Prostate CancerHIFINCT04307056
Evaluation of HIFU in TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER and OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY
A study testing Radical Prostatectomy and High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment in people with Prostate Cancer and Ultrasound Therapy, run by Association Francaise d'Urologie at 49 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
to compare the efficacy of HIFU treatment with standard treatment in two situations: 1. as first-line cancer treatment, HIFU is compared to radical prostatectomy. 2. for patients with recurrence after external beam radiotherapy, HIFU treatment is compared to radical prostatectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer, Ultrasound Therapy
- What is being tested?
- Radical Prostatectomy and High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,862 participants
- Where
- 49 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 23 Mar 2015to 24 Aug 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 70 years of age or older
- Patients with a life expectancy related to age and associated illness estimated to be greater than 5 years
- Patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 years and a state of health allowing general anaesthesia.
- NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Patient participating in other biomedical research within 3 months prior to their inclusion in this protocol
- Included patient simultaneously participating in another research study
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
49 sites in 2 countries.
49 sites in 2 countries
France48 sites
Centre Hospitalier d'Aix en Provence
Aix-en-Provence, 13616
Polyckinique du Beaujolais
Arnas, 69400
Clinique St Etienne
Bayonne, 64100
CHRU de Besançon
Besançon, 25000
Clinique St Vincent
Besançon, 25044
Clinique Tivoli-Ducos
Bordeaux, 33000
Clinique St Augustin
Bordeaux, 33074
CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076
Nouvelle clinique Bel Air
Bordeaux, 33200
CHR de Chambéry
Chambéry, 73011
Pôle Santé Léonard de Vinci
Chambray-lès-Tours, 37170
PôleSanté République
Clermont-Ferrand, 63050
Hôpitaux civils de Colmar
Colmar, 68024
Polyclinique du parc Drevon
Dijon, 21000
CHU de Dijon
Dijon, 21079
Cliniqe du Val d'Ouest
Écully, 69130
CHU de Grenoble
Grenoble, 38043
Hôpital Privé Drome Ardèche
Guilherand-Granges, 07500
Cliique du Pré
Le Mans, 72018
Clinique Bon Secours
Le Puy-en-Velay, 43000
CHRU de Lille
Lille, 59037
Clinique La Louvière
Lille, 59042
CHU de Limoges
Limoges, 87042
Hospices Civils de lyon
Lyon, 69002
Hôpital St Joseph
Marseille, 13008
AP-AM
Marseille, 13015
Clinique Beau Soleil
Montpellier, 34070
Clinique Diaconat-Roosevelt
Mulhouse, 68100
CHU de Nice
Nice, 06200
CHU de Nîmes
Nîmes, 30029
Fondation St Jean de Dieu - Clinique Oudinot
Paris, 75007
Clinique Turin
Paris, 75008
Hôpital St Joseph
Paris, 75014
Hôpital TENON
Paris, 75020
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, 75674
Hôpital Europeen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75908
CH de pontoise
Pontoise, 95300
Clinique Courlancy
Reims, 51100
CHU de rennes
Rennes, 35033
Clinique Nantes Atlantis
Saint-Herblain, 44800
CH de Saintonge
Saintes, 17108
Clinique Rhéna
Strasbourg, 67000
Hôpital Foch
Suresnes, 92150
Clinique St Michel
Toulon, 83000
CHU de Toulouse
Toulouse, 31059
Clinique Pasteur
Toulouse, 31076
Clinique St Jean du Languedoc
Toulouse, 31400
Clinique Océanne
Vannes, 56000
About this study
Official title: EVALUATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) IN CURATIVE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER AT LOW OR INTERMEDIATE RISK AND IN TREATMENT OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY (FORFAIT INNOVATION ART L165-1-1 Social Security Code)
to compare the efficacy of HIFU treatment with standard treatment in two situations:
- as first-line cancer treatment, HIFU is compared to radical prostatectomy.
- for patients with recurrence after external beam radiotherapy, HIFU treatment is compared to radical prostatectomy.
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer, Ultrasound Therapy
- Being tested
- Radical Prostatectomy, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment
- Keywords
- HIFU
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radical ProstatectomyProcedure or surgery
The surgical approach can be open or laparoscopic. The procedure begins with lymph node dissection for the intermediate risk groups (PSA > 10 ng/mL and/or presence of grade 4 Gleason score). Total prostatectomy includes removal of the seminal vesicles. It can preserve 1 or 2 neurovascular bundles, depending on the cancer stage and/or the choice expressed by the patient. The vesicourethral suture is either a running or interrupted suture, and there is drainage by a bladder catheter for at least 5 days.
High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) TreatmentProcedure or surgery
The treatment with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) evaluated in this study will be delivered by 2 types of medical devices currently available on the market, Ablatherm® and Focal One®. They are both computer-controlled and provided with an endo-rectal probe with integrated ultrasound, enabling planning and the monitoring of treatment of localized prostate cancer in realtime.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HIFU | Experimental | Patients Treated with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) Receives: Procedure: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment |
| Prostatectomy | Active comparator | Patients Treated by Radical Prostatectomy Receives: Procedure: Radical Prostatectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Recurrence-free survival
The main objective for patients is to compare recurrence-free survival (i.e., the rate of salvage therapy by external beam radiotherapy and/or hormone therapy) in patients treated by HIFU and those treated by radical prostatectomy. The implementation of salvage therapy will be decided according to several non-exclusive criteria (positivity of margins (for patients with radical prostatectomy), PSA at 3 months, biologic recurrence (increase in PSA > 0.2 ng/ml after radical surgery, > Nadir +2 after HIFU), control biopsies positive, the appearance of metastases
Measured: 30 months
Secondary outcomes (61)
Immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 6 weeks after treatment
Immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 3 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
clinical observations (Stenosis, bleeding, hemorrhoids, urinary infections ...)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
measured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
measured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
Measured: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
measured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
Measured: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
measured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
Measured: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
measured by the International Prostate Symptom score (IPSS). For the first seven questions: 0 to 7: mild disorders, 8 to 19: moderate disorders, 20 to 35: severe disorders For quality of life question 8: Score from 0 to 6: 0 no discomfort, 6 very discomfort
Measured: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the International Continence Society score (ICS score). Question 1: Stress incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub-score 1a (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 2: Insensitive incontinence Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 2 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 3: Incontinence at night Score (frequency) from 0 to 4 (never - always) Sub score 3 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (none - significant discomfort) Question 4: Change of clothing or protective wear Score from 0 to 4 (no leakage of urine - seal port) Sub-score 4 bis (quality of life) from 0 to 3 (no significant discomfort to major discomfort) Question 5: Number of protection used Day Score: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more) Score at night: 0 to 4 (none to 6 or more)
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
Urinary function measured by the Urinary Symptom Score(USP). 3 sub-scores:
stress urinary incontinence score: 0 to 9 (none - significant) OAB score: 0 to 21(none - significant) Dysuria score: 0 to 9 (none - significant)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Sexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
sexual fonction
Sexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Measured: 6 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Sexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Measured: 12 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Sexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Measured: 24 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Sexual function results are measured by the International Index Erectile Function score (IIEF-5). score from 1 to 4: not interpretable score from 5 to 10: severe erectile dysfunction score from 11 to 15: moderate erectile dysfunction score from 16 to 20: mild erectile dysfunction score from 21 to 25: normal erectile function
Measured: 30 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by EORTC-QLQ-C30. Questions 1 to 28 (general) score from 0 to 4 for each question (not at all to many) Question 29 (health status) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent) Question 30 (quality of life) score from 1 to 7 (very bad to excellent)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by PR 25. Questions 1 to 9 (urinary disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 10 to 13 (intestinal disorders) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 14 (hot flashes) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 15 (gynecomastia) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Question 16 (swollen legs) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 17 to 18 (weight gain or loss) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many) Questions 19 to 25 (sexuality) score from 0 to 4 for each question (none to many)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: Day 0, Inclusion
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: 12 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: 18 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: 24 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Quality of life measured by the 3-level version of EQ-5D. Questions 1 to 3 (mobility)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 4 to 6 (personal autonomy)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 7 to 9 (current activities)
1 (no problem) to 3 (unable) Questions 10 to 12 (pain/discomfort)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Questions 13 to 15 (anxiety/depression)
1 (none) to 3 (extreme) Question 16 (health status) Scale from 0 to 100 (worse health to better health)
Measured: 30 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 6 weeks after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 3 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 6 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 12 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 18 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 24 months after treatment
The rate of patients in biochemical failure
The rate of patients in biochemical failure is measured by PSA dosage:
- PSA > 0.2 ng for patients treated by radical surgery
- PSA nadir +2 ng/mL (Phoenix criteria) for patients treated by HIFU
Measured: 30 months after treatment
The rate of local recurrence
The rate of local recurrence is measured by control biopsy (number of positive biopsies)
Measured: 3 months after treatment
Survival without metastases
demonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Measured: 6 months after treatment
Survival without metastases
demonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Measured: 12 months after treatment
Survival without metastases
demonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Measured: 18 months after treatment
Survival without metastases
demonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Measured: 24 months after treatment
Survival without metastases
demonstrated by an additional assessment (CT scan and bone scintigraphy, supplemented by MRI in case of suspicious anomaly), recorded on the date of diagnosis.
Measured: 30 months after treatment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2020
- Study start23 Mar 2015
- Primary completion24 Aug 2022
- Study completion24 Aug 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,862 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Association Francaise d'Urologie
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04307056
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HIFU/AFU/12.03
- Other IDs
- 2013-A01042-43
- Acronym
- HIFI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2022
- First submitted
- 7 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 12 Jan 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Ploussard G, Coloby P, Chevallier T, Occean BV, Kassab D, Houede N, Villers A, Rischmann P. Salvage High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiotherapy (HIFI-2 Study). Eur Urol Oncol. 2026 Apr 28:S2588-9311(26)00112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.04.007. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42055879Ploussard G, Coloby P, Chevallier T, Occean BV, Houede N, Villers A, Rischmann P; HIFI group. Whole-gland or Subtotal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Versus Radical Prostatectomy: The Prospective, Noninferiority, Nonrandomized HIFI Trial. Eur Urol. 2025 May;87(5):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
PubMed 39632125
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Jan 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- EVALUATION OF HIGH INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND (HIFU) IN CURATIVE TREATMENT OF LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER AT LOW OR INTERMEDIATE RISK AND IN TREATMENT OF RECURRENCE AFTER RADIOTHERAPY (FORFAIT INNOVATION ART L165-1-1 Social Security Code)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04307056
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HIFI / HIFU/AFU/12.03
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer, Ultrasound Therapy
- Keywords
- HIFU
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,862 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Association Francaise d'UrologieUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 23 Mar 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 24 Aug 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 24 Aug 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
to compare the efficacy of HIFU treatment with standard treatment in two situations:
- as first-line cancer treatment, HIFU is compared to radical prostatectomy.
- for patients with recurrence after external beam radiotherapy, HIFU treatment is compared to radical prostatectomy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HIFU | Experimental | Procedure: High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) TreatmentPatients Treated with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) |
| Prostatectomy | Active comparator | Procedure: Radical ProstatectomyPatients Treated by Radical Prostatectomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patients 70 years of age or older
- Patients with a life expectancy related to age and associated illness estimated to be greater than 5 years
- Patients with a life expectancy greater than 10 years and a state of health allowing general anaesthesia.
- NON-INCLUSION CRITERIA
- Patient participating in other biomedical research within 3 months prior to their inclusion in this protocol
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radical ProstatectomyThe surgical approach can be open or laparoscopic. The procedure begins with lymph node dissection for the intermediate risk groups (PSA > 10 ng/mL and/or presence of grade 4 Gleason score). Total prostatectomy includes removal of the seminal vesicles. It can preserve 1 or 2 neurovascular bundles, depending on the cancer stage and/or the choice expressed by the patient. The vesicourethral suture is either a running or interrupted suture, and there is drainage by a bladder catheter for at least 5 days. | Procedure or surgery | Prostatectomy |
| High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) TreatmentThe treatment with High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) evaluated in this study will be delivered by 2 types of medical devices currently available on the market, Ablatherm® and Focal One®. They are both computer-controlled and provided with an endo-rectal probe with integrated ultrasound, enabling planning and the monitoring of treatment of localized prostate cancer in realtime. | Procedure or surgery | HIFU |
Primary outcome
Recurrence-free survival
Time frame: 30 months
The main objective for patients is to compare recurrence-free survival (i.e., the rate of salvage therapy by external beam radiotherapy and/or hormone therapy) in patients treated by HIFU and those treated by radical prostatectomy. The implementation of salvage therapy will be decided according to several non-exclusive criteria (positivity of margins (for patients with radical prostatectomy), PSA at 3 months, biologic recurrence (increase in PSA > 0.2 ng/ml after radical surgery, > Nadir +2 after HIFU), control biopsies positive, the appearance of metastases
61 secondary outcomes
Immediate or late complications
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Immediate or late complications
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 3 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 18 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
immediate or late complications
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 18 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
urinary function
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 18 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
urinary function
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
sexual fonction
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
sexual fonction
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 18 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 30 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: Day 0, Inclusion
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
Evaluation of quality of life
Time frame: 18 months after treatment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Jan 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42055879Ploussard G, Coloby P, Chevallier T, Occean BV, Kassab D, Houede N, Villers A, Rischmann P. Salvage High-intensity Focused Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Recurrence after Radiotherapy (HIFI-2 Study). Eur Urol Oncol. 2026 Apr 28:S2588-9311(26)00112-4. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2026.04.007. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39632125Ploussard G, Coloby P, Chevallier T, Occean BV, Houede N, Villers A, Rischmann P; HIFI group. Whole-gland or Subtotal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Versus Radical Prostatectomy: The Prospective, Noninferiority, Nonrandomized HIFI Trial. Eur Urol. 2025 May;87(5):526-533. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
Active, not recruitingObservational study
MRI Fusion Biopsy vs. Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
Prostate Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
49 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Radical Prostatectomy and High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Treatment in people with Prostate Cancer and Ultrasound Therapy, run by Association Francaise d'Urologie at 49 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jan 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 49 sites in France, Guadeloupe. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Recurrence-free survival (time frame: 30 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04307056, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jan 2023.