Breast CancerICAN-NCNCT04175639
mHealth Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention for Medically Underserved Patients
A study testing Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) in people with Breast Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The efficacy of a mobile health (mHealth) behavioral cancer pain intervention designed to decrease pain and disability for breast cancer patients in medically underserved areas has not been investigated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 180 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 20 Oct 2021to 20 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- women with a diagnosis of any breast cancer within the last three years
- being >18 years old
- having a life expectancy of >12 months
- report experiencing pain on at least 10 days in the last month and rate their pain in the past week as a 4 or greater on a 0-10 scale. The combination of these items assess patients level of persistent pain (in the last month) and pain severity with an accurate recall period (i.e., last week; >4).
Who cannot join
- cognitive impairment as indicated by a baseline Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination of <2588
- brain metastases
- presence of a severe psychiatric condition or a psychiatric condition (e.g., suicidal intent) that would contraindicate safe participation in the study as indicated by the medical chart, treating oncologist, or medical/study staff interactions, or 4) current or past (<6 months) engagement in PCST for cancer.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
About this study
Official title: mHealth Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention for Medically Undeserved Patients
The efficacy of a mobile health (mHealth) behavioral cancer pain intervention designed to decrease pain and disability for breast cancer patients in medically underserved areas has not been investigated. The long-term goal of this work is to use mHealth technologies to facilitate wide-spread implementation of an efficacious behavioral cancer pain intervention - a non-pharmacological approach to pain management. The proposed project's objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of an innovative mobile health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST-Community) designed to meet the needs of breast cancer patients with pain in medically underserved areas. mPCST-Community addresses intervention barriers for patients in medically underserved areas as it is delivered with video-conferencing in the patients' community based oncology clinic by a remote therapist, is extended to the patients' home environment using simple mHealth technology, and is low-literacy adapted. The central hypothesis is that mPCST-Community will result in decreased pain compared to a mHealth education attention control group (mHealth-Ed). The rationale of this proposal is that if mPCST-Community is shown to be efficacious it will rapidly increase intervention access for individuals who receive their oncology care in medically underserved areas and ultimately reduce pain-related suffering. Guided by strong preliminary data, a randomized controlled trial will be used to pursue three specific aims: 1) Test the extent to which the mPCST-Community intervention reduces pain, fatigue, disability, and distress, 2) Examine self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing as mediators through which the mPCST-Community leads to reductions in pain, fatigue, disability, and distress, and 3) To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mPCST-Community. For Aim 1, based on the study team's extensive work demonstrating the efficacy of in-person pain coping skills training protocols and pilot work showing promise for mPCST-Community, it is expected that mPCST-Community will lead to decreased pain as well as fatigue, disability, and distress compared to mHealth-Ed. For Aim 2, it is expected that the effects of mPCST-Community will be mediated by increased self-efficacy for pain control and decreased pain catastrophizing. For Aim 3, it is expected that mPCST-Community will demonstrate cost-effectiveness as assessed by all-cause medical resource use, participant and therapist time, and health utilities as well as successful overall accrual, high subject retention, and high intervention adherence.
Read the detailed description
Guided by extensive prior work, the investigators have designed an innovative mHealth behavioral pain coping skills training (PCST) intervention to reduce pain and disability in cancer patients in medically underserved areas (mPCST-Community). Our prior work has tested PCST protocols through in-person sessions at major medical centers where resources and literacy levels are relatively high. mPCST-Community is different and innovative; it uses mHealth technology (e.g., videoconferencing) to decrease access barriers for patients in medically underserved areas. The protocol is brief (4 sessions) and delivered in the community clinic by a remote well-trained pain therapist. Importantly, this protocol has been carefully adapted for low literacy patients.Beverly Thorn, PhD, a nationally recognized expert in strategies for adapting pain coping interventions to low literacy, medically underserved patients, was instrumental in developing the mPCST-Community protocol. mPCST-Community extends to the patient's daily life through use of a simple mobile application that provides low literacy text/audio protocol summaries, relaxation audio, daily assessment and personalized feedback, and coping messaging.
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of the developed mPCST-Community protocol in breast cancer patients with pain receiving cancer care in medically underserved areas (N=180). The investigators have done careful and extensive pilot work to prepare for the proposed trial. Our pilot work (Journal of Psychosocial Oncology) was conducted in breast cancer patients with pain in three medically underserved rural community clinics. First, focus group data (3 groups; n=19) were used to further refine the adapted protocol. Second, the mPCST-Community protocol was evaluated in a single-arm trial with 20 patients. The invesitgators found high feasibility (i.e., recruitment met), low attrition and high adherence (90% completion), and high acceptability. Importantly, impressive and positive pre- to post-intervention changes were found for pain severity (t=-2.52, p=0.01,gav=0.62; 30% change), pain interference (t=-2.62,p=0.01, gav=0.62), and self-efficacy for pain management (t=3.57, p=0.0004, gav=0.98; 30% change).8Study specific aims are:
Aim 1:Test the extent to which mPCST-Community reduces breast cancer patients' pain severity (primary outcome), pain interference, fatigue, physical disability, and psychological distress. Hypothesis:mPCST-Community will lead to decreases in these pain-related outcomes compared to a Health-Ed control condition.
Aim 2:Examine mediators through which mPCST-Community leads to benefits. Hypothesis:The effects of mPCST-Community on pain severity, pain interference, fatigue, physical disability, and psychological distress will be mediated by increased self-efficacy for pain management and decreased pain catastrophizing.
Aim 3:Evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of mPCST-Community. Hypothesis: mPCST-Community will be cost-saving or cost effective in terms of its incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year from a societal perspective, inclusive of healthcare, intervention and patient-time costs. Its sustainability will be further demonstrated by documenting successful accrual, retention, and protocol adherence.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST)
- Keywords
- cancer, pain, fatigue, distress, coping, mHealth, symptom management, physical disability
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Pain, Fatigue
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST)Behavioural
Participating in Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training will involve four 50-minute individual intervention sessions conducted over the course of 8 weeks with tele-video-conferencing at patient's community-based clinic. The therapist delivering the intervention will be at Duke University Medical Center, and patients will be at their community clinic.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) | Experimental | Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) protocol for breast cancer survivors with persistent pain that will produce significant improvements in pain, pain disability, fatigue, physical disability, and adherence to post-treatment lifestyle recommendations that are impacted by pain (i.e., daily activity, self-monitoring of symptoms). Receives: Behavioral: Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) |
| mHealth-Education (mHealth-Ed) | No intervention | mHealth-Education (mHealth- Ed): Participating in mHealth will involve four 50-minute individual intervention sessions conducted over the course of 8 weeks with tele-video-conferencing at patient's community-based clinic with a nurse about cancer care. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Severity as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Pain Severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) by asking patients about pain on a scale of 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Pain Interference as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Pain Interference will be assessed by asking how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other and sleep within the last 7 days on a scale of 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes. Reported as the mean score for the seven items.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Change in Fatigue
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) six-item Fatigue Scale is a self-report measure of fatigue symptoms. Items ask patients to evaluate symptoms from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that is likely to decrease one's ability to carry out daily activities. Reported as a T-score with a range of 0 to 100, with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates greater fatigue.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Physical Disability as Measured by the Patient Care Monitor (PCM)
Physical disability will be assessed using 4-item form Patient Care Monitor (PCM) scale. The four items ask about patients' ability to run, do light physical work or fun activities, do hard physical work or fun activities, and ability to function normally in the last 7 days (0 = not a problem to 10 = as bad as possible). Reported as the mean score for the four items.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Self-Efficacy for Pain Control as Measured by the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale
The self-efficacy for pain management will be assessed using 5-item Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy scale. This sub-scale contains 5 items that inquire about patients' certainty about degree of pain control, pain during daily activities, controlling pain during sleep, and making pain reductions without extra medication. These items will be answered on a scale of 10 = very uncertain to 100 = very certain scale and averaged.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Pain Catastrophizing as Measured by the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Pain catastrophizing will be assessed with the 6-item pain catastrophizing sub-scale of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire. These items ask about patients' tendency to catastrophize when faced with pain and are answered on a scale of 0 = never to 6 = always and averaged.
Measured: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Cost-Effectiveness
We will create a composite cost variable based on patient time, medical resource use, productivity, and the EQ-5D.The EQ-5D is a measure of health status that can be linked to population-based preference weights is widely used in economic evaluations. It is short, assessing 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). The respondent indicates no problems, some problems, or severe problems in each dimension.
Measured: Baseline, post intervention(up to 10 weeks or however long the intervention lasts), 3-month and 6- month: approximately 25 minutes each time
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2019
- Study start20 Oct 2021
- Primary completion20 Dec 2024
- Study completion20 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tamara J Somers, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04175639
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00103527
- Acronym
- ICAN-NC
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 9 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- mHealth Behavioral Cancer Pain Intervention for Medically Undeserved Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04175639
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICAN-NC / Pro00103527
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- cancer, pain, fatigue, distress, coping, mHealth, symptom management, physical disability
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 180 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Oct 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 9 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The efficacy of a mobile health (mHealth) behavioral cancer pain intervention designed to decrease pain and disability for breast cancer patients in medically underserved areas has not been investigated. The long-term goal of this work is to use mHealth technologies to facilitate wide-spread implementation of an efficacious behavioral cancer pain intervention - a non-pharmacological approach to pain management. The proposed project's objective is to demonstrate the efficacy of an innovative mobile health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST-Community) designed to meet the needs of breast cancer patients with pain in medically underserved areas. mPCST-Community addresses intervention barriers for patients in medically underserved areas as it is delivered with video-conferencing in the patients' community based oncology clinic by a remote therapist, is extended to the patients' home environment using simple mHealth technology, and is low-literacy adapted. The central hypothesis is that mPCST-Community will result in decreased pain compared to a mHealth education attention control group (mHealth-Ed). The rationale of this proposal is that if mPCST-Community is shown to be efficacious it will rapidly increase intervention access for individuals who receive their oncology care in medically underserved areas and ultimately reduce pain-related suffering. Guided by strong preliminary data, a randomized controlled trial will be used to pursue three specific aims: 1) Test the extent to which the mPCST-Community intervention reduces pain, fatigue, disability, and distress, 2) Examine self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing as mediators through which the mPCST-Community leads to reductions in pain, fatigue, disability, and distress, and 3) To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mPCST-Community. For Aim 1, based on the study team's extensive work demonstrating the efficacy of in-person pain coping skills training protocols and pilot work showing promise for mPCST-Community, it is expected that mPCST-Community will lead to decreased pain as well as fatigue, disability, and distress compared to mHealth-Ed. For Aim 2, it is expected that the effects of mPCST-Community will be mediated by increased self-efficacy for pain control and decreased pain catastrophizing. For Aim 3, it is expected that mPCST-Community will demonstrate cost-effectiveness as assessed by all-cause medical resource use, participant and therapist time, and health utilities as well as successful overall accrual, high subject retention, and high intervention adherence.
Detailed description
Guided by extensive prior work, the investigators have designed an innovative mHealth behavioral pain coping skills training (PCST) intervention to reduce pain and disability in cancer patients in medically underserved areas (mPCST-Community). Our prior work has tested PCST protocols through in-person sessions at major medical centers where resources and literacy levels are relatively high. mPCST-Community is different and innovative; it uses mHealth technology (e.g., videoconferencing) to decrease access barriers for patients in medically underserved areas. The protocol is brief (4 sessions) and delivered in the community clinic by a remote well-trained pain therapist. Importantly, this protocol has been carefully adapted for low literacy patients.Beverly Thorn, PhD, a nationally recognized expert in strategies for adapting pain coping interventions to low literacy, medically underserved patients, was instrumental in developing the mPCST-Community protocol. mPCST-Community extends to the patient's daily life through use of a simple mobile application that provides low literacy text/audio protocol summaries, relaxation audio, daily assessment and personalized feedback, and coping messaging.
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of the developed mPCST-Community protocol in breast cancer patients with pain receiving cancer care in medically underserved areas (N=180). The investigators have done careful and extensive pilot work to prepare for the proposed trial. Our pilot work (Journal of Psychosocial Oncology) was conducted in breast cancer patients with pain in three medically underserved rural community clinics. First, focus group data (3 groups; n=19) were used to further refine the adapted protocol. Second, the mPCST-Community protocol was evaluated in a single-arm trial with 20 patients. The invesitgators found high feasibility (i.e., recruitment met), low attrition and high adherence (90% completion), and high acceptability. Importantly, impressive and positive pre- to post-intervention changes were found for pain severity (t=-2.52, p=0.01,gav=0.62; 30% change), pain interference (t=-2.62,p=0.01, gav=0.62), and self-efficacy for pain management (t=3.57, p=0.0004, gav=0.98; 30% change).8Study specific aims are:
Aim 1:Test the extent to which mPCST-Community reduces breast cancer patients' pain severity (primary outcome), pain interference, fatigue, physical disability, and psychological distress. Hypothesis:mPCST-Community will lead to decreases in these pain-related outcomes compared to a Health-Ed control condition.
Aim 2:Examine mediators through which mPCST-Community leads to benefits. Hypothesis:The effects of mPCST-Community on pain severity, pain interference, fatigue, physical disability, and psychological distress will be mediated by increased self-efficacy for pain management and decreased pain catastrophizing.
Aim 3:Evaluate the cost and cost-effectiveness of mPCST-Community. Hypothesis: mPCST-Community will be cost-saving or cost effective in terms of its incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year from a societal perspective, inclusive of healthcare, intervention and patient-time costs. Its sustainability will be further demonstrated by documenting successful accrual, retention, and protocol adherence.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) | Experimental | Behavioral: Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST)Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) protocol for breast cancer survivors with persistent pain that will produce significant improvements in pain, pain disability, fatigue, physical disability, and adherence to post-treatment lifestyle recommendations that are impacted by pain (i.e., daily activity, self-monitoring of symptoms). |
| mHealth-Education (mHealth-Ed) | No intervention | –mHealth-Education (mHealth- Ed): Participating in mHealth will involve four 50-minute individual intervention sessions conducted over the course of 8 weeks with tele-video-conferencing at patient's community-based clinic with a nurse about cancer care. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- women with a diagnosis of any breast cancer within the last three years
- being >18 years old
- having a life expectancy of >12 months
- report experiencing pain on at least 10 days in the last month and rate their pain in the past week as a 4 or greater on a 0-10 scale. The combination of these items assess patients level of persistent pain (in the last month) and pain severity with an accurate recall period (i.e., last week; >4).
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- cognitive impairment as indicated by a baseline Folstein Mini-Mental Status Examination of <2588
- brain metastases
- presence of a severe psychiatric condition or a psychiatric condition (e.g., suicidal intent) that would contraindicate safe participation in the study as indicated by the medical chart, treating oncologist, or medical/study staff interactions, or 4) current or past (<6 months) engagement in PCST for cancer.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST)Participating in Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training will involve four 50-minute individual intervention sessions conducted over the course of 8 weeks with tele-video-conferencing at patient's community-based clinic. The therapist delivering the intervention will be at Duke University Medical Center, and patients will be at their community clinic. | Behavioural | Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) |
Primary outcome
Pain Severity as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Pain Severity will be assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) by asking patients about pain on a scale of 0 = no pain to 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine.
Pain Interference as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Pain Interference will be assessed by asking how much pain has interfered with seven daily activities including general activity, walking, work, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other and sleep within the last 7 days on a scale of 0 = does not interfere to 10 = completely interferes. Reported as the mean score for the seven items.
Change in Fatigue
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
The Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) six-item Fatigue Scale is a self-report measure of fatigue symptoms. Items ask patients to evaluate symptoms from mild subjective feelings of tiredness to an overwhelming, debilitating, and sustained sense of exhaustion that is likely to decrease one's ability to carry out daily activities. Reported as a T-score with a range of 0 to 100, with a mean score of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates greater fatigue.
Physical Disability as Measured by the Patient Care Monitor (PCM)
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Physical disability will be assessed using 4-item form Patient Care Monitor (PCM) scale. The four items ask about patients' ability to run, do light physical work or fun activities, do hard physical work or fun activities, and ability to function normally in the last 7 days (0 = not a problem to 10 = as bad as possible). Reported as the mean score for the four items.
3 secondary outcomes
Self-Efficacy for Pain Control as Measured by the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Pain Catastrophizing as Measured by the Coping Strategies Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months
Cost-Effectiveness
Time frame: Baseline, post intervention(up to 10 weeks or however long the intervention lasts), 3-month and 6- month: approximately 25 minutes each time
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tamara J Somers, Ph.D. principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobile Health Pain Coping Skills Training (mPCST) in people with Breast Cancer, run by Duke University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 9 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Severity as Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (time frame: Baseline, post-intervention (up to 10 weeks), 3 months, 6 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025.