ChalazionNCT04342507
Probiotics for Treatment of Chalazion in Adults
A study testing conservative treatment and probiotics in people with Chalazion, run by University of Molise at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
There is growing evidence encouraging probiotics use in several diseases. The aim of the investigator's study is to define the possible beneficial impact of probiotics on adults suffering from chalazia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chalazion
- What is being tested?
- conservative treatment and probiotics
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2019to 29 Feb 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- history of rapid onset of painful inflamed mass that had reached a stationary size for more than 2 months
- clinical appearance and location of the lesion
Who cannot join
- eyelid infection
- chalazion duration < 1 month
- nonpalpable chalazion
- suspicion of malignancy
- comorbidities (constitutional atopy and seborrheic dermatitis, hormonal dysfunction, presence of irritable bowel disease, infectious mainly related to Staphylococcus aureus and Propionibacterium acnes, demodex mite infestation, vitamin A deficiency, arterial hypertension, diabetes and pregnancy)
- personal habits (smoking, eating disorders, etc.)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effects of Probiotic Oral Supplementation on the Treatment of Chalazion in Adults: a Pilot Study on 20 Patients
There is growing evidence encouraging probiotics use in several diseases. The aim of the investigator's study is to define the possible beneficial impact of probiotics on adults suffering from chalazia.
Read the detailed description
Prospective comparative pilot study on 20 adults suffering from chalazion randomly divided into two groups. The first group, received conservative treatment with lid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days. The second group, in addition to the conservative treatment, received a mixture of probiotic microorganisms once a day up to 3 months. Chalazia were classified according to their size into three groups: small (≤2 mm), medium (2-4 mm), or large (>4 mm). When conservative treatment (with and without probiotics supplementation) failed to resolve the lesion, invasive methods were used, (intralesion steroid injection in medium size chalazion and surgical incision and curettage for the largest ones).
- Conditions
- Chalazion
- Being tested
- conservative treatment, probiotics
- Keywords
- microbiome/microbiota, probiotics, adults
- Medical subject headings
- Chalazion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
conservative treatmentOther
lid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days.
probioticsDietary supplement
use specific probiotics in addiction to conservative treatment to modify the intestinal microbiome to ameliorate the clinical course of adults chalazia by re-establishing intestinal and immune homeostasis
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: conservative | Other | conservative treatment with lid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days Receives: Other: conservative treatment |
| Group B: probiotics | Experimental | in addition to the conservative treatment they receive probiotics mixture (Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus) once a day up to 3 months. Receives: Other: conservative treatment; Dietary Supplement: probiotics |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
healing time
healing time changes with a complete resolution of chalazion
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
recurrences
evaluation of recurrences in both arms
Measured: six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2020
- Study start1 Feb 2019
- Primary completion29 Feb 2020
- Study completion29 Feb 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ChalazionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Prospective comparative pilot study with two groups randomly divided
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Molise
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ciro Costagliola, University of Molise
- Investigators
- Ciro Costagliola, Full Professor, Principal investigator, University of Molise
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04342507
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 08/2019
- Status last verified
- Apr 2020
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2020
- Last updated
- 14 Apr 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Gilchrist H, Lee G. Management of chalazia in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2009 May;38(5):311-4.
PubMed 19458801Unal M. Chalazion treatment. Orbit. 2008;27(6):397-8. doi: 10.1080/01676830802623174. No abstract available.
PubMed 19085290Sklar BA, Gervasio KA, Leng S, Ghosh A, Chari A, Wu AY. Management and outcomes of proteasome inhibitor associated chalazia and blepharitis: a case series. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 May 14;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1118-x.
PubMed 31088416Nemet AY, Vinker S, Kaiserman I. Associated morbidity of chalazia. Cornea. 2011 Dec;30(12):1376-81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821de36f.
PubMed 21993469Yam JC, Tang BS, Chan TM, Cheng AC. Ocular demodicidosis as a risk factor of adult recurrent chalazion. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):159-63. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000341. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
PubMed 23873491Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN. Similar to acne vulgaris, bacteria may produce the biological glue that causes plugging of the meibomian gland leading to chalazions. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;36(3):295; author reply 295-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01714.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 18412605Malekahmadi M, Farrahi F, Tajdini A. Serum Vitamin A Levels in Patients with Chalazion. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2017 Fall;6(3):63-66.
PubMed 29392144Nabie R, Soleimani H, Nikniaz L, Raoufi S, Hassanpour E, Mamaghani S, Bahremani E. A prospective randomized study comparing incision and curettage with injection of triamcinolone acetonide for chronic chalazia. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 May 7;31(3):323-326. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.04.001. eCollection 2019 Sep.
PubMed 31528769Lee JW, Yau GS, Wong MY, Yuen CY. A comparison of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for primary chalazion in children and adults. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:413729. doi: 10.1155/2014/413729. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
PubMed 25386597Kerry RG, Patra JK, Gouda S, Park Y, Shin HS, Das G. Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review. J Food Drug Anal. 2018 Jul;26(3):927-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PubMed 29976412Han KJ, Lee JE, Lee NK, Paik HD. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum KU15149 Derived from Korean Homemade Diced-Radish Kimchi. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 28;30(4):591-598. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2002.02052.
PubMed 32238771Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016 May 3;7(3):189-200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PubMed 26963409Kalyana Chakravarthy S, Jayasudha R, Sai Prashanthi G, Ali MH, Sharma S, Tyagi M, Shivaji S. Dysbiosis in the Gut Bacterial Microbiome of Patients with Uveitis, an Inflammatory Disease of the Eye. Indian J Microbiol. 2018 Dec;58(4):457-469. doi: 10.1007/s12088-018-0746-9. Epub 2018 Jun 4.
PubMed 30262956Iovieno A, Lambiase A, Sacchetti M, Stampachiacchiere B, Micera A, Bonini S. Preliminary evidence of the efficacy of probiotic eye-drop treatment in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;246(3):435-41. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0682-6. Epub 2007 Nov 27.
PubMed 18040708Tavakoli A, Flanagan JL. The Case for a More Holistic Approach to Dry Eye Disease: Is It Time to Move beyond Antibiotics? Antibiotics (Basel). 2019 Jun 30;8(3):88. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics8030088.
PubMed 31262073
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Apr 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Probiotic Oral Supplementation on the Treatment of Chalazion in Adults: a Pilot Study on 20 Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04342507
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 08/2019
- Conditions
- Chalazion
- Keywords
- microbiome/microbiota, probiotics, adults
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of MoliseUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Feb 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is growing evidence encouraging probiotics use in several diseases. The aim of the investigator's study is to define the possible beneficial impact of probiotics on adults suffering from chalazia.
Detailed description
Prospective comparative pilot study on 20 adults suffering from chalazion randomly divided into two groups. The first group, received conservative treatment with lid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days. The second group, in addition to the conservative treatment, received a mixture of probiotic microorganisms once a day up to 3 months. Chalazia were classified according to their size into three groups: small (≤2 mm), medium (2-4 mm), or large (>4 mm). When conservative treatment (with and without probiotics supplementation) failed to resolve the lesion, invasive methods were used, (intralesion steroid injection in medium size chalazion and surgical incision and curettage for the largest ones).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Prospective comparative pilot study with two groups randomly divided
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A: conservative | Other | Other: conservative treatmentconservative treatment with lid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days |
| Group B: probiotics | Experimental | Other: conservative treatment, Dietary Supplement: probioticsin addition to the conservative treatment they receive probiotics mixture (Streptococcus thermophilus, Lactococcus lactis, Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus) once a day up to 3 months. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- history of rapid onset of painful inflamed mass that had reached a stationary size for more than 2 months
- clinical appearance and location of the lesion
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- eyelid infection
- chalazion duration < 1 month
- nonpalpable chalazion
- suspicion of malignancy
- comorbidities (constitutional atopy and seborrheic dermatitis, hormonal dysfunction, presence of irritable bowel disease, infectious mainly related to Staphylococcus aureus and Propionibacterium acnes, demodex mite infestation, vitamin A deficiency, arterial hypertension, diabetes and pregnancy)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| conservative treatmentlid hygiene, warm compression, and dexamethasone/tobramycin ointment for at least 20 days. | Other | Group A: conservative, Group B: probiotics |
| probioticsuse specific probiotics in addiction to conservative treatment to modify the intestinal microbiome to ameliorate the clinical course of adults chalazia by re-establishing intestinal and immune homeostasis | Dietary supplement | Group B: probiotics |
Primary outcome
healing time
Time frame: 3 months
healing time changes with a complete resolution of chalazion
1 secondary outcome
recurrences
Time frame: six months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Apr 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 19458801Gilchrist H, Lee G. Management of chalazia in general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2009 May;38(5):311-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 19085290Unal M. Chalazion treatment. Orbit. 2008;27(6):397-8. doi: 10.1080/01676830802623174. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 31088416Sklar BA, Gervasio KA, Leng S, Ghosh A, Chari A, Wu AY. Management and outcomes of proteasome inhibitor associated chalazia and blepharitis: a case series. BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 May 14;19(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1118-x.
- Results publication: PubMed 21993469Nemet AY, Vinker S, Kaiserman I. Associated morbidity of chalazia. Cornea. 2011 Dec;30(12):1376-81. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e31821de36f.
- Results publication: PubMed 23873491Yam JC, Tang BS, Chan TM, Cheng AC. Ocular demodicidosis as a risk factor of adult recurrent chalazion. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar-Apr;24(2):159-63. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000341. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 18412605Burkhart CG, Burkhart CN. Similar to acne vulgaris, bacteria may produce the biological glue that causes plugging of the meibomian gland leading to chalazions. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;36(3):295; author reply 295-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2008.01714.x. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 29392144Malekahmadi M, Farrahi F, Tajdini A. Serum Vitamin A Levels in Patients with Chalazion. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2017 Fall;6(3):63-66.
- Results publication: PubMed 31528769Nabie R, Soleimani H, Nikniaz L, Raoufi S, Hassanpour E, Mamaghani S, Bahremani E. A prospective randomized study comparing incision and curettage with injection of triamcinolone acetonide for chronic chalazia. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2019 May 7;31(3):323-326. doi: 10.1016/j.joco.2019.04.001. eCollection 2019 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 25386597Lee JW, Yau GS, Wong MY, Yuen CY. A comparison of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection for primary chalazion in children and adults. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:413729. doi: 10.1155/2014/413729. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 29976412Kerry RG, Patra JK, Gouda S, Park Y, Shin HS, Das G. Benefaction of probiotics for human health: A review. J Food Drug Anal. 2018 Jul;26(3):927-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 32238771Han KJ, Lee JE, Lee NK, Paik HD. Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of Probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum KU15149 Derived from Korean Homemade Diced-Radish Kimchi. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Apr 28;30(4):591-598. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2002.02052.
- Results publication: PubMed 26963409Morrison DJ, Preston T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes. 2016 May 3;7(3):189-200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
- MicroRNAs and microbiota: Is there a cross talk?Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Chalazion
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Omega-3 Supplementation vs Demodex vs Eyelid Cleanser for Pediatric Chalazia
Pediatric Chalazia
Recruiting
Is the Use of a Steam Mask an Effective Treatment for Paediatric Chalazion in Comparison to Traditional Warm Compresses?
Chalazion
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light Treatment for Chalazion
Chalazion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ciro Costagliola, Full Professor principal investigator
University of Molise
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing conservative treatment and probiotics in people with Chalazion, run by University of Molise at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
healing time (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04342507, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2020.