Cerebral PalsyNCT04251390
Initial Outcomes of Robotic Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Use by a Non-ambulatory Child With CP
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
There are very few evidence-based interventions for children with cerebral palsy who cannot walk. The Trexo-Home is a device that is newly available for rent by families, but its impact is unknown. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 7 to 8 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebral Palsy
- What is being tested?
- trexo Home
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- 6 Dec 2019to 4 Feb 2021
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 7 to 8 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Study population: GMFCS IV
Who may be able to join
- This case study will involve one 7 year old child with cerebral palsy who is functionally non-ambulatory. This is a prospective case study to understand how a walking-aid device (trexo Home) that has been rented by a family, may impact a child with cerebral palsy who cannot walk. The decision to use the trexo exoskeleton device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on its use was secondary.
Who cannot join
- N/A
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Initial Outcomes of Robotic Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Use by a Non-ambulatory Child With Cerebral Palsy: A Case Study
There are very few evidence-based interventions for children with cerebral palsy who cannot walk. The Trexo-Home is a device that is newly available for rent by families, but its impact is unknown. By tracking and recording various outcome measures throughout this project, the investigators hope to inform future larger scale controlled studies.
Read the detailed description
Design: This is a prospective case study to understand how a walking-aid device (Trexo-Home) that has been rented by a family, may impact a child with cerebral palsy (CP) who cannot walk. The decision to use the device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on it's use was secondary, making it an observational study. The proposed procedures below may be modified to adapt to the child and family's interest and needs.
Background and Rationale: Evidence suggests that positive health outcomes are associated with reducing sedentary behaviour and sitting time. For individuals with significant motor impairments, spending the majority of their days sitting in a wheelchair is often a reality, potentially leading to secondary preventable chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers. Many children with CP have mobility limitations, and approximately 30% are non-ambulatory or require assistive devices. Currently, there are very few treatments available for non-ambulatory children with CP, and treatments may be invasive or have undesirable side effects. Tréxō Robotics (Trexo) aims to bridge the gap in treatments available for non-ambulatory children. Trexo offers a robotic exoskeleton that enables children to walk using a gait trainer with an external power source with the safety of a walker. This revolutionary technology is new to the world of pediatric rehabilitation, and Trexo Home provides the advantage of versatility to use the device at home or in the community on a daily basis. This means children who would otherwise spend most of their day sitting in a wheelchair can now stand and walk on a daily basis using this device in a familiar setting. Presently, the impacts of its use are unknown, however similar exoskeletons used with adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) show promising health benefits beyond enjoyment of walking again, such as improvements in spasticity and regularity of bowel movements.
This case study will involve one 7 year old child with CP who is functionally non-ambulatory. This child's family holds an agreement to lease the Trexo Home for a period of 6 months. Through the exploratory nature and prospective design of this case study, the investigators will gather critical data for informing future larger scale, controlled studies. With limited pediatric data related to the use of robotic assisted movement, this information could potentially add to or alter current interventions recommended for children with significant motor impairments.
Objective: The objective of this case study is to thoroughly assess the impact of Trexo Home use in one 7 year old child with CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV).
- Does using a robotic exoskeleton meet the family's primary goal - facilitating their child's experience of joy? ii) What is the family's experience around feasibility and the child's tolerability of using the Trexo at home or in the community? iii) What are the initial physiologic outcomes following twelve weeks of Trexo use?
Methods: Implementation of this project will occur over 16 weeks, with a baseline period of 4 weeks , an intervention period of 12 weeks. Throughout the project the investigators will have weekly contact with the participant's family. This frequency was selected in discussion with the family.
Joy will be evaluated using a Smiley Face Likert Scale, completed separately by the child and the parents on a weekly basis.
Feasibility and Tolerability will be quantified by number of minutes of Trexo Home use and number of steps taken per day. Reasons for skipping or abbreviating a therapeutic session will be recorded.
Physiologic outcomes evaluate key symptoms of cerebral palsy and secondary complications.
Spasticity will be assessed every second week using clinical measures (modified Tardieu and modified Ashworth Scale) and quantitative measures (the Portable Spasticity Assessment Device which differentiates reflexive and intrinsic stiffness).
Range of motion (ROM) at the hip and knee joint bilaterally will be measured via standardized goniometry, and will be done every second week, on alternate weeks from the spasticity assessment.
The child's sitting balance will be assessed monthly using the Early Clinical Assessment of Balance Version 2.
Bowel movement frequency and any related medication use will be tracked with daily diaries. This area has significant potential to enhance the quality of life of an individual, and adults with a spinal cord injury using exoskeleton have noted benefits.
Videos of the balance assessment and of free movement will occur in phase 1 and every month during phase 2, the intervention period. Video of the child using the Trexo device will be taken every two weeks in phase 2.
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Being tested
- trexo Home
- Keywords
- exoskeleton device
- Medical subject headings
- Cerebral Palsy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
trexo HomeDevice
12 week intervention, with weekly contact/assessments of the affects of using the trexo Home.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| trexo Home intervention | Participants family is renting a trexo Home from trexo. The decision to use the device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on its use was secondary. The proposed procedures may be modified to adapt to the child and family's interest and needs. Participant will use the trexo Home in their home, school, and community. Receives: Device: trexo Home |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of bowel movements
Daily diary describing quantity and quality of bowel movements
Measured: Daily for 12 weeks
modified Ashworth Scale and modified Tardieu
Muscle spasticity measured in lower extremities
Measured: every 1-2 weeks for 12 weeks
Range of motion of lower extremities
Standardized goniometry to measure range of ankle, knee and hip joints
Measured: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (4)
Early Clinical Assessment of Balance version 2
Measurement tool for postural balance and head control
Measured: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Parent and caregiver anecdotal reports
To describe feasibility and tolerability of using the trexo at home or in the community
Measured: Weekly over 12 weeks
Smiley face likert scale for Joy
A scale to quantify the participant's experience of joy while using the device
Measured: Daily when using the device over 12 weeks
Portable Spasticity Assessment Device
A device and software system used to measure muscle spasticity
Measured: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jan 2020
- Study start6 Dec 2019
- Primary completion15 Mar 2020
- Study completion4 Feb 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cerebral PalsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of CalgaryThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Calgary
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elizabeth Condliffe, PhD MD, University of Calgary
- Investigators
- Elizabeth G Condliffe, PhD, MD, Principal investigator, University of Calgary
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251390
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REB19-1484
- Status last verified
- Feb 2023
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 8 Feb 2023
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Feb 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Initial Outcomes of Robotic Lower Extremity Exoskeleton Use by a Non-ambulatory Child With Cerebral Palsy: A Case Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04251390
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REB19-1484
- Conditions
- Cerebral Palsy
- Keywords
- exoskeleton device
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CalgaryUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Feb 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are very few evidence-based interventions for children with cerebral palsy who cannot walk. The Trexo-Home is a device that is newly available for rent by families, but its impact is unknown. By tracking and recording various outcome measures throughout this project, the investigators hope to inform future larger scale controlled studies.
Detailed description
Design: This is a prospective case study to understand how a walking-aid device (Trexo-Home) that has been rented by a family, may impact a child with cerebral palsy (CP) who cannot walk. The decision to use the device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on it's use was secondary, making it an observational study. The proposed procedures below may be modified to adapt to the child and family's interest and needs.
Background and Rationale: Evidence suggests that positive health outcomes are associated with reducing sedentary behaviour and sitting time. For individuals with significant motor impairments, spending the majority of their days sitting in a wheelchair is often a reality, potentially leading to secondary preventable chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and some cancers. Many children with CP have mobility limitations, and approximately 30% are non-ambulatory or require assistive devices. Currently, there are very few treatments available for non-ambulatory children with CP, and treatments may be invasive or have undesirable side effects. Tréxō Robotics (Trexo) aims to bridge the gap in treatments available for non-ambulatory children. Trexo offers a robotic exoskeleton that enables children to walk using a gait trainer with an external power source with the safety of a walker. This revolutionary technology is new to the world of pediatric rehabilitation, and Trexo Home provides the advantage of versatility to use the device at home or in the community on a daily basis. This means children who would otherwise spend most of their day sitting in a wheelchair can now stand and walk on a daily basis using this device in a familiar setting. Presently, the impacts of its use are unknown, however similar exoskeletons used with adults with spinal cord injury (SCI) show promising health benefits beyond enjoyment of walking again, such as improvements in spasticity and regularity of bowel movements.
This case study will involve one 7 year old child with CP who is functionally non-ambulatory. This child's family holds an agreement to lease the Trexo Home for a period of 6 months. Through the exploratory nature and prospective design of this case study, the investigators will gather critical data for informing future larger scale, controlled studies. With limited pediatric data related to the use of robotic assisted movement, this information could potentially add to or alter current interventions recommended for children with significant motor impairments.
Objective: The objective of this case study is to thoroughly assess the impact of Trexo Home use in one 7 year old child with CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System level IV).
- Does using a robotic exoskeleton meet the family's primary goal - facilitating their child's experience of joy? ii) What is the family's experience around feasibility and the child's tolerability of using the Trexo at home or in the community? iii) What are the initial physiologic outcomes following twelve weeks of Trexo use?
Methods: Implementation of this project will occur over 16 weeks, with a baseline period of 4 weeks , an intervention period of 12 weeks. Throughout the project the investigators will have weekly contact with the participant's family. This frequency was selected in discussion with the family.
Joy will be evaluated using a Smiley Face Likert Scale, completed separately by the child and the parents on a weekly basis.
Feasibility and Tolerability will be quantified by number of minutes of Trexo Home use and number of steps taken per day. Reasons for skipping or abbreviating a therapeutic session will be recorded.
Physiologic outcomes evaluate key symptoms of cerebral palsy and secondary complications.
Spasticity will be assessed every second week using clinical measures (modified Tardieu and modified Ashworth Scale) and quantitative measures (the Portable Spasticity Assessment Device which differentiates reflexive and intrinsic stiffness).
Range of motion (ROM) at the hip and knee joint bilaterally will be measured via standardized goniometry, and will be done every second week, on alternate weeks from the spasticity assessment.
The child's sitting balance will be assessed monthly using the Early Clinical Assessment of Balance Version 2.
Bowel movement frequency and any related medication use will be tracked with daily diaries. This area has significant potential to enhance the quality of life of an individual, and adults with a spinal cord injury using exoskeleton have noted benefits.
Videos of the balance assessment and of free movement will occur in phase 1 and every month during phase 2, the intervention period. Video of the child using the Trexo device will be taken every two weeks in phase 2.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| trexo Home intervention | – | Device: trexo HomeParticipants family is renting a trexo Home from trexo. The decision to use the device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on its use was secondary. The proposed procedures may be modified to adapt to the child and family's interest and needs. Participant will use the trexo Home in their home, school, and community. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 7 to 8 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- GMFCS IV
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- This case study will involve one 7 year old child with cerebral palsy who is functionally non-ambulatory. This is a prospective case study to understand how a walking-aid device (trexo Home) that has been rented by a family, may impact a child with cerebral palsy who cannot walk. The decision to use the trexo exoskeleton device was separate from this research, and the decision to do research on its use was secondary.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- N/A
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| trexo Home12 week intervention, with weekly contact/assessments of the affects of using the trexo Home. | Device | trexo Home intervention |
Primary outcome
Frequency of bowel movements
Time frame: Daily for 12 weeks
Daily diary describing quantity and quality of bowel movements
modified Ashworth Scale and modified Tardieu
Time frame: every 1-2 weeks for 12 weeks
Muscle spasticity measured in lower extremities
Range of motion of lower extremities
Time frame: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Standardized goniometry to measure range of ankle, knee and hip joints
4 secondary outcomes
Early Clinical Assessment of Balance version 2
Time frame: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Parent and caregiver anecdotal reports
Time frame: Weekly over 12 weeks
Smiley face likert scale for Joy
Time frame: Daily when using the device over 12 weeks
Portable Spasticity Assessment Device
Time frame: every 1-2 weeks over 12 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Feb 2023.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Video-based Visual Feedback Combined With Task-oriented Physiotherapy Among Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy (CP)
Recruiting
Intrathecal Baclofen and Pediatric Dystonia
Dystonic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingPhase 2
tSCS and 5-Azacitidine for Enhanced Motor Outcomes in Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Robotic Gloves Training on Upper Limb Coordination, Selective Motor Control and Activities of Daily Living in Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Peripheral Neurotomies of the Upper Limb in Children With Cerebral Palsy.
Cerebral Palsy Infantile, Upper Limb Spasticity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Elizabeth G Condliffe, PhD, MD principal investigator
University of Calgary
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cerebral Palsy, run by University of Calgary at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of bowel movements (time frame: Daily for 12 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Feb 2023; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.