Advanced CancerRevie⊕NCT04254926
Impact of a Resource-based Life Review Intervention on Advanced Cancer Patients
A study testing Revie ⊕ in people with Advanced Cancer, run by School of Health Sciences Geneva at 2 sites in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial is conducted. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Revie ⊕
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 71 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 6 Apr 2019to 18 Aug 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults 18 years with and advanced cancer,
- whose general health status is adequate for participation in the study based on a clinical assessment by the nurse / doctor; and
- who consent to participate in the study.
Who cannot join
- documented cognitive impairment that compromises capacity for discernment,
- command of French is insufficient for reading, writing, or conversing.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Switzerland2 sites
Hopitaux Universitaires de Genève
Geneva, 1200
Haute école de santé
Geneva, 1206
About this study
Official title: " Revie ⊕" Impact of a Resource-based Life Review Intervention on Patients With Advanced Cancer in an Outpatient Oncology Center: a Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial is conducted. The study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva at 3 outpatient units.
Read the detailed description
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on spiritual well-being, personal development, life satisfaction, and the perception of the interaction with the nurses. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).This monocentric study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) at two outpatient units (planned n=102; 51 per group).
- Conditions
- Advanced Cancer
- Being tested
- Revie ⊕
- Keywords
- resource-based, self-esteem, life review intervention
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Revie ⊕Behavioural
Revie ⊕ is a positive approach centered on the resources and strengths of the patient, and it consists of an intervention that focuses on the individual's life review. Revie ⊕ allows specialist nurses to discuss life events with cancer patients, to identify the significant elements, and to explore how the diagnosis has changed their values and preferences. The intervention is geared toward working with the patient to discover their potential, to identify their strategies for coping with the events of their life, and to thereby accompany them in achieving a better understanding of themselves and what defines their identity. The intervention also allows their concerns surrounding death to be addressed, in addition to providing clarity in regard to the life projects. In the end, as a conclusion to the intervention, the patient is provided a booklet recounting the salient features of their life review along with photographs, quotes, or images.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Revie ⊕ intervention early | Experimental | participants randomized into (i) the intervention group (IG) receive the Revie ⊕ intervention early on. Receives: Behavioral: Revie ⊕ |
| Revie ⊕ intervention later | Experimental | The control group (CG) receives the same intervention Revie ⊕ but later on (i.e., after eight weeks). Receives: Behavioral: Revie ⊕ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self-esteem
Self-esteem will be measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE, 10 items) developed in 1965 (French version).
Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 4. A score above 30 points corresponds to a high level of self-esteem, between 20 and 30 points indicates a moderate self-esteem, and a score of less than 20 points reflects a low self-esteem.
Measured: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Spiritual well-being
Spiritual well-being will be measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-spiritual well-being (FACIT-Sp).
Minimum value = 0 Maximum value = 4. The higher the score, the better the spiritual well-being.
Measured: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Personal development
Personal development will be measured by the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) instrument developed by Tedeschi and Calhoun in 1996 Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 6. A high score means a high level of development.
Measured: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Satisfaction with life
Satisfaction with life will be measured with the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) instrument developed by Pavot and Diener in 1985.
Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 7. A high score means a high level of satisfaction with life.
Measured: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
The patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse
The Nurse-Patient-Interaction Scale (NPIS) questionnaire developed by Haugan in 2012 will be used to evaluate the patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 10. A high score means a great appreciation of interaction.
Measured: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Feb 2020
- Study start6 Apr 2019
- Primary completion18 Aug 2021
- Study completion18 Aug 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- School of Health Sciences Geneva
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Krebsforschung Schweiz, Bern, Switzerland, University Hospital, Geneva
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gora Da Rocha, School of Health Sciences Geneva
- Investigators
- Sophie Pautex, Professor, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Geneva
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04254926
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KFS-4390-02-2018
- Acronym
- Revie⊕
- Status last verified
- Jun 2023
- First submitted
- 14 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: this has to be specified later
Publications
da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Zumstein-Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: An intervention promoting the dignity of individuals with advanced cancer: A feasibility study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;39:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
PubMed 30850142Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Colin S, Shaha M, Pautex S. [The acceptability of the intervention Revie plus sign in circle : the nurses' perceptions and experiences]. Rech Soins Infirm. 2016 Dec;(127):55-70. doi: 10.3917/rsi.127.0055. French.
PubMed 28186482Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: the influence of a life review intervention including a positive, patient-centered approach towards enhancing the personal dignity of patients with advanced cancer-a study protocol for a feasibility study using a mixed method investigation. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 19;2:63. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0101-z. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27965878Da Rocha Rodrigues G, Warne DW, Scuderi L, Lilla D, Stanic J, Pautex S. Revie plus sign in circle: Impact of a resource-based life review intervention on patients with advanced cancer: A waitlist controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb;68:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102506. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
PubMed 38301385
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- " Revie ⊕" Impact of a Resource-based Life Review Intervention on Patients With Advanced Cancer in an Outpatient Oncology Center: a Waitlist Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04254926
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Revie⊕ / KFS-4390-02-2018
- Conditions
- Advanced Cancer
- Keywords
- resource-based, self-esteem, life review intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 71 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- School of Health Sciences GenevaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Krebsforschung Schweiz, Bern, Switzerland, University Hospital, Geneva
- Study start
- 6 Apr 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Aug 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 18 Aug 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Feb 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial is conducted. The study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva at 3 outpatient units.
Detailed description
The main objective of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on the self-esteem of patients diagnosed with an advanced cancer. The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effects of the Revie ⊕ intervention on spiritual well-being, personal development, life satisfaction, and the perception of the interaction with the nurses. A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).This monocentric study takes place in the oncology department of the University Hospitals of Geneva (HUG) at two outpatient units (planned n=102; 51 per group).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A pragmatic, two-arm parallel-group, waitlist randomized controlled trial (WLRCT) is conducted in which participants are randomized into (i) intervention, or (ii) waitlist control groups. The intervention group (IG) receives the Revie ⊕ intervention early on and the control group (CG) the same intervention but later on (i.e., after eight weeks).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Revie ⊕ intervention early | Experimental | Behavioral: Revie ⊕participants randomized into (i) the intervention group (IG) receive the Revie ⊕ intervention early on. |
| Revie ⊕ intervention later | Experimental | Behavioral: Revie ⊕The control group (CG) receives the same intervention Revie ⊕ but later on (i.e., after eight weeks). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults 18 years with and advanced cancer,
- whose general health status is adequate for participation in the study based on a clinical assessment by the nurse / doctor; and
- who consent to participate in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- documented cognitive impairment that compromises capacity for discernment,
- command of French is insufficient for reading, writing, or conversing.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Revie ⊕Revie ⊕ is a positive approach centered on the resources and strengths of the patient, and it consists of an intervention that focuses on the individual's life review. Revie ⊕ allows specialist nurses to discuss life events with cancer patients, to identify the significant elements, and to explore how the diagnosis has changed their values and preferences. The intervention is geared toward working with the patient to discover their potential, to identify their strategies for coping with the events of their life, and to thereby accompany them in achieving a better understanding of themselves and what defines their identity. The intervention also allows their concerns surrounding death to be addressed, in addition to providing clarity in regard to the life projects. In the end, as a conclusion to the intervention, the patient is provided a booklet recounting the salient features of their life review along with photographs, quotes, or images. | Behavioural | Revie ⊕ intervention early, Revie ⊕ intervention later |
Primary outcome
Self-esteem
Time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Self-esteem will be measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSE, 10 items) developed in 1965 (French version). Minimum value = 1 Maximum value = 4. A score above 30 points corresponds to a high level of self-esteem, between 20 and 30 points indicates a moderate self-esteem, and a score of less than 20 points reflects a low self-esteem.
4 secondary outcomes
Spiritual well-being
Time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Personal development
Time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Satisfaction with life
Time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
The patient's perception of their interaction with the nurse
Time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2023.
- Background: PubMed 30850142da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Zumstein-Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: An intervention promoting the dignity of individuals with advanced cancer: A feasibility study. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;39:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
- Background: PubMed 28186482Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Colin S, Shaha M, Pautex S. [The acceptability of the intervention Revie plus sign in circle : the nurses' perceptions and experiences]. Rech Soins Infirm. 2016 Dec;(127):55-70. doi: 10.3917/rsi.127.0055. French.
- Background: PubMed 27965878Da Rocha Rodrigues MG, Pautex S, Shaha M. Revie plus sign in circle: the influence of a life review intervention including a positive, patient-centered approach towards enhancing the personal dignity of patients with advanced cancer-a study protocol for a feasibility study using a mixed method investigation. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 19;2:63. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0101-z. eCollection 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38301385Da Rocha Rodrigues G, Warne DW, Scuderi L, Lilla D, Stanic J, Pautex S. Revie plus sign in circle: Impact of a resource-based life review intervention on patients with advanced cancer: A waitlist controlled trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Feb;68:102506. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102506. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. this has to be specified later
Related trials for Advanced Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Belzutifan (MK-6482) in Combination With Lenvatinib Versus Cabozantinib for Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma (MK-6482-011)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of ABSK043 in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumor
Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sophie Pautex, Professor principal investigator
University Hospital, Geneva
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Revie ⊕ in people with Advanced Cancer, run by School of Health Sciences Geneva at 2 sites in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self-esteem (time frame: Baseline, change from Baseline at 2 months, change from Baseline at 4 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04254926, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2023.