Eyelid DiseasesNCT04235803
Telemedicine Follow-up for Routine, Low-Risk Oculoplastic Surgery
A study testing Telemedicine follow-up in people with Eyelid Diseases and Ptosis, Eyelid, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators propose utilizing a simple telemedical protocol to allow patients to substitute the first post-operative visit with a remote survey that includes essential post-operative history, vision measurement, and photographs, all of which can be provided using a personal computer, tablet, or smart phone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Eyelid Diseases, Ptosis, Eyelid, Blepharoptosis
- What is being tested?
- Telemedicine follow-up
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 78 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2020to 27 Jul 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Are age 18 years or older
- Are fluent in English
- Own or have ready access to a smart phone, tablet, or personal computer with high speed internet
- Participate in an informed consent process with the surgeon(s) including documentation of written informed consent
- Are undergoing a low-risk* eyelid procedure in a clinic, ambulatory surgery center, or hospital operating room setting, including but not limited to:
- upper eyelid blepharoplasty repair
Show all 16Show fewer
- ectropion repair
- entropion repair
- external levator resection
- internal levator resection
- eyelid lesion removal and/or biopsy
- eyelid reconstruction and defect repair including after Mohs' surgery
- eyelid tightening procedures for Floppy Eyelid Syndrome
- tarsorrhaphy
- dacryocystorhinostomy
- ()These listed procedures have a low reported rate of serious complications including vision loss, infection, severe bleeding, or death; however, surgical risk is ultimately determined by the surgeon on a per-patient basis, except in those cases specifically excluded in the subsequent section.
Who cannot join
- Are under the age of 18 years
- Are incarcerated
- Are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the period of surgery and 3 month recovery (however these patients are not eligible for elective eyelid surgery)
- Are not fluent in English
- Do not have access to or do not feel comfortable using a smart phone, tablet, or personal computer
- Lack personal capacity for consent (i.e. those patients requiring consent for the surgery by a legal representative are excluded)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Experience a serious intra-operative complication (this criterion is assessed after initial consent)
- Are undergoing eyelid or other oculoplastic procedures that are deemed greater than low-risk for serious complications, including but not limited to:
- orbital surgery
- lower eyelid blepharoplasty
- repair of extensive eyelid defects following Mohs' surgery (roughly >33%)
- procedures requiring skin grafting
- procedures requiring extensive tissue rearrangement
- procedures involving an implant (e.g. frontalis sling, gold weight implantation; except dacryocystorhinostomy due to the low-risk nature of the lacrimal stent)
- procedures requiring in-person care at the first post-operative week (e.g. suture removal, bolster removal, patch removal)
- Notably, patients undergoing greater than low risk procedures listed here are absolutely excluded from this trial. Surgeon assessment of individual patient surgical risk only applies to those typically low-risk procedures listed in the previous section on inclusion criteria; reasons for escalation of risk level include patient characteristics (e.g. frailty, previous infection or wound dehiscence), re-operation/revision status, or other factors.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
About this study
The investigators propose utilizing a simple telemedical protocol to allow patients to substitute the first post-operative visit with a remote survey that includes essential post-operative history, vision measurement, and photographs, all of which can be provided using a personal computer, tablet, or smart phone. The investigators have selected for this purpose a subset of oculoplastic procedures involving the eyelid and lacrimal system that have well-reported low rates of serious complications, since high-risk procedures will likely always require close, in-person care. The investigators hypothesize that telemedicine follow-up for the first post-operative week after low-risk oculoplastic surgery will decrease the time burden on patients without compromising their satisfaction or increase the risk of late post-operative complications.
- Conditions
- Eyelid Diseases, Ptosis, Eyelid, Blepharoptosis, Dermatochalasis, Ectropion, Entropion
- Being tested
- Telemedicine follow-up
- Keywords
- Oculoplastic, Eye plastic, Eyelid surgery, Telemedicine, Remote follow-up, Remote visit, Blepharoplasty, Ptosis repair, External levator resection, Internal levator resection, Ectropion repair, Entropion repair
- Medical subject headings
- Eyelid Diseases, Blepharoptosis, Cutis Laxa, Ectropion, Entropion, Eyelid Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Telemedicine follow-upOther
A telemedicine follow-up form based in REDCap that collects information from the patient including: history, photographs, vision measurement, and questions.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Telemedicine | Experimental | Patients in the telemedicine arm will have their post-operative week one visit via a telemedicine portal. Receives: Other: Telemedicine follow-up |
| Routine | No intervention | Patient in the routine arm will have their post-operative week one visit in clinic. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
FACE-Q 'Satisfaction with Outcome'
A patient-reported outcome measure assessing satisfaction with the surgical outcome.
Measured: Approximately 3 months post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (4)
FACE-Q 'Early Life Impact'
A patient-reported outcome measure assessing early life impact of facial plastic surgery.
Measured: Approximately 1 week post-operatively
FACE-Q 'Satisfaction with Doctor'
A patient-reported outcome measure assessing satisfaction with the surgeon.
Measured: Approximately 3 months post-operatively
Late post-operative complications
Investigator-reported post-operative complications.
Measured: Between the first and second post-operative visits (approximately 1 week to 3 months)
Time burden
Patient-reported time spent on the first post-operative visit, including waiting, travel, the visit, and all forms.
Measured: Approximately 1 week post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2020
- Study start1 Sep 2020
- Primary completion27 Jul 2021
- Study completion27 Jul 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eyelid DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Randomization to telemedicine follow-up versus routine in-person follow-up for the 1 week assessment after low-risk oculoplastic surgery.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Davin C Ashraf, MD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04235803
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Eye plastic telemedicine
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Jan 2020
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Only plan to share in the event that journal requests de-identified data to be released.
Publications
Vyas KS, Hambrick HR, Shakir A, Morrison SD, Tran DC, Pearson K, Vasconez HC, Mardini S, Gosman AA, Dobke M, Granick MS. A Systematic Review of the Use of Telemedicine in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Dermatology. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):736-768. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001044.
PubMed 28328635Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.
PubMed 23842982Kummerow Broman K, Roumie CL, Stewart MK, Castellanos JA, Tarpley JL, Dittus RS, Pierce RA. Implementation of a Telephone Postoperative Clinic in an Integrated Health System. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
PubMed 27545100Robaldo A, Rousas N, Pane B, Spinella G, Palombo D. Telemedicine in vascular surgery: clinical experience in a single centre. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(7):374-7. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091011. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
PubMed 20679407Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth. 2018 May 2;4:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.03. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29963556Carter SR, Stewart JM, Khan J, Archer KF, Holds JB, Seiff SR, Dailey RA. Infection after blepharoplasty with and without carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul;110(7):1430-2. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00447-0.
PubMed 12867404Chang S, Lehrman C, Itani K, Rohrich RJ. A systematic review of comparison of upper eyelid involutional ptosis repair techniques: efficacy and complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):149-157. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230a1c7.
PubMed 22186506Lee EW, Holtebeck AC, Harrison AR. Infection rates in outpatient eyelid surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;25(2):109-10. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181994124.
PubMed 19300151Mejia JD, Egro FM, Nahai F. Visual loss after blepharoplasty: incidence, management, and preventive measures. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Jan;31(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10391212.
PubMed 21239669Kam KY, Cole CJ, Bunce C, Watson MP, Kamal D, Olver JM. The lateral tarsal strip in ectropion surgery: is it effective when performed in isolation? Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):827-32. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.34. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
PubMed 22402697
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Telemedicine Follow-up for Routine, Low-Risk Oculoplastic Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04235803
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Eye plastic telemedicine
- Conditions
- Eyelid Diseases, Ptosis, Eyelid, Blepharoptosis, Dermatochalasis, Ectropion, Entropion
- Keywords
- Oculoplastic, Eye plastic, Eyelid surgery, Telemedicine, Remote follow-up, Remote visit, Blepharoplasty, Ptosis repair
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 78 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jul 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jul 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose utilizing a simple telemedical protocol to allow patients to substitute the first post-operative visit with a remote survey that includes essential post-operative history, vision measurement, and photographs, all of which can be provided using a personal computer, tablet, or smart phone. The investigators have selected for this purpose a subset of oculoplastic procedures involving the eyelid and lacrimal system that have well-reported low rates of serious complications, since high-risk procedures will likely always require close, in-person care. The investigators hypothesize that telemedicine follow-up for the first post-operative week after low-risk oculoplastic surgery will decrease the time burden on patients without compromising their satisfaction or increase the risk of late post-operative complications.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Randomization to telemedicine follow-up versus routine in-person follow-up for the 1 week assessment after low-risk oculoplastic surgery.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Telemedicine | Experimental | Other: Telemedicine follow-upPatients in the telemedicine arm will have their post-operative week one visit via a telemedicine portal. |
| Routine | No intervention | –Patient in the routine arm will have their post-operative week one visit in clinic. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Are age 18 years or older
- Are fluent in English
- Own or have ready access to a smart phone, tablet, or personal computer with high speed internet
- Participate in an informed consent process with the surgeon(s) including documentation of written informed consent
- Are undergoing a low-risk* eyelid procedure in a clinic, ambulatory surgery center, or hospital operating room setting, including but not limited to:
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Are under the age of 18 years
- Are incarcerated
- Are pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the period of surgery and 3 month recovery (however these patients are not eligible for elective eyelid surgery)
- Are not fluent in English
- Do not have access to or do not feel comfortable using a smart phone, tablet, or personal computer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Telemedicine follow-upA telemedicine follow-up form based in REDCap that collects information from the patient including: history, photographs, vision measurement, and questions. | Other | Telemedicine |
Primary outcome
FACE-Q 'Satisfaction with Outcome'
Time frame: Approximately 3 months post-operatively
A patient-reported outcome measure assessing satisfaction with the surgical outcome.
4 secondary outcomes
FACE-Q 'Early Life Impact'
Time frame: Approximately 1 week post-operatively
FACE-Q 'Satisfaction with Doctor'
Time frame: Approximately 3 months post-operatively
Late post-operative complications
Time frame: Between the first and second post-operative visits (approximately 1 week to 3 months)
Time burden
Time frame: Approximately 1 week post-operatively
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 28328635Vyas KS, Hambrick HR, Shakir A, Morrison SD, Tran DC, Pearson K, Vasconez HC, Mardini S, Gosman AA, Dobke M, Granick MS. A Systematic Review of the Use of Telemedicine in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Dermatology. Ann Plast Surg. 2017 Jun;78(6):736-768. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001044.
- Background: PubMed 23842982Hwa K, Wren SM. Telehealth follow-up in lieu of postoperative clinic visit for ambulatory surgery: results of a pilot program. JAMA Surg. 2013 Sep;148(9):823-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.2672.
- Background: PubMed 27545100Kummerow Broman K, Roumie CL, Stewart MK, Castellanos JA, Tarpley JL, Dittus RS, Pierce RA. Implementation of a Telephone Postoperative Clinic in an Integrated Health System. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):644-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 20679407Robaldo A, Rousas N, Pane B, Spinella G, Palombo D. Telemedicine in vascular surgery: clinical experience in a single centre. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(7):374-7. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2010.091011. Epub 2010 Aug 2.
- Background: PubMed 29963556Williams AM, Bhatti UF, Alam HB, Nikolian VC. The role of telemedicine in postoperative care. Mhealth. 2018 May 2;4:11. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.04.03. eCollection 2018.
- Background: PubMed 12867404Carter SR, Stewart JM, Khan J, Archer KF, Holds JB, Seiff SR, Dailey RA. Infection after blepharoplasty with and without carbon dioxide laser resurfacing. Ophthalmology. 2003 Jul;110(7):1430-2. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00447-0.
- Background: PubMed 22186506Chang S, Lehrman C, Itani K, Rohrich RJ. A systematic review of comparison of upper eyelid involutional ptosis repair techniques: efficacy and complication rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Jan;129(1):149-157. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230a1c7.
- Background: PubMed 19300151Lee EW, Holtebeck AC, Harrison AR. Infection rates in outpatient eyelid surgery. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Mar-Apr;25(2):109-10. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181994124.
- Background: PubMed 21239669Mejia JD, Egro FM, Nahai F. Visual loss after blepharoplasty: incidence, management, and preventive measures. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Jan;31(1):21-9. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10391212.
- Background: PubMed 22402697Kam KY, Cole CJ, Bunce C, Watson MP, Kamal D, Olver JM. The lateral tarsal strip in ectropion surgery: is it effective when performed in isolation? Eye (Lond). 2012 Jun;26(6):827-32. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.34. Epub 2012 Mar 9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Only plan to share in the event that journal requests de-identified data to be released.
Related trials for Eyelid Diseases
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Study Evaluating Nordlys™ SWT IPL for Dry Eye Disease (DED) Due to MGD
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Blepharoptosis After Repeated Intravitreal Anti-VEGF Injections: A Prospective Study
Blepharoptosis, Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Omega-3 Supplementation vs Demodex vs Eyelid Cleanser for Pediatric Chalazia
Pediatric Chalazia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Phase 2 Study to Compare Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Topical Therapy (APT-001, Spinosad 1.8%) in Patients With Blepharitis
Blepharitis
Not yet recruiting
TearCare in Young Adults
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (Disorder)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Davin C Ashraf, MD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Telemedicine follow-up in people with Eyelid Diseases and Ptosis, Eyelid, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
FACE-Q 'Satisfaction with Outcome' (time frame: Approximately 3 months post-operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04235803, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2026.