AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood Transfusion ComplicationNCT04344613

Evaluation of the Clinical Performances of a Point of Care Analyzer Enabling Pre-transfusion ABOD Group Ultimate Verification at the Patient Bedside

A study testing ABODpoct device in people with Blood Transfusion Complication, run by Francis Corazza at 1 site in Belgium.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Blood Transfusion Complication
What is being tested?
ABODpoct device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
10 Apr 2020to 1 Oct 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For the device evaluation inside the laboratory : every patient for whom a blood group is ordered to the blood transfusion laboratory.
  • For the device bedside evaluation : each patient from the hematology unit (one day clinic) requiring a transfusion.

Who cannot join

  • Emergency circumstances requiring an urgent transfusion
  • Patient older than 80 years old
  • Patients with venous access

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • CHU Brugmann

    Brussels, 1020

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).

The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.

The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).

Read the detailed description

ABO-incompatible red blood cell transfusions still represent an important hazard in transfusion medicine. Therefore, some countries have introduced a systematic bedside ABO agglutination test checking that the right blood is given to the right patient. However, this strategy is entirely manual, requires an extremely time-consuming learning program and relies on a subjective interpretation of agglutination on ABO test cards (for example Biorad, Diagast).

The ULB spinoff Antigon developed a prototype device on the basis of a technology developed in the Translational research laboratory of CHU-Brugmann, ULB. This device is specifically dedicated to perform a "near patient" control of the blood group of the patient and of the blood bag just before transfusion, and to control that the right blood bag is given to the right patient by cross-checking their identifications. The principle of the assay relies on an agglutination and filtration in a disk including anti A,B and D antibodies.

Results of a preliminary study using a first Proof of Concept Prototype demonstrated the feasibility of ABO determination with a simple device, eliminating manipulation and subjective interpretation responsible for transfusion errors.The investigators then developed an end-user friendly, portable device using disposable fluidic disks and including everything needed to perform an agglutination test to determine the ABO group + RHD status of a patient and a blood bag, or alternatively of two patients.The system is designed to be used near the patient just before the beginning of transfusion.

The goal of this study is to validate the analytical performances of this device (phase A) and to validate the clinical performances of this device (phase B).

Phase A will be conducted in the laboratory and will allow the determination of the cut off values for the quantitative optical measures. These cut-off values will define the presence or absence of antigens A, B or D. Blood groups will be determined using the prototype and compared to the blood group determined in the blood transfusion laboratory with an automate using gel filtration technology. The validation will be performed both on blood bag samples and on random EDTA blood samples collected from consecutive unselected patients of our institution for whom a blood group had been requested (no additional sampling procedure nor additional blood volume will be required). The performances of the defined cut-off values will be tested in a second step on additional blood pathological samples selected from the routine samples received at the laboratory. They will cover a large range of hematological and immunological anomalies susceptible to interfere with or impair test performance and results. Finally, tests will be run on residual blood samples of neonates.

Phase B will be conducted to investigate the performances of the device in real conditions for the ultimate control of the ABO compatibility by comparing the patient and blood bag ABO groups. It will be conducted for its most part inside the laboratory and for another part in clinical units where the test will be performed by the nurses, with the assistance of the technologist involved in the validation of the device. For the part of the study conducted inside the lab, blood bags routinely attributed to patients will be selected the be tested on the device in parallel with the blood from the correct patient or from a 'wrong' (with other blood group) patient, in order to simulate situations of transfusion errors and evaluate the performances of the device to identify and block these errors. If the results are satisfying, the device will be tested in real life at the bedside in real conditions of transfusion. For this part of validation the results provided by the device (expressed as Compatible/not compatible/undetermined) will be compared with the results obtained with the manual point of care compatibility control (according to local procedure), and with the known groups of the patient and the blood bag stored in the patient blood bank file.

The number of ABO tests both on patients and on blood bag from donors has been determined in accordance with the recommendations from European Commission for Technical Specifications for In vitro diagnostic medical devices. ABOD assay performances have to be evaluated on at least 3000 samples.

Being tested
ABODpoct device
Medical subject headings
Transfusion Reaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ABODpoct deviceDevice

    The device has been developed by a consortium including the Université Libre de Bruxelles, research centers (SIRRIS, CER), a private company (CISEO), and the spin-off Antigon S.A..The device includes a reader and a disposable disk (ABOD disk) for testing one patient et a blood bag. Four blood drops from the patient are deposited on one side of the disk and 4 blood drops from the blood bag one the other side. The disk correctly filled is inserted in the reader and after 2 minutes the result is displayed on the screen as a message GO or No GO. In case of incompatibility or any other problem a red Stop message will appear on the screen.

Study groups in NCT04344613
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blood samplesExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: ABODpoct device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cut off value of optical signal - antigen A

    Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Cut off value of optical signal - antigen B

    Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Cut off value of optical signal - antigen D

    Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Cut off value of optical signal - negative control

    Determination of the analytical performances of each channel of the disk:analysis of discrimination between positive and negative samples for each blood group antigen.

    Measured: 6 months

  5. Percentage of concordance of the blood group

    Percentage of concordance between the blood group result delivered by the tested device and the blood group determined by the validated laboratory methods.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2020
  2. Study start10 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2025
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2025

Why it stopped: Practical considerations

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04344613
Sponsor's protocol ID
LRT-ABOD- PICABO
Status last verified
Oct 2025
First submitted
27 Feb 2020
Last updated
6 Oct 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ABODpoct device in people with Blood Transfusion Complication, run by Francis Corazza at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cut off value of optical signal - antigen A (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in