Classical Hodgkin LymphomaPhase 2TIRHOLNCT04318080
Tislelizumab in Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by BeiGene at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This was a Phase 2 trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab in participants with relapsed or hard-to-treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Participants were grouped by prior treatments. The main outcome was to assess overall response rate (ORR) across both cohorts. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
- What is being tested?
- Tislelizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 46 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2020to 29 Aug 2024
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).
- Participants had either:
- Relapsed cHL, defined as disease progression after a partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) to their most recent therapy; or
- Refractory cHL, defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to their most recent therapy.
- Participants were assigned to one of two cohorts based on the following:
- Cohort 1: Participants who were relapsed or refractory after prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT):
Show all 13Show fewer
- Had failed to achieve a response or had experienced disease progression following autologous HSCT (a transplant using the participant's own stem cells).
- Were not considered candidates for additional autologous or allogeneic HSCT (a transplant using donor stem cells).
- Cohort 2: Participants who were relapsed or refractory to salvage chemotherapy and had not received prior HSCT:
- Were not considered candidates for autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
- Had received at least one prior systemic therapy regimen for cHL.
- Participants had measurable disease, defined as at least one positron emission tomography (PET)-positive, 2-\[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-avid nodal lesion greater than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest diameter, or at least one FDG-avid extranodal lesion (hepatic nodule) greater than 1.0 cm in longest diameter.
- Participants had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1, indicating full activity or restricted activity but capable of self-care.
Who cannot join
- Participants had nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma or gray zone lymphoma.
- Participants had received prior allogeneic HSCT.
- Participants had received prior therapy targeting immune checkpoint pathways, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4).
- Participants had active autoimmune disease or a history of autoimmune disease with potential to relapse.
- Note: Additional inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the protocol may have applied.
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
United States3 sites
Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201-2013
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920-1511
Huntsman Cancer Institute
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5550
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
This was a Phase 2 trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab in participants with relapsed or hard-to-treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Participants were grouped by prior treatments. The main outcome was to assess overall response rate (ORR) across both cohorts. Participants continued receiving the study treatment until their disease got worse, side effects became too severe, or they chose to stop for other reasons.
- Conditions
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Being tested
- Tislelizumab
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TislelizumabDrug
Also called BGB-A317
200 milligrams (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Experimental | Participants who had relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and had either not achieved a response or had disease progression following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation received tislelizumab 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks. Receives: Drug: Tislelizumab |
| Cohort 2 | Experimental | Participants who had relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and had either not achieved a response or had disease progression after at least one prior systemic therapy and were not candidates for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Receives: Drug: Tislelizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) per the Lugano Classification and as determined by the investigator. CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all target lesions on PET-CT, with no new lesions detected. PR was defined as a significant reduction in metabolic activity or lesion size consistent with partial tumor shrinkage as per Lugano criteria.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Secondary outcomes (4)
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
CRR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) by PET-CT or CT per the Lugano Classification and determined by the investigator. CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all target lesions on PET-CT or CT, with no new lesions detected.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the time from the date that response criteria (CR or PR) were first met to the date of objectively documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Participants without an event were censored at the data cutoff or end of study, whichever occurred first. Participants who received new anti-lymphoma therapies, including Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT), before having an event were censored at the date of therapy initiation. Only participants with confirmed response were included in the analysis. Median DOR was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Time to Response (TTR)
TRR was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of tislelizumab to the date the response criteria were first met CR or PR per the Lugano Classification, and was analyzed only in participants who achieved an overall response; CR was defined as complete disappearance of disease, PR as ≥50% reduction in tumor burden, and Overall Response Rate (ORR) included participants with either CR or PR.
Measured: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as any AE that began or worsened in severity after the first dose of study treatment and up to 90 days following the last dose, regardless of initiation of new anti-lymphoma therapy. The following safety data are reported:
Number of participants with any TEAEs: Participants who experienced at least one TEAE of any grade.
Number of participants with any Grade ≥3 TEAEs: Participants who experienced at least one TEAE that was Grade 3 or higher in severity.
Number of participants with any SAEs: Participants who experienced at least one serious adverse event, regardless of relationship to study treatment, occurring up to 90 days after the last dose.
Measured: From the date of the first dose of tislelizumab through 90 days after the last dose (maximum duration of tislelizumab exposure was 168 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Mar 2020
- Study start20 Aug 2020
- Primary completion12 Dec 2022
- Study completion29 Aug 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Classical Hodgkin LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BeiGeneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGene
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lymphoma Study Association
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Herve Ghesguieres, Principal investigator, Lymphoma Study Association
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04318080
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BGB-A317-210
- Other IDs
- 2019-002105-22, 2019
- Acronym
- TIRHOL
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: BeiGene shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved. BeiGene shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations. Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeiGene review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Publications
Ghesquières H, López-Guillermo A, De la Cruz F, et al. Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in TIRHOL BGB-A317-210: a prospective multicenter LYSA phase 2 study conducted in Western countries. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):1717. DOI:10.1182/blood-2023-188545
Ghesquières H, et al. TIRHOL (BGB-A317-210): International Phase 2 Study in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Presented at: Congrès de la Société Française d'Hématologie (SFH); March 2024; Paris, France.
Ghesquières H, López-Guillermo A, De la Cruz F, et al. Final analysis from the LYSA phase 2 TIRHOL study (BGB-A317-210): tislelizumab in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Presented at: 18th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML); June 18-22, 2025; Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_130
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of Tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04318080
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TIRHOL / BGB-A317-210
- Conditions
- Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 46 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BeiGeneIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Lymphoma Study Association
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Dec 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 29 Aug 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 24 Sep 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a Phase 2 trial evaluating the effectiveness and safety of tislelizumab in participants with relapsed or hard-to-treat classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Participants were grouped by prior treatments. The main outcome was to assess overall response rate (ORR) across both cohorts. Participants continued receiving the study treatment until their disease got worse, side effects became too severe, or they chose to stop for other reasons.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1 | Experimental | Drug: TislelizumabParticipants who had relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and had either not achieved a response or had disease progression following autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation received tislelizumab 200 milligrams (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks. |
| Cohort 2 | Experimental | Drug: TislelizumabParticipants who had relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and had either not achieved a response or had disease progression after at least one prior systemic therapy and were not candidates for autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation received tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Participants had a histologically confirmed diagnosis of relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL).
- Participants had either:
- Cohort 1: Participants who were relapsed or refractory after prior autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT):
- Cohort 2: Participants who were relapsed or refractory to salvage chemotherapy and had not received prior HSCT:
- Participants had measurable disease, defined as at least one positron emission tomography (PET)-positive, 2-\[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-avid nodal lesion greater than 1.5 centimeters (cm) in longest diameter, or at least one FDG-avid extranodal lesion (hepatic nodule) greater than 1.0 cm in longest diameter.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Participants had nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma or gray zone lymphoma.
- Participants had received prior allogeneic HSCT.
- Participants had received prior therapy targeting immune checkpoint pathways, including programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), programmed death-ligand 2 (PD-L2), or cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4).
- Participants had active autoimmune disease or a history of autoimmune disease with potential to relapse.
- Note: Additional inclusion and exclusion criteria defined in the protocol may have applied.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TislelizumabAlso: BGB-A317200 milligrams (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks (Q3W) | Drug | Cohort 1, Cohort 2 |
Primary outcome
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) by Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) per the Lugano Classification and as determined by the investigator. CR was defined as the complete disappearance of all target lesions on PET-CT, with no new lesions detected. PR was defined as a significant reduction in metabolic activity or lesion size consistent with partial tumor shrinkage as per Lugano criteria.
4 secondary outcomes
Complete Response Rate (CRR)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Time to Response (TTR)
Time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: From the date of the first dose of tislelizumab through 90 days after the last dose (maximum duration of tislelizumab exposure was 168 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publicationGhesquières H, López-Guillermo A, De la Cruz F, et al. Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma in TIRHOL BGB-A317-210: a prospective multicenter LYSA phase 2 study conducted in Western countries. Blood. 2023;142(Suppl 1):1717. DOI:10.1182/blood-2023-188545
- Results publicationGhesquières H, et al. TIRHOL (BGB-A317-210): International Phase 2 Study in Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Presented at: Congrès de la Société Française d'Hématologie (SFH); March 2024; Paris, France.
- Results publicationGhesquières H, López-Guillermo A, De la Cruz F, et al. Final analysis from the LYSA phase 2 TIRHOL study (BGB-A317-210): tislelizumab in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Presented at: 18th International Conference on Malignant Lymphoma (ICML); June 18-22, 2025; Lugano, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1002/hon.70093_130
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. BeiGene shares data on completed studies responsibly and provides qualified scientific and medical researchers access to data and supporting documentation for clinical trials in dossiers for medicines and indications after submission and approval in the United States, China, and Europe. Clinical trials supporting subsequent local approvals, new indications, or combination products are eligible for sharing once corresponding regulatory approvals are achieved. BeiGene shares data only when permitted by applicable data privacy and security laws and regulations, when it is feasible to do so without compromising the privacy of study participants, and other considerations. Qualified researchers with appropriate competencies who are engaged in novel scientific research may submit a request for participant-level data with a research proposal for BeiGene review. Research teams must include a biostatistician and sign a Data Sharing Agreement prior to receiving access to clinical trial data.
Related trials for Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare Standard Therapy to Treat Hodgkin Lymphoma to the Use of Two Drugs, Brentuximab Vedotin and Nivolumab
Lugano Classification Limited Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma AJCC v8
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Safety and Efficacy of Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Children and Young Adults With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (MK-3475-667/KEYNOTE-667)
Hodgkin Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Pembrolizumab and Vorinostat in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL, FCL or HL.
Grade 3b Follicular Lymphoma, Recurrent B-Cell Lymphoma, Unclassifiable, With Features Intermediate Between DLBCL and Classic HL
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Brentuximab Vedotin and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children and Young Adults With Stage IIB, Stage IIIB, IVA, or IVB Hodgkin Lymphoma
Ann Arbor Stage IIB Hodgkin Lymphoma, Ann Arbor Stage IIIB Hodgkin Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Nivolumab With Ruxolitinib in Relapsed or Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma
Hodgkin Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Herve Ghesguieres principal investigator
Lymphoma Study Association
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tislelizumab in people with Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, run by BeiGene at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States, Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Sep 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Response Rate (ORR) (time frame: From first dose to primary analysis data cutoff (12 Dec 2022) or new anti-lymphoma therapy start, whichever came first. Median follow-up was 11.4 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04318080, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2025.