscopy. At least ten endotypes have been described although there is considerable overlap in terms of mucosal morphology, allergic status, the presence of polypoid tissue, and expression of biomarkers such as cytokines, specific IgE and other proteins. It may be incorrect to assume that the effectiveness of dupilumab demonstrated for those suffering with nasal polyps is exclusive to this CRS cluster alone.
One aspect to explain the differential effects of certain drugs and biologics on the treatment of CRS relates to host nasal and sinus microbial environment. The microbiome of CRS patients has been found to have reduced diversity, increased bacterial populations, and ultimately to have less stable bacterial networks. This imbalance of the microbiome may be a potential cause for sinus inflammation. Studies have demonstrated that Propionibacterium acnes for example, acts as an important stabilizing organism in the bacterial networks. Removal of this bacterial species e.g. from antibiotic use, may allow for more pathogenic organisms such as Staphylococcus or Streptococcus to flourish leading to increased inflammation.
An example of how Staphylococcus aureus may increase inflammation is through the production of superantigen that is thought to skew nasal inflammatory responses towards a Th2 dominated disease endotype. Other groups, have concluded that the host mucosal microbiota helps predict disease severity and might also predict susceptibility to certain therapies. Indeed, treatment with certain antibiotics has shown to modulate mucosal bacterial populations leading to clinical improvement and reduced polyp formation in some patients. It is not known whether host microbial and inflammatory milieu adequately predicts polyp formation or helps predict treatment success in the presence of dupilumab. The current study will include investigation of this important exploratory outcome.
The investigators have previously shown that modulation of both the innate and adaptive immune responses can impact dendritic cell and basophil responses in vitro and that these changes correlate with treatment success of patients with chronic allergic rhinosinusitis. The investigators also more recently discovered that IL-4 and IL-13 secreted by human basophils upregulates CD20 (mannose receptor), CD23 (FcεRII) and pSTAT6 expression on monocytes, while also promoting CCL17 (TARC) production by these cells. Other investigators have shown that the mannose receptor on monocytes negatively modulates TLR-4 innate immune signaling on dendritic cells that in turn affects T-cell polarization and response to allergens. The investigators might expect dupilumab to help attenuate this pathway resulting in a reduction of local sIgE production in the mucosa for example. It is already known that dupilumab reduces the expression of other inflammatory mediators such as CCL17 in asthma and atopic dermatitis. These aspects will be examined in the exploratory investigations using cell culture assays, flow cytometry and immunofluorescence pre and post treatment.
The overarching objective of this study is to determine the clinical effectiveness of dupilumab for the treatment of CRS that includes several potential disease endotypes with the exclusion of the nasal polyp cluster that has previously been determined. The additional information gained from secondary and exploratory outcomes will help provide important insight for applied research studies and may also provide practical guidance to clinicians on how to select patients for treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- double blind randomized placebo controlled
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumab treatment group | Experimental | Biological: dupilumabdupilumab treatment group |
| placebo group | Placebo comparator | Drug: placeboplacebo group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Age 18-75 with history of chronic sinusitis without polyps
- SNOT-22 score of at least 30 at baseline
- Bilateral Lund-Mackay CT score 4 or more and/or MLK endoscopy score 4 or more
- Blood eosinophil count of at least 300/ul and/or SPT positive to at least 5/30 allergens, or eosinophil less than 300/ul and SPT negative (Th2 low group).
- Prior oral steroid or antibiotic use is acceptable but not required for entry
Key exclusion criteria (31 listed)
- Immunosuppression other than oral steroids in the past 3 months
- History of nasal polyps within the past 3 years or noted at screening by CT or endoscopy
- Acute sinusitis at the time of entry
- Acute fungal sinusitis at the time of entry
- Uncontrolled asthma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumabAlso: Dupixent300mg dupixent SC every two weeks for six months | Biological | dupilumab treatment group |
| placeboplacebo SC injection every two weeks for six months | Drug | placebo group |
Primary outcome
SNOT-22
Time frame: Every two weeks for six months
Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) survey score after six months treatment (range 0-110). Higher score means worse symptoms.
7 secondary outcomes
Mini-RQLQ
Time frame: Every two weeks for six months
UPSIT
Time frame: Every two weeks for six months
Rescue medication
Time frame: Every two weeks for six months
CT Score
Time frame: Once at screening and then at six month final visit
Rhinoscopy Score
Time frame: Once at screening and then at six month final visit
Drop out rate rate
Time frame: Continuous during entire length of study which is three years.
Adverse event rate
Time frame: Continuous during entire length of study which is three years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Nov 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chronic Sinusitis
RecruitingPhase 4
Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate Changes in Symptoms in Adult Participants With Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyposis Initiating Treatment With Tezepelumab
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Clinical Trial of TQC2731 Injection in Patients With Chronic Sinusitis and Nasal Polyps
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP)
Not yet recruiting
FESS With or Without Intranasal Desmopressin in Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps
Chronic Sinusitis, Nasal Polyposis
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Probiotic Nasal Irrigation on the Postoperative Care of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Sinusitis Chronic, Postoperative Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jody Tversky principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing dupilumab in people with Chronic Sinusitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 31 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
SNOT-22 (time frame: Every two weeks for six months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Nov 2025.