Brain DiseasesNCT04188834
Effects of Sensory Flicker and Electrical Flicker Stimulation
A study testing Customized version of DAVID device and Blackrock CereStim in people with Brain Diseases, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The study will evaluate whether sensory flicker can modulate neural activity of deep brain regions in humans, and whether it can have relevant effects on behavior. Moreover, it will compare those effects to the gold-standard method of modulating brain circuits, direct electrical stimulation of the brain (the same… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Customized version of DAVID device and Blackrock CereStim
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Jan 2020to 22 Nov 2022
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (>18 years, regardless of gender, race or ethnicity).
- To be implanted with intracranial depth or grid/strip electrodes for surgical evaluation.
- Patient was not shown, during phase I seizure monitoring, to exhibit abnormal EEG activity in response to photic stimulation, and is not clinically suspected to be susceptible to photic-induced seizures.
- Patient has no pre-existing diagnosis of autism.
- Patient is not considered at risk for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) triggered by sensory stimulation.
- Fluent in English.
- Able to understand an informed consent (comprehend potential risks and benefits).
- Give written and verbal informed consent to all experiments patient would participate in.
Who cannot join
- Failure to meet any one inclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Sensory Flicker and Electrical Flicker Stimulation
The study will evaluate whether sensory flicker can modulate neural activity of deep brain regions in humans, and whether it can have relevant effects on behavior. Moreover, it will compare those effects to the gold-standard method of modulating brain circuits, direct electrical stimulation of the brain (the same mechanism as deep brain stimulation), using a powerful within-subjects design.
Read the detailed description
Clinical trials have explored the modulation of brain circuits to treat several brain disorders, including Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), depression, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). However, current means to non-invasively modulate brain activity are limited.
The study will evaluate whether sensory flicker can modulate neural activity of deep brain regions in humans, and whether it can have relevant effects on behavior. Moreover, it will compare those effects to the gold-standard method of modulating brain circuits, direct electrical stimulation of the brain (the same mechanism as deep brain stimulation), using a powerful within-subjects design.
- Conditions
- Brain Diseases
- Being tested
- Customized version of DAVID device, Blackrock CereStim
- Keywords
- Sensory Flicker Stimulation, Electrical Flicker Stimulation, Neurophysiological Effects, Behavioral Effects, Brain circuits modulation, Steady-state evoked potentials
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Customized version of DAVID deviceDevice
A customized version of the DAVID device will be used to expose participants to sensory flicker. The device consists of opaque glasses containing LEDs to present flickering light, as well as earbuds or headphones to present flickering sound.
Blackrock CereStimDevice
The Blackrock CereStim is a fully programmable neurostimulator. The current pulses generated by the Blackrock CereStim are intended to stimulate neurons in proximity to a set of electrodes.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sensory Flicker Stimulation | Experimental | Participants will be exposed for about 10 to 60 minutes at a time, to a sequence of sensory flicker trials each lasting a few seconds to 5 minutes, while their eyes are open or closed. Each trial may include the following modalities and frequencies of flicker:
* Modalities: auditory only, visual only, or audiovisual combined.
* Frequencies: random, or anywhere from 3Hz to 200Hz.
Additionally, subjects may be exposed to individual pulses of light and/or sound, i.e. around or less than 1 pulse /second, for up to 20 minutes at a time. Receives: Device: Customized version of DAVID device |
| Electrical Flicker Stimulation | Active comparator | Participants will be exposed to direct electrical brain stimulation with low-amplitude current, at given flicker frequencies. Participants will be exposed to frequencies ranging from 5-100Hz, for up to 10 seconds at a time. Initially, frequencies of 5.5Hz and 40Hz will be tested.
During brain stimulation sessions, bipolar electrical stimulation will be applied to one or more areas of the brain at a time either with or without associated memory tasks. Stimulation in the absence of any memory task will be applied to assess the subject's neurophysiological response to stimulation and to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for use during memory tasks. Stimulation during behavioral tasks will be applied in an attempt to affect the subject's memory. Receives: Device: Blackrock CereStim |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fold-change in Oscillatory Activity (Power Spectral Density) in Response to Exposure to Sensory Flicker: Comparing Mean Power Spectral Density at the Frequency of Flicker Being Presented Between Flicker and Baseline Periods
The power spectral density of the LFP will be measured across stimulus frequencies and modalities of sensory flicker stimuli in visual areas, auditory areas, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. To evaluate the effects of sensory flicker on brain activity in various brain regions, researchers compared the average increase in oscillatory neural activity of given recorded brain regions during sensory stimulation, among the total number of recording locations that showed a significant response to sensory stimulation compared to baseline. In participants in whom a condition was repeated across multiple experimental sessions. If a location showed a significant response in multiple sessions, the data point that showed the highest level of response was kept. The average fold-change increase in oscillatory activity, 25th and 75th percentiles, within a region of interest is reported.
Measured: During experiment session (up to 2 hours) during hospital admission (up to 2 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Effect of Sensory Flicker on the Rate of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) Which Represent Pathological Activity Often Observed in Epilepsy
The change of of the sensory flicker effect will be evaluated by the comparison of the whole-brain rate of IEDs between sensory flicker stimulation and baseline (no stimulation).
Measured: During experiment session (up to 2 hours) during hospital admission (up to 2 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Dec 2019
- Study start10 Jan 2020
- Primary completion22 Nov 2022
- Study completion22 Nov 2022
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Emory UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Emory University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Joseph R Manns, PhD, Emory University
- Investigators
- Joseph Manns, PhD, Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04188834
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00107577
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 4 Dec 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant and data that underlie the results reported after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be available. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, analytic code will be made available immediately following publication with no end date.
Publications
Blanpain LT, Chen E, Park J, Walelign MY, Gross RE, Cabaniss BT, Willie JT, Singer AC. Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Humans. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Mar 17:2023.03.14.23286691. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.14.23286691.
PubMed 36993248
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Neurophysiological and Behavioral Effects of Sensory Flicker and Electrical Flicker Stimulation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04188834
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB00107577
- Conditions
- Brain Diseases
- Keywords
- Sensory Flicker Stimulation, Electrical Flicker Stimulation, Neurophysiological Effects, Behavioral Effects, Brain circuits modulation, Steady-state evoked potentials
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Emory UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Georgia Institute of Technology
- Study start
- 10 Jan 2020 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 Nov 2022 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 Nov 2022 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 26 Mar 2024
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study will evaluate whether sensory flicker can modulate neural activity of deep brain regions in humans, and whether it can have relevant effects on behavior. Moreover, it will compare those effects to the gold-standard method of modulating brain circuits, direct electrical stimulation of the brain (the same mechanism as deep brain stimulation), using a powerful within-subjects design.
Detailed description
Clinical trials have explored the modulation of brain circuits to treat several brain disorders, including Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease (AD), depression, and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). However, current means to non-invasively modulate brain activity are limited.
The study will evaluate whether sensory flicker can modulate neural activity of deep brain regions in humans, and whether it can have relevant effects on behavior. Moreover, it will compare those effects to the gold-standard method of modulating brain circuits, direct electrical stimulation of the brain (the same mechanism as deep brain stimulation), using a powerful within-subjects design.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sensory Flicker Stimulation | Experimental | Device: Customized version of DAVID deviceParticipants will be exposed for about 10 to 60 minutes at a time, to a sequence of sensory flicker trials each lasting a few seconds to 5 minutes, while their eyes are open or closed. Each trial may include the following modalities and frequencies of flicker: * Modalities: auditory only, visual only, or audiovisual combined. * Frequencies: random, or anywhere from 3Hz to 200Hz. Additionally, subjects may be exposed to individual pulses of light and/or sound, i.e. around or less than 1 pulse /second, for up to 20 minutes at a time. |
| Electrical Flicker Stimulation | Active comparator | Device: Blackrock CereStimParticipants will be exposed to direct electrical brain stimulation with low-amplitude current, at given flicker frequencies. Participants will be exposed to frequencies ranging from 5-100Hz, for up to 10 seconds at a time. Initially, frequencies of 5.5Hz and 40Hz will be tested. During brain stimulation sessions, bipolar electrical stimulation will be applied to one or more areas of the brain at a time either with or without associated memory tasks. Stimulation in the absence of any memory task will be applied to assess the subject's neurophysiological response to stimulation and to identify the optimal stimulation parameters for use during memory tasks. Stimulation during behavioral tasks will be applied in an attempt to affect the subject's memory. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adult (>18 years, regardless of gender, race or ethnicity).
- To be implanted with intracranial depth or grid/strip electrodes for surgical evaluation.
- Patient was not shown, during phase I seizure monitoring, to exhibit abnormal EEG activity in response to photic stimulation, and is not clinically suspected to be susceptible to photic-induced seizures.
- Patient has no pre-existing diagnosis of autism.
- Patient is not considered at risk for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) triggered by sensory stimulation.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Failure to meet any one inclusion criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Customized version of DAVID deviceA customized version of the DAVID device will be used to expose participants to sensory flicker. The device consists of opaque glasses containing LEDs to present flickering light, as well as earbuds or headphones to present flickering sound. | Device | Sensory Flicker Stimulation |
| Blackrock CereStimThe Blackrock CereStim is a fully programmable neurostimulator. The current pulses generated by the Blackrock CereStim are intended to stimulate neurons in proximity to a set of electrodes. | Device | Electrical Flicker Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Fold-change in Oscillatory Activity (Power Spectral Density) in Response to Exposure to Sensory Flicker: Comparing Mean Power Spectral Density at the Frequency of Flicker Being Presented Between Flicker and Baseline Periods
Time frame: During experiment session (up to 2 hours) during hospital admission (up to 2 weeks)
The power spectral density of the LFP will be measured across stimulus frequencies and modalities of sensory flicker stimuli in visual areas, auditory areas, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex. To evaluate the effects of sensory flicker on brain activity in various brain regions, researchers compared the average increase in oscillatory neural activity of given recorded brain regions during sensory stimulation, among the total number of recording locations that showed a significant response to sensory stimulation compared to baseline. In participants in whom a condition was repeated across multiple experimental sessions. If a location showed a significant response in multiple sessions, the data point that showed the highest level of response was kept. The average fold-change increase in oscillatory activity, 25th and 75th percentiles, within a region of interest is reported.
1 secondary outcome
Effect of Sensory Flicker on the Rate of Interictal Epileptiform Discharges (IEDs) Which Represent Pathological Activity Often Observed in Epilepsy
Time frame: During experiment session (up to 2 hours) during hospital admission (up to 2 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 36993248Blanpain LT, Chen E, Park J, Walelign MY, Gross RE, Cabaniss BT, Willie JT, Singer AC. Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in Humans. medRxiv [Preprint]. 2023 Mar 17:2023.03.14.23286691. doi: 10.1101/2023.03.14.23286691.
- Multisensory Flicker Modulates Widespread Brain Networks and Reduces Interictal Epileptiform Discharges in HumansLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant and data that underlie the results reported after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be available. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, analytic code will be made available immediately following publication with no end date.
Related trials for Brain Diseases
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Acupressure as Long-term Intervention to Slow the Progression of Early/Mild Alzheimer's Disease
Alzheimer's Disease
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Joseph Manns, PhD principal investigator
Emory University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Customized version of DAVID device and Blackrock CereStim in people with Brain Diseases, run by Emory University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Mar 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fold-change in Oscillatory Activity (Power Spectral Density) in Response to Exposure to Sensory Flicker: Comparing Mean Power Spectral Density at the Frequency of Flicker Being Presented Between Flicker and Baseline Periods (time frame: During experiment session (up to 2 hours) during hospital admission (up to 2 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04188834, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2024.