AzTrials
AzTrials

ColonoscopyNCT04310332

1L- vs. 4L-PEG for Bowel Preparation Among Inpatients.

An observational study of Colonoscopy and Hospitalized Patients, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 10 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background and aims: Inpatients are at high risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution because of its effectiveness and safety profile. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
1L-PEG and 4L-PEG
How many people
1,004 participants
Where
10 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 Feb 2019to 15 Dec 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Hospitalized patients who are scheduled a colonoscopy as inpatients.

Who may be able to join

  • Adult inpatients scheduled for colonoscopy for any indication within the normal process of care.

Who cannot join

  • patients who underwent emergency or elective therapeutic colonoscopies (e.g. polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection)
  • patients who underwent bowel preparation outside the hospital

Trial locations and contacts

10 sites in 1 country.

10 sites in 1 country

Italy10 sites
  • Policlinico Sant'Orsola-Malpighi

    Bologna

  • Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza

    Brescia

  • UOSD Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Azienda USL di Modena

    Carpi

  • Gastroenterology Unit, Valduce Hospital

    Como

  • Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Forli-Cesena Hospital, AUSL Romagna

    Forlì

  • Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Centro Traumatologico-Ortopedico Hospital

    Iglesias

  • Department of Gastroenterology, ASST Rhodense, Rho and Garbagnate Milanese Hospital

    Milan

  • Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità

    Novara

  • Department of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, "Guglielmo da Saliceto" Hospital

    Piacenza

  • Gastroenterology Unit, S. Maria delle Croci Hospital

    Ravenna

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: 1L- vs. 4L-Polyethylene Glycol for Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy Among Inpatients: a Propensity Score-matching Analysis.

Background and aims: Inpatients are at high risk for inadequate colon cleansing. Experts recommend 4L-polyethylene-glycol (PEG) solution because of its effectiveness and safety profile. A higher colon cleansing adequacy rate for a hyperosmolar 1L-PEG plus ascorbate prep has been recently reported in an observational study among more than 1,000 inpatients. Thus, the present study is aimed at determining whether 1L-PEG outperforms 4L-PEG among inpatients, through a propensity score-matching between the two groups in order to correct for confounders.

Being tested
1L-PEG, 4L-PEG

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 1L-PEGDrug

    The drug is 1L-PEG plus ascorbic acid (Plenvu®). It will be administered either the day before colonoscopy, or half the day before and half the day of colonoscopy, or the day of colonoscopy.

    Patients are prescribed bowel prep according to local clinical practice and then all undergo colonoscopy. No standardized intervention on bowel prep is applied, as the design of the study is observational.

  • 4L-PEGDrug

    The drug is 4L-PEG. It will be administered either the day before colonoscopy, or half the day before and half the day of colonoscopy, or the day of colonoscopy.

    Patients are prescribed bowel prep according to local clinical practice and then all undergo colonoscopy. No standardized intervention on bowel prep is applied, as the design of the study is observational.

Study groups in NCT04310332
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1L-PEGHospitalized patients who are prescribed colonoscopy with 1L-polyethylene glycole (PEG) plus ascorbic acid as bowel preparation.
Receives: Drug: 1L-PEG
4L-PEGHospitalized patients who are prescribed colonoscopy with 4L-polyethylene glycole (PEG) as bowel preparation.
Receives: Drug: 4L-PEG

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall colon cleansing efficacy

    Proportion of patients with adequate colon cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Score ≥2 for each colon segment)

    Measured: Outcome will be assessed during colonoscopy

  2. Right colon cleansing efficacy

    Proportion of patients with adequate colon cleansing in the right colon (Boston Bowel Preparation Score ≥2 in the right colon)

    Measured: Outcome is assessed during colonoscopy

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Safety (serum sodium imbalance)

    Degree of serum sodium shift (mmol/L) before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  2. Safety (serum potassium imbalance)

    Degree of serum potassium shift (mmol/L) before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  3. Safety (serum calcium imbalance)

    Degree of serum calcium shift (mg/dL) before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  4. Safety (serum magnesium imbalance)

    Degree of serum magnesium shift (mg/dL) before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  5. Safety (serum creatinine imbalance)

    Degree of serum creatinine shift (mg/dL) before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  6. Safety (glomerular filtration rate change)

    Degree of change in glomerular filtration rate (mL/min/1.73 m2), before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

  7. Safety (hematocrit change)

    Degree of change in hematocrit (%), before and after bowel preparation

    Measured: within 12 hours before starting bowel prep intake; the morning of the day after the colonoscopy

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Feb 2019
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion15 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,004 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04310332
Sponsor's protocol ID
QIPS propensity score matching
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
12 Mar 2020
Last updated
17 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Frazzoni L, Spada C, Radaelli F, Mussetto A, Laterza L, La Marca M, Piccirelli S, Cortellini F, Rondonotti E, Paci V, Bazzoli F, Fabbri C, Manno M, Aragona G, Manes G, Occhipinti P, Cadoni S, Zagari RM, Hassan C, Fuccio L. 1L- vs. 4L-Polyethylene glycol for bowel preparation before colonoscopy among inpatients: A propensity score-matching analysis. Dig Liver Dis. 2020 Dec;52(12):1486-1493. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2020.10.006. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

    PubMed 33250131

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Colonoscopy and Hospitalized Patients, run by IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna at 10 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 10 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall colon cleansing efficacy (time frame: Outcome will be assessed during colonoscopy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04310332, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Mar 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in