DementiaPICSI-HNCT04283994
Project to Improve Communication About Serious Illness--Hospital Study: Comparative Effectiveness Trial (Trial 2)
A study testing Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart and EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart in people with Dementia and Chronic Disease, run by University of Washington at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dementia, Chronic Disease, Neoplasm Metastasis
- What is being tested?
- Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart and EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 756 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 26 Jul 2021to 27 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PATIENTS. Eligible patients will be those who are: 1) equal to or older than 80 years of age; or 2) equal to or older than 55 years of age with one or more chronic conditions used by the Dartmouth Atlas to study end-of-life care: malignant cancer/leukemia, chronic pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease, dementia, diabetes with end-organ damage, and peripheral vascular disease, 3) English-speaking, 4) admitted for minimum of 12 hours/maximum of 96 hours to participating in-patient services at the participating hospitals, and 5) without documentation in the EHR of a goals-of-care discussion during this admission. Patients without decisional capacity (as documented in the EHR or as identified with a brief six-item screening tool) will be represented by a legal surrogate decision maker/legal next of kin (LNOK) in accordance with Washington State Law RCW 7.70.065.
- SURROGATE/FAMILY. Eligible surrogate/family subjects will be those who are 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, involved in the patient's medical care or decision-making.
- CLINICIANS (Interview). Eligible clinicians will be those who are 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, employed at a participating hospital, and have been the clinician of record for an enrolled patient in the trial.
Who cannot join
- Reasons for exclusion for any patient in include: restricted status (prisoners or victims of violence); legal or risk management concerns (as determined by the attending physician or via hospital record designation); unable to complete informed consent procedures; and without a legal surrogate to participate for them. Patients who are non-English speaking (and therefore unable to complete survey materials) are excluded. Reasons for exclusion for any surrogate/family subject include: non-English speaking (and therefore unable to complete study materials), legal or risk management concerns (as determined by the attending physician or via hospital record designation); psychological illness or morbidity; and physical or mental limitations preventing ability to complete questionnaires. Patients under COVID precautions will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104
UW Medical Center - Northwest
Seattle, Washington, 98133
UW Medical Center - Montlake
Seattle, Washington, 98195
About this study
Official title: Using the Electronic Health Record to Identify and Promote Goals-of-Care Communication for Older Patients With Serious Illness
The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study is particularly interested in understanding the effect of the intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) but will also include other common chronic, life-limiting illnesses.
The specific aims are:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart, drawn from the electronic medical record (EHR), the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, drawn from patient or family completed surveys, and usual care for improving quality of care provided to patients with chronic illness experiencing a hospitalization. The primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion, assessed from randomization through 30 days. Secondary outcomes include: a) intensity of care outcomes (e.g., ICU use, ICU and hospital free days, hospital readmissions, costs of hospital care); and b) patient- and family-reported outcomes assessed by surveys at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization, including occurrence and quality of goals-of-care discussions in the hospital, goal-concordant care, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.
- To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the interventions, guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks for implementation science, incorporating quantitative evaluation of the interventions' reach and adoption, as well as qualitative analyses of interviews with participants, to explore barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.
Read the detailed description
OVERVIEW: Jumpstart is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians, patients and their families that focuses on hospitalized patients' goals of care. In this comparative effectiveness trial, the investigators examine the effectiveness of two approaches designed to promote goals-of-care discussions for older, seriously ill, hospitalized patients recruited from three UW Medicine hospitals. The two approaches include a survey-based bi-directional intervention and an EHR-based clinician-facing intervention. Both of these interventions provide clinicians with Jumpstart Guides that include data selected from the EHR on advance care planning as well as tips designed to improve communication about patients' goals of care and care preferences. Additionally, the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart includes not only the EHR-based care planning information but also communication tips that are based on specific information from patients' (or surrogates) self-reported surveys. These bi-directional Jumpstarts are shared not only with clinicians but also with participating patients and families. The Jumpstart Guide is provided by email and in-person. This trial tests the comparative effectiveness of the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart and usual care. Unique to this trial is the use of the EHR to identify eligible participants, provide data for the intervention, and be the mechanism for delivering the intervention.
This current study is "Trial 2" of the R01 Award funding this trial. Trial 1 was completed prior to the initiation of Trial 2.
SPECIFIC AIM 1: Evaluate the effectiveness of the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart compared to the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart and usual care for improving quality of care.
TRIAL 2 has four components.
Component 1- Subject Identification/Recruitment/Randomization: Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are screened and identified using daily screening reports and staff review. The investigators oversample patients with ADRD to include 40% of the sample. Patients are approached by study staff in person during their hospital stay to assess their interest in participating in the study. Recruitment conversations are designed to take place in the patient's hospital room. Subjects are asked to complete surveys at three time points: 1) at enrollment; 2) 3-5 days after randomization; and 3) 4-6 weeks after randomization. Follow-up surveys may be completed in-person, by paper, online, or by phone, based on respondents' preferences.
If patients are not able to participate themselves (e.g., cognitive impairment, sedated or ventilated), the investigators recruit their legal surrogate decision-maker to participate. This surrogate (under Washington State Law RCW 7.70.065) provides consent on their own behalf and is a research study subject.
Eligible patients are assigned to one of the three interventions in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients are randomized using variable size blocks and stratified for hospital and ADRD vs. no ADRD. Surrogates/families follow the randomization status of the patients whom they are representing.
Component 2- EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart guide: The Jumpstart guide is developed from an automated review of the EHR. It summarizes the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation. It provides general recommendations to assist clinicians in initiating goals of care discussions.
Component 3- Survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart Guide: Survey data, completed by patients or their surrogate/family at enrollment provide assessments of the following: a) preferences for discussions about goals of care; b) most important barrier and facilitator for having such discussions; and c) current goals of care. These elements are contained within the Jumpstart guides and the information is tailored to each recipient (i.e., patient, surrogate/family, or clinician). This version provides survey-response specific recommendations to initiate goals of care discussions.
Component 4- Delivery of the intervention:
Clinician delivery: Guides are delivered within the first few days (1-3) after randomization to the primary clinician team (attending and resident physicians and advanced practice providers) via secure email or in person. Study staff monitor the care team for the patient and ensure that any new providers also receive the Jumpstart guide.
Patient and family delivery: For the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart arm, study staff provide the patient or surrogate with a version of the Jumpstart guide, tailored to be appropriate for patients or their surrogates (without information on EHR-based advance care planning documents) and following the same timeframe. Jumpstart guides are delivered to the patient or surrogate/family at the hospital.
Comparison group: We will compare all 3 arms (survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart, usual care) in three two-way comparisons.
Outcome Assessment: The primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion in the 30 days following randomization. All subjects are asked to complete questionnaires at enrollment. The questionnaires may be completed as computer-assisted interviews or on-line depending on the subject's preference. The study staff member enrolling the subjects notifies them of their randomization status at this time. Subjects randomized to the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart arm complete additional questionnaire items used to create the Jumpstart Guide.
The research staff will contact all subjects in person (or by telephone or email) for the evaluation/post-intervention phase. Patient and surrogate/family subjects will complete surveys at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization. Surveys can be completed by telephone, mail, or online; we will contact each patient or family/surrogate at each interval using their preferred modality. Subjects may complete the surveys with study staff in person (if the patient is still in the hospital), over the phone, online using REDCap, or on paper and return via mail. Surrogate/Family subjects will complete the same measures at the same intervals as patients with a few exceptions: families will complete the SF-1 for themselves as well as by proxy for patients.
Follow up contacts for subjects at 3-5 days follow-up will be as follows: If the patient is still hospitalized, in-person contact will be attempted (surrogates, who may not be reachable in person, may be contacted by their preferred mode); otherwise, contact will be attempted via phone, email, or mail per the subject's preference. Second and third contact attempts will be made using the subject's preferred mode 2 and 4 days later (7 and 14 days later for mail).
Follow-up contacts for subjects at 4-6 weeks follow-up will be as follows: initial contact by subject's preferred mode at 4 weeks from enrollment, followed by 4 additional contacts at an interval of every 4-7 days for phone and online, and an interval of every 7-10 days for mail. In all cases, only non-respondents will continue to be contacted.
For surrogates of patients who have died, after a minimum of 4 weeks following the patient death, an "after death" questionnaire will be sent to the subject using their preferred mode. The after-death questionnaire includes items related to treatment preferences, psychological distress (HADS), and health-related quality of life (SF1). The after-death questionnaire will be sent one time with no additional follow-ups.
At the end of study participation, study staff will collect additional information from the patient's electronic health record including intensity of care outcomes. Data will be abstracted using automated EHR data collection and "gold standard" manual abstraction using standardized methods for training and quality control.
Secondary outcomes also include the following patient- and surrogate/family-reported outcomes assessed by survey at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization: occurrence and quality of goals-of-care communication in the hospital, goal concordant care, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.
SPECIFIC AIM 2: Evaluate the factors affecting the Jumpstart intervention implementation and identify barriers and facilitators to future implementation.
Patient and Surrogate/Family Subject Identification and Recruitment: Included in the patient's and surrogate/family member's consent form is a provision informing subjects that they may be contacted at the end of their study involvement to take part in a short, semi-structured interview to evaluate their study participation. Subjects will be sampled purposively to represent the following experiences: 1) participants from both intervention arms (EHR-based and survey-based); 2) participants who participated in the intervention fully as well as those who did not to better understand the reasons for less than full participation. "Full" participation is indicated by having completed all of the study materials.
Clinician Subject Identification and Recruitment: Study staff will recruit clinicians who were involved with the study to participate in a short interview after the clinician's study involvement with the enrolled patient has ended.
All interview participants will be selected using purposive sampling to ensure a diverse group (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, specialty, year of training) in addition to the characteristics noted above.
Interview: Using an interview guide developed specifically for this project, interviewers will assess respondents' experience with the intervention and gather suggestions for ways to improve the intervention's content, delivery, and implementation, including implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, fidelity, penetration, maintenance) that will guide future dissemination of the intervention.
Assessment: Interviews are audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Validity and reliability are assessed by co-coding approaches.
- Conditions
- Dementia, Chronic Disease, Neoplasm Metastasis, Lung Neoplasms, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Heart Failure, Congestive
- Being tested
- Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart, EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart
- Keywords
- Patient care, Inpatients, Health Communication, Patient Care Planning, Quality of Life, Health care quality, access, and evaluation, Palliative care
- Medical subject headings
- Dementia, Chronic Disease, Neoplasm Metastasis, Lung Neoplasms, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Heart Failure, Liver Cirrhosis, Kidney Failure, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Survey-based Patient/Clinician JumpstartBehavioural
Also called Bidirectional Jumpstart Guide Intervention
The Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians, patients and their families that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The Jumpstart takes two forms. One is "EHR-based" and provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation derived from the EHR. The other is "bi-directional" and patient-specific (Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart Guide). It provides the same information as the EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide but also includes information about patients' self-reported preferences for communication and care as well as primary barriers and facilitators to this communication. The Jumpstart Guides include tips to improve this communication for clinicians, patients and families.
EHR-based Clinician JumpstartBehavioural
Also called Clinician-facing Jumpstart Guide Intervention
The Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The one-page EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation derived from the EHR. The EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide includes tips to improve goals-of-care communication.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart | Experimental | The Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart Guide will be developed with two types of data: 1) EHR data; and 2) Survey data. Using automated methods and NLP/ML algorithms, the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation will be identified from both inpatient and outpatient notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. The survey data will be completed by patients or their surrogate/family at enrollment and will provide assessments of the following: a) preferences for discussions about goals of care; b) most important barrier and facilitator for having such discussions; and c) current goals of care. These elements are contained within the Jumpstart guides and the information is tailored to each recipient (i.e., patient, surrogate/family, or clinician). Receives: Behavioral: Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart |
| EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart | Active comparator | The EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide will be developed by using automated methods and NLP/ML algorithms to both inpatient and outpatient EHR notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. It will summarize the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation. It will not include survey-based information. Receives: Behavioral: EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart |
| Usual care | No intervention | Patients in this arm receive usual care; neither subjects nor providers will receive either version of the Jumpstart Guide. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EHR Documentation of Goals of Care Discussions
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who have a goals-of-care discussion that has been documented in the electronic medical record (EHR) in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization. The proportion is the number of patients with goals-of-care (GOC) documentation over the number of patients in each study arm. Documentation of goals-of-care discussions will be evaluated using our natural language processing/machine learning (NLP/ML) methods.
Measured: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Secondary outcomes (15)
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (30 Days)
Any new ICU admissions or readmissions collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (90 Days)
Any new ICU admissions or readmissions collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (Post-discharge, 7 Days)
Any ICU admissions or readmissions collected from the EHR. Censored at 90 days post-randomization.
Measured: 7-days post-discharge
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (Post-discharge, 30 Days)
Any ICU admissions or readmissions collected from the EHR. Censored at 90 days post-randomization.
Measured: 30-days post-discharge
Intensity of Care: Hospital Readmissions (7 Days)
Any hospital readmissions in 7 days following discharge; collected from the EHR. Censored at 90 days post-randomization.
Measured: readmissions in 7 days following discharge
Intensity of Care: Hospital Readmissions (30 Days)
Any hospital readmissions in 30 days following discharge collected from the EHR. Censored at 90 days post-randomization.
Measured: readmissions in 30 days following discharge
Intensity of Care: ICU Free Days (30 Days)
Number of days alive and out of the ICU within 30 days from randomization, collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Free Days (90 Days)
Number of days alive and out of the ICU within 90 days from randomization, collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: Hospital Free Days (30 Days)
Number of days alive and out of the hospital within 30 days from randomization; collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: Hospital Free Days (90 Days)
Number of days alive and out of the hospital within 90 days from randomization; collected from the EHR.
Measured: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Patient or Surrogate/Family-reported Discussion of Goals (3-5 Days)
Subjects will self-report (yes or no) if they had a discussion of goals of care ("the kind of medical care you/your loved one would want") during the index hospitalization. Responses of "unsure" are included in the sample and not counted as missing. This outcome is presented as a proportion: the number of participants reporting a goals-of-care discussion over the number of patients in each study arm.
Measured: 3-5 days after randomization
Patient or Surrogate/Family-reported Discussion of Goals (4-6 Weeks)
Subjects will self-report (yes or no) if they had a discussion of goals of care ("the kind of medical care you/your loved one would want") during the index hospitalization. Responses of "unsure" are included in the sample and not counted as missing. This outcome is presented as a proportion: the number of subjects reporting a goals-of-care discussion over the number of patients in each study arm.
Measured: 4-6 weeks after randomization
Quality of Communication (QOC)
Quality of goals-of-care communication is assessed with the end-of-life communication scale (QOC_eol) of the Quality of Communication (QOC) survey. The QOC_eol subscale is based on 4 items, with item scores ranging from 0 (worst) to 10 (best). Responses of "My doctor has not done this" are converted into a rating of 0. Scores from the 4 items are summed together, resulting in a total score that ranges from 0 (worst) to 40 (best).
Measured: 3-5 days after randomization
SUPPORT Questions (3-5 Days)
Concordance between the care patients want and the care they are receiving is measured with two questions from the SUPPORT study. The first defines patients' preferences: "If you/patient had to make a choice at this time, would you/they prefer a course of treatment focused on extending life as much as possible, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, or would you/they want a plan of care focused on relieving pain and discomfort as much as possible, even if that means not living as long?" The second question assesses perceptions of current treatment using the same two options. Responses of "unsure" are included in the sample and not counted as missing. The outcome is a dichotomous variable of whether the preference matches the report of care received.
Measured: 3-5 days after randomization
SUPPORT Questions (4-6 Weeks)
Concordance between the care patients want and the care they are receiving is measured with two questions from the SUPPORT study. The first defines patients' preferences: "If you/patient had to make a choice at this time, would you/they prefer a course of treatment focused on extending life as much as possible, even if it means having more pain and discomfort, or would you/they want a plan of care focused on relieving pain and discomfort as much as possible, even if that means not living as long?" The second question assesses perceptions of current treatment using the same two options. Responses of "unsure" are included in the sample and not counted as missing. The outcome is a dichotomous variable of whether the preference matches the report of care received.
Measured: 4-6 weeks after randomization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Feb 2020
- Study start26 Jul 2021
- Primary completion1 Dec 2023
- Study completion27 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DementiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of WashingtonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 756 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Washington
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erin Kross, University of Washington
- Investigators
- Erin K Kross, MD, Principal investigator, University of Washington
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04283994
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00007031-B
- Other IDs
- 1R01AG006244
- Acronym
- PICSI-H
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lee RY, Li KS, Sibley J, Cohen T, Lober WB, O'Brien J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Ungar A, Walsh J, Nielsen EL, Dotolo DG, Kross EK. A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records. Clin Trials. 2026 Apr;23(2):145-154. doi: 10.1177/17407745251405386. Epub 2026 Feb 12.
PubMed 41680079
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using the Electronic Health Record to Identify and Promote Goals-of-Care Communication for Older Patients With Serious Illness
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04283994
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PICSI-H / STUDY00007031-B
- Conditions
- Dementia, Chronic Disease, Neoplasm Metastasis, Lung Neoplasms, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Heart Failure, Congestive
- Keywords
- Patient care, Inpatients, Health Communication, Patient Care Planning, Quality of Life, Health care quality, access, and evaluation, Palliative care
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 756 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of WashingtonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)
- Study start
- 26 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 21 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this protocol is to test the effectiveness of a Jumpstart intervention on patient-centered outcomes for patients with chronic illness by ensuring that they receive care that is concordant with their goals over time, and across settings and providers. This study is particularly interested in understanding the effect of the intervention to improve quality of palliative care for patients with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) but will also include other common chronic, life-limiting illnesses.
The specific aims are:
- To evaluate the efficacy of the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart, drawn from the electronic medical record (EHR), the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, drawn from patient or family completed surveys, and usual care for improving quality of care provided to patients with chronic illness experiencing a hospitalization. The primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion, assessed from randomization through 30 days. Secondary outcomes include: a) intensity of care outcomes (e.g., ICU use, ICU and hospital free days, hospital readmissions, costs of hospital care); and b) patient- and family-reported outcomes assessed by surveys at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization, including occurrence and quality of goals-of-care discussions in the hospital, goal-concordant care, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.
- To conduct a mixed-methods evaluation of the implementation of the interventions, guided by the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks for implementation science, incorporating quantitative evaluation of the interventions' reach and adoption, as well as qualitative analyses of interviews with participants, to explore barriers and facilitators to future implementation and dissemination.
Detailed description
OVERVIEW: Jumpstart is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians, patients and their families that focuses on hospitalized patients' goals of care. In this comparative effectiveness trial, the investigators examine the effectiveness of two approaches designed to promote goals-of-care discussions for older, seriously ill, hospitalized patients recruited from three UW Medicine hospitals. The two approaches include a survey-based bi-directional intervention and an EHR-based clinician-facing intervention. Both of these interventions provide clinicians with Jumpstart Guides that include data selected from the EHR on advance care planning as well as tips designed to improve communication about patients' goals of care and care preferences. Additionally, the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart includes not only the EHR-based care planning information but also communication tips that are based on specific information from patients' (or surrogates) self-reported surveys. These bi-directional Jumpstarts are shared not only with clinicians but also with participating patients and families. The Jumpstart Guide is provided by email and in-person. This trial tests the comparative effectiveness of the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart and usual care. Unique to this trial is the use of the EHR to identify eligible participants, provide data for the intervention, and be the mechanism for delivering the intervention.
This current study is "Trial 2" of the R01 Award funding this trial. Trial 1 was completed prior to the initiation of Trial 2.
SPECIFIC AIM 1: Evaluate the effectiveness of the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart compared to the EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart and usual care for improving quality of care.
TRIAL 2 has four components.
Component 1- Subject Identification/Recruitment/Randomization: Patients who meet the inclusion criteria are screened and identified using daily screening reports and staff review. The investigators oversample patients with ADRD to include 40% of the sample. Patients are approached by study staff in person during their hospital stay to assess their interest in participating in the study. Recruitment conversations are designed to take place in the patient's hospital room. Subjects are asked to complete surveys at three time points: 1) at enrollment; 2) 3-5 days after randomization; and 3) 4-6 weeks after randomization. Follow-up surveys may be completed in-person, by paper, online, or by phone, based on respondents' preferences.
If patients are not able to participate themselves (e.g., cognitive impairment, sedated or ventilated), the investigators recruit their legal surrogate decision-maker to participate. This surrogate (under Washington State Law RCW 7.70.065) provides consent on their own behalf and is a research study subject.
Eligible patients are assigned to one of the three interventions in a 1:1:1 ratio. Patients are randomized using variable size blocks and stratified for hospital and ADRD vs. no ADRD. Surrogates/families follow the randomization status of the patients whom they are representing.
Component 2- EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart guide: The Jumpstart guide is developed from an automated review of the EHR. It summarizes the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation. It provides general recommendations to assist clinicians in initiating goals of care discussions.
Component 3- Survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart Guide: Survey data, completed by patients or their surrogate/family at enrollment provide assessments of the following: a) preferences for discussions about goals of care; b) most important barrier and facilitator for having such discussions; and c) current goals of care. These elements are contained within the Jumpstart guides and the information is tailored to each recipient (i.e., patient, surrogate/family, or clinician). This version provides survey-response specific recommendations to initiate goals of care discussions.
Component 4- Delivery of the intervention:
Clinician delivery: Guides are delivered within the first few days (1-3) after randomization to the primary clinician team (attending and resident physicians and advanced practice providers) via secure email or in person. Study staff monitor the care team for the patient and ensure that any new providers also receive the Jumpstart guide.
Patient and family delivery: For the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart arm, study staff provide the patient or surrogate with a version of the Jumpstart guide, tailored to be appropriate for patients or their surrogates (without information on EHR-based advance care planning documents) and following the same timeframe. Jumpstart guides are delivered to the patient or surrogate/family at the hospital.
Comparison group: We will compare all 3 arms (survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart, EHR-based clinician-facing Jumpstart, usual care) in three two-way comparisons.
Outcome Assessment: The primary outcome is EHR documentation of a goals-of-care discussion in the 30 days following randomization. All subjects are asked to complete questionnaires at enrollment. The questionnaires may be completed as computer-assisted interviews or on-line depending on the subject's preference. The study staff member enrolling the subjects notifies them of their randomization status at this time. Subjects randomized to the survey-based bi-directional Jumpstart arm complete additional questionnaire items used to create the Jumpstart Guide.
The research staff will contact all subjects in person (or by telephone or email) for the evaluation/post-intervention phase. Patient and surrogate/family subjects will complete surveys at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization. Surveys can be completed by telephone, mail, or online; we will contact each patient or family/surrogate at each interval using their preferred modality. Subjects may complete the surveys with study staff in person (if the patient is still in the hospital), over the phone, online using REDCap, or on paper and return via mail. Surrogate/Family subjects will complete the same measures at the same intervals as patients with a few exceptions: families will complete the SF-1 for themselves as well as by proxy for patients.
Follow up contacts for subjects at 3-5 days follow-up will be as follows: If the patient is still hospitalized, in-person contact will be attempted (surrogates, who may not be reachable in person, may be contacted by their preferred mode); otherwise, contact will be attempted via phone, email, or mail per the subject's preference. Second and third contact attempts will be made using the subject's preferred mode 2 and 4 days later (7 and 14 days later for mail).
Follow-up contacts for subjects at 4-6 weeks follow-up will be as follows: initial contact by subject's preferred mode at 4 weeks from enrollment, followed by 4 additional contacts at an interval of every 4-7 days for phone and online, and an interval of every 7-10 days for mail. In all cases, only non-respondents will continue to be contacted.
For surrogates of patients who have died, after a minimum of 4 weeks following the patient death, an "after death" questionnaire will be sent to the subject using their preferred mode. The after-death questionnaire includes items related to treatment preferences, psychological distress (HADS), and health-related quality of life (SF1). The after-death questionnaire will be sent one time with no additional follow-ups.
At the end of study participation, study staff will collect additional information from the patient's electronic health record including intensity of care outcomes. Data will be abstracted using automated EHR data collection and "gold standard" manual abstraction using standardized methods for training and quality control.
Secondary outcomes also include the following patient- and surrogate/family-reported outcomes assessed by survey at 3-5 days and 4-6 weeks after randomization: occurrence and quality of goals-of-care communication in the hospital, goal concordant care, psychological symptoms, and quality of life.
SPECIFIC AIM 2: Evaluate the factors affecting the Jumpstart intervention implementation and identify barriers and facilitators to future implementation.
Patient and Surrogate/Family Subject Identification and Recruitment: Included in the patient's and surrogate/family member's consent form is a provision informing subjects that they may be contacted at the end of their study involvement to take part in a short, semi-structured interview to evaluate their study participation. Subjects will be sampled purposively to represent the following experiences: 1) participants from both intervention arms (EHR-based and survey-based); 2) participants who participated in the intervention fully as well as those who did not to better understand the reasons for less than full participation. "Full" participation is indicated by having completed all of the study materials.
Clinician Subject Identification and Recruitment: Study staff will recruit clinicians who were involved with the study to participate in a short interview after the clinician's study involvement with the enrolled patient has ended.
All interview participants will be selected using purposive sampling to ensure a diverse group (e.g., age, race/ethnicity, gender, specialty, year of training) in addition to the characteristics noted above.
Interview: Using an interview guide developed specifically for this project, interviewers will assess respondents' experience with the intervention and gather suggestions for ways to improve the intervention's content, delivery, and implementation, including implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, fidelity, penetration, maintenance) that will guide future dissemination of the intervention.
Assessment: Interviews are audio recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using thematic analysis. Validity and reliability are assessed by co-coding approaches.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart | Experimental | Behavioral: Survey-based Patient/Clinician JumpstartThe Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart Guide will be developed with two types of data: 1) EHR data; and 2) Survey data. Using automated methods and NLP/ML algorithms, the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation will be identified from both inpatient and outpatient notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. The survey data will be completed by patients or their surrogate/family at enrollment and will provide assessments of the following: a) preferences for discussions about goals of care; b) most important barrier and facilitator for having such discussions; and c) current goals of care. These elements are contained within the Jumpstart guides and the information is tailored to each recipient (i.e., patient, surrogate/family, or clinician). |
| EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart | Active comparator | Behavioral: EHR-based Clinician JumpstartThe EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide will be developed by using automated methods and NLP/ML algorithms to both inpatient and outpatient EHR notes (e.g., progress notes, specialty consult notes, alerts and care plans) preceding the current hospitalization. It will summarize the presence/absence of POLST, advance directives and DPOA documentation. It will not include survey-based information. |
| Usual care | No intervention | –Patients in this arm receive usual care; neither subjects nor providers will receive either version of the Jumpstart Guide. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- PATIENTS. Eligible patients will be those who are: 1) equal to or older than 80 years of age; or 2) equal to or older than 55 years of age with one or more chronic conditions used by the Dartmouth Atlas to study end-of-life care: malignant cancer/leukemia, chronic pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic liver disease, chronic renal disease, dementia, diabetes with end-organ damage, and peripheral vascular disease, 3) English-speaking, 4) admitted for minimum of 12 hours/maximum of 96 hours to participating in-patient services at the participating hospitals, and 5) without documentation in the EHR of a goals-of-care discussion during this admission. Patients without decisional capacity (as documented in the EHR or as identified with a brief six-item screening tool) will be represented by a legal surrogate decision maker/legal next of kin (LNOK) in accordance with Washington State Law RCW 7.70.065.
- SURROGATE/FAMILY. Eligible surrogate/family subjects will be those who are 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, involved in the patient's medical care or decision-making.
- CLINICIANS (Interview). Eligible clinicians will be those who are 18 years of age or older, English-speaking, employed at a participating hospital, and have been the clinician of record for an enrolled patient in the trial.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Reasons for exclusion for any patient in include: restricted status (prisoners or victims of violence); legal or risk management concerns (as determined by the attending physician or via hospital record designation); unable to complete informed consent procedures; and without a legal surrogate to participate for them. Patients who are non-English speaking (and therefore unable to complete survey materials) are excluded. Reasons for exclusion for any surrogate/family subject include: non-English speaking (and therefore unable to complete study materials), legal or risk management concerns (as determined by the attending physician or via hospital record designation); psychological illness or morbidity; and physical or mental limitations preventing ability to complete questionnaires. Patients under COVID precautions will be excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Survey-based Patient/Clinician JumpstartAlso: Bidirectional Jumpstart Guide InterventionThe Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians, patients and their families that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The Jumpstart takes two forms. One is "EHR-based" and provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation derived from the EHR. The other is "bi-directional" and patient-specific (Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart Guide). It provides the same information as the EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide but also includes information about patients' self-reported preferences for communication and care as well as primary barriers and facilitators to this communication. The Jumpstart Guides include tips to improve this communication for clinicians, patients and families. | Behavioural | Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart |
| EHR-based Clinician JumpstartAlso: Clinician-facing Jumpstart Guide InterventionThe Jumpstart Guide is a communication-priming intervention for clinicians that addresses hospitalized patients' goals of care. The intervention's goal is to prompt clinicians to provide standard of care which includes a discussion with patients or their legal surrogate decision-maker about their goals of care. The one-page EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide provides information to the clinician about prior advance care planning documentation derived from the EHR. The EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart Guide includes tips to improve goals-of-care communication. | Behavioural | EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart |
Primary outcome
EHR Documentation of Goals of Care Discussions
Time frame: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who have a goals-of-care discussion that has been documented in the electronic medical record (EHR) in the period between randomization and 30 days following randomization. The proportion is the number of patients with goals-of-care (GOC) documentation over the number of patients in each study arm. Documentation of goals-of-care discussions will be evaluated using our natural language processing/machine learning (NLP/ML) methods.
15 secondary outcomes
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (30 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (90 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (Post-discharge, 7 Days)
Time frame: 7-days post-discharge
Intensity of Care: ICU Admissions (Post-discharge, 30 Days)
Time frame: 30-days post-discharge
Intensity of Care: Hospital Readmissions (7 Days)
Time frame: readmissions in 7 days following discharge
Intensity of Care: Hospital Readmissions (30 Days)
Time frame: readmissions in 30 days following discharge
Intensity of Care: ICU Free Days (30 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: ICU Free Days (90 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: Hospital Free Days (30 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 30 days post randomization
Intensity of Care: Hospital Free Days (90 Days)
Time frame: from randomization to 90 days post randomization
Patient or Surrogate/Family-reported Discussion of Goals (3-5 Days)
Time frame: 3-5 days after randomization
Patient or Surrogate/Family-reported Discussion of Goals (4-6 Weeks)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks after randomization
Quality of Communication (QOC)
Time frame: 3-5 days after randomization
SUPPORT Questions (3-5 Days)
Time frame: 3-5 days after randomization
SUPPORT Questions (4-6 Weeks)
Time frame: 4-6 weeks after randomization
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jun 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41680079Lee RY, Li KS, Sibley J, Cohen T, Lober WB, O'Brien J, LeDuc N, Mallon Andrews K, Ungar A, Walsh J, Nielsen EL, Dotolo DG, Kross EK. A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records. Clin Trials. 2026 Apr;23(2):145-154. doi: 10.1177/17407745251405386. Epub 2026 Feb 12.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dementia
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Safety of Disease-Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
Alzheimer's Disease (AD)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Lisdexamfetamine For the Treatment of Conduct Disorder in Children
Conduct Disorder
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KarXT + KarX-EC for the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Alzheimer's Disease (ADAGIO-1)
Alzheimer Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Erin K Kross, MD principal investigator
University of Washington
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Survey-based Patient/Clinician Jumpstart and EHR-based Clinician Jumpstart in people with Dementia and Chronic Disease, run by University of Washington at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 21 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EHR Documentation of Goals of Care Discussions (time frame: from randomization to 30 days post randomization). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04283994, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jun 2025.