AzTrials
AzTrials

Bilateral Hearing LossNCT04242940

Assessing Listening Effort at Different Signal-to-noise Ratios in Bone-anchored Users

A study testing Fitting of Ponto 4 in people with Bilateral Hearing Loss, run by Oticon Medical at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess listening effort during a speech-in-noise task in bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) users via pupillometry. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Bilateral Hearing Loss
What is being tested?
Fitting of Ponto 4
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
14 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
21 Feb 2020to 17 May 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Minimum 18 years and maximum 70 years old.
  • UK English mother tongue.
  • Bilateral conductive or mixed hearing loss.
  • Users fitted unilaterally or bilaterally on abutment.
  • Users are currently fitted with either Ponto 3, Ponto Plus or Ponto Pro (devices with a fitting range up to 45 dB HL).
  • Users with at least 6 months of daily experience with one Ponto sound processor.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • BC thresholds of the implanted ear(s) better (lower) than or equal to 40 dB HL (average of 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 kHz) based on BC in-situ measurement at the first visit.
  • People currently employed/self-employed (since the Need for Recovery questionnaire refers to work-related fatigue).
  • Speech recognition scores better (higher) than or equal to 50% at +4 dB SNR with OSN OFF (as assessed via the first training list at Visit 1). This is to avoid including patients that are already "giving up" at +4 dB SNR.
  • Users entitled for a sound-processor upgrade (according to the investigator) will first be selected. If there are not enough users entitled for an upgrade, then patients fitted with Ponto between 7 and 12 months before visit 1 will be considered. If there are not enough users within 7-12 months, then patients fitted with Ponto between 13 and 18 months before visit 1 will be considered.

Who cannot join

  • Single-sided deafness (SSD)
  • Hearing aid or cochlear implant on the opposite ear.
  • Test persons with current eye diseases and/or history of eye surgery on both eyes.
  • If the patient takes medications that can impact the autonomic nervous system - and hence pupil dilation (e.g., drugs for Parkinson's disease, peptic ulcers, incontinence, motion sickness).
  • If the investigator or physician assesses that the patient is not fit for trial participation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Audiology Department, Nuffield House, University Hospitals Birmingham

    Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TH

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess listening effort during a speech-in-noise task in bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) users via pupillometry.

Read the detailed description

Pupil dilation can be used as an objective indicator of listening effort during the execution of a task. The aim is to compare listening effort with different settings (OpenSound Navigator ON and OFF) of Ponto 4, the sound processor released by Oticon Medical AB in June 2019, in listening scenarios that differ in complexity. The study consists of three visits of about two hours each in duration, during which the patients will perform a speech-in-noise task where the listening task varies in difficulty (i.e., in terms of signal-to-noise ratio, SNR). Pupil dilation will be recorded during the listening task as an indicator of listening effort. The patients will also use Ponto 4, instead of their own Ponto device, during a field-trial period of three months in between visit 2 and 3. Subjective evaluations of Ponto 4 will be performed via three questionnaires, one regarding self-reported performance in everyday life, one regarding work-related fatigue, and one regarding overall sound processor preference (Ponto 4 vs. patient's own device). All these outcome measures are non-invasive measurements. This is a post market study and all products used are CE marked and used in clinical practice worldwide.

Being tested
Fitting of Ponto 4
Keywords
Bone anchored hearing systems, BAHS, Listening effort, Pupillometry, Ponto 4
Medical subject headings
Hearing Loss, Bilateral

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fitting of Ponto 4Device

    Bone-anchored hearing systems (BAHS) use the body's natural ability to transfer sound through bone conduction. The sound processor picks up sound and converts it into vibrations that are transferred through the skull bone to the inner ear (cochlea). Thus, for patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses, patients with lasting hearing loss following a middle ear disease or malformations (such as microtia), the vibrations are bypassing the conductive problem in the ear canal or middle ear. The intervention in this study is audiologically fitting one/two bone-anchored sound processors (Ponto 4) to patients that are already implanted with abutments.

Study groups in NCT04242940
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ponto 4 sound processorExperimentalAll patients will be fitted with a bone-anchored sound processor (Ponto 4), unilaterally or bilaterally.
Receives: Device: Fitting of Ponto 4

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Pupil Dilation

    Overall pupil dilation for OSN ON and OSN OFF at +4 dB SNR

    a third-order polynomial function was fit to the pupil dilation data, with the OSN setting as a fixed factor, as well as the interaction of OSN with each of the polynomial time terms. The formula used is the following: Pupil Dilation = (Linear + Quadratic + Cubic) X OSN setting + (1 + Linear + Quadratic + Cubic| Subject); where the Linear, Quadratic, and Cubic are the orthogonal terms; X indicates the interaction with OSN setting, and the terms reported in the second parenthesis are the random factors. The random factors include the effect of listeners, and of each of the time terms, to account for the variability in the time course of dilation across listeners.

    Outcome measure is the percentage reduction(% change) in pupil dilation with OSN ON vs OSN OFF

    Measured: 10 days

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD) for OSN ON and OSN OFF

    The difference in pupil dilation between OSN ON and OSN OFF was also analyzed via Peak Pupil Dilation (PPD); thus, by investigating differences in dilation at the peak of the curve. The PPD was obtained for each subject as the maximum dilation between 7.5 and 9 s.

    Measured: 10 days

  2. Speech Recognition Scores With OSN ON vs. OSN OFF Across SNRs

    A mixed-linear model with OSN setting (2 levels: ON and OFF) and SNR (5 levels: -8, -4, 0, +4, +8 dB) as fixed factors, and subject as random factor, was fit to the data.

    Measured: 10 days

  3. Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) Questionnaire Scores

    Self-reported perception before, during (at 1 month), and after field trial (at 3months).

    The SSQ questionnaire consists of 49 items with a scale from 0-10 where 0 represents "Not at all" and 10 represents "Perfect".

    The SSQ questionnaire is comprised of three subscales domains (Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing) - that is, each of the 49 items fits into one of these subscale "categories".

    The subscale scores AND the total scores (the total score is comprised of all of the 49 items) use the same scale of 0 to 10 where 0 represents "Not at all" and 10 represents "Perfect". For the total scale and all subscales (again all questions and by extension, the scales range from 0 to 10) the higher the value (closer to 10) represents a better outcome than lower values (closer to 0).

    Measured: 4 months

  4. Preference Questionnaire Scores.

    Self-reported preference after field trial. The preference questionnaire consists of 11 questions. The scores are from 1 to 5, where 1 means "Own sound processor much better" and 5 means "Test sound processor [Ponto 4] much better".

    Measured: 4 months

  5. Aided Sound Field Thresholds

    Sound field audiometry performed with the Auricle system while the patient is wearing the Ponto sound processor. This measurement is conducted at 10 frequencies from 250 Hz to 8 kHz. The Pure tone threshold is calculated as the average across .5, 1, 2, \& 3 kHz)

    Measured: 4 months

  6. BC in Situ Thresholds.

    Hearing level thresholds (dB HL) as assessed in situ with Ponto 4 placed on the patient's abutment. Bone-conduction thresholds (BC) are measured as the softest sound level that is audible by the patient at 10 frequencies from 250 Hz to 8 kHz. The Pure tone threshold is calculated as the average across .5, 1, 2, \& 3 kHz

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jan 2020
  2. Study start21 Feb 2020
  3. Primary completion17 May 2022
  4. Study completion17 May 2022

Why it stopped: The sponsor decided to terminate the study prematurely given that patient enrollment was delayed by more than two years relative to what originally stated in the protocol.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
14 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04242940
Sponsor's protocol ID
BC103
Status last verified
Apr 2025
First submitted
22 Jan 2020
Last updated
15 May 2025
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fitting of Ponto 4 in people with Bilateral Hearing Loss, run by Oticon Medical at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Pupil Dilation (time frame: 10 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in