Bullous PemphigoidPhase 2/3LIBERTY-BPNCT04206553
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid
A Phase 2/3 study testing dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS) in people with Bullous Pemphigoid, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 9 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether dupilumab is effective and safe for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Dupilumab is a type of drug called a "monoclonal antibody". An antibody is a special kind of protein that the immune (defense) system normally makes to fight bacteria and viruses. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bullous Pemphigoid
- What is being tested?
- dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 53 sitesin 9 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Oct 2020to 5 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients must have characteristic clinical features of bullous pemphigoid (BP) (eg, urticarial or eczematous or erythematous plaques, bullae, pruritus) at the screening and baseline visits.
- Study participants are required to have a confirmed diagnosis of BP based on histopathology, immunopathology, and serology at the baseline visit, as defined in the protocol.
- Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) activity score ≥24 at baseline and screening visits.
- Baseline peak pruritus NRS score for maximum itch intensity ≥4
- Karnofsky performance status score ≥50% at the screening visit.
Who cannot join
- Forms of pemphigoid other than classic BP (eg, Brunsting-Perry cicatricial pemphigoid, anti-p200 pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, or BP with concomitant pemphigus vulgaris)
- Patients who are receiving treatments known to cause or exacerbate BP (eg, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, penicillamine, furosemide, phenacetin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor) who have not been on a stable dose of these medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Have ever received treatment with an IL-4 or IL-13 antagonist such as dupilumab, tralokinumab, or lebrikizumab.
- Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 7 days before the baseline visit
- Treatment with topical corticosteroids of medium potency or higher, topical calcineurin inhibitor, or topical crisaborole within 7 days before the baseline visit
- Treatment with non-steroidal immunosuppressive/immunomodulating drug(s) (eg, mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, or methotrexate) within 4 weeks before the baseline visit.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Treatment with BP-directed biologics as follows:
- Any cell-depleting agents including but not limited to rituximab: within 12 months before the baseline visit, or until lymphocyte and CD 19+ lymphocyte count returns to normal, whichever is longer
- Other biologics (such as IL-5 inhibitors benralizumab or mepolizumab): within 5 half-lives (if known) or 16 weeks prior to the baseline visit, whichever is longer
- Intravenous immunoglobulin within 16 weeks prior to the baseline visit
- NOTE: Other Protocol Defined Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Apply
Trial locations and contacts
53 sites in 9 countries.
53 sites in 9 countries
United States15 sites
Regeneron study Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5314
Regeneron study Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35233
Regeneron Study Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116
Regeneron Study Site
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
Regeneron study Site
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Regeneron Study Site
Farmington, Connecticut, 06030
Regeneron Study Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Regeneron Study Site
Miami, Florida, 33125
Regeneron Study Site
Murray, Utah, 84107
Regeneron study Site
Orlando, Florida, 32827
Regeneron Study Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Regeneron Study Site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Regeneron study Site
Providence, Rhode Island, 02908
Regeneron Study Site
Redwood City, California, 94063
Regeneron Study Site
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85259
Germany12 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Berlin, 10117
Regeneron Study Site
Buxtehude, 21614
Regeneron Study Site 2
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Regeneron Study Site
Erlangen, 91054
Regeneron Study Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104
Regeneron Study Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23538
Regeneron Study site'
Magdeburg, 39120
Regeneron Study Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131
Regeneron Study site
Marburg, 35043
Regeneron Study Site
Munich, 80802
Regeneron Study Site
Münster, North Rhine-Westphal, 48149
Regeneron Study Site
Stuttgart, 70178
France6 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Bobigny, 93009
Regeneron Study Site
Bordeaux, 33000
Regeneron Study Site
Lille, 59037
Regeneron Study Site
Nice, 06200
Regeneron Study Site
Paris, 75010
Regeneron Study Site
Rouen, 76031
Japan6 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Hirosaki, 036-8563
Regeneron Study Site
Ichinomiya, 491-8558
Regeneron Study site
Kurume, Hukuoka, 830-0011
Regeneron Study Site
Osaka, 545-8586
Regeneron Study Site
Sapporo, 060-8648
Regeneron Study Site
Tokyo, 160-8582
Spain4 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Badalona, Barcelona, 08916
Regeneron Study Site
Madrid, 28034
Regeneron study Site
Madrid, 28046
Regeneron study Site
Pamplona, 31008
Israel3 sites
Regeneron study Site
Afula, 1834111
Regeneron study Site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Regeneron study Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Poland3 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-147
Regeneron Study site'
Ossy, 42-624
Regeneron Study site'
Wroclaw, 50566
Australia2 sites
Regeneron Study Site
Box Hill, Victoria, 3128
Regeneron Study Site
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
Taiwan2 sites
Regeneron study Site
Taipei, Zhongzheng District, 10002
Regeneron study Site
Taoyuan City, 33305
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid
The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether dupilumab is effective and safe for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Dupilumab is a type of drug called a "monoclonal antibody". An antibody is a special kind of protein that the immune (defense) system normally makes to fight bacteria and viruses. Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, predominately affecting the elderly (typical onset after age 60).
The study is looking at several other research questions, including:
- Side effects that may be experienced by people taking dupilumab
- How dupilumab works in the body and affects the body
- How dupilumab affects quality of life
- How much dupilumab is present in the blood
- To see if dupilumab works to wean the patient off oral corticosteroids
- Conditions
- Bullous Pemphigoid
- Being tested
- dupilumab, Matching Placebo, Oral corticosteroids (OCS)
- Medical subject headings
- Pemphigoid, Bullous
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dupilumabDrug
Also called Dupixent®, REGN668, SAR231893
Loading dose administered subcutaneous (SC), followed by SC once every 2 weeks (Q2W) dosing.
Matching PlaceboDrug
Matching dupilumab without active substance
Oral corticosteroids (OCS)Drug
Prednisone or prednisolone per standard of care to obtain control of disease activity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumab | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: dupilumab; Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) |
| Matching placebo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Matching Placebo; Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36
Sustained remission at week 36, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions \& epithelialization of old lesions) \& off oral corticosteroids (OCS) no later than week 16 \& (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 36 \& (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 36 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 36 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders \& those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation.
Measured: At Week 36
Secondary outcomes (47)
Total Cumulative Dose of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) From Baseline to Week 36
All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the worst observation carried forward (WOCF) method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 36 completers in each treatment group.
Measured: Week 36
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 36
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 36
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percent Change in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Activity Score From Baseline to Week 36
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Time to First Use of Rescue Medication Up to Week 36
Participants were considered to have used rescue treatment at the time of discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death. Participants were censored at the time of discontinuation from the study due to other reasons. Restricted mean event time and corresponding standard error (SE) are based on the Kaplan-Meier method. The restricted mean event time was calculated up to study day 253 (i.e., week 36).
Measured: Up to Week 36
Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 36
Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 36
Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 36.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 36
Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 centimeters [cm] diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 36
Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 36.
Measured: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 36
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 36
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 36
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 36 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Change in Autoimmune Bullous Disease Quality of Life (ABQOL) Score From Baseline to Week 36
ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 36
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Change in BP180 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 52
Sustained remission at week 52, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions \& epithelialization of old lesions) \& off OCS no later than week 16 \& (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 52 \& (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 52 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 52 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders \& those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation.
Measured: At Week 52
Total Cumulative Dose of OCS From Baseline to Week 52
All participants in both treatment groups were started on OCS at randomization (day 1) with taper beginning no later than week 6 with the objective to taper off by week 16. OCS could be used as rescue treatment for loss of disease control/ disease relapse during the study. Days after non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use were imputed by the WOCF method (i.e., the highest daily OCS dose prior to any non-OCS systemic rescue treatment use). Missing data after study discontinuation were imputed with the average daily OCS dose among week 52 completers in each treatment group.
Measured: Week 52
Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 52
Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered as not achieving complete remission after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered as not achieving complete remission. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 52
Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who achieved initial control of disease activity after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved control of disease activity before week 52.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 52
Relapse was defined as the appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month (blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques) or at least 1 large (>10 cm diameter) eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week. Control of disease activity was defined as absence of new lesions and existing lesions beginning to heal. Participants who used rescue treatment were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to have relapsed after achieving control of disease activity.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 52
Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants who achieved initial complete remission after rescue treatment use were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52. Participants whose response status could not be determined due to missing data were considered to not have achieved complete remission before week 52.
Measured: Up to Week 52
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 52
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 52
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 52
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 52
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 52
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 52
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 52 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change in ABQOL Score From Baseline to Week 52
ABQOL questionnaire consists of 17 items, which encompass physical burden of the disease, psychiatric effects, and effects on daily life functioning. Each question ranges from 0 to 3 points, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life. The maximum ABQOL score is 51. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change in Percent BSA of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 52
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change in BP180 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52
Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 52. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants in Complete Remission and Off OCS No Later Than Week 16
Complete remission was defined as absence of new lesions and epithelialization of old lesions. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Participants with missing assessment of complete remission before week 16 due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation.
Measured: Up to Week 16
Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 16
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 16
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 16
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 16
BPDAI activity score is the arithmetic sum of 3 subcomponents: cutaneous blisters/erosions, cutaneous urticaria/erythema, and mucosal blisters/erosions. Scores can range from 0 to 360 for BPDAI total activity (maximum 240 for total skin activity and 120 for mucosal activity), with higher scores indicating greater disease activity. Participants were required to have a BPDAI activity score of ≥24 at the screening and baseline visits for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the BPDAI activity score.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 16
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Values after first rescue treatment were set to missing and were imputed with the worst value from the closest visit on or prior to rescue medication use and afterwards up to and including week 36. Missing values caused by discontinuation from the study due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were imputed by the WOCF method. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed by multiple imputation.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 16
Peak pruritus NRS was used by participants to rate the intensity of pruritus during the past 24 hours, with 0 indicating no itch and 10 indicating worst itch possible. Participants were required to have a baseline peak pruritus NRS maximum intensity average of ≥4 during the 7 days prior to randomization for eligibility. Participants were considered non-responders after rescue treatment use. Participants with missing values caused by discontinuation from the study before week 16 due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders. Missing values due to other reasons were imputed using multiple imputation of the continuous data of the weekly average of daily peak pruritus NRS.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 52
Measured: Through Week 52
Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 52
Measured: Through Week 52
Number of Participants With At Least One TE Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI) Through Week 52
Measured: Through Week 52
Number of Participants With At Least One TEAE Through Week 64
Measured: Week 52 through Week 64
Number of Participants With At Least One Serious TEAE Through Week 64
Measured: Week 52 through Week 64
Number of Participants With At Least One TE AESI Through Week 64
Measured: Week 52 through Week 64
Concentrations of Functional Dupilumab in Serum
Measured: Baseline to Week 64
Number of Participants With TE Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Response Per Maximum Titer Category
Measured: Baseline to Week 64
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Dec 2019
- Study start28 Oct 2020
- Primary completion12 Jul 2024
- Study completion5 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bullous PemphigoidStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Regeneron PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trial Management, Study director, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04206553
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R668-BP-1902
- Other IDs
- 2019-003520-20, 2024-510745-34-00, 2019
- Acronym
- LIBERTY-BP
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All individual patient data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
- Expanded access
- Available
Publications
Murrell DF, Joly P, Werth VP, Ujiie H, Worm M, Mangold AR, Avetisova E, Maloney J, Laws E, Mortensen E, Dubost-Brama A, Shabbir A. Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT. Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2991-3002. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02810-3. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
PubMed 38443648
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04206553
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LIBERTY-BP / R668-BP-1902
- Conditions
- Bullous Pemphigoid
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Regeneron PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Sanofi
- Study start
- 28 Oct 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 12 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 6 Mar 2026
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate whether dupilumab is effective and safe for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid. Dupilumab is a type of drug called a "monoclonal antibody". An antibody is a special kind of protein that the immune (defense) system normally makes to fight bacteria and viruses. Bullous pemphigoid is an autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease, predominately affecting the elderly (typical onset after age 60).
The study is looking at several other research questions, including:
- Side effects that may be experienced by people taking dupilumab
- How dupilumab works in the body and affects the body
- How dupilumab affects quality of life
- How much dupilumab is present in the blood
- To see if dupilumab works to wean the patient off oral corticosteroids
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumab | Experimental | Drug: dupilumab, Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) |
| Matching placebo | Experimental | Drug: Matching Placebo, Drug: Oral corticosteroids (OCS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients must have characteristic clinical features of bullous pemphigoid (BP) (eg, urticarial or eczematous or erythematous plaques, bullae, pruritus) at the screening and baseline visits.
- Study participants are required to have a confirmed diagnosis of BP based on histopathology, immunopathology, and serology at the baseline visit, as defined in the protocol.
- Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) activity score ≥24 at baseline and screening visits.
- Baseline peak pruritus NRS score for maximum itch intensity ≥4
- Karnofsky performance status score ≥50% at the screening visit.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Forms of pemphigoid other than classic BP (eg, Brunsting-Perry cicatricial pemphigoid, anti-p200 pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, or BP with concomitant pemphigus vulgaris)
- Patients who are receiving treatments known to cause or exacerbate BP (eg, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, penicillamine, furosemide, phenacetin, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor) who have not been on a stable dose of these medications for at least 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- Have ever received treatment with an IL-4 or IL-13 antagonist such as dupilumab, tralokinumab, or lebrikizumab.
- Treatment with systemic corticosteroids within 7 days before the baseline visit
- Treatment with topical corticosteroids of medium potency or higher, topical calcineurin inhibitor, or topical crisaborole within 7 days before the baseline visit
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| dupilumabAlso: Dupixent®, REGN668, SAR231893Loading dose administered subcutaneous (SC), followed by SC once every 2 weeks (Q2W) dosing. | Drug | dupilumab |
| Matching PlaceboMatching dupilumab without active substance | Drug | Matching placebo |
| Oral corticosteroids (OCS)Prednisone or prednisolone per standard of care to obtain control of disease activity. | Drug | Matching placebo, dupilumab |
Primary outcome
Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36
Time frame: At Week 36
Sustained remission at week 36, defined as: (1) Complete remission (absence of new lesions \& epithelialization of old lesions) \& off oral corticosteroids (OCS) no later than week 16 \& (2) Absence of disease relapse (appearance of ≥3 new lesions a month [blisters, eczematous lesions, or urticarial plaques] or at least 1 large eczematous lesion or urticarial plaque that does not heal within 1 week) after completion of OCS taper, no later than week 16, to week 36 \& (3) Absence of need for rescue therapy during 36 weeks (rescue therapy includes increase of OCS dose during the taper, re-initiation of OCS after completion of the OCS taper, or initiation of any BP-directed therapy). Participants with missing sustained remission data at week 36 due to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy, treatment-related AE, or death were considered non-responders \& those with missing data due to other reasons were handled using multiple imputation.
47 secondary outcomes
Total Cumulative Dose of Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Week 36
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percent Change in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) Activity Score From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Time to First Use of Rescue Medication Up to Week 36
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 36
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 36
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 36
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 36
Time frame: Up to Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Change in Autoimmune Bullous Disease Quality of Life (ABQOL) Score From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA) of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Change in BP180 Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 36
Time frame: Baseline, Week 36
Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 52
Time frame: At Week 52
Total Cumulative Dose of OCS From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Duration of Complete Remission While Not Requiring OCS Up to Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Control of Disease Activity Before Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Relapsed After Achieving Control of Disease Activity Up to Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percent of Participants Who Did Not Achieve Complete Remission Before Week 52
Time frame: Up to Week 52
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change in ABQOL Score From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change in Percent BSA of BP Involvement From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change in BP180 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Change in BP230 IgG Autoantibody Titer From Baseline to Week 52
Time frame: Baseline, Week 52
Percent of Participants in Complete Remission and Off OCS No Later Than Week 16
Time frame: Up to Week 16
Percent Change in BPDAI Activity Score From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥50% From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥75% From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants Achieving a Reduction in BPDAI Activity Score of ≥90% From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percent Change in Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Percent of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) of Weekly Average of Daily Peak Pruritus NRS ≥4 From Baseline to Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
Number of Participants With At Least One Treatment-emergent Adverse Event (TEAE) Through Week 52
Time frame: Through Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38443648Murrell DF, Joly P, Werth VP, Ujiie H, Worm M, Mangold AR, Avetisova E, Maloney J, Laws E, Mortensen E, Dubost-Brama A, Shabbir A. Study Design of a Phase 2/3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Dupilumab in Adults with Bullous Pemphigoid: LIBERTY-BP ADEPT. Adv Ther. 2024 Jul;41(7):2991-3002. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02810-3. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
- A Plain Language Summary is available on TrialSummaries.comLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All individual patient data (IPD) that underlie publicly available results will be considered for sharing
Related trials for Bullous Pemphigoid
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Subconjunctival Humira for Boston Keratoprosthesis
Penetrating Keratoplasty, Multiple Graft Failure
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1b Trial of RAY121 in Immunological Diseases (RAINBOW Trial)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), Bullous Pemphigoid (BP)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Phase 1b Long-term Extension Trial of RAY121 in Immunological Diseases (RAINBOW-LTE Trial)
Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS), Bullous Pemphigoid (BP)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Association Between Disease Severity and Clinical, Histopathological, and Eosinophilic Markers in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid (BP-EPIC)
Bullous Pemphigoid (BP)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Rituximab Versus Oral Cyclophosphamide in Severe Forms of Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Severe Forms of Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trial Management study director
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
53 sites in 9 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing dupilumab and Oral corticosteroids (OCS) in people with Bullous Pemphigoid, run by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals at 53 sites in 9 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 53 sites in United States, Germany, France, Japan, Spain and 4 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent of Participants Achieving Sustained Remission at Week 36 (time frame: At Week 36). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04206553, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.