NASH - Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisPhase 2NCT04321343
Study of PXL065 in Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)
A Phase 2 study testing PXL065 in people with NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Poxel SA at 29 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
- What is being tested?
- PXL065
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 117 participants
- Where
- 29 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 20 Jun 2022
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients have given written informed consent
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m²
- For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m²
- Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF
- Qualifying liver biopsy (NAS) ≥ 4 and fibrosis score F1, F2 or F3
- Effective contraception for women of child bearing potential
Who cannot join
- Evidence of another form of liver disease
- Evidence of liver cirrhosis
- Evidence of hepatic impairment
- Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease
- History of excessive alcohol intake
- Acute cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to Randomization
Show all 9Show fewer
- Any disease which in the Investigator's opinion which in the Investigator's opinion would exclude the patient from the study
- Use of non-permitted concomitant medication
- Pregnancy or lactation
Trial locations and contacts
29 sites in 1 country.
29 sites in 1 country
United States29 sites
Study site 19
Austin, Texas, 78746
Study site 15
Boca Raton, Florida, 33434
Study site 11
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Study site 25
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37411
Study site 17
Chula Vista, California, 91910
Study site 30
Clarksville, Tennessee, 37040
Study site 27
East Syracuse, New York, 13057
Study site 09
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Study site 23
Edinburg, Texas, 78539
Study site 14
Fayetteville, North Carolina, 28304
Study site 24
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Study site 31
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912
Study site 16
Fresno, California, 93720
Study Site 02
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
Study site 12
Glendale, Arizona, 85306
Study site 04
Huntington Park, California, 90255
Study site 10
Jackson, Mississippi, 39216
Study site 18
Kansas City, Kansas, 61431
Study site 05
Los Angeles, California, 90057
Study site 22
Orange, California, 92866
Study site 06
Panorama City, California, 90402
Study site 08
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Pinnacle Clinical Research (Study site 20)
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site 07
Santa Ana, California, 92704
Study site 01
Sarasota, Florida, 34240
Study site 29
Summerville, South Carolina, 29485
Study site 13
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site 21
Tucson, Arizona, 85712
Study site 28
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
About this study
Official title: A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients
This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment
Read the detailed description
The study will be performed in patients with NASH. The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the change in the percentage of liver fat content (assessed by MRI-PDFF).
- Conditions
- NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
- Being tested
- PXL065, Placebo oral tablet
- Medical subject headings
- Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PXL065Drug
PXL065 oral tablet
Placebo oral tabletDrug
Placebo oral tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | PXL065 Dose 1 Receives: Drug: PXL065 |
| Group 2 | Experimental | PXL065 Dose 2 Receives: Drug: PXL065 |
| Group 3 | Experimental | PXL065 Dose 3 Receives: Drug: PXL065 |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | Placebo oral tablet Receives: Drug: Placebo oral tablet |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.
Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100.
The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Secondary outcomes (25)
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual.
Absolute change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline.
The analysis of the absolute change in LFC was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an ANCOVA model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36
Responders were defined as patients who achieved a clinically meaningful relative reduction of at least 30% in LFC from baseline to Week 36 as assessed by MRI-PDFF
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)
Normalization of ALT was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if ALT normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)
Normalization of AST was analyzed in the subset of patients with baseline greater than the upper reference range. Patients were classed as responders if AST normalized, i.e. decreased to < upper reference range at a post baseline visit.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3
Pro-C3 is the released N-terminal pro-peptide of type III collagen. It is a fibrosis marker.
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score
ELF score is an extracellular matrix marker set consisting of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), amino-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen (PIIINP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) showing good correlations with fibrosis stages in chronic liver disease.The set cutoffs for this scoring are: ELF < 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; ELF between 7.7 - 9.8: moderate fibrosis; ELF between 9.8 - 11.3: severe fibrosis; and ELF > or = 11.3: cirrhosis.
Blood samples used for TIMP-1, PIIINP and HA were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score
Fib-4 score is a non invasive method based on clinical determinations that indicates the level of fibrosis/ scarring of the liver. The set cutoffs for this scoring are: Fib-4 < 1.45: absence of cirrhosis; Fib-4 between 1.45 - 3.25: inconclusive and Fib-4 > 3.25: cirrhosis.
Fib-4 score was calculated as (Age [years] × AST [U/L]) / (platelet [10^9/L] × √[ALT [U/L]]). Blood samples used for AST, ALT and platelet counts were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score
The NFS is based on a combination of clinical and laboratory measurements (i.e. age, glycemia, BMI, platelet, albumin and AST/ALT ratio). The set cutoffs for this scoring are: < -1.455 for exclusion of advance fibrosis, > -1.455 to < or = 0.675 for indetermined, and > 0.675 for presence of advance fibrosis.
NFS was calculated as: 1.675 + 0.037 x age (years) + 0.094 x BMI (kg/m²) + 1.13 x Impaired Fasting Glucose or Diabetes (yes =1; no=0) + 0.99 x AST/ALT ratio - 0.013 x platelet (10^9/L) - 0.66 x albumin (g/dL)
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
NAS is the NAFLD activity score, calculated as the sum of steatosis, lobular inflammation and ballooning scores. Improvement in NAS is defined as a decrease of at least 2 points. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. No worsening in NASH CRN fibrosis score means that the score remained stable or decreased.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
NASH resolution is defined as a NAS score of 0-1 for inflammation, 0 for ballooning, and any value for steatosis. Improvement in fibrosis is defined as a decrease of at least one stage in NASH CRN fibrosis score.
Measured: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
HOMA-IR was calculated as: Serum C-peptide (ng/mL) × FPG (mg/dL) / 405 Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
HOMA-IR is an indicator of insulin resistance. The higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)
The QUICKI was calculated as: 1 / (log (FPG [mg/dL]) + log (C-peptide [ng/mL])).
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
QUICKI is an indicator of insulin resistance. Lower numbers reflect greater insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR
The Adipo-IR was calculated as: Fasting serum Free Fatty Acids (mmol/L) x Fasting serum insulin (μIU/mL) Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
The Adipo-IR is a marker of adipose tissue insulin resistance. Higher the value, the greater the insulin resistance. There is no minimum or maximum index score.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin
Blood samples were collected, handled and stored according to the instructions described in the laboratory manual and all measurements were performed at a central laboratory.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight
Body weight was measured using a scale with appropriate resolution, placed on a stable, flat surface. Shoes, bulky layers of clothing, and jackets had to be removed so that only light clothing remained.
Measured: Baseline to Week 36
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion8 Jun 2022
- Study completion20 Jun 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for NASH - Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Poxel SA
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04321343
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PXL065-003
- Status last verified
- Aug 2023
- First submitted
- 23 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2023
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A 36-week, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of PXL065 Versus Placebo in Noncirrhotic Biopsy-proven NonAlcoholic SteatoHepatitis (NASH) Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04321343
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PXL065-003
- Conditions
- NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 117 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Poxel SAIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 Jun 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Jun 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 29 Aug 2023
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the effect of 3 doses of PXL065 versus placebo on liver fat content in NASH patients after 36 weeks of treatment
Detailed description
The study will be performed in patients with NASH. The primary endpoint will be the assessment of the change in the percentage of liver fat content (assessed by MRI-PDFF).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | Experimental | Drug: PXL065PXL065 Dose 1 |
| Group 2 | Experimental | Drug: PXL065PXL065 Dose 2 |
| Group 3 | Experimental | Drug: PXL065PXL065 Dose 3 |
| Group 4 | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo oral tabletPlacebo oral tablet |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients have given written informed consent
- Body mass index (BMI) ≤ 50 kg/m²
- For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: either naive of glucose lowering drug or under stable oral glucose lowering drug
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73m²
- Liver fat content ≥ 8% on MRI-PDFF
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Evidence of another form of liver disease
- Evidence of liver cirrhosis
- Evidence of hepatic impairment
- Positive serologic evidence of current infectious liver disease
- History of excessive alcohol intake
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PXL065PXL065 oral tablet | Drug | Group 1, Group 2, Group 3 |
| Placebo oral tabletPlacebo oral tablet | Drug | Group 4 |
Primary outcome
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF])
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. Relative change from baseline to Week 36 was calculated as follows: (LFC at Week 36 - LFC at baseline) / LFC at baseline x 100. The primary analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model adjusting for treatment, for stratification factors, and for the baseline LFC as a continuous covariate. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF) (Wilcoxon Test Sensitivity Analysis)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
MRI-PDFF was performed using a standardized imaging protocol, and a central reader analyzed the results. The central reader for this study trained the local imaging centers and provided the imaging manual. The sensitivity analysis was performed for the Intent-to-treat Set (ITTS) using a non parametric pairwise Wilcoxon test stratified according to T2DM status and NASH CRN fibrosis scoring system. LFC missing values at Week 36 were imputed using a multivariate imputation approach by fully conditional specification regression method assuming Missing At Random Mechanism.
25 secondary outcomes
Absolute Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of LFC (Assessed by MRI-PDFF)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Relative Reduction of at Least 30% in LFC) at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alanine Amino Transferase (ALT)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of ALT)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Percentage of Responders (Normalization of AST)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Gamma Glutamyltransferase (GGT)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Pro-C3
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fibrosis-4 (Fib-4) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in NAFLD Fibrosis Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Improvement in NAS of at Least 2 Points With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
NASH Resolution With no Worsening in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
NASH Resolution With Improvement of at Least 1 Point in NASH CRN Fibrosis Score at Week 36
Time frame: Baseline and Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum Insulin
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Serum C-peptide
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adipo-IR
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Adiponectin
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Change From Baseline to Week 36 in Weight
Time frame: Baseline to Week 36
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2023.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Efruxifermin in Subjects With Non-Cirrhotic Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH)/Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) and Fibrosis
NASH With Fibrosis, MASH With Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate ALN-CIDEB in Adult Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease or With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASLD/MASH)
Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease, Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis
Active, not recruiting
Target of Suv420h1/2 in Hepatocytes
NAFLD
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of Lanifibranor Followed by an Active Treatment Extension in Adult Patients With (NASH) and Fibrosis Stages F2 and F3 ( NATiV3 )
NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Roflumilast in the Treatment of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Patients
NAFLD (Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
29 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing PXL065 in people with NASH - Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis, run by Poxel SA at 29 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 29 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 29 Aug 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Relative Change From Baseline to Week 36 in the Percentage of Liver Fat Content (LFC) (Assessed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging - Proton Density Fat Fraction [MRI-PDFF]) (time frame: Baseline and Week 36). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2023.