AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Prostate CancerPhase 1/2CELLO-1NCT04179864

A Study of Tazemetostat With Enzalutamide or Abiraterone/Prednisone in Participants With Advanced Prostate Cancer

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tazemetostat, Abiraterone/prednisone and Enzalutamide in people with Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer, run by Epizyme, Inc. at 24 sites in 3 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a global, multi-center, open-label, randomized phase 1b/2, active-controlled safety and efficacy study of oral administration of tazemetostat in combination with enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone (phase 1b) versus enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone alone in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic subjects… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, men only
What is being tested?
Tazemetostat, Abiraterone/prednisone and Enzalutamide
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
24 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
18 Nov 2019to 4 Nov 2024
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age at the time of consent ≥ 18 years.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 1 (Appendix
  • Life expectancy of > 3 months.
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Small cell or neuroendocrine tumors of the prostate are also permitted.
  • Progressive disease in the setting of medical or surgical castration (ie, castration- resistant prostate cancer [CRPC]) by PCWG3 criteria for study entry.
  • Evidence of disease progression by rising PSA or
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Soft tissue progression per RECIST 1.1 or
  • Evidence of disease progression by observation of 2 new bone lesions since the initiation of last systemic therapy.
  • Metastatic prostate cancer disease, documented by the following imaging
  • Bone lesions on bone scan (per PCWG3) or by soft tissue disease (per RECIST 1.1) by CT/MRI imaging Must have undergone bilateral orchiectomy or be willing to continue GnRH analogue or antagonist.
  • Prior treatment with a second-generation androgen inhibitor as follows:
  • For phase 1b, EITHER Previously untreated with or progressed on a second generation androgen inhibitor (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide) OR progressed on a second generation inhibitor (inhibitor (abiraterone, enzalutamide, or apalutamide)
  • For phase 2 randomized component (i.e, enzalutamide- containing treatment arms) of the study, previously progressed on abiraterone.

Who cannot join

  • Known symptomatic brain metastases
  • Treatment with any of the following for prostate cancer within the indicated timeframe prior to day 1 of starting study treatment:
  • First generation: AR antagonists (eg, bicalutamide, nilutamide, flutamide) within 4 weeks.
  • 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, ketoconazole, estrogens (including diethylstilbesterol), or progesterones within 2 weeks.
  • Chemotherapy (except as permitted in inclusion criteria #10) within 3 weeks.
  • Prior radionuclide therapy within 4 weeks.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Another interventional product or standard agent in a clinical study within 28 days prior to the first planned dose of Tazemetostat
  • For phase 2 subjects to be randomized to one of the enzalutamide treatment arms only, prior treatment with the second-generation androgen antagonist including enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, and proxalutamide, etc.
  • Severe concurrent disease, infection, or comorbidity that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would make the subject inappropriate for enrollment
  • Has had prior exposure to tazemetostat or other inhibitor(s) of enhancer of zeste homologue-2.

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 3 countries.

24 sites in 3 countries

United States16 sites
  • Dana Farber Cancer Institute

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • SCRI - Tennessee Oncology Chattanooga

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • The Urology Center Of Colorado

    Denver, Colorado, 80211

  • Urology Associates P.C.

    Hendersonville, Tennessee, 37075

  • XCancer - Tennesee Cancer Specialists

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909

  • Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada - Central Valley

    Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169

  • SCRI - Tennessee Oncology Nashville

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

    New York, New York, 10065

  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Hillman Cancer Center

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15232

  • Hematology Oncology Associates of the Treasure Coast

    Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34952

  • XCancer - Northwest Oncology and Hematology

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Urology San Antonio

    San Antonio, Texas, 78229

  • Genesis Healthcare Partners

    San Diego, California, 92123

  • Associated Medical Professionals of NY, PLLC - Urology

    Syracuse, New York, 13210

  • Montefiore Einstein Center for Cancer Care

    The Bronx, New York, 10461

Other trials in United States

Spain7 sites
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu i. Sant Pau

    Barcelona

  • Hospital del Mar Parc de Salut Mar

    Barcelona

  • Hospital Universitario de Jerez de la Frontera

    Jerez de la Frontera, Cadiz

  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

    Madrid

  • Hospital Universitario La Paz

    Madrid

  • Clinica Universidad de Navarra

    Pamplona

Other trials in Spain

Belgium1 site
  • Academisch Ziekenhuis Groeninge Campus Kennedylaan

    Kortrijk, West Vlaanderen

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Official title: CELLO-1: A Phase 1b/2 Open-Label Study Evaluating Tazemetostat in Combination With Enzalutamide or Abiraterone/Prednisone in Chemotherapy Naive Subjects With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

This is a global, multi-center, open-label, randomized phase 1b/2, active-controlled safety and efficacy study of oral administration of tazemetostat in combination with enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone (phase 1b) versus enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone alone in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic subjects with progressive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed on either abiraterone acetate, enzalutamide, or apalutamide or who are second generation anti-androgen treatment naive, and who have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC.

This study is designed to determine the recommended phase 2 doses (RP2D) of tazemetostat in combination with either enzalutamide or abiraterone/prednisone, based on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and efficacy profiles.

Being tested
Tazemetostat, Abiraterone/prednisone, Enzalutamide
Keywords
metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, tazemetostat, EPZ-6438, E7438, enzalutamide, abiraterone, Prednisone, Zytiga, Xtandi
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • TazemetostatDrug

    Also called EPZ-6438, E7438, IPN60200

    Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438) is a selective small-molecule inhibitor of the histone-lysine methyltransferase EZH2 gene

  • Abiraterone/prednisoneDrug

    Also called Zytiga

    1,000 mg (two 500 mg tablets or four 250 mg tablets) orally once daily in combination with prednisone 5 mg administered orally twice daily.

  • EnzalutamideDrug

    Also called Xtandi

    enzalutamide 160 mg (four 40 mg capsules) orally once daily

Study groups in NCT04179864
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phase 1b: Tazemetostat in Combination with Abiraterone/PrednisoneExperimentalIn Phase 1b, abiraterone/prednisone will be administered in combination with tazemetostat in cycle 1 (28 days) to establish the recommended dose of tazemetostat in this combination; participants may continue treatment in additional 28-day cycles, as tolerated, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Receives: Drug: Tazemetostat; Drug: Abiraterone/prednisone
Phase 1b: Tazemetostat in Combination with EnzalutamideExperimentalIn Phase 1b, enzalutamide will be administered in combination with tazemetostat in cycle 1 (28 days) to establish the recommended dose of tazemetostat in this combination; participants may continue treatment in additional 28-day cycles, as tolerated, until progression or unacceptable toxicity
Receives: Drug: Tazemetostat; Drug: Enzalutamide
Phase 2: Tazemetostat in Combination with EnzalutamideExperimentalParticipants will receive the newly established recommended phase 2 dose, orally twice daily when given in combination with enzalutamide) as determined in phase 1b part of the study) or enzalutamide alone. All participants will receive treatment in 28-day cycles.
Receives: Drug: Tazemetostat; Drug: Enzalutamide
Phase 2: Enzalutamide onlyActive comparatorIn Phase 2, Enzalutamide will be administered on cycle 1 day 1
Receives: Drug: Enzalutamide

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Non-Serious Adverse Events and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had a causal relationship with this study drug. An SAE was an AE which occurred during any study phase and at any dose of study drug, that fulfilled 1 or more of following: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability or incapacity, was a congenital abnormality or birth defect, or was an important medical event that might jeopardize the participant or might require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. TEAEs were AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the date of the first dose of study drug through 30 after the end of study drug, or prior to initiation of another investigational agent or cytotoxic chemotherapy. The treatment-emergent non-serious AEs are presented with a frequency threshold of 5%.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 149 weeks

  2. Phase 1b: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Tazemetostat

    RP2D was based on pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters, pharmacodynamics (PD) parameters as well as efficacy and the overall tolerability of each combination (tazemetost with enzalutamide or tazemetostat with abiraterone/prednisone).

    Measured: From Day 1 up to Day 28 of Cycle 1 (each cycle was 28 days)

  3. Phase 2: Radiographic Progression-Free Survival (rPFS)

    rPFS was defined as the time from date of randomization (phase 2)/date of first dose of study drug (phase 1b) to the first objective evidence of radiographic progression using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) (soft tissue) and prostate cancer clinical trials working group 3 (PCWG3) (bone), or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. The radiographic PD for soft tissue lesion was determined based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) per RECIST 1.1 criteria and no confirmatory scan was required for soft tissue PD; for bone lesion was determined by 2 or more new bone lesions on bone scan per PCWG3 criteria (i.e., the appearance of 2 or more new bone lesions on bone scan) and the 2 scans (i.e., the confirmatory scan is required for bone disease progression) should be at least 6 weeks apart from each other.

    Measured: Assessments performed at screening (within 4 weeks of randomization) and every 8 weeks for first 6 months and then every 12 weeks thereafter, until death, PD, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or termination of study. Approximately 200 weeks

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Phase 1b and 2: Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Prostate-Specific Antigen >=50% (PSA50) Response

    Blood samples were collected for evaluation of PSA. Confirmed PSA50 response was defined as >=50% decline of PSA from baseline at any time on study for participants with a baseline PSA >=1.0 microgram per liter (mcg/L) (nanogram/milliliter [ng/mL]) per PCWG3 criteria. Baseline was defined as: Phase 1b: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date the participant received the first dose of study drug; Phase 2: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 149 weeks and 191 weeks for Phase 1b and Phase 2 respectively

  2. Phase 1b and 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological lymph nodes (LN) must be <10 millimeter (mm) in the short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the baseline sum of the diameters.

    Measured: Tumor assessments performed at screening (within 4 weeks of randomization) and every 8 weeks for first 6 months and then every 12 weeks thereafter, until death, PD, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or termination of study.Approximately 259 weeks

  3. Phase 1b and 2: Best Overall Response (BOR)

    BOR was defined as percentage of participants with CR, PR, stable disease (SD), PD, or not evaluable (NE). CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological LN must be <10 mm in the short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the baseline sum of the diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, the smallest sum of diameters recorded since the drug started. In addition, the sum had an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm. NE was defined as which cannot be classified by 1 of the above preceding definitions. Percentages are rounded off to the tenth decimal place.

    Measured: Tumor assessments performed at screening (within 4 weeks of randomization) and every 8 weeks for first 6 months and then every 12 weeks thereafter, until death, PD, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or termination of study.Approximately 259 weeks

  4. Phase 1b and 2: Disease Control Rate (DCR) at 6 Months

    DCR at 6 months (24 weeks) was defined as percentage of participants with measurable soft tissue disease at baseline who had BOR of CR or PR and remaining on study without progression at 23 weeks or with a duration of SD for at least 23 weeks after of randomization (phase 2)/first dose (phase 1b) using overall imaging-based response assessed by RECIST 1.1 (soft tissue) and PCWG-3 criteria (bone). BOR: percentage of participants with CR, PR, SD, PD, or NE. CR: disappearance of all target lesions, any pathological LN must be <10 mm in the short axis. PR: at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, baseline sum of diameters. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD. PD: at least a 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as a reference, smallest sum of diameters recorded since the drug started. In addition, sum had an absolute increase from nadir of 5 mm.

    Measured: Baseline and at 6 months (24 weeks)

  5. Phase 1b and 2: Time to First Skeletal-Related Event (SRE) Per Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 Criteria

    Time to first SRE per PCWG3 criteria was defined as the time from the date of randomization (phase II)/date of the first dose of study drug (phase Ib) to the date of first SRE. An SRE was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, or spinal cord compression.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Phase 1b) and randomization (Phase 2) (Day 1) up to approximately 259 weeks

  6. Phase 1b and 2: Time to Initiation of the Next Systemic Treatment (TTNT) for Prostate Cancer

    TTNT was defined as the time from the date of randomization (phase II)/date of the first dose of the study drug (phase Ib) to the date of the first documented administration of systemic treatment for prostate cancer.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Phase 1b) and randomization (Phase 2) (Day 1) up to approximately 259 weeks

  7. Phase 1b and 2: Time to Prostate-Specific Antigen Progression (TTPP)

    TTPP was defined as the duration from the date of randomization (phase II)/date of first dose of study drug (phase Ib) to the date of first PSA progression per PCWG3 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a >=25% increase and an absolute increase of >=2 mcg/L (2 ng/mL) above the nadir (or baseline value for participants who did not have a decline in PSA value beyond 12 weeks). Baseline was defined as: Phase 1b: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date the participant received the first dose of study drug; Phase 2: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Phase 1b) and randomization (Phase 2) (Day 1) up to approximately 259 weeks

  8. Phase 1b and 2: Percentage of Participants With Reduction in Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC)

    Blood samples were collected for evaluation of CTC. Reduction in CTC was defined as participants from a state of having a detectable number of CTCs to having an undetectable number of CTCs. Percentage of participants with detectable CTC at baseline and non-detectable CTC are presented. Baseline was defined as: Phase 1b: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date the participant received the first dose of study drug; Phase 2: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date of randomization. Percentage of participants with detectable CTC at baseline and non-detectable CTC at any post-baseline time point up to 149 weeks and 191 weeks for Phase 1b and Phase 2 respectively are presented.

    Measured: From Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 149 weeks and 191 weeks for Phase 1b and Phase 2 respectively

  9. Phase 1b and 2: Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cells Response

    Blood samples were collected for evaluation of CTC. CTC response was defined as a >=30% reduction in CTC number from baseline in participants who entered the study. Baseline was defined as: Phase 1b: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date the participant received the first dose of study drug; Phase 2: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on the date of randomization.

    Measured: From Cycle 1 Day 1 (Baseline) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 149 weeks and 191 weeks for Phase 1b and Phase 2 respectively

  10. Phase 2: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Non-Serious Adverse Events and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a medicinal product and which did not necessarily had a causal relationship with this study drug. An SAE was an AE which occurred during any study phase and at any dose of the study drug, that fulfilled 1 or more of following: resulted in death, was life-threatening, required hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in disability or incapacity, was a congenital abnormality or birth defect, or was an important medical event that might jeopardize the participant or might require medical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above. TEAEs were AEs that started or worsened in severity on or after the date of the first dose of study drug through 30 after end of study drug, or prior to initiation of another investigational agent or cytotoxic chemotherapy. The treatment-emergent non-serious AEs are presented with a frequency threshold of 5%.

    Measured: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 191 weeks

  11. Phase 1b: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of Tazemetostat

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUC0-last of tazemetostat.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 (each cycle was 28 days)

  12. Phase 1b: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Tazemetostat

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of Cmax of tazemetostat.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 (each cycle was 28 days)

  13. Phase 1b: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of 8 Hours Post-Dose (AUC0-8) of Tazemetostat

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUC0-8 of tazemetostat.

    Measured: Up to 8 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 (each cycle was 28 days)

  14. Phase 1b: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of 12 Hours Post-Dose (AUC0-12) of Tazemetostat

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUC0-12 of tazemetostat.

    Measured: Up to 12 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 (each cycle was 28 days)

  15. Phase 1b: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of 24 Hours Post-Dose (AUC0-24) of Enzalutamide

    Blood samples were collected at specified timepoints for the assessment of AUC0-24 of enzalutamide.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Days 1, 2 and 21 (each cycle was 28 days)

  16. Phase 2: Maximum Plasma Concentration of Enzalutamide

    For Phase 2, PK blood samples for assessment of Cmax of enzalutamide were pre-specified to be collected at different time points by treatment arm. In the Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 only. In the Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Day 1 only. No PK samples were collected at other time points for these arms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 for Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm (each cycle was 28 days)

  17. Phase 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration of Enzalutamide

    For Phase 2, PK blood samples for assessment of AUC0-last of enzalutamide were pre-specified to be collected at different time points by treatment arm. In the Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 only. In the Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Day 1 only. No PK samples were collected at other time points for these arms.

    Measured: Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 for Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm and Cycle 1 Day 1 for Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm (each cycle was 28 days)

  18. Phase 2: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of 24 Hours Post-Dose of Enzalutamide

    For Phase 2, PK blood samples for assessment of enzalutamide AUC0-24 were pre-specified to be collected at different time points by treatment arm. In the Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 only. In the Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm, samples were collected at Cycle 1 Day 1 only. No PK samples were collected at other time points for these arms.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Days 2 and 21 for Phase 2: Tazemetostat 1200 mg + Enzalutamide arm and up to 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 for Phase 2: Enzalutamide arm (each cycle was 28 days)

  19. Phase 2: Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostrate (FACT-P): Functional Well-being Subscale (FWB) and Prostate Cancer Subscale (PCS) Scores

    FACT-P questionnaire included subscales:physical well-being(PWB) (Questions [Q] GP1 to GP7),social/family well-being subscale(SWB) (Q GS1 to GS7),emotional well-being subscale(EWB) (Q GE1 to GE6),functional well-being subscale(FWB) (Q GF1 to GF7) and prostate cancer subscale(PCS) (Q C2, C6, P1 to P8, BL2 and BL5). Each question had 5 responses, 0: "not at all", 1: "a little bit", 2: "somewhat", 3: "quite a bit" and 4: "very much". Scores ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much") for positively phrased questions. Negatively phrased questions had a reverse scoring, from 0 ("very much") to 4 ("not at all"). Q that were reversed (via subtraction of the response from 4) were: GP1-7, GE1, GE3-6, C2, P1-3, P6-P8 and BL2. Total FACT-P score was sum of scores of all sub-scales (PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB and PCS). Higher scores: better quality of life. Baseline: last value recorded for a variable prior to or on date of randomization. Change from baseline in FWB and PCS scores is presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1), Cycle (C) 3 Day 57, C 5 Day 113, C 7 Day 169, C 10 Day 253, C 13 Day 337, C 14 Day 421, C 15 Day 505, C 16 Day 589, C 17 Day 673, C 18 Day 757, C 19 Day 841, C 20 Day 925, C 21 Day 1009, C 22 Day 1093, C 23 Day 1177 and C 24 Day 1261

  20. Phase 2: Time to Definitive Deterioration (TDD) in Prostate Symptoms as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostrate: Prostate Cancer Subscale Score

    TTD was defined as the interval from date of randomization until date of first clinically meaningful deterioration (3 points or more decline for subscale score, 10 points or more decline for total score) that was confirmed at subsequent visit at least 3 weeks apart with no improvement in between visits or death (by any cause) in absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether participant discontinued study drug(s) prior to deterioration. PCS included Q C2, C6, P1 to P8, BL2 and BL5. Each question had 5 responses,0: "not at all",1: "a little bit",2: "somewhat",3: "quite a bit" and 4: "very much". Scores ranged from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("very much") for positively phrased questions. Negatively phrased questions had a reverse scoring, from 0 ("very much") to 4 ("not at all"). Total FACT-P: sum of scores of all sub-scales(PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB and PCS). Higher scores: better quality of life. TDD in prostate symptoms as assessed by FACT-P: PCS score is presented.

    Measured: Baseline (Day 1) up to Cycle 24 Day 1261

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Nov 2019
  2. Study start18 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion4 Nov 2024
  4. Study completion4 Nov 2024

Why it stopped: The study was terminated early as Sponsor decided to discontinue the development of tazemetostat in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer and the primary endpoint was not met for this study. There were no safety concerns.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04179864
Sponsor's protocol ID
EZH-1101
Other IDs
2019-003649-14, 2019
Acronym
CELLO-1
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
14 Nov 2019
Last updated
10 Mar 2026
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Tazemetostat, Abiraterone/prednisone and Enzalutamide in people with Metastatic Prostate Cancer and Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer, run by Epizyme, Inc. at 24 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Spain, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2026). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Non-Serious Adverse Events and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs) (time frame: From first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to either 30 days after last dose of study drug or until the initiation of subsequent anticancer therapy or end of treatment visit. Assessed up to 149 weeks). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in