AzTrials
AzTrials

Carotid Artery StenosisPERFORMANCE IINCT04201132

Protection Against Emboli During Carotid Artery Stenting Using the Neuroguard IEP System

A study testing Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP System in people with Carotid Artery Stenosis and Carotid Artery Diseases, run by Contego Medical, Inc. at 38 sites in 6 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective, multicenter single-arm, open label study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Neuroguard IEP System for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in subjects at elevated risk for adverse events following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
305 participants
Where
38 sitesin 6 countries
Study dates
12 Jun 2020to Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male and non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding female subjects whose age is ≥ 20 years and ≤ 80.
  2. Patient is willing and capable of complying with all study protocol requirements, including the specified follow-up visits and can be contacted by telephone.
  3. Patient or his/her authorized legal representative must sign a written informed consent form that has been approved by the local governing Institutional Review Board (IRB)/ Ethics Committee (EC) of the respective clinical site.
  4. Patient is diagnosed with carotid artery stenosis treatable with carotid artery stenting and is considered a high operative risk for CEA.
  5. Patient is diagnosed with either:
  6. Symptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 50% as determined by angiography using NASCET methodology. Symptomatic is defined as ipsilateral transient monocular blindness: amaurosis fugax; ipsilateral carotid transient ischemic attack (TIA), with neurologic symptoms persisting less than 24 hours; or ipsilateral non-disabling stroke within 180 days of the procedure; or
  7. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis ≥ 80% as determined by angiography using NASCET methodology.
  8. Patient has a modified Rankin Scale score of ≤ 2 at the time of informed consent.
  9. Females of child-bearing potential have a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of the index procedure.
  10. Patient is willing and able to take dual antiplatelet therapy for a minimum of 30 days following the index procedure.

Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  1. Target lesion located at the carotid bifurcation and/or proximal internal carotid artery (ICA).
  2. Single de novo or restenotic (post carotid endarterectomy (CEA)) target lesion or severe tandem lesions that can be covered by a single Neuroguard stent.
  3. Target lesion length is ≤ 20 mm (for 30 mm stents) or is ≤ 30 mm (for 40 mm stents).
  4. Index vessel diameter (segment covered by the mid-portion of the stent) between 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm at the site of the target lesion.
  5. Distal vessel diameter at the site of filter deployment is between 4.0 mm to 7.0 mm.
  6. Distal common carotid artery diameter (segment covered by proximal portion of the stent) is between 4.0 mm and 8.0 mm
  7. Sufficient landing zone exists in the cervical internal carotid artery distal to the target lesion to allow for the safe and successful deployment of both the primary embolic protection filter and the Neuroguard filter.

High Risk for CEA Conditions For inclusion in the study, a patient must meet at least one significant anatomic or comorbid high risk conditions listed below. Patients at high risk for CEA are defined as having significant comorbidities and/or anatomic risk factors and would be poor candidates for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the opinion of a physician.

High Anatomic Risk for CEA Conditions

  1. Target lesion at or above C2 (level of jaw) or below the clavicle.
  2. Inability to extend the head due to cervical arthritis or other cervical disorders.
  3. History of radiation treatment to the neck or radical neck dissection
  4. Prior head and neck surgery in the region of the carotid artery.
  5. Spinal immobility of the neck.
  6. Tracheostomy or tracheostoma.
  7. Hostile neck or surgically inaccessible lesion
  8. Laryngeal palsy or laryngectomy.
  9. Severe tandem lesions (total length must be ≤ 30 mm and must be covered with one stent).
  10. Occlusion of the contralateral CCA or ICA.
  11. Severe bilateral ICA stenosis.

High Co-morbid Risk Conditions for CEA

  1. Patient is ≥ 70 years of age (maximum 80 years) at the time of enrollment.
  2. NYHA Class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF)
  3. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with FEV1 < 50 or on intermittent or chronic oxygen therapy.
  4. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35%
  5. Unstable angina
  6. History of recent MI (between 14 days and 6 weeks prior to index the procedure)
  7. Coronary artery disease with two or more vessels with ≥ 70% stenosis
  8. Planned coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve replacement surgery between 31 and 60 days after CAS procedure
  9. Peripheral vascular surgery or abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is required and planned between 31 and 60 days following CAS procedure
  10. Contralateral laryngeal nerve paralysis
  11. Restenosis following a prior carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

General Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Life expectancy of less than one year, cancer with metastatic spread, undergoing active chemotherapy treatment, or currently requiring an organ transplantation.
  2. An evolving acute stroke.
  3. Anticipated or potential sources of emboli including left ventricular aneurysm, severe cardiomyopathy, aortic or mitral mechanical heart valve, severe calcific aortic stenosis (valve area < 1.0 cm2), endocarditis, moderate to severe mitral stenosis, known previously symptomatic PFO, left atrial thrombus, any intracardiac mass or DVT or PE treated within the past 12 months.
  4. History of paroxysmal atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation requiring chronic anticoagulation
  5. History of chronic atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation.
  6. Anticoagulation with Phenprocoumon (Marcumar®), warfarin, or a direct thrombin inhibitor, or anti-Xa agents within 14 days of the index procedure.
  7. Acute febrile illness (temperature > 100.4F or 38C) or active infection.
  8. Subjects with presumptive or confirmed SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection.
  • A SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 test shall be performed 72 hours prior to the index procedure for all subjects
  • Note: If a subject has confirmed SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 infection (SARSCoV-2/COVID-19+), eligibility may be re-established 21 days following diagnosis if infection is asymptomatic and 21 days following resolution of symptoms if infection is symptomatic.
  1. Acute myocardial infarction < 14 days prior to index procedure.
  2. Any major surgical procedure (i.e. intraabdominal or intrathoracic surgery or any surgery / interventional procedure involving cardiac or vascular system) 30 days prior to or following the index procedure.
  3. History of major disabling stroke with substantial residual disability (modified Rankin score ≥ 3)
  4. Known severe carotid stenosis or complete occlusion contralateral to the target lesion requiring treatment within 30 days of the index procedure.
  5. Other neurological deficit not due to stroke that may confound the neurological assessments.
  6. Dementia considered other than mild.
  7. Known hypersensitivity to nitinol or its components (e.g. nickel, titanium).
  8. History of intracranial hemorrhage within 90 days prior to the index procedure.
  9. History of GI bleed within 30 days prior to the index procedure
  10. Chronic renal insufficiency (serum creatinine ≥ 2.5 ml/dL or estimated GFR < 30 cc/min)
  11. Any condition that precludes proper angiographic assessment or makes percutaneous arterial access unsafe (e.g., severe hepatic impairment, malignant hypertension, morbid obesity).
  12. Known hypersensitivity to contrast media that cannot be adequately premedicated.
  13. Hemoglobin (Hgb) < 8 gm/dL, platelet count < 100,000, INR > 1.5 (irreversible), or heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.
  14. History or current indication of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy including thrombocytopenia or an inability to receive heparin in amounts sufficient to maintain an activated clot time at ≥ 250 seconds.
  15. Contraindication to standard of care study medications, including antiplatelet therapy or aspirin.
  16. Currently enrolled in another interventional device or drug study that has not yet reached the primary endpoint.
  17. Potential for subject non-compliance with protocol-required follow up or anti platelet medication in the opinion of the investigator.

Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

  1. Total occlusion of the target carotid artery.
  2. Previously placed stent in the ipsilateral carotid artery.
  3. Severe calcification or vascular tortuosity of the target vessel that may preclude the safe introduction of the sheath, guiding catheter, distal filter, Neuroguard stent or Neuroguard filter. Excessive circumferential calcification of the target lesion is defined as >3 mm of thickness of calcification seen in orthogonal views on fluoroscopy. Severe vascular tortuosity is defined as 2 or more bends of 90 degrees or more within 4 cm of the target lesion.
  4. Qualitative characteristics of stenosis and stenosis-length of carotid bifurcation (common carotid) and/or ipsilateral external carotid artery, that preclude the safe introduction of the sheath.
  5. Angulation or tortuosity (≥ 90 degree) of the innominate and common carotid artery (CCA) that precludes safe, expeditious sheath placement or that will transmit a severe loop to the internal carotid after sheath placement.
  6. Angiographic evidence of a mobile filling defect or fresh thrombus in the target carotid artery.
  7. Presence of "string sign" of the target lesion (a sub-totally occluded, long segment of the true lumen of the artery with markedly reduced contrast flow).
  8. Non-atherosclerotic carotid stenosis (e.g. dissection, fibromuscular dysplasia)
  9. Proximal/ostial CCA, innominate stenosis, or intracranial stenosis located distal to the target stenosis that is more severe that target stenosis.
  10. Patient in whom percutaneous vascular access is not possible, including severe tortuosity or stenosis that requires additional endovascular procedures to facilitate aortic arch access or that prevents safe and expeditious access.
  11. Patient with intracranial pathology that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient inappropriate for study participation (e.g., arteriovenous malformations, brain tumor, microangiopathy or large vessel cerebral vascular disease, etc) or that would confound the neurological evaluation.
  12. Known mobile plaque or thrombus in the aortic arch.
  13. Type III aortic arch.
  14. Angiographic, CT, MR or ultrasound evidence of severe atherosclerosis, tortuosity or angulation of the aortic arch or origin of the innominate or common carotid arteries that would preclude or make difficult safe passage of the sheath and other endovascular devices to the target artery as needed for carotid stenting.

Trial locations and contacts

38 sites in 6 countries.

38 sites in 6 countries

United States28 sites
  • Manatee Memorial Hospital

    Bradenton, Florida, 34208

  • University at Buffalo Neurosurgery

    Buffalo, New York, 14203

  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Prisma Health Midlands

    Columbia, South Carolina, 29203

  • St. Vincent Hospital

    Erie, Pennsylvania, 16502

  • UPMC Hamot

    Erie, Pennsylvania, 16507

  • Stern Cardiovascular Foundation

    Germantown, Tennessee, 38138

  • Prisma Health Upstate

    Greenville, South Carolina, 29605

  • Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular Institute

    Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17043

  • Terrebonne General Medical Center

    Houma, Louisiana, 70360

  • Texas Heart Institute

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • Huntsville Hospital

    Huntsville, Alabama, 35801

  • University of Iowa Hospital and Clinics

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • Lyerly Baptist Neurosurgery

    Jacksonville, Florida, 32207

  • Ballad Wellmont Holston Valley Medical Center

    Kingsport, Tennessee, 37660

  • Turkey Creek Medical Center

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 27934

  • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

    Lebanon, New Hampshire, 03756

  • University of Lexington

    Lexington, Kentucky, 40503

  • Mt. Sinai

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Miriam Hospital

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02906

  • North Carolina Heart and Vascular Research

    Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607

  • Monument Health - Rapid City Regional Hospital

    Rapid City, South Dakota, 57701

  • White Oak Medical Center

    Silver Spring, Maryland, 20904

  • North Central Heart Institute

    Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57108

  • St. Helena Hospital

    St. Helena, California, 94574

  • Stony Brook University Medical Center

    Stony Brook, New York, 11794

  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010

  • Lankenau Institute

    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096

Other trials in United States

Germany6 sites
  • University Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen

    Bad Krozingen, 78189

  • Sankt Gertrauden-Krankenhaus GmbH

    Berlin, 10713

  • Cardiovascular Centre Frankfurt

    Frankfurt

  • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum Prof. Mathey, Prof. Schofer GmbH

    Hamburg

  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Elblandklinikum Radebeul

    Radebeul, 01445

Other trials in Germany

Bulgaria1 site
  • Acibadem City Clinic University Hospital

    Sofia, 1407

Other trials in Bulgaria

Italy1 site
  • Centro Cardiologico Monzino

    Milan, 20138

Other trials in Italy

North Macedonia1 site
  • University Clinic of Cardiology Skopje

    Skopje, 1000

Other trials in North Macedonia

Slovenia1 site
  • University Medical Center Ljubljana

    Ljubljana, 1000

Other trials in Slovenia

About this study

Official title: Protection Against Emboli During Carotid Artery Stenting Using a 3-in-1 Delivery System Comprised of a Post-dilation Balloon, Integrated Embolic Filter and a Novel Carotid Stent - the PERFORMANCE II Study

A prospective, multicenter single-arm, open label study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Neuroguard IEP System for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in subjects at elevated risk for adverse events following carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Read the detailed description

The Neuroguard IEP System is a 3-in-1 carotid stent delivery system consisting of an angioplasty balloon, an integrated embolic protection device and a nitinol self-expanding stent loaded over the balloon and constrained by an outer sheath. Eligible patients must be between 20 and 80 years of age and diagnosed with either de-novo atherosclerotic or post CEA restenotic lesion(s) in the internal carotid arteries (ICA) or at the carotid bifurcation with ≥50% stenosis if symptomatic), or, ≥80% stenosis if asymptomatic (both defined by angiography using NASCET methodology). Symptomatic patients are defined as having stroke or TIA ipsilateral to the carotid lesion within 180 days of the procedure within the hemisphere supplied by the target vessel. Enrolled subjects will be followed at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months.

Being tested
Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP System
Medical subject headings
Carotid Stenosis, Carotid Artery Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP SystemDevice

    Carotid artery stenting (treatment) with the Neuroguard IEP 3-in-1 Carotid Stent and Post-Dilation Balloon System with Integrated Embolic Protection

Study groups in NCT04201132
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Carotid artery stentingExperimentalCarotid artery stenting procedure with Neuroguard IEP System
Receives: Device: Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MAE

    Death, all stroke and myocardial infarction (MI)

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Ipsilateral Stroke

    Ipsilateral hemiparesis

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Technical success

    Successful stent deployment, successful filter deployment and retrieval, successful stent post-dilation and successful delivery system retrieval

    Measured: Day of procedure

  2. Procedure success

    Successful stent implantation with <50% residual stenosis

    Measured: Day of procedure

  3. TLR

    Target Lesion Revascularization

    Measured: 12 months

  4. In-Stent Restenosis (ISR)

    Restenosis of stented segment

    Measured: 12 months, 24 months, 36 months

  5. Major stroke

    New focal ischemic neurological deficit of abrupt onset which is present after 7 days and results in greater than or equal to 4 point increase in NIHSS compared to baseline.

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Minor stroke

    New focal ischemic neurological deficit of abrupt onset lasting > 24 hours and increases NIHSS by less than or equal to 3 points at 7 days

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA)

    Focal ischemic neurological deficit of abrupt onset and of presumed vascular etiology that resolves completely within 24 hours of onset

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Neurological death

    Death after a stroke that is either a direct consequence of the stroke or a complication of the stroke

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2019
  2. Study start12 Jun 2020
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2023
  4. Study completionDec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
305 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04201132
Sponsor's protocol ID
CSP1400
Acronym
PERFORMANCE II
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
13 Dec 2019
Last updated
6 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Gray WA, Metzger DC, Zidar J, Kedev S, Petrov I, Soukas P, Levy E, Bachinsky W, Bacharach JM, Montorsi P, Novack V, Lansky A, Langhoff R. The PERFORMANCE II Trial: A Prospective Multicenter Investigation of a Novel Carotid Stent System. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Feb 10;18(3):367-376. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2024.10.031. Epub 2025 Jan 8.

    PubMed 39797836

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Carotid artery stenting with Neuroguard IEP System in people with Carotid Artery Stenosis and Carotid Artery Diseases, run by Contego Medical, Inc. at 38 sites in 6 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 38 sites in United States, Germany, Bulgaria, Italy, North Macedonia and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MAE (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04201132, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in