AzTrials
AzTrials

Effects of; Anesthesia, Local,Pain,in DISENCT04300595

Anesthetic Approaches for Dacryocystorhinostomy Surgery: The Effect of Adding Local Anesthesia to General Inhalational Anesthesia

A study testing Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in people with Effects of; Anesthesia, Local,Pain,in DISE, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To Study the effect of combination of of general anesthesia and local anesthesia in anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy and assess quality of the procedure Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 50 years
What is being tested?
Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Apr 2020to 30 Jul 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 50 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • American society of anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II.
  • Elective unilateral Dacryocystorhinostomy with paranasal skin incision.

Who cannot join

  • Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy.
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics or opioids.
  • Drug abuse.
  • Pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Heba M EL-Asser, MD contact

00201062393152

aseeaswad1@yahoo.com

amr sh Elshafei, MD contact

00201225800795

amrshaaban85@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Zagazig University

    Zagazig, Sharqia Province, 002055

    Zagazig University, 0552363635, info_medicine@zu.edu.eg

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: The Efficacy of Combined Local and General Anesthesia or General Anesthesia Alone in External Dacryocystorhinostomy: A Randomized Controlled Study

To Study the effect of combination of of general anesthesia and local anesthesia in anesthesia for external dacryocystorhinostomy and assess quality of the procedure

Read the detailed description
  • calculate the total requirement for anaesthetic agents to maintain satisfactory operating conditions
  • calculate total anesthetic time
  • assess intraoperative changes in hemodynamics
  • assess intraoperative blood loss
  • evaluate surgeon and patient satisfaction
  • recognize whether this was related with changes in postoperative analgesia .
  • Also occurrence of postoperative nausea was recorded and compared with general anaesthesia combined with intravenous opioid for (EXT-DCR) surgery.
Being tested
Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgeryProcedure or surgery

    all patients were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia with intravenous opioids and local infiltration of saline (Group G) or general anesthesia with intravenous saline and local infiltration of a mixture of lidocaine/epinephrine (Group L).

    In both groups, general anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and tracheal intubation was facilitated by 0.1 mg/kg cisatracurium. All patients underwent mechanical ventilation with 100% oxygen. Anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane, and muscle relaxation was provided by an injection of cisatracurium 0.02 mg/kg every 20 minutes.

Study groups in NCT04300595
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
general anesthesia (Group G)Active comparatorPatients receive general anesthesia with intravenous opioids and local infiltration of saline (Group G)
Receives: Procedure: Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery
Local anesthesia (Group L)Active comparatorPatients receive general anesthesia with intravenous saline and local infiltration of a mixture of lidocaine/epinephrine (Group L).
Receives: Procedure: Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. postoperative pain assessment

    To quantify the intensity of postoperative pain, the patients were asked to use a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) grade from 0-cm (no pain) to 10-cm (the worst possible pain) 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after extubation

    Measured: change in visual analogue scale at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperative after extubation

  2. hemodynamic assessment

    Change in heart rate were recorded preoperatively, after induction of general anesthesia, after IV injection of 10 ml syringe and after local infiltration, then every 5 min intraoperatively, and during early recovery, and every 30 min, thereafter for 24 hours

    Measured: for 24 hours

  3. hemodynamic assessment

    Change in arterial blood pressure were recorded preoperatively, after induction of general anesthesia, after IV injection of 10 ml syringe and after local infiltration, then every 5 min intraoperatively, and during early recovery, and every 30 min, thereafter for 24 hours

    Measured: for 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. extubation time

    Extubation time was calculated from time of anesthesia off till extubation and recorded in each patient

    Measured: intraoperative (from time of anesthesia ended till extubation and recorded in each patient in minutes)

  2. mean isoflurane %

    Isoflurane concentration was adjusted according to hemodynamics by increase or decrease concentration when heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure increase or decrease more than 20-30% of the basal preoperative record, respectively and after nalbuphine dose failed to adjust hemodynamics

    Measured: intraoperative ( recorded every 5 minutes)

  3. time to rescue analgesia

    The time from the end of anaesthesia to first use of rescue analgesia (nalbuphine)

    Measured: up to 24 hours of postoperative

  4. The number of patients who required nalbuphine in the postoperative period,

    to calculate the number of patients who required nalbuphine in the postoperative period,

    Measured: up to 24 hours of postoperative

  5. intraoperative bleeding

    to the nearest milliliter) was determined by the amount of blood in the suction containers and gauze sponges, based on assessment by the surgeon.

    Measured: at the end of surgery

  6. patient and surgeon satisfaction

    An overall satisfaction score according to postoperative analgesia .

    • nil = 0
    • mild = 1
    • good = 2
    • excellent = 3 was recorded on the first postoperative day from both patients and surgeons. The acceptance of combination of LA and GA was questioned and the patients who applied for a successive operation on the other eye were recorded

    Measured: assessed on the first postoperative day from both patients and surgeons.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2020
  2. Study start1 Apr 2020
  3. Primary completion30 Jul 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jul 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
The day before surgery and after obtaining written informed consent and full history taking, all patients were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia with intravenous opioids and local infiltration of saline (Group G) or general anesthesia with intravenous saline and local infiltration of a mixture of lidocaine/epinephrine (Group L).
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04300595
Sponsor's protocol ID
local anesthesia in DCR
Status last verified
Jul 2023
First submitted
17 Feb 2020
Last updated
18 Jul 2023
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Scawn RL, Allen MJ, Rose GE, Verity DH. Randomised, masked study of local anaesthesia administered prior to external dacryocystorhinostomy under general anaesthesia. Eye (Lond). 2019 Mar;33(3):374-379. doi: 10.1038/s41433-018-0201-5. Epub 2018 Sep 18.

    PubMed 30228368
  • Ghali AM, El Btarny AM. The effect on outcome of peribulbar anaesthesia in conjunction with general anesthesia for vitreoretinal surgery. Anaesthesia. 2010 Mar;65(3):249-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06191.x. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

    PubMed 20039868

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Combination of General anesthesia and local anesthesia in dacryocystorhinostomy surgery in people with Effects of; Anesthesia, Local,Pain,in DISE, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Heba M EL-Asser, MD (00201062393152, aseeaswad1@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

postoperative pain assessment (time frame: change in visual analogue scale at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 hours postoperative after extubation). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04300595, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in