Chronic Spontaneous UrticariaPhase 3NCT04180488
Dupilumab for the Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Patients Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1 Antihistamine and Who Are naïve to, Intolerant of, or Incomplete Responders to Omalizumab (LIBERTY-CSU CUPID)
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 and non sedating H1-antihistamine in people with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, run by Sanofi at 98 sites in 11 countries.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab in study participants with CSU who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1 antihistamine (Study A and C: omalizumab naïve; Study B: omalizumab intolerant or incomplete responders) Secondary Objectives: This study aimed to demonstrate the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
- What is being tested?
- Dupilumab SAR231893 and non sedating H1-antihistamine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 397 participants
- Where
- 98 sitesin 11 countries
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2019to 25 Oct 2024
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Study A and C: Participant were ≥6 years to 80 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Study B: Participant were ≥12 years (or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigational site) to 80 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent
- Participants who had a diagnosis of CSU refractory to H1 antihistamines (H1-AH) at the time of randomization defined by
- Diagnosis of CSU>6 months prior to screening visit
- Presence of itch and hives for >6 consecutive weeks at any time prior to screening visit despite the use of H1-AH during that time period
- Used a study defined H1-antihistamine for CSU treatment
Show all 10Show fewer
- During the 7 days before randomization:
- UAS7≥16 ISS7≥ 8
- Study A and C: omalizumab naïve, Study B; intolerant or incomplete responder to omalizumab
- Participants were willing and able to complete a daily symptom e-Diary for the duration of the study
Who cannot join
- Participants were excluded from any of the studies if any of the following criteria apply:
- Weight was less than 30 kg in adults and adolescents and 15 kg in children aged 6 to<12years
- Clearly defined underlying etiology for chronic urticarias other than CSU
- Presented of skin morbidities other than CSU that may interfere with the assessment of the study outcomes
- Active atopic dermatitis
- Severe concomitant illness(es) that, in the investigator's judgment, would have adversely affected the participant's participation in the study
Show all 14Show fewer
- Active tuberculosis or non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection, or a history of incompletely treated tuberculosis unless documented adequately treated.
- Diagnosed active endoparasitic infections; suspected or high risk of endoparasitic infection
- Active chronic or acute infection requiring treatment with systemic antibiotics, antivirals, antiprotozoals, or antifungals within 2 weeks before the screening visit and during the screening period
- Known or suspected immunodeficiency
- Active malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years before the baseline visit, except completely treated in situ carcinoma of the cervix, completely treated and resolved non-metastatic squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin
- History of systemic hypersensitivity or anaphylaxis to omalizumab or any biologic therapy, including any excipients
- Participation in prior dupilumab clinical study, or have been treated with commercially available dupilumab.
- The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Trial locations and contacts
98 sites in 11 countries.
98 sites in 11 countries
United States16 sites
Johns Hopkins University (Asthma and Allergy Center) Site Number : 8400016
Baltimore, Maryland, 21224
National Allergy and ENT Site Number : 8400011
Charleston, South Carolina, 29420
Immunocarolina LLC Site Number : 8400010
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28277
Bernstein Clinical Research Center Site Number : 8400014
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45236
Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Inc. Site Number : 8400003
Dallas, Texas, 75231
California Allergy and Asthma Medical Group, Inc. Site Number : 8400019
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Allergy & Asthma Specialists, PSC Site Number : 8400020
Owensboro, Kentucky, 42301
Allergy and Clinical Immunology Associates Site Number : 8400024
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15241
UR Dermatology at College Town Site Number : 8400008
Rochester, New York, 14642
STAAMP Research, LLC Site Number : 8400007
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Sarasota Clinical Research Site Number : 8400017
Sarasota, Florida, 34239
Aeroallergy Research Laboratories of Savannah, INC Site Number : 8400018
Savannah, Georgia, 31406
The Clinical Research Center, LLC Site Number : 8400009
St Louis, Missouri, 63141
Lenus Research & Medical Group Site Number : 8400001
Sweetwater, Florida, 33172
University of South Florida Site Number : 8400006
Tampa, Florida, 33613
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, P.C. Site Number : 8400015
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74136
Spain13 sites
Investigational Site Number : 7240003
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08003
Investigational Site Number : 7240008
Barcelona, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08036
Investigational Site Number : 7240013
Burjassot - Valencia, Valenciana, Comunidad, 46100
Investigational Site Number : 7240004
Córdoba, 14004
Investigational Site Number : 7240010
Esplugues de Llobregat, Catalunya [Cataluña], 08950
Investigational Site Number : 7240014
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona [Barcelona], 08907
Investigational Site Number : 7240005
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, 35010
Investigational Site Number : 7240007
Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28027
Investigational Site Number : 7240001
Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28040
Investigational Site Number : 7240006
Madrid, Madrid, Comunidad de, 28041
Investigational Site Number : 7240002
Pamplona, Navarre, 31008
Investigational Site Number : 7240012
Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña [La Coruña], 15702
Investigational Site Number : 7240011
Villarreal de Huerva, 12540
Canada12 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1240009
Calgary, Alberta, T2J 7E1
Investigational Site Number : 1240010
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C3
Investigational Site Number : 1240014
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 3C3
Investigational Site Number : 1240013
Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X3
Investigational Site Number : 1240003
Niagara Falls, Ontario, L2H 1H5
Investigational Site Number : 1240004
Québec, G1V 4W2
Investigational Site Number : 1240011
Québec, G1W 4R4
Investigational Site Number : 1240016
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1G 1X9
Investigational Site Number : 1240005
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3S6
Investigational Site Number : 1240002
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1E2
Investigational Site Number : 1240006
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8T 7A1
Investigational Site Number : 1240007
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 2G1
Japan12 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3920005
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 734-8551
Investigational Site Number : 3920007
Izumo-shi, Shimane, 693-8501
Investigational Site Number : 3920011
Kagoshima, Kagoshima-ken, 890-0063
Investigational Site Number : 3920002
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0017
Investigational Site Number : 3920004
Nagoya, 454-8509
Investigational Site Number : 3920009
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0807
Investigational Site Number : 3920001
Shinagawa-Ku, Tokyo, 141-8625
Investigational Site Number : 3920003
Suita-shi, Osaka, 565-0871
Investigational Site Number : 3920006
tabashi City, Tokyo, 173-8610
Investigational Site Number : 3920010
Tachikawa-shi, Tokyo, 190-0023
Investigational Site Number : 3920013
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 221-0825
Investigational Site Number : 3920008
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004
Russia10 sites
Investigational Site Number : 6430008
Chelyabinsk, 454048
Investigational Site Number : 6430006
Kazan', 420064
Investigational Site Number : 6430007
Krasnodar, 350020
Investigational Site Number : 6430005
Moscow, 115522
Investigational Site Number : 6430010
Moscow, 115522
Investigational Site Number : 6430002
Moscow, 123182
Investigational Site Number : 6430003
Saint Petersburg, 193231
Investigational Site Number : 6430009
Saratov, 410028
Investigational Site Number : 6430004
Smolensk, 214006
Investigational Site Number : 6430001
Stavropol, 355030
China9 sites
Investigational Site Number : 1560010
Beijing, 100045
Investigational Site Number : 1560004
Beijing, 100050
Investigational Site Number : 1560001
Chengdu, 610041
Investigational Site Number : 1560007
Guangzhou, 510630
Investigational Site Number : 1560002
Hangzhou, 310006
Investigational Site Number : 1560008
Hangzhou, 310016
Investigational Site Number : 1560006
Jinan, 250013
Investigational Site Number : 1560003
Shanghai, 200040
Investigational Site Number : 1560005
Wuxi, 214002
France8 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2500009
Calais, 62107
Investigational Site Number : 2500002
Lille, 59037
Investigational Site Number : 2500011
Mont-de-Marsan, 40000
Investigational Site Number : 2500004
Nantes, 44093
Investigational Site Number : 2500012
Nice, 06000
Investigational Site Number : 2500003
Nice, 06200
Investigational Site Number : 2500006
Paris, 75970
Investigational Site Number : 2500005
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Argentina7 sites
Investigational Site Number : 0320001
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
Investigational Site Number : 0320008
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1023AAB
Investigational Site Number : 0320004
CABA, Buenos Aires, C1414AIF
Investigational Site Number : 0320006
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, 2000
Investigational Site Number : 0320007
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000BRH
Investigational Site Number : 0320005
Rosario, Santa Fe Province, S2000JKR
Investigational Site Number : 0320003
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000AXL
Germany5 sites
Investigational Site Number : 2760001
Berlin, 10117
Investigational Site Number : 2760010
Bramsche, 49565
Investigational Site Number : 2760006
Dresden, 01307
Investigational Site Number : 2760007
Kiel, 24148
Investigational Site Number : 2760008
Tübingen, 72076
Hungary4 sites
Investigational Site Number : 3480005
Debrecen, 4031
Investigational Site Number : 3480004
Szeged, 6720
Investigational Site Number : 3480003
Szolnok, 5000
Investigational Site Number : 3480002
Szombathely, 9700
United Kingdom2 sites
Investigational Site Number : 8260002
London, London, City of, E1 1BB
Investigational Site Number : 8260001
Manchester, M23 9QZ,
About this study
Official title: Master Protocol of Three Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Studies of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1 Antihistamine Treatment in Patients naïve to Omalizumab and in Patients Who Are Intolerant or Incomplete Responders to Omalizumab
Primary Objective:
This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab in study participants with CSU who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1 antihistamine (Study A and C: omalizumab naïve; Study B: omalizumab intolerant or incomplete responders)
Read more
Secondary Objectives:
This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria activity composite endpoint and itch or hives, separately, at various timepoints This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on angioedema This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria control This study aimed to demonstrate improvement in health-related quality of life and overall disease status and severity This study aimed to evaluate the ability of dupilumab in reducing the proportion of participants who require treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) This study aimed to evaluate safety outcome measures This study aimed to evaluate immunogenicity of dupilumab
Read the detailed description
The duration of study for each participant included 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24 weeks of treatment period and 12 weeks of post treatment period.
- Conditions
- Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
- Being tested
- Dupilumab SAR231893, Placebo, non sedating H1-antihistamine
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Urticaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dupilumab SAR231893Drug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
PlaceboDrug
Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous
non sedating H1-antihistamineDrug
Pharmaceutical form:Tablet Route of administration: oral administration
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study A Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants who were omalizumab naïve received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows:
* 300 milligrams (mg) SC injection every 2 weeks (q2w) for adults and those adolescents who weighed >=60 kilograms (kg) at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1,
* 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents who weighed <60 kg and children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed >=30 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1 and
* 300 mg SC injection every 4 weeks (q4w) for children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed <30 kg and >=15 kg at screening starting from Week 4 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
| Study A Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants who were omalizumab naïve received placebo matched to dupilumab as subcutaneous (SC) injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
| Study B Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants who were intolerant or incomplete responders to omalizumab received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows:
* 300 mg SC injection q2w for adults and those adolescents weighing >=60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1 or
* 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents weighing <60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
| Study B Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants who were intolerant or incomplete responders to omalizumab received placebo matched to dupilumab as SC injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
| Study C Dupilumab | Experimental | Participants who were omalizumab naïve received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows:
* 300 mg SC injection q2w for adults and those adolescents who weighed >=60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1,
* 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents who weighed <60 kg and children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed >=30 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1 and
* 300 mg SC injection q4w for children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed <30 kg and >=15 kg at screening starting from Week 4 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1. Receives: Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
| Study C Placebo | Placebo comparator | Participants who were omalizumab naïve received placebo matched to dupilumab as SC injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Week 24
ISS was recorded in e-diary. The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. Least squares (LS) mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of daily scores obtained for 7 days prior to randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Secondary outcomes (24)
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score at Week 24
UAS is a validated composite patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure for assessing chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) activity. The once daily UAS is the sum of the daily hives severity score (HSS) and daily ISS recorded in e-diary. Daily HSS assesses number of wheals and range from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) whereas daily ISS assesses itch intensity and range from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The daily UAS scores range from 0 to 6 point/day. Once daily UAS scores are summed over 7-day period to create the UAS7 with an overall scale of 0 (no urticaria) to 42 (severe urticaria). Higher scores indicate greater severity of urticaria symptoms. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Hives Severity Score at Week 24
Daily HSS was recorded in e-diary. The HSS7 score is the sum of daily HSS ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) recorded by a participant at the same time of each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no hives) to 21 (severe hives). Higher scores indicate greater intensity of hives. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders for Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 24
The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. An ISS7 MID response was defined as >=5 points decrease from baseline after study intervention.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score <=6 at Week 24
UAS is a validated composite PRO measure for assessing CSU activity. The once daily UAS is the sum of the daily HSS and daily ISS recorded in e-diary. Daily HSS assesses number of wheals and range from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) whereas daily ISS assesses itch intensity and range from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The daily UAS scores range from 0 to 6 point/day. Once daily UAS scores are summed over 7-day period to create the UAS7 with an overall scale of 0 (no urticaria) to 42 (severe urticaria). Higher scores indicate greater severity of urticaria symptoms. In evaluating urticaria control using UAS7, an UAS7 score of <=6 indicated a well-controlled urticaria.
Measured: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score =0 at Week 24
UAS is a validated composite PRO measure for assessing CSU activity. The once daily UAS is the sum of the daily HSS and daily ISS recorded in e-diary. Daily HSS assesses number of wheals and range from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) whereas daily ISS assesses itch intensity and range from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The daily UAS scores range from 0 to 6 point/day. Once daily UAS scores are summed over 7-day period to create the UAS7 with an overall scale of 0 (no urticaria) to 42 (severe urticaria). Higher scores indicate greater severity of urticaria symptoms. In evaluating urticaria control using UAS7, an UAS7 score of 0 indicated an absence of both itch and hives and a complete resolution of CSU symptoms.
Measured: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urticaria Control Test (UCT) at Week 24
The UCT assessed urticaria control based on 4 items (severity of pruritus and wheals urticaria symptoms; frequency of treatment being not sufficient; quality-of-life [QoL] impairment; overall urticarial control). Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (no control) to 4 (maximum control). The overall UCT score was the sum of all 4 individual item scores with a range of 0 (no disease control) to 16 (complete disease control). Higher scores indicated greater disease control. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Week 12
ISS was recorded in e-diary. The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of daily scores obtained for 7 days prior to randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score at Week 12
UAS is a validated composite PRO measure for assessing CSU activity. The once daily UAS is the sum of the daily HSS and daily ISS recorded in e-diary. Daily HSS assesses number of wheals and range from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) whereas daily ISS assesses itch intensity and range from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The daily UAS scores range from 0 to 6 point/day. Once daily UAS scores are summed over 7-day period to create the UAS7 with an overall scale of 0 (no urticaria) to 42 (severe urticaria). Higher scores indicate greater severity of urticaria symptoms. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score <=6 and =0 at Week 12
UAS is a validated composite PRO measure for assessing CSU activity. The once daily UAS is the sum of the daily HSS and daily ISS recorded in e-diary. Daily HSS assesses number of wheals and range from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) whereas daily ISS assesses itch intensity and range from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The daily UAS scores range from 0 to 6 point/day. Once daily UAS scores are summed over 7-day period to create the UAS7 with an overall scale of 0 (no urticaria) to 42 (severe urticaria). Higher scores indicate greater severity of urticaria symptoms. In evaluating urticaria control using UAS7, an UAS7 score of <=6 indicated a well-controlled urticaria and an UAS7 score of 0 indicated an absence of both itch and hives and a complete resolution of CSU symptoms.
Measured: Week 12
Percentage of Responders for Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference at Week 12
The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. An ISS7 MID response was defined as >=5 points decrease from baseline after study intervention.
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Hives Severity Score at Week 12
Daily HSS was recorded in e-diary. The HSS7 score is the sum of daily HSS ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (more than 50 hives) recorded by a participant at the same time of each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no hives) to 21 (severe hives). Higher scores indicate greater intensity of hives. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Urticaria Control Test at Week 12
The UCT assessed urticaria control based on 4 items (severity of pruritus and wheals urticaria symptoms; frequency of treatment being not sufficient; quality-of-life [QoL] impairment; overall urticarial control). Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (no control) to 4 (maximum control). The overall UCT score was the sum of all 4 individual item scores with a range of 0 (no disease control) to 16 (complete disease control). Higher scores indicated greater disease control. LS mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20
ISS was recorded in e-diary. The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. Mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of daily scores obtained for 7 days prior to randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20
Time to First Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference Response During the 24-Week Treatment Period
The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. The MID for ISS7 was a change of 5.0 points. Time to first ISS7 MID response (ISS7 >=5) was defined as time to reduction from baseline of 5 points or more. Kaplan-Meier estimate is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of daily scores obtained for 7 days prior to randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Angioedema Activity Score Over 7 Days (AAS7) at Weeks 12 and 24
The AAS is a diary in which participants document on a daily basis the presence or absence of angioedema during the past 24 hours. If angioedema is present, participants answer 5 additional questions about the time of the day the swelling episode occurred and the severity and impact on daily functioning and appearance this swelling episode has had. Each AAS item is scored between 0 (minimum) and 3 (maximum). The daily AASs range from 0 (no episode) to 15 (severe) points. The AAS7 score is the sum of daily AAS scores reported by a participant at the same time of each day over 7 days, with a range of 0 (no angioedema episodes) to 105 (highest angioedema severity). Higher scores indicate greater angioedema activity. Mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of the daily scores for the 7 days prior to the day of randomization.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Percentage of Well-controlled Participants (Urticaria Control Test >=12) at Weeks 12 and 24
The UCT assessed urticaria control based on 4 items (severity of pruritus and wheals urticaria symptoms; frequency of treatment being not sufficient; QoL impairment; overall urticarial control). Each item was rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale from 0 (no control) to 4 (maximum control). The overall UCT score was the sum of all 4 individual item scores with a range of 0 (no disease control) to 16 (complete disease control). Higher scores indicated greater disease control. An UCT score of >=12 (out of maximum 16) indicated a well-controlled urticaria disease status.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality-of-life (HRQoL) as Measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in Participants >=16 Years Old at Weeks 12 and 24
The DLQI is an assessment assessing the impact of skin disease on participants' HRQoL over the previous week and contains 10 questions related to symptoms, leisure activities, work/school or holiday time, personal relationships including intimate, the side effects of treatment, and emotional reactions to having a skin disease. The questions (except question 7) were scored on a 4-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (a lot), 3 (very much). Question 7 about work/studying asked whether work/study had been prevented and then (if "No") to what degree the skin condition has been a problem at work/study; the item was again rated on a 3-point Likert scale: 0 (not at all) to 3 (a lot). Total DLQI was calculated by summing the score of each question and ranged from 0 (no impact) to 30 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated poor HRQoL. Mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality-of-life as Measured by Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) in Participants >=6 to <16 Years Old at Weeks 12 and 24
The CDLQI is a validated questionnaire designed to measure the impact of skin disease on children's HRQoL. Participants provide responses to 10 questions (symptoms feelings associated with disease, the impact of the disease on leisure, school or holidays, personal relationships, sleep, and side effects of treatment for the skin disease). The instrument has a recall period of 7 days. 9 of the 10 questions are scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all/question unanswered) to 3 (very much). Question 7 has an additional possible response (prevented school) which is assigned a score of 3 (0 [not at all] to 3 [definitely]). The total CDLQI score is the sum of the score of each question ranging 0 (no impact) to 30 (severe impact). The higher the score, the greater the impact is on the child's HRQoL. Mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria at Weeks 12 and 24
The PGIC is a 1-item questionnaire that asks the participant to provide the overall self-assessment of change in their CSU on a 7-point scale compared to just before participant started taking the study intervention. Response choices are: 0 (very much better), 1 (moderately better), 2 (a little better), 3 (no change), 4 (a little worse), 5 (moderately worse), 6 (very much worse). Higher score indicate worsening.
Measured: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria at Weeks 12 and 24
The PGIS is a 1-item questionnaire that asks participants to provide the overall self-assessment of their disease severity on a 4-point scale for the past week. Response choices are: 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). Higher score indicate more severity. Baseline was defined as the last available value up to randomization date and prior to the first dose of study intervention.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Time to First Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Use for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria During the 24-week Treatment Period
Participants receiving OCS as rescue medications for CSU were recorded by the Investigator in e-case report form (eCRF) during the 24-week treatment period. Kaplan-Meier estimate for time to first OCS use is presented.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Receiving Oral Corticosteroid for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria During the 24-week Treatment Period
Percentage of participants receiving OCS as rescue medications for CSU were recorded by the Investigator in eCRF during the 24-week treatment period.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical study participant, temporally associated with the use of study intervention, whether or not considered related to the study intervention. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was an important medical event. TEAEs were defined as AEs that developed, worsened or became serious during the TE period.
Measured: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, approximately 36 weeks each for Study A, B and C
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Dupilumab
Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints and ADA samples were assayed using validated methods. Treatment-emergent ADA response was defined as a positive response in the ADA assay post first dose when baseline results were negative or missing. Number of participants with treatment-emergent ADA response is presented.
Measured: Up to Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Nov 2019
- Study start11 Dec 2019
- Primary completion1 Aug 2024
- Study completion25 Oct 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Spontaneous UrticariaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by SanofiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 397 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sanofi
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Sciences & Operations, Study director, Sanofi
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04180488
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EFC16461
- Other IDs
- U1111-1241-8208, 2019-003775-19, 2019
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Publications
Casale TB, Saini SS, Ben-Shoshan M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Bernstein JA, Hayama K, Amin N, Robinson LB, Bauer D, Dakin P, Laws E, Radin A, Makhija M. Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Phase 3 LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2026 Apr 1;162(4):350-358. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.6023.
PubMed 41706458Gimenez-Arnau AM, Casale TB, Yosipovitch G, Ensina LF, Inomata N, Msihid J, Makhija M, Radin A, Cyr SL, Sugerman P, Thomas RB, Chuang CC. Dupilumab Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Omalizumab-Naive Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01605-w. Epub 2025 Dec 2.
PubMed 41326897Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Koo JY, Chen Z, Wiggins S, Zahn J, Sugerman P, Haddad EB, Cyr SL. Dupilumab Reduces Pruritus in Clinically Distinct Dermatologic Diseases: Data from Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis, Prurigo Nodularis, and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):1983-1995. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01596-8. Epub 2025 Nov 22.
PubMed 41272364Maurer M, Casale TB, Saini SS, Ben-Shoshan M, Laws E, Maloney J, Bauer D, Radin A, Makhija M. Dupilumab Reduces Urticaria Activity, Itch, and Hives in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Regardless of Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2427-2441. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01231-y. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
PubMed 39066978
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Master Protocol of Three Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Multi-center, Parallel-group Studies of Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) Who Remain Symptomatic Despite the Use of H1 Antihistamine Treatment in Patients naïve to Omalizumab and in Patients Who Are Intolerant or Incomplete Responders to Omalizumab
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04180488
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFC16461
- Conditions
- Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 397 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SanofiIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Oct 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 20 Aug 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective:
This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab in study participants with CSU who remained symptomatic despite the use of H1 antihistamine (Study A and C: omalizumab naïve; Study B: omalizumab intolerant or incomplete responders)
Secondary Objectives:
This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria activity composite endpoint and itch or hives, separately, at various timepoints This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on angioedema This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of dupilumab on urticaria control This study aimed to demonstrate improvement in health-related quality of life and overall disease status and severity This study aimed to evaluate the ability of dupilumab in reducing the proportion of participants who require treatment with oral corticosteroids (OCS) This study aimed to evaluate safety outcome measures This study aimed to evaluate immunogenicity of dupilumab
Detailed description
The duration of study for each participant included 2-4 weeks of screening period, 24 weeks of treatment period and 12 weeks of post treatment period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study A Dupilumab | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were omalizumab naïve received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows: * 300 milligrams (mg) SC injection every 2 weeks (q2w) for adults and those adolescents who weighed >=60 kilograms (kg) at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1, * 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents who weighed <60 kg and children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed >=30 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1 and * 300 mg SC injection every 4 weeks (q4w) for children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed <30 kg and >=15 kg at screening starting from Week 4 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1. |
| Study A Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were omalizumab naïve received placebo matched to dupilumab as subcutaneous (SC) injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. |
| Study B Dupilumab | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were intolerant or incomplete responders to omalizumab received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows: * 300 mg SC injection q2w for adults and those adolescents weighing >=60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1 or * 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents weighing <60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1. |
| Study B Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were intolerant or incomplete responders to omalizumab received placebo matched to dupilumab as SC injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. |
| Study C Dupilumab | Experimental | Drug: Dupilumab SAR231893, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were omalizumab naïve received dupilumab for 24 weeks as follows: * 300 mg SC injection q2w for adults and those adolescents who weighed >=60 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1, * 200 mg SC injection q2w for adolescents who weighed <60 kg and children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed >=30 kg at screening starting from Week 2 following a loading dose of 400 mg (2×200 mg injections) on Day 1 and * 300 mg SC injection q4w for children (>=6 to <12 years of age) who weighed <30 kg and >=15 kg at screening starting from Week 4 following a loading dose of 600 mg (2×300 mg injections) on Day 1. |
| Study C Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: non sedating H1-antihistamineParticipants who were omalizumab naïve received placebo matched to dupilumab as SC injection including loading dose from Day 1 up to 24 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Study A and C: Participant were ≥6 years to 80 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent.
- Study B: Participant were ≥12 years (or the minimum legal age for adolescents in the country of the investigational site) to 80 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent
- Participants who had a diagnosis of CSU refractory to H1 antihistamines (H1-AH) at the time of randomization defined by
- Diagnosis of CSU>6 months prior to screening visit
- Presence of itch and hives for >6 consecutive weeks at any time prior to screening visit despite the use of H1-AH during that time period
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participants were excluded from any of the studies if any of the following criteria apply:
- Weight was less than 30 kg in adults and adolescents and 15 kg in children aged 6 to<12years
- Clearly defined underlying etiology for chronic urticarias other than CSU
- Presented of skin morbidities other than CSU that may interfere with the assessment of the study outcomes
- Active atopic dermatitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dupilumab SAR231893Pharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Study A Dupilumab, Study B Dupilumab, Study C Dupilumab |
| PlaceboPharmaceutical form:Injection solution Route of administration: Subcutaneous | Drug | Study A Placebo, Study B Placebo, Study C Placebo |
| non sedating H1-antihistaminePharmaceutical form:Tablet Route of administration: oral administration | Drug | Study A Dupilumab, Study A Placebo, Study B Dupilumab, Study B Placebo, Study C Dupilumab, Study C Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
ISS was recorded in e-diary. The ISS represents severity of itch on a scale ranging from 0 (none) to 3 (intense). The ISS7 score was the sum of daily ISS scores recorded by a participant at the same time each day over 7 days with an overall scale of 0 (no impact) to 21 (severe impact). Higher scores indicated greater intensity of itch. Least squares (LS) mean is presented. Baseline was defined as the sum of daily scores obtained for 7 days prior to randomization.
24 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Hives Severity Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Percentage of Responders for Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference (MID) at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score <=6 at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score =0 at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urticaria Control Test (UCT) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Urticaria Activity Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Weekly Urticaria Activity Score <=6 and =0 at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Percentage of Responders for Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Hives Severity Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Urticaria Control Test at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 20
Time to First Weekly Itch Severity Score Minimally Important Difference Response During the 24-Week Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Change From Baseline in Angioedema Activity Score Over 7 Days (AAS7) at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Percentage of Well-controlled Participants (Urticaria Control Test >=12) at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality-of-life (HRQoL) as Measured by Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) in Participants >=16 Years Old at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Health-related Quality-of-life as Measured by Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) in Participants >=6 to <16 Years Old at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGIS) of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria at Weeks 12 and 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 12 and 24
Time to First Oral Corticosteroid (OCS) Use for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria During the 24-week Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Percentage of Participants Receiving Oral Corticosteroid for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria During the 24-week Treatment Period
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 24
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time frame: From first dose of study intervention (Day 1) up to end of follow-up, approximately 36 weeks each for Study A, B and C
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Dupilumab
Time frame: Up to Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41706458Casale TB, Saini SS, Ben-Shoshan M, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Bernstein JA, Hayama K, Amin N, Robinson LB, Bauer D, Dakin P, Laws E, Radin A, Makhija M. Dupilumab in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Phase 3 LIBERTY-CSU CUPID Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2026 Apr 1;162(4):350-358. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.6023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41326897Gimenez-Arnau AM, Casale TB, Yosipovitch G, Ensina LF, Inomata N, Msihid J, Makhija M, Radin A, Cyr SL, Sugerman P, Thomas RB, Chuang CC. Dupilumab Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Omalizumab-Naive Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jan;16(1):549-562. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01605-w. Epub 2025 Dec 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41272364Yosipovitch G, Kim BS, Koo JY, Chen Z, Wiggins S, Zahn J, Sugerman P, Haddad EB, Cyr SL. Dupilumab Reduces Pruritus in Clinically Distinct Dermatologic Diseases: Data from Clinical Trials on Atopic Dermatitis, Prurigo Nodularis, and Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Apr;16(4):1983-1995. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01596-8. Epub 2025 Nov 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39066978Maurer M, Casale TB, Saini SS, Ben-Shoshan M, Laws E, Maloney J, Bauer D, Radin A, Makhija M. Dupilumab Reduces Urticaria Activity, Itch, and Hives in Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Regardless of Baseline Serum Immunoglobulin E Levels. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2427-2441. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01231-y. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
- EFC16461 Plain language Results SummaryLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Related trials for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Remibrutinib in Real-world Clinical Practice - a South Korea Sub-Study
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
Long-term Efficacy and Safety Extension (LTE) Study of Barzolvolimab in Participants With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of THB335 in Adults With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU)
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU), Chronic Idiopathic Urticaria
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
A Trial of HRS-3095 in Healthy Volunteers
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Learn About Ritlecitinib for the Potential Treatment of Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Adults.
Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Sciences & Operations study director
Sanofi
98 sites in 11 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Dupilumab SAR231893 and non sedating H1-antihistamine in people with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria, run by Sanofi at 98 sites in 11 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 98 sites in United States, Spain, Canada, Japan, Russia and 6 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Aug 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Weekly Itch Severity Score at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04180488, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2025.