Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast CancerLEHRNCT04175821
Late-term Effects of Hypofractionated Chest Wall and Regional Nodal Irradiation in Patients With Breast Cancer
An observational study of Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.
Trial summary
Survival of breast cancer patients has improved with multimodality treatment. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is rapidly emerging as one of the options for breast cancer patients after breast conservation surgery (BCS) but data on postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with hypofractionation is lacking and there… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Hypofractionated radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,770 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 1990to Jun 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy followed by radiotherapy to the chest wall and regional nodes. Chemotherapy and hormonal therapy depending on the indication.
Who may be able to join
- invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease
Who cannot join
- breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non- breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), bilateral breast cancer
About this study
Official title: Dept. of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh
Survival of breast cancer patients has improved with multimodality treatment. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is rapidly emerging as one of the options for breast cancer patients after breast conservation surgery (BCS) but data on postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with hypofractionation is lacking and there is always concern for the late effects of RT especially with regional nodal irradiation (RNI). The potential survival benefits of locoregional radiation needs to be balanced with late-term effects. There is a dearth of data on RNI with hypofractionation. Therefore, reporting late-term effects of radiation in these patients is of utmost importance, especially with hypofractionation. Very few patients were given PMRT or RNI in the START trials, so definitive conclusions about the safety of shorter fractionation RNI cannot be drawn from these studies.1-3 There are also studies from Canada and the US with similar dose fractionations in the PMRT setting with limited number of patients but without RNI.4,5 There is a world-wide need for data on PMRT and especially with RNI for patients with breast cancer with its late-term consequences. Because of this, many radiation oncology societies are hesitant in recommending hypofractionated RNI. It is also an area for potential research in breast cancer radiotherapy. We have published our clinical outcomes with 3 weeks of adjuvant local and RNI with hypofractionation in the past.6-10 In this study, we will report late-term effects of PMRT and RNI with this schedule in patients with stage II and III breast cancer from a single institute from India which is practicing hypofractionation since 1976.
Read the detailed description
Between January 1990 to December 2007, women with breast cancer who were given radical treatment with mastectomy, systemic therapy and RT at least 10 years ago were included. Eligible patients were recruited from the radiotherapy department record and these were on regular follow-up in the breast clinic. The study was approved by the departmental ethics committee. Clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were taken from the patient file. Inclusion criteria were: female patients age ≥18 years of age, with invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy, complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease treated with locoregional RT. Exclusion criteria were: breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non-breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), irrespective of date of diagnosis. Patients with bilateral breast cancer were also excluded.
Patients were treated in supine position on a breast board with ipsilateral arm abducted to 900. All patients were planned using 2-D fluoroscopic conventional simulator with two tangential fields to the chest wall and a single incident field to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa. Lateral border of supraclavicular fossa was up to deltoid insertion.
Radiotherapy dose delivered was 35Gy/15fractions /3 weeks to the chest wall. Dose was prescribed at mid separation. Bolus was used in all patients on alternate days, that is for 50% of treatment. In patients with positive margins bolus was used daily and a scar boost of 10Gy/4fractions was given. None of the patients had breast reconstruction. Supraclavicular fossa(SCF), axillary chain and internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI)6 was done with a single incident field. No posterior axillary field was used. The dose delivered was 40Gy/15fractions/3weeks. All patients were treated on linac or cobalt-60 machine.
A biologically effective dose(BED) of 35Gy/15fractions/3weeks is 75.1Gy in terms of 2Gy per fraction for late effects, 55.1Gy for tumour control, 45Gy for erythema and 42.3Gy for desquamation in case of local radiotherapy. The BED for RNI with this schedule is 90Gy, 65Gy, 52.5Gy and 49Gy for late effects, tumour control, erythema and desquamation, respectively.
Patients were seen by the radiation oncologists with special focus on chest wall fibrosis, telangiectasia, shoulder function, lymphedema, arm pain and sensory symptoms. Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall. Telangiectasia was defined grade 1 as <1cm2, grade 2 as 1 cm2-4 cm2 and grade 3 as >4 cm2 area of chest wall. Lymphedema was graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus . For lymphedema and shoulder function, the treated side was compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. Lymphedema was classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm. If the patient had symptoms of pain in the arm, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, or other sensory symptoms then injury to the brachial plexus was suspected and reported as brachial plexopathy. A four point scale(none, a little, quite a bit, very much ) was used to assess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale. Late lung toxicity was defined grade 1 as asymptomatic or mild symptoms of dry cough, slight radiographic changes; grade 2 as moderate symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis (severe cough), low grade fever, patchy radiographic changes; grade 3 as severe symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes and grade 4 as severe respiratory insufficiencies, oxygen required of assisted ventilation. Late cardiac toxicity was defined grade 1 as minimal enlargement of cardiosilhoutte (ECS), grade 2 as ECS without pulmonary congestion, grade 3 as ECS pulmonary congestion and grade 4 as ECS with frank pulmonary oedema. All late effects assessment scores were dichotomised as none/mild versus moderate/marked effects.
- Being tested
- Hypofractionated radiotherapy
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Hypofractionated radiotherapy, Post mastectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Hypofractionated radiotherapyRadiation
35Gy/ 15#/3weeks to chest wall and 40Gy/15#/3 weeks to supraclavicular fossa
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Chest wall fibrosis ("change" is being assessed)
Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall.
Measured: 5, 10 and 15 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Telengiectasia ("change" is being assessed for all outcomes)
Telangiectasia was defined grade 1 as <1cm2, grade 2 as 1 cm2-4 cm2 and grade 3 as >4 cm2 area of chest wall
Measured: 5, 10 and 15 years
Lymphedema
Lymphedema was graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus . For lymphedema and shoulder function, the treated side was compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. Lymphedema was classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm.
Measured: 5, 10 and 15 years
Lung toxicity
Late lung toxicity was defined grade 1 as asymptomatic or mild symptoms of dry cough,slight radiographic changes; grade 2 as moderate symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis (severe cough), low grade fever, patchy radiographic changes; grade 3 as severe symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes and grade 4 as severe respiratory insufficiencies, oxygen required of assisted ventilation.
Measured: 5, 10 and 15 years
Cardiac toxicity
Late cardiac toxicity was defined grade 1 as minimal enlargement of cardiosilhoutte (ECS), grade 2 as ECS without pulmonary congestion, grade 3 as ECS pulmonary congestion and grade 4 as ECS with frank pulmonary oedema. All late effects assessment scores were dichotomised as none/mild versus moderate/marked effects.
Measured: 5, 10 and 15 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2019
- Study start1 Jan 1990
- Primary completion31 Dec 2007
- Study completionJun 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1,770 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Budhi Singh Yadav, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04175821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LEHR
- Acronym
- LEHR
- Status last verified
- Nov 2019
- First submitted
- 22 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 26 Nov 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Nov 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Dept. of Radiation Oncology, PGIMER, Chandigarh
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04175821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEHR / LEHR
- Keywords
- Breast cancer, Hypofractionated radiotherapy, Post mastectomy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,770 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, ChandigarhUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 1990 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2019
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Survival of breast cancer patients has improved with multimodality treatment. Hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) is rapidly emerging as one of the options for breast cancer patients after breast conservation surgery (BCS) but data on postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT) with hypofractionation is lacking and there is always concern for the late effects of RT especially with regional nodal irradiation (RNI). The potential survival benefits of locoregional radiation needs to be balanced with late-term effects. There is a dearth of data on RNI with hypofractionation. Therefore, reporting late-term effects of radiation in these patients is of utmost importance, especially with hypofractionation. Very few patients were given PMRT or RNI in the START trials, so definitive conclusions about the safety of shorter fractionation RNI cannot be drawn from these studies.1-3 There are also studies from Canada and the US with similar dose fractionations in the PMRT setting with limited number of patients but without RNI.4,5 There is a world-wide need for data on PMRT and especially with RNI for patients with breast cancer with its late-term consequences. Because of this, many radiation oncology societies are hesitant in recommending hypofractionated RNI. It is also an area for potential research in breast cancer radiotherapy. We have published our clinical outcomes with 3 weeks of adjuvant local and RNI with hypofractionation in the past.6-10 In this study, we will report late-term effects of PMRT and RNI with this schedule in patients with stage II and III breast cancer from a single institute from India which is practicing hypofractionation since 1976.
Detailed description
Between January 1990 to December 2007, women with breast cancer who were given radical treatment with mastectomy, systemic therapy and RT at least 10 years ago were included. Eligible patients were recruited from the radiotherapy department record and these were on regular follow-up in the breast clinic. The study was approved by the departmental ethics committee. Clinical, pathological and treatment characteristics were taken from the patient file. Inclusion criteria were: female patients age ≥18 years of age, with invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy, complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease treated with locoregional RT. Exclusion criteria were: breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non-breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, including ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), irrespective of date of diagnosis. Patients with bilateral breast cancer were also excluded.
Patients were treated in supine position on a breast board with ipsilateral arm abducted to 900. All patients were planned using 2-D fluoroscopic conventional simulator with two tangential fields to the chest wall and a single incident field to the axilla and supraclavicular fossa. Lateral border of supraclavicular fossa was up to deltoid insertion.
Radiotherapy dose delivered was 35Gy/15fractions /3 weeks to the chest wall. Dose was prescribed at mid separation. Bolus was used in all patients on alternate days, that is for 50% of treatment. In patients with positive margins bolus was used daily and a scar boost of 10Gy/4fractions was given. None of the patients had breast reconstruction. Supraclavicular fossa(SCF), axillary chain and internal mammary nodal irradiation (IMNI)6 was done with a single incident field. No posterior axillary field was used. The dose delivered was 40Gy/15fractions/3weeks. All patients were treated on linac or cobalt-60 machine.
A biologically effective dose(BED) of 35Gy/15fractions/3weeks is 75.1Gy in terms of 2Gy per fraction for late effects, 55.1Gy for tumour control, 45Gy for erythema and 42.3Gy for desquamation in case of local radiotherapy. The BED for RNI with this schedule is 90Gy, 65Gy, 52.5Gy and 49Gy for late effects, tumour control, erythema and desquamation, respectively.
Patients were seen by the radiation oncologists with special focus on chest wall fibrosis, telangiectasia, shoulder function, lymphedema, arm pain and sensory symptoms. Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall. Telangiectasia was defined grade 1 as <1cm2, grade 2 as 1 cm2-4 cm2 and grade 3 as >4 cm2 area of chest wall. Lymphedema was graded by measuring arm circumference 10cm above and below the medial epicondyle of humerus . For lymphedema and shoulder function, the treated side was compared with the untreated opposite side as a reference. Lymphedema was classified as none, mild, moderate and marked if there was no difference, 0.5-2cm, 2.1-3cm and >3cm difference, respectively in the circumference of the affected and normal arm. If the patient had symptoms of pain in the arm, paresthesia, numbness, weakness, or other sensory symptoms then injury to the brachial plexus was suspected and reported as brachial plexopathy. A four point scale(none, a little, quite a bit, very much ) was used to assess all late effects according to the RTOG LENT SOMA scale. Late lung toxicity was defined grade 1 as asymptomatic or mild symptoms of dry cough, slight radiographic changes; grade 2 as moderate symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis (severe cough), low grade fever, patchy radiographic changes; grade 3 as severe symptomatic fibrosis or pneumonitis, dense radiographic changes and grade 4 as severe respiratory insufficiencies, oxygen required of assisted ventilation. Late cardiac toxicity was defined grade 1 as minimal enlargement of cardiosilhoutte (ECS), grade 2 as ECS without pulmonary congestion, grade 3 as ECS pulmonary congestion and grade 4 as ECS with frank pulmonary oedema. All late effects assessment scores were dichotomised as none/mild versus moderate/marked effects.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with breast cancer who had undergone mastectomy followed by radiotherapy to the chest wall and regional nodes. Chemotherapy and hormonal therapy depending on the indication.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- invasive carcinoma of the breast, post mastectomy complete microscopic excision of primary tumour and stage II or III disease
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- breast conserving surgery, stage I or IV disease, past history of malignancy except (i) basal cell skin cancer or CIN cervix uteri or(ii) non- breast malignancy if treated with curative intent and at least 5 years disease-free or contralateral breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), bilateral breast cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Hypofractionated radiotherapy35Gy/ 15#/3weeks to chest wall and 40Gy/15#/3 weeks to supraclavicular fossa | Radiation | – |
Primary outcome
Chest wall fibrosis ("change" is being assessed)
Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years
Late fibrosis was defined grade 1 as barely palpable firmness, grade 2 as definite increased firmness and grade 3 as marked firmness of the chest wall.
4 secondary outcomes
Telengiectasia ("change" is being assessed for all outcomes)
Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years
Lymphedema
Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years
Lung toxicity
Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years
Cardiac toxicity
Time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Nov 2019.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Late Effects of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Breast Cancer, run by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Nov 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Chest wall fibrosis ("change" is being assessed) (time frame: 5, 10 and 15 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Nov 2019.