AzTrials
AzTrials

AspleniaSPLEENNCT04199403

Assessment of Complication Risk Factors in a French National Cohort of Asplenic Patients

An observational study of Asplenia, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 12 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Spleen could have been surgically removed for trauma, cancer, auto-immune disease, or to perform a diagnosis. Spleen could be non-functional due to radiotherapy or splenic artery embolism. These patients are at risks of infectious diseases due to encapsulated bacteria, cancer, and thromboembolism disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Asplenia
How many people
6,000 participants
Where
12 sitesFrance
Study dates
9 Jan 2020to Jan 2040
How long will I take part?
10 Years
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients >18 years with acquired asplenia due to splenectomy, artery embolization, or spleen radiotherapy

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 year-old
  • With asplenia due to splenectomy, splenic artery embolization or radiotherapy

Who cannot join

  • Genetic asplenia including sick cell disease

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

12 sites in 1 country

France12 sites, 10 recruiting
  • C.H. d'Angoulême

    Angoulême, 16959

    Agnès RICHE, MD, agnes.riche@ch-angouleme.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H. Victor Dupouy

    Argenteuil, 95100

    Damien CONTOU, MD, +33 1 34 23 11 73, damien.contou@ch-argenteuil.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H. de Béthune

    Béthune, 62660

    Withdrawn
  • Hôpitaux de Chartres

    Chartres, 28019

    Active, not recruiting
  • C.H.U. de Lille

    Lille, 59037

    Fanny VUOTTO, MD, fanny.vuotto@chru-lille.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H.U. de Montpellier

    Montpellier, 34295

    Corinne MERLE, MD, c-merle_de_boever@chu-montpellier.fr

    Recruiting
  • Hôtel-Dieu - CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, 44093

    Maeva LEFEBVRE, MD, maeva.lefebvre@chu-nantes.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H.U. de Poitiers

    Poitiers, 86000

    Mathieu PUYADE, MD, +33 5 49 44 2 76, mathieu.puyade@chu-poitiers.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H.U. de Rouen

    Rouen, 76031

    Manuel ETIENNE, MD, manuel.etienne@chu-rouen.fr

    Not yet recruiting
  • C.H.U. de Toulouse

    Toulouse, 31059

    Guillaume MARTIN-BLONDEL, MD, martin-blondel.g@chu-toulouse.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H. de Tourcoing

    Tourcoing, 59208

    Nathalie VIGET, MD, nviget@ch-tourcoing.fr

    Recruiting
  • C.H. de Valenciennes

    Valenciennes, 59300

    Nicolas ETTAHAR, MD, ettahar-n@ch-valenciennes.fr

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Spleen could have been surgically removed for trauma, cancer, auto-immune disease, or to perform a diagnosis. Spleen could be non-functional due to radiotherapy or splenic artery embolism. These patients are at risks of infectious diseases due to encapsulated bacteria, cancer, and thromboembolism disease. The purpose of this study is to assess complications occurring in French patients without spleen and to implement new diagnostic tools for follow-up.

Read the detailed description

Asplenia can be congenital or acquired. Acquired asplenia can be due to diagnostic or therapeutic surgery, splenic artery embolization, or radiotherapy. Incidence of splenectomized patients was estimated between 10 and 15/100 000 persons in 2003. More recent data suggested a decrease in splenectomy due to increase of splenic artery embolization. From 212 to 2016, about 4000 splenectomy had still been performed.

Three different risks are known for asplenic patients: infectious, neoplastic, and thromboembolic. Prevalence rate of infectious complications in splenectomized patients was 3.2% with a mortality rate of 1.4%. A US cohort study including 8149 splenectomized veterans have shown that the risk of cancer was increased, so did the risk of thromboembolic disease, on a 27-year period of follow-up. Pathophysiology of these risks are not well known.

There are very few tools to assess splenic function: Howell-Jolly bodies in red blood cells, scintigraphy. These tools lack sensitivity and are not correlated with complications in asplenic patients.

To better understand how splenic function and how immunity evolves during time in asplenic patients, a longitudinal follow-up could be useful. There may be some differences between splenectomized patients, those who benefited from splenic artery embolization, and those who received radiotherapy. Infectious risk may be different between these three groups. Implementing new tools assessing residual splenic function could improve management of these patients. A prospective follow-up aims at accurately estimate the incidence rate of infectious and non-infectious complications in this population.

Conditions
Asplenia
Keywords
spleen, asplenic patients, splenectomy, asplenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04199403
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Single GroupNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Assessment of complication risk factors

    Comparison between splenectomy and other type of asplenia for prevalence of infectious diseases, cancer, and thromboembolism disease

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Dec 2019
  2. Study start9 Jan 2020
  3. Primary completionJan 2040 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2040 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
6,000 participants (estimated)
Target duration
10 Years
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04199403
Sponsor's protocol ID
SPLEEN
Acronym
SPLEEN
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
12 Dec 2019
Last updated
16 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Publications

  • Kristinsson SY, Gridley G, Hoover RN, Check D, Landgren O. Long-term risks after splenectomy among 8,149 cancer-free American veterans: a cohort study with up to 27 years follow-up. Haematologica. 2014 Feb;99(2):392-8. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.092460. Epub 2013 Sep 20.

    PubMed 24056815
  • Mebius RE, Kraal G. Structure and function of the spleen. Nat Rev Immunol. 2005 Aug;5(8):606-16. doi: 10.1038/nri1669.

    PubMed 16056254
  • Aiolfi A, Inaba K, Strumwasser A, Matsushima K, Grabo D, Benjamin E, Lam L, Demetriades D. Splenic artery embolization versus splenectomy: Analysis for early in-hospital infectious complications and outcomes. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Sep;83(3):356-360. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001550.

    PubMed 28459796

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Asplenia, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 12 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Mathieu PUYADE, MD (+33 5 49 44 32 76, mathieu.puyade@chu-poitiers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Assessment of complication risk factors (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04199403, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in