AzTrials
AzTrials

Hernia, InguinalQoL-TAPPNCT04211142

Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.

A study testing Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Hernia, Inguinal
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
216 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
20 Jan 2020to 1 Aug 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • primary inguinal hernia
  • unilateral hernia

Who cannot join

  • bilateral hernia
  • recurrent hernia
  • incarcerated hernia
  • large scrotal hernia
  • known femoral hernia
  • need for associated procedures
Show all 13Show fewer
  • not able to understand the questionaire
  • immunosuppression (including corticosteroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
  • chronic renal failure (hemodialysis)
  • active infection
  • pregnancy
  • allergy to polypropylene or cyanoacrylate
  • patient's refusal and/or absence of informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD contact

+ 34 687 79 54 58

guillaumes@clinic.cat

Irene Bachero, MD contact

+34 627 31 59 56

ibachero@clinic.cat

Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital Clínic

    Barcelona, 08006

    Irene Bachero, MD, ibachero@clinic.cat

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair. Randomized Study Comparing Laparoscopic TAPP Repair With Open Lichtenstein Repair (QoL-TAPP Study)

This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score).

Read the detailed description

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. Since the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have fallen dramatically and chronic pain, as a side-effect of surgery, is becoming increasingly important.

Chronic pain is defined as pain or discomfort that lasts for more than 3 months after surgery. The reported incidence of chronic pain varies between 0 and 75 per cent after open mesh repair, and between 0 and 29 per cent after laparoscopic repair. Prospective trials suggest that there is less chronic pain after laparoscopic than open repair.

Although pain is an important parameter determining the Quality of Life (QoL) after a hernia operation, other aspects, like restriction of activities and esthetical outcome, are also of importance.

This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.

Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score). The EuraHS-QoL score is a validated hernia specific questionnaire with 9 questions that can be scored by the patient in an 11-point scale from 0-10. The EuraHS-QoL questions are divided in 3 domains: "Pain" (range 0-30), "Restriction of activities" (range 0-40), and "Esthetical discomfort" (range 0-20). The total score ranges from 0-90, with the lower scores being the most favourable outcome.

The EuraHS-QoL score can be downloaded in several languages from EuraHS web pages ( http://www.eurahs.eu/EuraHS-QoL-download.php). EuraHS QoL score was previously validated and the results have been already reported in Surgery (Muysoms FE., Surgery. 2016 ;160:1344-1357)

Up to 216 patients will need to be enrolled for this study (n=108/group) and each subject will be followed for up to 12 months after the surgical intervention. The sample size was calculated to explore differences in chronic postoperative pain between the groups, accepting an α risk of 0.05 and a statistical power defined as 90 per cent (β risk = 0.1) in a two-sided test.

The study will be carried out at the Hospital Plató in Barcelona (Spain). Hospital Plató is a district general hospital serving an aggregate population of over 150.000. Hospital surgery department undertakes conventional open and laparoscopic treatment for inguinal hernia on a regular basis.

The hernia repair will be performed in all patients of both arms using the same lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® 60 g/m2 ; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany): A tailored 7.5 × 15 cm mesh for repairs in the open Lichtenstein arm, and a tailored 15 x 15 cm mesh for all patients in the laparoscopic TAPP arm. To avoid biases, meshes will be fixed in all patients (both groups) by applying liquid drops of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®; B. Braun Surgical, Rubí, Barcelona, Spain).

Being tested
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair), Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Keywords
Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, Laparoscopic Surgery, Cyanoacrylates, Mesh, Surgical
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)Procedure or surgery

    Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

  • Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)Procedure or surgery

    Open Inguinal Hernia Repair

Study groups in NCT04211142
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Laparoscopic repairActive comparatorLaparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)
Open repairActive comparatorOpen Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
Receives: Procedure: Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Chronic pain

    Pain scores (0-10) using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument (EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire). Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Restrictions of activities

    Restrictions of activities because of pain or discomfort at the site of the hernia. Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Cosmetic discomfort

    Cosmetic discomfort with abdomen shape o site of the hernia . Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Duration of surgery

    Time from start of incision to skin closure

    Measured: Surgery

  4. Rate of postoperative complications

    Rate of postoperative complications (i.e., re-admission, urinary retention, symptomatic seroma, surgical-site infection). The severity of complications will be reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Early recurrences

    Clinical recurrence or those confirmed by ultrasound examination

    Measured: 1-year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Dec 2019
  2. Study start20 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
216 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04211142
Sponsor's protocol ID
QoL-TAPP
Acronym
QoL-TAPP
Status last verified
Feb 2024
First submitted
22 Dec 2019
Last updated
28 Feb 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F, Veres A, Troyano D, Trias M, Martrat A, Ardid J, Obiols J, Lopez-Cano M. Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):688-694. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10488. Epub 2017 Feb 20.

    PubMed 28218406
  • Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

    PubMed 27316825

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD (+ 34 687 79 54 58, guillaumes@clinic.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Chronic pain (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04211142, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in