AzTrials
AzTrials

Airway ManagementNCT04206592

Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A study testing Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum. in people with Airway Management and Laryngeal Masks, run by Hospital Plató at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, controlled, randomized study to compare Ambu AuraGain with Intersurgical i-Gel mask during mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Airway Management, Laryngeal Masks
What is being tested?
Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum.
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
98 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
18 Dec 2019to 17 Feb 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18-80 year
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status I-III
  • Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Who cannot join

  • Previous knowledge of difficult intubation
  • Mouth opening less than 35 mm
  • Cervical spine disease
  • BMI≥35 kg/m2
  • Upper respiratory or digestive tract disease
  • Severe obstructive pulmonary disease
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Recent history of upper respiratory tract infection
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who have a risk of gastric aspiration
  • Preoperative sore throat
  • Patients who refuse to participate
  • Withdrawal criterion:
  • -Orotracheal intubation during surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Anesthesia Department, Hospital Plató

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08006

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Controlled and Randomized Comparison of the Ambu AuraGain and Intersurgical i-Gel Laryngeal Masks in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Prospective, controlled, randomized study to compare Ambu AuraGain with Intersurgical i-Gel mask during mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The investigators hypothesise that when comparing the Ambu® AuraGainTM with Intersurgical i-GelTM mask, the Ambu® AuraGainTM would exhibit a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) during mechanical ventilation in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

The main goal is to compare the Ambu AuraGain with the i-Gel in terms of safety and efficacy during mechanical ventilation in critical phase of the pneumoperitoneum in lateral decubitus and reverse trendelemburg position. Secondary objectives are comparing insertion time, number of attempts, ventilatory airway peak pressure, time and success rates for gastric tube insertion and the incidence of side effects.

Read the detailed description

Design: Prospective, controlled, randomized study. Participants: After approval by the local Clinical Research Ethics Committee, all patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy at Hospital Plató (Barcelona) will be screened for participation. Patients will be informed about the study and they must provide written consent.

The need for orotracheal intubation during surgery will be considered as a study withdrawal criterion.

The primary outcome is the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP).

The secondary outcomes are: insertion time, number of attempts, ventilatory airway peak pressure, time, and success rates for gastric tube insertion and side effects.

Sample size has been calculated to detect a significant difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) between two devices. According to the results of previous studies, the investigators assume a mean OLP of 29.2 (3.3) cmH2O for the i-Gel and of 34 (5) cmH2O for the Ambu AuraGain. In order to detect a difference of 10%, assuming a standard deviation of 5 cmH2O for both devices, 44 patients are required per group with a power of 80% and an alpha error of 0.05. To cover against a dropout rate of 10%, a total of 98 patients will be recruited.

The patients included in the study will be numbered consecutively and assigned to one of the two groups, 'LMA Ambu AuraGain' or 'i-gel', using a computer-generated random number table, by the principal investigator. The individual result will be kept in opaque envelopes. After the recruitment, the day of the procedure, the enrolling investigator will open sealed, opaque envelopes that conceal the group allocation. Participants will be blinded to their group allocation.

Procedures In the operating room, intravenous access will be secured and routine monitoring using ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, heart rate, oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) and sevoflurane (EtSevo) (Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Compact Critical Care Monitor; GE Healthcare). After pre-oxygenation with 100% oxygen by facemask for 3 min, anaesthesia will be induced with intravenous Fentanyl 50 μg/ml (2μg/kg), Propofol 1% (2-3 mg/kg) and Rocuronio 1% (0,6 mg/kg). The investigators will continue ventilating with 100% oxygen using a facemask at least for 1 min until optimum conditions for laryngeal mask insertion are achieved (loss of eyelash reflex, relaxation of the jaw, immobility, and apnoea).

Anesthesia will be maintained with Sevoflurane 2% in an air-oxygen mixture using a circle system with a fresh gas flow of 2 l/min. Additional intravenous Fentanyl will be administrated as clinically needed during anesthesia by an increase of 10-20% in blood pressure or heart rate. Laryngeal masks size will be determined according to the manufacturers weight-based recommendations and the insertion technique will be according to the recommendations of the Instruction Manual. After successful insertion, the cuff will be inflated with air until 60 cmH2O intracuff pressure (ICP) measured using an Ambu® airway pressure manometer (AMBU, S.L. B- 81040149, Alcala, Madrid, Spain). The second measurement of intracuff pressure will be performed for surgeries taking over an hour to ensure that the intracuff pressure has not changed significantly (± 5 cmH2O) since the last calibrated intracuff pressure. An effective airway will be judged by a square wave capnograph trace, bilateral chest auscultation and no audible leak with peak airway pressures at 12 cmH2O or greater during gentle manual ventilation. The device will be connected to the respiratory machine (Datex-Ohmeda S/5 Compact Critical Care Monitor; GE Healthcare) and patients will be ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 ml/kg, adjusting the respiratory rate to an end-tidal CO2 of 30-35mmHg.

A gastric tube will be inserted via the drain tube. The correct placement of the gastric tube will be confirmed by free movement during insertion and by aspiration of gastric fluid or detection of injected air by epigastric auscultation. Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) will be measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3 liters/min (maximum allowed 40 cmH2O) recording the pressure at which equilibrium has been reached or audible air is leaking.

The leak pressure will be recorded before peritoneal insufflation and during pneumoperitoneum. The peritoneal insufflation pressure will be set at 12 mmHg. At the end of the surgery, the anesthesiologist will remove the laryngeal masks when the patients obey commands. The patients will be transferred to the Post-Anaesthesia Care Unit (PACU) to be monitored after the surgery.

Statistical Analysis Data will be entered into an Excel Database. All statistical analyses will be conducted using software from the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS, Version 18.0, Chicago, IL, USA). The distribution of data will be determined using Kolmogorov- Smirnov analysis. The quantitative variables will be summarized with means and standard deviations or with medians and percentiles P25 and P75 in case of asymmetric distributions, and qualitative variables with frequencies and percentages. To study the relationships between qualitative variables, contingency tables will be made and the Chi-square or Fisher's tests will be used. The difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) between two devices will be analyzed by a Student ́s t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test in case of non-normal distributions. To compare the incidence of side effects between the groups, the exact Fisher test or Chi-squared tests will be used. Significant differences will be quantified with 95% confidence intervals.

Being tested
Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum.
Keywords
Laryngeal mask, Oropharyngeal leak pressure, Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum.Device

    Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) will be measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3 litres/min (maximum allowed 40 cmH2O) recording the pressure at which equilibrium has been reached or audible air is leaking.

Study groups in NCT04206592
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
i Gel LMAActive comparatorThe sealing pressure of the igel laryngeal mask will be measured during pneumoperitoneum in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Receives: Device: Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum.
Ambu Aura GainActive comparatorIt will be compared the Ambu Aura Gain LMA vs iGel in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Receives: Device: Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oropharyngeal leak pressure pneumoperitoneum.

    Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) will be measured by closing the expiratory valve of the circle system at a fixed gas flow of 3 litres/min (maximum allowed 40 cmH2O) recording the pressure at which equilibrium has been reached or audible air is leaking.

    Measured: Intraoperatively, during pneumoperitoneum at 12 mmHg in the reverse Trendelenburg position.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Dec 2019
  2. Study start18 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion17 Feb 2021
  4. Study completion17 Feb 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
98 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04206592
Sponsor's protocol ID
MLA- Anesth
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
18 Dec 2019
Last updated
27 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Oropharyngeal leak pressure during pneumoperitoneum. in people with Airway Management and Laryngeal Masks, run by Hospital Plató at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oropharyngeal leak pressure pneumoperitoneum. (time frame: Intraoperatively, during pneumoperitoneum at 12 mmHg in the reverse Trendelenburg position.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in