AzTrials
AzTrials

Atopic DermatitisPhase 3ADhereNCT04250337

Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab (LY3650150) in Combination With Topical Corticosteroid in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

A Phase 3 study testing Lebrikizumab and Topical Corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 63 sites in 4 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which is 16 weeks in duration. The study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab when used in combination with topical corticosteroid (TCS) treatment compared with placebo in combination with TCS treatment for… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atopic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Lebrikizumab and Topical Corticosteroid
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
228 participants
Where
63 sitesin 4 countries
Study dates
3 Feb 2020to 16 Sep 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female adult and adolescents (≥12 years to <18 years, and weighing ≥40 kg).
  • Chronic AD (according to American Academy of Dermatology Consensus Criteria) that has been present for ≥1 year before the screening visit.
  • Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score ≥16 at the baseline visit.
  • Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score ≥3 (scale of 0 to 4) at the baseline visit
  • ≥10% body surface area (BSA) of AD involvement at the baseline visit.
  • History of inadequate response to treatment with topical medications.

Who cannot join

  • Participation in a prior lebrikizumab clinical study.
  • Treatment with the following prior to the baseline visit:
  • An investigational drug within 8 weeks or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer.
  • Dupilumab within 8 weeks.
  • B-cell-depleting biologics, including to rituximab, within 6 months.
  • Other biologics within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks, whichever is longer.
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Treatment with a live (attenuated) vaccine within 12 weeks of the baseline visit or planned during the study.
  • Uncontrolled chronic disease that might require bursts of oral corticosteroids.
  • Evidence of active acute or chronic hepatitis
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or positive HIV serology at screening.
  • History of malignancy, including mycosis fungoides, within 5 years before the screening visit, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, completely treated and resolved non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study.

Trial locations and contacts

63 sites in 4 countries.

63 sites in 4 countries

United States43 sites
  • Orange County Research Institute

    Anaheim, California, 92801

  • Fivenson Dermatology

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48103

  • Arlington Research Center, Inc

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • ActivMed Practices and Research

    Beverly, Massachusetts, 01915

  • Wallace Medical Group, Inc.

    Beverly Hills, California, 90211

  • Clinical Research Center of the Carolinas

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29407

  • OnSite Clinical Solutions

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277

  • Clarkston Skin Research

    Clarkston, Michigan, 48346

  • St. Francis Medical Institute

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Dermatology Treatment and Research Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75230

  • Psoriasis Treatment Center of Central New Jersey

    East Windsor, New Jersey, 08520

  • First OC Dermatology

    Fountain Valley, California, 92708

  • Center For Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • University of Florida - Gainesville

    Gainesville, Florida, 32606

  • Direct Helpers Medical Center

    Hialeah, Florida, 33012

  • The Community Research of South Florida

    Hialeah, Florida, 33016

  • Clinical Partners, LLC

    Johnston, Rhode Island, 02919

  • California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group + Research Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90025

  • Keck School of Medicine University of Southern California

    Los Angeles, California, 90033

  • Dermatology Research Associates

    Los Angeles, California, 90045

  • LA Universal Research Center, INC

    Los Angeles, California, 90057

  • GSI Clinical Research, LLC

    Margate, Florida, 33063

  • Clinical Research Institute

    Medford, Oregon, 97504

  • Vitae Research Center, LLC

    Miami, Florida, 33135

  • Well Pharma Medical Research Corp.

    Miami, Florida, 33143

  • Sadick Research Group

    New York, New York, 10075

  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Oregon Dermatology and Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Oregon Medical Research Center

    Portland, Oregon, 97223

  • OHSU Center for Health and Healing

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • ALLCUTIS Research

    Portsmouth, New Hampshire, 03801

  • Beacon Clinical Research LLC

    Quincy, Massachusetts, 02169

  • Dermatology and Skin Cancer Specialists

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • MediSearch Clinical Trials

    Saint Joseph, Missouri, 64506

  • ACRC Studies

    San Diego, California, 92119

  • University Clinical Trials, Inc.

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Advanced Medical Research

    Sandy Springs, Georgia, 30328

  • Southern California Dermatology, Inc.

    Santa Ana, California, 92701

  • Investigate MD

    Scottsdale, Arizona, 85255

  • ForCare Clinical Research

    Tampa, Florida, 33613-1244

  • Foxhall Dermatology

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20016

  • Wilmington Dermatology Center

    Wilmington, North Carolina, 28405

Other trials in United States

Poland9 sites
  • COPERNICUS Podmiot Leczniczy sp. z o.o.

    Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-219

  • Clinica Vitae Sp. z o.o.

    Gdansk, Woj. Pomorskie, 80-405

  • Gabinet Dermatlogiczny. Beata Krecisz

    Kielce, Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship, 25-155

  • Labderm s.c.

    Ossy, Silesian Voivodeship, 42-624

  • Kliniczny Szpital Wojewodzki nr. 1 Klinika Dermatologii

    Rzeszów, Podkarpackie Voivodeship, 35-055

  • Alergo-Med Specjalistyczna Przychodnia Lekarska Sp Z O.O.

    Tarnów, Malopolska, 33100

  • Clinical Research Group Sp. z o.o.

    Warsaw, 01-142

  • Centralny Szpital Kliniczny MSWiA

    Warsaw, 02-507

  • DermMEDICA Sp. z o.o.

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 51-318

Other trials in Poland

Canada6 sites
  • International Dermatology Research

    Montreal, Quebec, H3H1V4

  • SKiN Centre for Dermatology

    Peterborough, Ontario, K9J 5K2

  • CARe Clinic

    Red Deer, Alberta, T4N 6V7

  • Dr. Chih-ho Hong Medical Inc.

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3R 6A7

  • Enverus Medical Research

    Surrey, British Columbia, V3V 0C6

  • Wiseman Dermatology Research Inc.

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3M 3Z4

Other trials in Canada

Germany5 sites
  • Praxis für Ganzheitliche Dermatologie im Ärztehaus

    Berlin, 13055

  • Elbe Klinikum Buxtehude

    Buxtehude, Lower Saxony, 21614

  • Technische Universitaet Dresden - Universitaetsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus - Klinik und Poliklinik fuer

    Dresden, Saxony, 01307

  • Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt

    Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590

  • TFS Trial Form Support GmbH

    Hamburg, 20537

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab When Used In Combination With Topical Corticosteroid Treatment In Patients With Moderate-To-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which is 16 weeks in duration. The study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lebrikizumab when used in combination with topical corticosteroid (TCS) treatment compared with placebo in combination with TCS treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.

Being tested
Lebrikizumab, Placebo, Topical Corticosteroid
Keywords
Eczema, Dermatitis, Dermatitis, Atopic, Skin Diseases
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Atopic, Eczema, Dermatitis, Skin Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • LebrikizumabBiological

    Also called LY3650150, DRM06

    Subcutaneous injection

  • PlaceboOther

    Subcutaneous injection

  • Topical CorticosteroidOther

    Topical Corticosteroid

Study groups in NCT04250337
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lebrikizumab + Topical CorticosteroidExperimental500 mg Lebrikizumab (2 x 250 mg) subcutaneous (SC) injections of lebrikizumab as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 followed by a single injection of 250 mg Lebrikizumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) from Week 4 until Week 14. Topical corticosteroid (TCS) will be initiated at Baseline in all participants and may be tapered or stopped, or restarted as needed, based on treatment response.
Receives: Biological: Lebrikizumab; Other: Topical Corticosteroid
Placebo + Topical CorticosteroidPlacebo comparatorTwo placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections as a loading dose at Baseline and Week 2 followed by a single injection of placebo every Q2W from Week 4 until Week 14. TCS will be initiated at Baseline in all participants and may be tapered or stopped, or restarted as needed, based on treatment response
Receives: Other: Placebo; Other: Topical Corticosteroid

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2-points From Baseline to Week 16.

    The IGA measures the investigator's global assessment of the participant's overall severity of their AD, based on a static, numeric 5-point scale from 0 (clear skin) to 4 (severe disease). The score is based on an overall assessment of the degree of erythema, papulation/induration, oozing/crusting, and lichenification.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) (≥75% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score) at Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

Secondary outcomes (29)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 (≥90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score) at Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  2. Percent Change in Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable." Least Squares (LS) Mean was calculated using analysis covariance (ANCOVA) model includes treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥4-Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-Point Reduction From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  4. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 16

    Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to rate their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours with 0 indicating "No itch" and 10 indicating "Worst itch imaginable."

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  5. Percent Change in EASI Score From Baseline at Week 16

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA score (IGA 3 versus 4) as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  6. Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA)

    The BSA affected by AD will be assessed for 4 separate body regions: head and neck, trunk (including genital region), upper extremities, and lower extremities (including the buttocks). Each body region will be assessed for disease extent ranging from 0% to 100% involvement. BSA was calculated using the participant's palm using the 1% rule, 1 palm was equivalent to 1% with estimates of the number of palms it takes to cover the affected AD area. Maximum number of palms were 10 palms for head and neck (10%), 20 palms for upper extremities (20%), 30 palms for trunk, including axilla and groin (30%), 40 palms for lower extremities, including buttocks (40%). Percent of BSA for a body region was calculated as = total number of palms in a body region * % surface area equivalent to 1 palm. Overall percent BSA of all 4 body regions ranges from 0% to 100 % with higher values representing greater severity of AD.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90 at Week 4

    The EASI assesses objective physician estimates of 2 dimensions of atopic dermatitis - disease extent and clinical signs affected: 0 = 0%; 1 = 1-9%; 2 = 10-29%; 3 = 30-49%; 4 = 50-69%; 5 = 70-89%; 6 = 90-100% and the severity of 4 clinical signs: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) excoriation, and (4) lichenification each on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = none, absent; 1 = mild; 2 = moderate; 3 = severe) at 4 body sites (head/neck, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs). Half scores are allowed between severities 1, 2, and 3. The final EASI score was obtained by weight-averaging these 4 scores and will range from 0 to 72 (severe).

    The EASI responder is defined as a participant who achieves a ≥ 90% improvement from baseline in the EASI score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  8. Percent Change in Sleep-loss Score From Baseline to Week 16

    Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    .

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  9. Change From Baseline in Sleep-loss Score at Week 16

    Sleep Loss due to interference of itch will be assessed by the participant. Participants rate their interference of itch on sleep based on a 5-point Likert scale [0 (not at all) to 4 (unable to sleep at all)]. Higher scores indicated a greater impact and worse outcome. Assessments will be recorded daily by the participant using an electronic diary. LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    APD: All randomized participants, even if the participant does not take the assigned treatment, does not receive the correct treatment, or otherwise does not follow the protocol.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  10. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥4-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  11. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥4-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2

  12. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥4-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 1

  13. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 4

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 4

  14. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 2

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 2

  15. Percentage of Participants With a Pruritus NRS of ≥5-points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4-point Reduction From Baseline to Week 1

    The Pruritus NRS is an 11-point scale used by participants to assess their worst itch severity over the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch imaginable.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 1

  16. Percentage of Topical Corticosteroid (TCS)/Topical Calcineurin Inhibitors (TCI) Free Days From Baseline to Week 16

    Number of the total TCS/TCI free days divided by total number of days during the treatment period. The mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) includes treatment, visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA score.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  17. Median Time (Days) to TCS/TCI-free Use From Baseline to Week 16

    Days from first study drug injection to the day participant stopped using all TCS/TCI (if a participant started and stopped using low or midpotency TCS/TCI multiple times, use the last stop date as the stop date for this participant).

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  18. Percent Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) From Baseline to Week 16

    The SCORAD index uses the rule of nines to assess disease extent and evaluates 6 clinical characteristics to determine disease severity: (1) erythema, (2) edema/papulation, (3) oozing/crusts, (4) excoriation, (5) lichenification, and (6) dryness on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=absence, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). The SCORAD index also assesses subjective symptoms of pruritus and sleep loss with VAS where 0 is no itching or no trouble sleeping and 10 is unbearable itching or a lot of trouble sleeping. These 3 aspects: extent of disease (A: 0-1-2), disease severity (B: 0-18), \& subjective symptoms (C: 0-20) combine using A/5 + 7*B/2+ C to give a maximum possible score of 103, where 0 = no disease and 103 = severe disease.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment group, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  19. Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16

    The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  20. Percentage of Participants With a DLQI Score ≥4 Points at Baseline Who Achieve a ≥4 Points

    The DLQI is a 10-item, validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of skin disease on the quality of life of an affected person. The 10 questions cover the following topics: symptoms, embarrassment, shopping and home care, clothes, social and leisure, sport, work or study, close relationships, sex, and treatment, over the previous week. Response categories include "Not at all," "A little," "A lot," and "Very much," with corresponding scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3 respectively. Questions 3-10 also have an additional response category of "Not relevant" which is scored as "0". Questions are scored from 0 to 3, giving a possible total score range from 0 (no impact of skin disease on quality of life) to 30 (maximum impact on quality of life). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 16

  21. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 16 Health State Index

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The first part is comprised of the following 5 participant-reported dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. The responses are used to derive the health state index scores using the United Kingdom (UK) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.594 to 1, and the United States (US) algorithm, with scores ranging from -0.109 to 1, with higher score indicating better health state.

    LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  22. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 16 Visual Analog Score (VAS)

    The EQ-5D-5L is a 2-part measurement. The second part is assessed using a VAS that ranged from 0 to 100 millimeter (mm), where 0 is the worst health you can imagine and 100 is the best health you can imagine. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  23. Change From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) at Week 16

    POEM is a 7-item, validated, questionnaire used by the participant to assess disease symptoms over the last week. The participant is asked to respond to 7 questions on skin dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding and weeping. All 7 answers carry equal weight with a total possible score from 0 to 28 (answers scored as: No days=0; 1- 2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; everyday = 4). A high score is indicative of a poor quality of life. POEM responses will be captured using an electronic diary and transferred into the clinical database. LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model using treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit, the interaction of treatment by-visit as covariates, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  24. Change From Baseline in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety at Week 16 - Adults

    PROMIS is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. The PROMIS measures will be completed by the participant in the study clinic. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety. Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-scores with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  25. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16 - Adults

    PROMIS is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. The PROMIS measures will be completed by the participant in the study clinic. PROMIS depression has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Depression. Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-scores with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  26. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Anxiety at Week 16 - Pediatrics

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS anxiety has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Anxiety (or Pediatric Anxiety Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-scores with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  27. Change From Baseline in PROMIS Depression at Week 16 - Pediatrics

    PROMIS® is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Participants ≤17 years will complete pediatric versions for the duration of the study. PROMIS depression has 8 questions on Emotion Distress-Depression (or Pediatric Depressive Symptom). Each question has 5 response options with values from 1 to 5. Total raw scores were converted to T-scores with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. LS Mean was calculated using the ANCOVA model with treatment, baseline value, and stratification factors of geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  28. Change From Baseline in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ-5) Score at Week 16 in Participants Who Have Self-reported Comorbid Asthma

    The ACQ-5 has been shown to reliably measure asthma control and distinguish participants with well-controlled asthma (score ≤0.75 points) from those with uncontrolled asthma (score ≥1.5 points). It consists of 5 questions that are scored on a 7- point Likert scale with a recall period of 1 week. The total ACQ-5 score is the mean score of all questions; a lower score represents better asthma control.

    LS Mean was calculated using ANCOVA with treatment, baseline value, geographic region, age group, baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  29. Change From Baseline in Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) at Week 16

    The CDLQI questionnaire is designed for use in children (4 to 16 years of age). It consists of 10 items that are grouped into 6 domains: symptoms \& feelings, leisure, school or holidays, personal relationships, sleep, \& treatment. The scoring of each question is: Very much =3; Quite a lot = 2; Only a little = 1; Not at all = 0. CDLQI total score is calculated by summing all 10 items responses, and has a range of 0 to 30 (higher scores are indicative of greater impairment).

    LS Mean was calculated using MMRM model which includes treatment, baseline value, visit, the interaction of the baseline value-by-visit as covariates, the interaction of treatment by-visit, geographic region, age group, and baseline IGA (3 versus 4) score as fixed factors.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2020
  2. Study start3 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion11 Aug 2021
  4. Study completion16 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo controlled
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
228 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04250337
Sponsor's protocol ID
17803
Other IDs
2019-004300-34, J2T-DM-KGAD, DRM06-AD06, 2019
Acronym
ADhere
Status last verified
May 2022
First submitted
30 Jan 2020
Last updated
9 May 2022
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymized individual patient level data will be provided in a secure access environment upon approval of a research proposal and a signed data sharing agreement.

Publications

  • Simpson EL, Gooderham M, Wollenberg A, Weidinger S, Armstrong A, Soung J, Ferrucci S, Lima RG, Witte MM, Xu W, ElMaraghy H, Natalie CR, Pierce E, Blauvelt A; ADhere Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Lebrikizumab in Combination With Topical Corticosteroids in Adolescents and Adults With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial (ADhere). JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Feb 1;159(2):182-191. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.5534.

    PubMed 36630140

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Lebrikizumab and Topical Corticosteroid in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Eli Lilly and Company at 63 sites in 4 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 63 sites in United States, Poland, Canada, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 May 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction ≥2-points From Baseline to Week 16. (time frame: Baseline to Week 16). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04250337, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 May 2022; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in