AzTrials
AzTrials

Children Requiring IV PlacementNCT04291404

Virtual Reality-based Distraction to Reduce Distress in the Pediatric Emergency Department

A study testing Virtual Reality Distraction in people with Children Requiring IV Placement, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Needle procedures, such as intravenous (IV) insertions, are among the most commonly performed procedures for children needing medical care. IV insertions are often a painful and stressful experience for both children and their parents/ caregivers. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Children Requiring IV Placement
What is being tested?
Virtual Reality Distraction
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
28 Sep 2020to 12 Feb 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • child aged 6-17 years
  • requires IV placement
  • will receive topical anesthetic cream for IV placement

Who cannot join

  • medically unstable (CTAS 1, requires immediate IV insertion)
  • unconscious or not fully alert
  • visual, auditory or cognitive or mental health issues precluding safe interaction with the VR intervention
  • conditions that could be exacerbated by the VR environment (as reported by the family), such as: (i) current symptomatic nausea / vomiting / dizziness / migraine; (ii) history of psychosis / hallucinations / epilepsy
  • presence of an infection / injury which could contaminate the VR intervention equipment (as determined by the healthcare team) including but not limited to: (i) open wounds / infections of the head and neck area; (ii) suspected or confirmed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization
  • screens positive for 'influenza-like illness' (ILI) as per the current SCH ED screening criteria
  • child or parental language barrier precluding the ability to understand and complete study assessments, in the absence of a native language translator
  • previous enrollment in this study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Stollery Children's Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual Reality-based Distraction for Venipuncture-related Distress in Children

Needle procedures, such as intravenous (IV) insertions, are among the most commonly performed procedures for children needing medical care. IV insertions are often a painful and stressful experience for both children and their parents/ caregivers. Pediatric pain and distress that is not adequately treated may lead to a frightened and uncooperative child, repeated IV attempts and overall frustration with care for the family and clinical team.

Distraction therapy is a common psychological strategy which involves engaging children in a cognitive task or activity in order to divert attention away from painful stimuli. Given children's growing enthusiasm for novel technology, the investigators propose that an immersive virtual reality (VR) experience may provide an effective means of distraction for children undergoing IV insertions.

Read the detailed description

Objectives: The investigators' primary objective is to compare the reduction of distress with the use of distraction (via the VR intervention) versus current standard of care in children aged 6 to 17 years who are undergoing IV placement. The secondary objectives are to compare (a) the reduction of pain; (b) the reduction of fear; (c) the reduction of parental/caregiver anxiety; and (d) parental/caregiver and nurse satisfaction with the procedure in the intervention versus control arms; and (e) to assess the safety of using VR intervention in children aged 6 to17 years who are undergoing IV placement.

Research Plan: The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled trial consisting of a control arm receiving departmental standard of care and an intervention arm which will include the addition of an immersive VR experience to current standard of care. Children 6 to 17 years of age who are undergoing IV insertions in the Stollery Children's Hospital emergency department will be considered for enrollment into the study. Approximately 80 families will be recruited over a one-year period.

Study Intervention and Comparison: The VR intervention will aim to provide distraction by immersing the child in an artificial 3-dimensional environment that will engage them for the duration of the IV procedure. The child will wear a head-mounted display ("VR goggles") that will allow them to explore the virtual world through their own visual perspective in 360-degrees. A small handheld controller (optional) can be used to interact with the virtual environment and change settings. The VR goggles will occlude the patient's view of the treatment room, and a pair of noise-cancelling headphones (optional) can be used to further block out ambient hospital sounds. Together, this will provide the child with a unique vivid experience of being fully immersed or "present" inside the 3D virtual world. The control group will receive departmental standard of care which will include topical anesthetic cream (mandatory) and may include parent/caregiver support, child life services, nursing support, etc (at the discretion of the ED clinical care team and the family). At present, there is no single established distraction therapy or routine that is consistently employed for IV procedures within the study site ED. Thus, for pragmatic and ethical considerations, it is felt that the new study VR intervention should be compared to what is currently already in practice (ie. standard of care). Of note, other forms of technology (e.g. smart phones, tablets) will not be prohibited in the control group, if the family chooses to offer them. Due to ethical and pragmatic considerations, children in both groups must receive topical anesthetic cream for IV placement, as it is known to be effective and considered standard of care within the study hospital.

Study Impact: The use of immersive VR technology has previously shown promise in numerous healthcare settings. However, there is still a need for robust evidence regarding its effectiveness in treating pediatric distress associated with IV procedures, particularly in the emergency department. Results of this randomized controlled trial could inform an evidence-based strategy for the management of pediatric distress, which could be used in settings with and without child life specialists.

Being tested
Virtual Reality Distraction
Keywords
Pain, Distress, Virtual Reality, Distraction Therapy
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual Reality DistractionDevice

    Distraction therapy using a Virtual Reality (VR) device

Study groups in NCT04291404
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care (Control) ArmNo interventionStandard of care treatment, which may include a combination of the following, at the discretion of the treating team and family: parent/ caregiver support, child life services, healthcare provider support, etc.
Intervention ArmExperimentalAddition of distraction via an immersive, interactive VR experience to Standard of Care
Receives: Device: Virtual Reality Distraction

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Child's total distress score during the IV procedure

    Two RAs will independently observe a videotape of each child and use the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised (OSBD-R) to assess children's response behaviors to pain. (0 = no distress, 23.5 = maximum distress)

    Measured: During the IV placement procedure

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Child's pain score during the IV procedure

    Self reported by child using an 11-point verbal Numerical Rating Scale (vNRS) ranging from 0, which indicates no pain, to 10, which indicates the worst possible pain

    Measured: Immediately after IV placement

  2. Child's Fear

    Self reported by child using the Children's Fear Scale (CFS). This is a five face scale ranging from 0= not scared at all to 4= most scared possible.

    Measured: Immediately after IV placement

  3. Parental anxiety

    Parent will fill out the State Trait Anxiety Inventory - State Scale Revised Version (STAI-S, Form Y), a validated and commonly used version of STAI, which has improved psychometric properties. The score ranges from 20 to 80, with 80 indicating maximum anxiety.

    Measured: Immediately after IV placement

  4. Parent/ Caregiver Satisfaction

    Self-reported using a 5-point likert scale, ranging from 1 "Not at all satisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied".

    Measured: Immediately following the IV procedure

  5. Nurse Satisfaction

    Self-reported using a 5-point likert scale, ranging from 1 "Not at all satisfied" to 5 "Very satisfied".

    Measured: Immediately following the IV procedure

  6. Child Satisfaction

    For children, we will use a a 5-point likert scale ranging from 1 "Not at all happy" to 5 "Very happy".

    Measured: Immediately following the IV procedure

  7. Frequency of adverse events related to the study intervention

    Determined by assessing the frequency of adverse events post intervention. Nausea will be self-rated by children immediately following the intervention, using the Baxter Retching Faces (BARF) scale. This is a six face scale ranging from 0= no nausea at all to 10= most nausea it is possible to feel.

    Measured: During the IV procedure

  8. Child's distress during the IV procedure

    In addition to assessing child distress via the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised (primary outcome), we will also ask children to self-report their distress on an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 "no distress" to 10 "the most distress you can imagine having". While easy to use and previously employed, this scale has not been validated or compared to the validated Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress - Revised.

    Measured: Immediately after IV placement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2020
  2. Study start28 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion12 Feb 2022
  4. Study completion12 Feb 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04291404
Sponsor's protocol ID
Pro00095418
Status last verified
Oct 2021
First submitted
20 Feb 2020
Last updated
31 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ali S, Hudson S, Rajagopal M, Stinson JN, Gourlay K, Ma K, Candelaria P, Vandermeer B, Felkar B, Schreiner K, Proctor A, Hartling L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Commercially Available Virtual Reality for Intravenous Cannulation-Related Distress in Children. J Pediatr. 2026 Jan;288:114803. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2025.114803. Epub 2025 Sep 15.

    PubMed 40962105
  • Ali S, Rajagopal M, Stinson J, Ma K, Vandermeer B, Felkar B, Schreiner K, Proctor A, Plume J, Hartling L. Virtual reality-based distraction for intravenous insertion-related distress in children: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 30;12(3):e057892. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057892.

    PubMed 35354617

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual Reality Distraction in people with Children Requiring IV Placement, run by University of Alberta at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Child's total distress score during the IV procedure (time frame: During the IV placement procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04291404, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in