Corona Virus InfectionReCovERNCT04351854
Registry for Clinical Presentation and Management of Patients With COVID-19 in the Emergency Room
An observational study of Corona Virus Infection and SARS-CoV 2, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Patients with COVID-19 usually present in the ED and receive their initial medical check-up here. We will try to gather information of comorbidities and other conditions at the time of presentation of COVID-19 patients to the ED. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Corona Virus Infection, SARS-CoV 2
- What is being tested?
- Retrospective data collection
- How many people
- 500 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- 20 Apr 2020to 31 Jan 2022
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED and matching controls, based on demographics, underlying diseases and duration of hospital stay (i.e. one control per case, both in the same hospital).
Who may be able to join
- Clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Patients with COVID-19 usually present in the ED and receive their initial medical check-up here. We will try to gather information of comorbidities and other conditions at the time of presentation of COVID-19 patients to the ED. The course of the disease prior to admission as well as the momentary health status at presentation to the ED are of interest because they influence risk stratification and decision-making of treating physicians. The ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe symptoms will help to calculate the need for hospital beds including beds on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Intermediate Care Units (IMC), as well as the need for other hospital resources.
Read the detailed description
Patients with COVID-19 usually present in the ED and receive their initial medical check-up here. It is the ED where crucial diagnostic and therapeutic steps are taken and where the decision for admission or discharge is made. As of now, the effectiveness and value of these initial measures and decisions are unclear. With still raising numbers of infections despite regulatory constraints in place, there is an urgent need to develop valid decision trees on how to treat patients suspected with COVID-19 in the ED.
Apart from the already described risk factors little is known about if and to which degree an infection with COVID-19 itself predisposes to other acute conditions (e.g. myocarditis, myocardial infarction or stroke). We will try to gather information of comorbidities and other conditions at the time of presentation of COVID-19 patients to the ED.
Not all patients seek medical consultation at the very beginning of symptoms. The course of the disease prior to admission as well as the momentary health status at presentation to the ED are of interest because they influence risk stratification and decision-making of treating physicians. For example: an immunocompromised patient who presents with mild symptoms at a very early stage of COVID-19 would probably be deemed more at risk than the same patient who reports mild symptoms without progression for a duration of several weeks.
The ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe symptoms will help to calculate the need for hospital beds including beds on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Intermediate Care Units (IMC), as well as the need for other hospital resources. It will also help to identify the need for capacities in ambulatory care. COVID-19 Patients with mild or moderate symptoms can remain in quarantine at home. This would not only disburden hospitals but would also lower the risk for previously uninfected patients otherwise having to share rooms and wards with them.
Confirming the diagnosis There is uncertainty with regard to the best initial diagnostic in COVID-19 patients. Diagnostic tool of choice is a low-dose CT-scan of the thorax, which will detect typical radiologic signs of COVID-19 (ground-glass-opacities, bilateral consolidations and "crazy paving") with a high sensitivity, and in some cases even before onset of clinical symptoms. However, these features are also seen in other viral pneumonias and specificity reaches only 25%. Moreover, a CT-scan might not be available 24/7 in all hospitals, is time-consuming and exposes radiologic personnel to the risk of infection. Additionally, as is described later, many patients present with severe hypoxemia, a situation in which they might not be able to lie in a supine position in the CT-scanner. The role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in detection of COVID-19 has not been examined properly so far.
Testing for COVID-19 usually is done using an oral swab (or expectorated sputum) and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) after a clinical suspicion based on different parameters and/or after visits of the patient to regions with high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of this method has not been systematically evaluated, however, false-positive, as well as false-negative results have been reported. Moreover, there are sometimes contradictory results of RT-PCR and CT-scan. The registry will be used to collect and compare diagnostic data from radiological exams as well as RT-PCR-testing.
Many COVID-19 patients present with shortness of breath and hypoxemia. Physicians have used different therapeutic approaches including high-flow oxygen (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation or intubation and mechanical ventilation. While a trial with non-invasive methods is deemed safe and adequate by most experts, others have raised concerns and advocate early intubation and invasive ventilation in COVID-19. Participants of the registry will be asked to state the method of oxygenation/ventilatory support that was initiated in the ED.
Admission vs. discharge As has already been laid out, patients with COVID-19 exhibit symptoms of different severity. It is neither possible nor would it be reasonable to hospitalize every patient in which the condition is suspected or confirmed. Unfortunately, there are no diagnostic markers or laboratory cut-offs that help decide if a COVID-19 patient who presents to the ED has to be hospitalized or can be safely managed in ambulatory care. Our goal is to gather information of outcomes in both hospitalized and discharged patients and to compare this data with epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiologic data from the date of their visit to the ED.
The ED is the first contact to a hospital. Diagnostic and therapeutic measures from patients who are hospitalized due to the severity of their disease will be analyzed as well as complications or death during hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization will be analyzed and compared to the initial clinical picture.
- Conditions
- Corona Virus Infection, SARS-CoV 2
- Being tested
- Retrospective data collection
- Medical subject headings
- Coronavirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Retrospective data collectionOther
Retrospective data collection to identify predicting factors in the clinical picture of COVID-19 patients presenting to the ED.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with SARS-CoV-2-infection | Patients with clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED Receives: Other: Retrospective data collection | |
| Control group | Particularly, controls will be identified retrospectively at the same hospitals based on matching of demographics, underlying diseases and duration of hospital stay (i.e. one control per case, both in the same hospital). Moreover, the mere suspicion of SARS-CoV-2-infection on admission in the ED is sufficient for enrolment. A considerable portion of these patients are actually not infected and serve as internal control. Receives: Other: Retrospective data collection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Identification of risk factors present at the earliest stage of hospital care (i.e. in the ED) that warrant hospital admission.
Identification of risk factors present at the earliest stage of hospital care (i.e. in the ED) that warrant hospital admission.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Determination of the course of the disease (days since onset of symptoms, nature of symptoms, e.g. fever, chills, headache) and the state at which patients present to the ED
Determination of the course of the disease (days since onset of symptoms, nature of symptoms, e.g. fever, chills, headache) and the state at which patients present to the ED
Measured: 6 months
Identification of the ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe disease
Identification of the ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe disease
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2020
- Study start20 Apr 2020
- Primary completion31 Jan 2022
- Study completion31 Jan 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Corona Virus InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cologne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Volker Burst, University of Cologne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04351854
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ReCovER
- Acronym
- ReCovER
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 25 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Registry for Clinical Presentation and Management of Patients With COVID-19 in the Emergency Room
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04351854
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ReCovER / ReCovER
- Conditions
- Corona Virus Infection, SARS-CoV 2
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 500 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CologneUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with COVID-19 usually present in the ED and receive their initial medical check-up here. We will try to gather information of comorbidities and other conditions at the time of presentation of COVID-19 patients to the ED. The course of the disease prior to admission as well as the momentary health status at presentation to the ED are of interest because they influence risk stratification and decision-making of treating physicians. The ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe symptoms will help to calculate the need for hospital beds including beds on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Intermediate Care Units (IMC), as well as the need for other hospital resources.
Detailed description
Patients with COVID-19 usually present in the ED and receive their initial medical check-up here. It is the ED where crucial diagnostic and therapeutic steps are taken and where the decision for admission or discharge is made. As of now, the effectiveness and value of these initial measures and decisions are unclear. With still raising numbers of infections despite regulatory constraints in place, there is an urgent need to develop valid decision trees on how to treat patients suspected with COVID-19 in the ED.
Apart from the already described risk factors little is known about if and to which degree an infection with COVID-19 itself predisposes to other acute conditions (e.g. myocarditis, myocardial infarction or stroke). We will try to gather information of comorbidities and other conditions at the time of presentation of COVID-19 patients to the ED.
Not all patients seek medical consultation at the very beginning of symptoms. The course of the disease prior to admission as well as the momentary health status at presentation to the ED are of interest because they influence risk stratification and decision-making of treating physicians. For example: an immunocompromised patient who presents with mild symptoms at a very early stage of COVID-19 would probably be deemed more at risk than the same patient who reports mild symptoms without progression for a duration of several weeks.
The ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe symptoms will help to calculate the need for hospital beds including beds on Intensive Care Units (ICU) and Intermediate Care Units (IMC), as well as the need for other hospital resources. It will also help to identify the need for capacities in ambulatory care. COVID-19 Patients with mild or moderate symptoms can remain in quarantine at home. This would not only disburden hospitals but would also lower the risk for previously uninfected patients otherwise having to share rooms and wards with them.
Confirming the diagnosis There is uncertainty with regard to the best initial diagnostic in COVID-19 patients. Diagnostic tool of choice is a low-dose CT-scan of the thorax, which will detect typical radiologic signs of COVID-19 (ground-glass-opacities, bilateral consolidations and "crazy paving") with a high sensitivity, and in some cases even before onset of clinical symptoms. However, these features are also seen in other viral pneumonias and specificity reaches only 25%. Moreover, a CT-scan might not be available 24/7 in all hospitals, is time-consuming and exposes radiologic personnel to the risk of infection. Additionally, as is described later, many patients present with severe hypoxemia, a situation in which they might not be able to lie in a supine position in the CT-scanner. The role of lung ultrasound (LUS) in detection of COVID-19 has not been examined properly so far.
Testing for COVID-19 usually is done using an oral swab (or expectorated sputum) and real-time PCR (RT-PCR) after a clinical suspicion based on different parameters and/or after visits of the patient to regions with high prevalence of SARS-CoV-2. The sensitivity of this method has not been systematically evaluated, however, false-positive, as well as false-negative results have been reported. Moreover, there are sometimes contradictory results of RT-PCR and CT-scan. The registry will be used to collect and compare diagnostic data from radiological exams as well as RT-PCR-testing.
Many COVID-19 patients present with shortness of breath and hypoxemia. Physicians have used different therapeutic approaches including high-flow oxygen (HFNC), non-invasive ventilation or intubation and mechanical ventilation. While a trial with non-invasive methods is deemed safe and adequate by most experts, others have raised concerns and advocate early intubation and invasive ventilation in COVID-19. Participants of the registry will be asked to state the method of oxygenation/ventilatory support that was initiated in the ED.
Admission vs. discharge As has already been laid out, patients with COVID-19 exhibit symptoms of different severity. It is neither possible nor would it be reasonable to hospitalize every patient in which the condition is suspected or confirmed. Unfortunately, there are no diagnostic markers or laboratory cut-offs that help decide if a COVID-19 patient who presents to the ED has to be hospitalized or can be safely managed in ambulatory care. Our goal is to gather information of outcomes in both hospitalized and discharged patients and to compare this data with epidemiological, clinical, laboratory and radiologic data from the date of their visit to the ED.
The ED is the first contact to a hospital. Diagnostic and therapeutic measures from patients who are hospitalized due to the severity of their disease will be analyzed as well as complications or death during hospitalization. The duration of hospitalization will be analyzed and compared to the initial clinical picture.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with SARS-CoV-2-infection | – | Other: Retrospective data collectionPatients with clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED |
| Control group | – | Other: Retrospective data collectionParticularly, controls will be identified retrospectively at the same hospitals based on matching of demographics, underlying diseases and duration of hospital stay (i.e. one control per case, both in the same hospital). Moreover, the mere suspicion of SARS-CoV-2-infection on admission in the ED is sufficient for enrolment. A considerable portion of these patients are actually not infected and serve as internal control. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED and matching controls, based on demographics, underlying diseases and duration of hospital stay (i.e. one control per case, both in the same hospital).
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Clinical suspicion or evidence of SARS-CoV-2-infection on presentation in the ED
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Retrospective data collectionRetrospective data collection to identify predicting factors in the clinical picture of COVID-19 patients presenting to the ED. | Other | Control group, Patients with SARS-CoV-2-infection |
Primary outcome
Identification of risk factors present at the earliest stage of hospital care (i.e. in the ED) that warrant hospital admission.
Time frame: 6 months
Identification of risk factors present at the earliest stage of hospital care (i.e. in the ED) that warrant hospital admission.
2 secondary outcomes
Determination of the course of the disease (days since onset of symptoms, nature of symptoms, e.g. fever, chills, headache) and the state at which patients present to the ED
Time frame: 6 months
Identification of the ratio of patients with mild or moderate to severe disease
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 May 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Corona Virus Infection
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Phase I Open-Label Safety Trial of Pembrolizumab for Neurological Post- Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PD1-PASC I)
Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of OCU500, ChAd36 Vector Encoding SARS-CoV-2 Spike Vaccine Via Intranasal and Inhalational Routes in Previously Vaccinated Adults
COVID-19
Recruiting
Home-Based Exercise Tele-Rehabilitation After COVID-19
Post SARS-CoV2 (COVID-19)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Safety, Reactogenicity and Immunogenicity Trial of RVX-sCPD9 Booster Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine
COVID -19
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiovascular Disease Progression in Survivors of Community Acquired Pneumonia and Lung Infection by Covid-19.
Pneumonia, Community-Acquired, COVID-19 Pneumonia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Corona Virus Infection and SARS-CoV 2, run by University of Cologne at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Identification of risk factors present at the earliest stage of hospital care (i.e. in the ED) that warrant hospital admission. (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2022.