Hernia, InguinalQoL-TAPPNCT04211142
Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair: Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair.
A study testing Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Hernia, Inguinal
- What is being tested?
- Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 216 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 20 Jan 2020to 1 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- primary inguinal hernia
- unilateral hernia
Who cannot join
- bilateral hernia
- recurrent hernia
- incarcerated hernia
- large scrotal hernia
- known femoral hernia
- need for associated procedures
Show all 13Show fewer
- not able to understand the questionaire
- immunosuppression (including corticosteroids, radiotherapy, chemotherapy)
- chronic renal failure (hemodialysis)
- active infection
- pregnancy
- allergy to polypropylene or cyanoacrylate
- patient's refusal and/or absence of informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínic
Barcelona, 08006
Irene Bachero, MD, ibachero@clinic.cat
About this study
Official title: Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair. Randomized Study Comparing Laparoscopic TAPP Repair With Open Lichtenstein Repair (QoL-TAPP Study)
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score).
Read the detailed description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. Since the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have fallen dramatically and chronic pain, as a side-effect of surgery, is becoming increasingly important.
Chronic pain is defined as pain or discomfort that lasts for more than 3 months after surgery. The reported incidence of chronic pain varies between 0 and 75 per cent after open mesh repair, and between 0 and 29 per cent after laparoscopic repair. Prospective trials suggest that there is less chronic pain after laparoscopic than open repair.
Although pain is an important parameter determining the Quality of Life (QoL) after a hernia operation, other aspects, like restriction of activities and esthetical outcome, are also of importance.
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.
Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score). The EuraHS-QoL score is a validated hernia specific questionnaire with 9 questions that can be scored by the patient in an 11-point scale from 0-10. The EuraHS-QoL questions are divided in 3 domains: "Pain" (range 0-30), "Restriction of activities" (range 0-40), and "Esthetical discomfort" (range 0-20). The total score ranges from 0-90, with the lower scores being the most favourable outcome.
The EuraHS-QoL score can be downloaded in several languages from EuraHS web pages ( http://www.eurahs.eu/EuraHS-QoL-download.php). EuraHS QoL score was previously validated and the results have been already reported in Surgery (Muysoms FE., Surgery. 2016 ;160:1344-1357)
Up to 216 patients will need to be enrolled for this study (n=108/group) and each subject will be followed for up to 12 months after the surgical intervention. The sample size was calculated to explore differences in chronic postoperative pain between the groups, accepting an α risk of 0.05 and a statistical power defined as 90 per cent (β risk = 0.1) in a two-sided test.
The study will be carried out at the Hospital Plató in Barcelona (Spain). Hospital Plató is a district general hospital serving an aggregate population of over 150.000. Hospital surgery department undertakes conventional open and laparoscopic treatment for inguinal hernia on a regular basis.
The hernia repair will be performed in all patients of both arms using the same lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® 60 g/m2 ; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany): A tailored 7.5 × 15 cm mesh for repairs in the open Lichtenstein arm, and a tailored 15 x 15 cm mesh for all patients in the laparoscopic TAPP arm. To avoid biases, meshes will be fixed in all patients (both groups) by applying liquid drops of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®; B. Braun Surgical, Rubí, Barcelona, Spain).
- Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Being tested
- Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair), Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)
- Keywords
- Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, Laparoscopic Surgery, Cyanoacrylates, Mesh, Surgical
- Medical subject headings
- Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)Procedure or surgery
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)Procedure or surgery
Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic repair | Active comparator | Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) |
| Open repair | Active comparator | Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) Receives: Procedure: Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chronic pain
Pain scores (0-10) using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument (EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire). Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (5)
Restrictions of activities
Restrictions of activities because of pain or discomfort at the site of the hernia. Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Cosmetic discomfort
Cosmetic discomfort with abdomen shape o site of the hernia . Scores (0-10) using the EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire. Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Duration of surgery
Time from start of incision to skin closure
Measured: Surgery
Rate of postoperative complications
Rate of postoperative complications (i.e., re-admission, urinary retention, symptomatic seroma, surgical-site infection). The severity of complications will be reported using the Clavien-Dindo classification system.
Measured: 30 days
Early recurrences
Clinical recurrence or those confirmed by ultrasound examination
Measured: 1-year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Dec 2019
- Study start20 Jan 2020
- Primary completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hernia, InguinalStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaNils Jimmy Hidalgo, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaIrene Bachero, MD, Principal investigator, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04211142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QoL-TAPP
- Acronym
- QoL-TAPP
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 28 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F, Veres A, Troyano D, Trias M, Martrat A, Ardid J, Obiols J, Lopez-Cano M. Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):688-694. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10488. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
PubMed 28218406Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
PubMed 27316825
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain and Quality of Life After Inguinal Hernia Repair. Randomized Study Comparing Laparoscopic TAPP Repair With Open Lichtenstein Repair (QoL-TAPP Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04211142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QoL-TAPP / QoL-TAPP
- Conditions
- Hernia, Inguinal
- Keywords
- Hernia, Inguinal, Pain, Chronic Pain, Quality of Life, Laparoscopic Surgery, Cyanoacrylates, Mesh, Surgical
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 216 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia. Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score).
Detailed description
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical operations. Since the introduction of mesh repair, recurrence rates have fallen dramatically and chronic pain, as a side-effect of surgery, is becoming increasingly important.
Chronic pain is defined as pain or discomfort that lasts for more than 3 months after surgery. The reported incidence of chronic pain varies between 0 and 75 per cent after open mesh repair, and between 0 and 29 per cent after laparoscopic repair. Prospective trials suggest that there is less chronic pain after laparoscopic than open repair.
Although pain is an important parameter determining the Quality of Life (QoL) after a hernia operation, other aspects, like restriction of activities and esthetical outcome, are also of importance.
This investigation will be a double-armed, randomized prospective study designed to compare open (Lichtenstein Technique) versus laparoscopic (TAPP) repair of primary unilateral inguinal hernia.
Chronic pain, restriction of activities and esthetical outcome will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively, at 1, 4 and 12 months, using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life score (EuraHS-QoL score). The EuraHS-QoL score is a validated hernia specific questionnaire with 9 questions that can be scored by the patient in an 11-point scale from 0-10. The EuraHS-QoL questions are divided in 3 domains: "Pain" (range 0-30), "Restriction of activities" (range 0-40), and "Esthetical discomfort" (range 0-20). The total score ranges from 0-90, with the lower scores being the most favourable outcome.
The EuraHS-QoL score can be downloaded in several languages from EuraHS web pages ( http://www.eurahs.eu/EuraHS-QoL-download.php). EuraHS QoL score was previously validated and the results have been already reported in Surgery (Muysoms FE., Surgery. 2016 ;160:1344-1357)
Up to 216 patients will need to be enrolled for this study (n=108/group) and each subject will be followed for up to 12 months after the surgical intervention. The sample size was calculated to explore differences in chronic postoperative pain between the groups, accepting an α risk of 0.05 and a statistical power defined as 90 per cent (β risk = 0.1) in a two-sided test.
The study will be carried out at the Hospital Plató in Barcelona (Spain). Hospital Plató is a district general hospital serving an aggregate population of over 150.000. Hospital surgery department undertakes conventional open and laparoscopic treatment for inguinal hernia on a regular basis.
The hernia repair will be performed in all patients of both arms using the same lightweight polypropylene mesh (Optilene® 60 g/m2 ; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany): A tailored 7.5 × 15 cm mesh for repairs in the open Lichtenstein arm, and a tailored 15 x 15 cm mesh for all patients in the laparoscopic TAPP arm. To avoid biases, meshes will be fixed in all patients (both groups) by applying liquid drops of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®; B. Braun Surgical, Rubí, Barcelona, Spain).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic repair | Active comparator | Procedure: Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) |
| Open repair | Active comparator | Procedure: Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- primary inguinal hernia
- unilateral hernia
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- bilateral hernia
- recurrent hernia
- incarcerated hernia
- large scrotal hernia
- known femoral hernia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair)Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair | Procedure or surgery | Laparoscopic repair |
| Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair)Open Inguinal Hernia Repair | Procedure or surgery | Open repair |
Primary outcome
Chronic pain
Time frame: 1 year
Pain scores (0-10) using the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument (EuraHS Quality of Life questionnaire). Each question has a scale from 0-10, whereas 0 is considered the best outcome.
5 secondary outcomes
Restrictions of activities
Time frame: 1 year
Cosmetic discomfort
Time frame: 1 year
Duration of surgery
Time frame: Surgery
Rate of postoperative complications
Time frame: 30 days
Early recurrences
Time frame: 1-year
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Feb 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28218406Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Carvajal F, Veres A, Troyano D, Trias M, Martrat A, Ardid J, Obiols J, Lopez-Cano M. Randomized clinical trial of mesh fixation with glue or sutures for Lichtenstein hernia repair. Br J Surg. 2017 May;104(6):688-694. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10488. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
- Background: PubMed 27316825Muysoms FE, Vanlander A, Ceulemans R, Kyle-Leinhase I, Michiels M, Jacobs I, Pletinckx P, Berrevoet F. A prospective, multicenter, observational study on quality of life after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with ProGrip laparoscopic, self-fixating mesh according to the European Registry for Abdominal Wall Hernias Quality of Life Instrument. Surgery. 2016 Nov;160(5):1344-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.026. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
Related trials for Hernia, Inguinal
Recruiting
Permanent Versus Slowly Dissolving Stitches for Non-Mesh (Shouldice) Groin Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Recruiting
Watchful Waiting Versus Immediate Repair for Occult Contralateral Inguinal Hernias.
Inguinal Hernia Bilateral, Inguinal Hernia Unilateral
Recruiting
Primary Sac Abandonment and Distal Sac Fixation vs Complete Sac Dissection for Inguinoscrotal Hernias
Seroma, Inguinal Hernias
Recruiting
Comparing Two Laparoscopic Techniques for Hernia Repair in Children
Inguinal Hernia
Not yet recruiting
Lumbar ESP Block Versus TAP Block for Postoperative Pain Control in Children Undergoing Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Nils Jimmy Hidalgo, MD principal investigator
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Irene Bachero, MD principal investigator
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP repair) and Open Inguinal Hernia Repair (Lichtenstein repair) in people with Hernia, Inguinal, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Salvador Guillaumes, MD, PhD (+ 34 687 79 54 58, guillaumes@clinic.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chronic pain (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04211142, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Feb 2024.