Palatal Expansion TechniqueNCT04354116
MARPE in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate
A study testing Rapid maxillary expansion and Maxillary Protraction in people with Palatal Expansion Technique and Cleft Lip and Palate, run by Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The objective of this randomized controlled study will be to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask, associated with MARPE and Class III elastics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) with maxillary retrusion, compared to HYRAX type maxillary expanders. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 13 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Palatal Expansion Technique, Cleft Lip and Palate, Class III Malocclusion
- What is being tested?
- Rapid maxillary expansion and Maxillary Protraction
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2020to 10 Sep 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 13 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients with cleft lip and palate;
- 6 to 13 years before orthodontic treatment, with sagittal deficiency of the facial middle third;
- Angle Class III malocclusion, or mesial step of the deciduous second molars, and anterior crossbite;
- ANB less than 0˚, Wits less than -2 mm and the distance from point A to the perpendicular nasion less than 0 mm.
Who cannot join
- Previous orthodontic treatment;
- Other craniofacial anomalies;
- Inadequate maxillary denture for placement of a expander.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30535-901
Ildeu Andrade Jr., PhD, 3319-4416, ildeu_andrade@yahoo.com.br
About this study
Official title: Microimplant-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliance to Orthopedically Correct Midface Deficiency in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: a Randomized Clinical Trial
The objective of this randomized controlled study will be to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask, associated with MARPE and Class III elastics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) with maxillary retrusion, compared to HYRAX type maxillary expanders. The investigators will examine differences in treatment times, along with skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes.
Read the detailed description
The CONSORT statement will be used as a guide for this study. This work will be a parallel group study, randomized, with active control, with an allocation ratio of 1: 1.
This study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais. Participants will be recruited in the Master's Degree in Orthodontics at PUC Minas, based on inclusion criteria.
Interventions:
Palatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars or second deciduous molars will be used for patients in both groups. The hooks for the use of Class III elastics will be welded on the vestibular of the upper molar bands. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control group will be active, with conventional dento-mucus-supported HYRAX expanders. All expanders will be manufactured by the same orthodontic technician.
Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day). The direction of the elastics for the maxillary traction force will be between 15˚ to 30˚ below the occlusal plane, providing a force between 400 and 500 g per side. During the day (12 hours a day), patients will use a lower expansion plate with an occlusal stop, which will be activated once a week (0.25 mm), with hooks in the region of the lower canines for the use of Class III elastics. size 3/16 "(150g). The time-frame of the experiment will be 6 months.
Results (primary and secondary) The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment). Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Conical beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Teleradiographies will be extracted from the CFFCs and cephalometric measurements will be obtained by the investigator (V.E.) using the Dolphin Image software (Austin, USA). Traditional cephalometric measurements will be used to describe the changes before and after treatment.
Calculation of the sample size As no study in the orthodontic literature used the same protocol used in this study, the sample size will be estimated by G * Power (version 3.0.8), with 95% power; significance level of 5%; two-tailed. For point A, sagittal movements of 2.6 +/- 1.5 mm in the RME group and 5.8 +/- 2.3 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 11 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. For ANS, sagittal movements of 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm in the RME group and 4.8 +/- 2.5 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 16 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. Therefore, 16 will be the minimum sample size for each group. The sample size will be increased by 40%, resulting in 22 patients for each group, in case there is a withdrawal or the need to use a different protocol.
Randomization (random number generation, allocation hiding, implementation) Patients will be recruited and allocated to the control group (RME) or the intervention group (MARPE) according to the sequence of participation. Simple randomization will be applied.
Blinding The blinding of investigators or participants will not be possible because the expanders in the two groups will be different. Operators and patients will easily know which group they are in. However, blinding will be used during cephalometric analysis. All image exams will be hidden by opaque tape and replaced with research numbers and then mixed together before analysis. The investigator will not know the clustering of the CT scans, which will look similar.
Statistical analysis (primary and secondary results, subgroup analyzes) All statistical analyzes will be performed using the software (version 18.0; PASW Statistics, Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive statistics will include the means and standard deviations of age, total treatment time, maxillary prostration time, cephalometric values and changes in values in each group. The 1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to test the normality of distributions for all times and differences in cephalometric values. Independent t-tests will be used to compare the two groups, including total treatment time, protraction time and changes in cephalometric values; the t-tests will be used for the values that show "equality of variances not assumed" between the groups (SNA and Nasio perpendicular). The level of significance will be 0.05, with two-tailed test.
Error of the Method All locations and measurements of the points will be checked twice carefully at the end of the initial plots and measurements. Not all images will be traced twice. However, to evaluate the tracing errors, 20 scans will be chosen at random. Plots, locations and measurements will be made twice, two weeks apart and then subjected to the Dahlberg formula. The error of the method will be determined by the Dahlberg formula, where n = 20 and d will be the difference between the measurements in 2 moments.
- Conditions
- Palatal Expansion Technique, Cleft Lip and Palate, Class III Malocclusion, Skeletal Malocclusion
- Being tested
- Rapid maxillary expansion, Maxillary Protraction
- Keywords
- palatal expansion technique, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Maxillary retroposition
- Medical subject headings
- Cleft Lip, Malocclusion, Angle Class III, Cleft Palate, Retrognathia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rapid maxillary expansionDevice
Palatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars will be used for patients in both groups. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control active group will be with conventional HYRAX expanders. The maxillary expansion protocol will be once a day for 2 weeks.
Maxillary ProtractionDevice
Protraction hooks will be projected around the upper canine area. In the experimental group (MARPE), the appliance will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants. The control active group will be anchored with conventional HYRAX expanders. Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MARPE | Experimental | Maxillary expander anchored in mini-implants (MARPE) Receives: Device: Rapid maxillary expansion; Device: Maxillary Protraction |
| Hyrax | Active comparator | Tooth-born anchored maxillary expanders, without mini-implants Receives: Device: Rapid maxillary expansion; Device: Maxillary Protraction |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment).
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Cone beam computed tomography will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2020
- Study start10 Jan 2020
- Primary completion10 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Sep 2021 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Palatal Expansion TechniqueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ildeu Andrade Jr., Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
- Investigators
- Ildeu Andrade Jr., PhD, Principal investigator, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04354116
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MARPE Class III cleft patients
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Microimplant-assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion Appliance to Orthopedically Correct Midface Deficiency in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: a Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04354116
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MARPE Class III cleft patients
- Conditions
- Palatal Expansion Technique, Cleft Lip and Palate, Class III Malocclusion, Skeletal Malocclusion
- Keywords
- palatal expansion technique, Cleft Lip, Cleft Palate, Maxillary retroposition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas GeraisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Sep 2021 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this randomized controlled study will be to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of maxillary protraction with a facemask, associated with MARPE and Class III elastics in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP) with maxillary retrusion, compared to HYRAX type maxillary expanders. The investigators will examine differences in treatment times, along with skeletal, dental and soft tissue changes.
Detailed description
The CONSORT statement will be used as a guide for this study. This work will be a parallel group study, randomized, with active control, with an allocation ratio of 1: 1.
This study was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Pontifical Catholic University of Minas Gerais. Participants will be recruited in the Master's Degree in Orthodontics at PUC Minas, based on inclusion criteria.
Interventions:
Palatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars or second deciduous molars will be used for patients in both groups. The hooks for the use of Class III elastics will be welded on the vestibular of the upper molar bands. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control group will be active, with conventional dento-mucus-supported HYRAX expanders. All expanders will be manufactured by the same orthodontic technician.
Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day). The direction of the elastics for the maxillary traction force will be between 15˚ to 30˚ below the occlusal plane, providing a force between 400 and 500 g per side. During the day (12 hours a day), patients will use a lower expansion plate with an occlusal stop, which will be activated once a week (0.25 mm), with hooks in the region of the lower canines for the use of Class III elastics. size 3/16 "(150g). The time-frame of the experiment will be 6 months.
Results (primary and secondary) The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment). Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Conical beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Teleradiographies will be extracted from the CFFCs and cephalometric measurements will be obtained by the investigator (V.E.) using the Dolphin Image software (Austin, USA). Traditional cephalometric measurements will be used to describe the changes before and after treatment.
Calculation of the sample size As no study in the orthodontic literature used the same protocol used in this study, the sample size will be estimated by G * Power (version 3.0.8), with 95% power; significance level of 5%; two-tailed. For point A, sagittal movements of 2.6 +/- 1.5 mm in the RME group and 5.8 +/- 2.3 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 11 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. For ANS, sagittal movements of 2.1 +/- 1.3 mm in the RME group and 4.8 +/- 2.5 mm in the RME group with constriction, a minimum sample size of 16 in each group will be necessary to detect a significant difference between groups. Therefore, 16 will be the minimum sample size for each group. The sample size will be increased by 40%, resulting in 22 patients for each group, in case there is a withdrawal or the need to use a different protocol.
Randomization (random number generation, allocation hiding, implementation) Patients will be recruited and allocated to the control group (RME) or the intervention group (MARPE) according to the sequence of participation. Simple randomization will be applied.
Blinding The blinding of investigators or participants will not be possible because the expanders in the two groups will be different. Operators and patients will easily know which group they are in. However, blinding will be used during cephalometric analysis. All image exams will be hidden by opaque tape and replaced with research numbers and then mixed together before analysis. The investigator will not know the clustering of the CT scans, which will look similar.
Statistical analysis (primary and secondary results, subgroup analyzes) All statistical analyzes will be performed using the software (version 18.0; PASW Statistics, Chicago, Illinois). Descriptive statistics will include the means and standard deviations of age, total treatment time, maxillary prostration time, cephalometric values and changes in values in each group. The 1-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to test the normality of distributions for all times and differences in cephalometric values. Independent t-tests will be used to compare the two groups, including total treatment time, protraction time and changes in cephalometric values; the t-tests will be used for the values that show "equality of variances not assumed" between the groups (SNA and Nasio perpendicular). The level of significance will be 0.05, with two-tailed test.
Error of the Method All locations and measurements of the points will be checked twice carefully at the end of the initial plots and measurements. Not all images will be traced twice. However, to evaluate the tracing errors, 20 scans will be chosen at random. Plots, locations and measurements will be made twice, two weeks apart and then subjected to the Dahlberg formula. The error of the method will be determined by the Dahlberg formula, where n = 20 and d will be the difference between the measurements in 2 moments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MARPE | Experimental | Device: Rapid maxillary expansion, Device: Maxillary ProtractionMaxillary expander anchored in mini-implants (MARPE) |
| Hyrax | Active comparator | Device: Rapid maxillary expansion, Device: Maxillary ProtractionTooth-born anchored maxillary expanders, without mini-implants |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 13 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with cleft lip and palate;
- 6 to 13 years before orthodontic treatment, with sagittal deficiency of the facial middle third;
- Angle Class III malocclusion, or mesial step of the deciduous second molars, and anterior crossbite;
- ANB less than 0˚, Wits less than -2 mm and the distance from point A to the perpendicular nasion less than 0 mm.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Previous orthodontic treatment;
- Other craniofacial anomalies;
- Inadequate maxillary denture for placement of a expander.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rapid maxillary expansionPalatal expanders of the HYRAX type, with bands on the first permanent molars will be used for patients in both groups. In the experimental group, the expander will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants, in a technique known as rapid maxillary expansion assisted by mini-implants (MARPE). The control active group will be with conventional HYRAX expanders. The maxillary expansion protocol will be once a day for 2 weeks. | Device | Hyrax, MARPE |
| Maxillary ProtractionProtraction hooks will be projected around the upper canine area. In the experimental group (MARPE), the appliance will be anchored mesially and bilaterally in mini-implants. The control active group will be anchored with conventional HYRAX expanders. Both groups will be treated with maxillary protraction with a Petit-type face mask at night (12 hours a day). | Device | Hyrax, MARPE |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment).
Time frame: 6 months
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. Three-dimensional virtual models, built from the CBCT's scans, will allow to measure the changes between T0 and T1. The processing of the TCFC and virtual models will be done using the ITK-SNAP 2.2 software (free software, www.itksnap.org), SLICER CMF 4.0 (free software, www.slicer.org).
1 secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes will be changes in other cephalometric variables and treatment time.
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2020.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Palatal Expansion Technique
Active, not recruiting
Teleorthodontics Versus Conventional Follow-up During Early Interceptive Orthodontic Treatment in Children
Teledentistry, Orthodontics, Interceptive
Recruiting
The Effectiveness of Early Intervention to Correct the Position of PDC:s
Ectopic Tooth Eruption, Palatal Expansion Technique
Not yet recruiting
Miniscrew-Assisted Rapid Palatal Expansion for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
OSA - Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Palatal Expansion Technique
Recruiting
3D Evaluation of Maxillary Expansion Methods
Maxillary Transverse Deficiency
Recruiting
Evaluation of Hard and Soft Tissue Change During Maxillary Expansion Using a Computer-aided Design / Computer-aided Manufacturing Appliance.
Palatal Expansion Technique
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ildeu Andrade Jr., PhD principal investigator
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rapid maxillary expansion and Maxillary Protraction in people with Palatal Expansion Technique and Cleft Lip and Palate, run by Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vitor Eto, DDS (55(31)99822-5804, ildeu_andrade@yahoo.com.br), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome will be the degree of anterior movement of the maxilla after treatment). (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2020.