Atopic DermatitisPhase 2ADVISENCT04162769
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
A Phase 2 study testing Etrasimod 1 mg and Etrasimod 2 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Arena Pharmaceuticals at 38 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Atopic Dermatitis
- What is being tested?
- Etrasimod 1 mg and Etrasimod 2 mg
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 140 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 4 Oct 2019to 11 Oct 2021
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participants with chronic atopic dermatitis, defined by Hanifin and Rajka criteria, that has been present for at least 1 year prior to the Screening Visit
- Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 12 at the Screening Visit and ≥ 16 at the Baseline Visit
- Participants with validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA) score ≥ 3 (on the 0 to 4 vIGA scale, in which 3 = moderate and 4 = severe) involvement at the Screening and Baseline visits
Who cannot join
- Presence of skin comorbidities that would interfere with study assessments of the underlying disease.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 3 countries.
38 sites in 3 countries
United States35 sites
Gadolin Research
Beaumont, Texas, 77702
Hope Clinical Research
Canoga Park, California, 91303
Clinical Research of West Florida
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Modern Research Associates, PLLC
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Prohealth Research Center
Doral, Florida, 33166
First OC Dermatology
Fountain Valley, California, 92708
FMC Science
Georgetown, Texas, 78626
Aby's New Generation Research, Inc.
Hialeah, Florida, 33016
Skin Care Research, LLC
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Advanced Research Institute of Miami LLC
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Amber Pediatrics Research, LLC
Homestead, Florida, 33030
Marvel Research LLC
Huntington Beach, California, 92647
ADVA Clinical Research, Inc
Inglewood, California, 90301
FMC Science
Lampasas, Texas, 76550
Excel Clinical Research
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Skin Sciences PLLC
Louisville, Kentucky, 40217
South Miami Medical & Research Group. Inc
Miami, Florida, 33155
Amber Pediatrics Research, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33169
Skin Research of South Florida
Miami, Florida, 33173
Amber Clinical Research, LLC
Miami Shores, Florida, 33138
Greenwich Village Dermatology
New York, New York, 10012
Alliance for Multispecialty Research
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606
Quality Clinical Research Inc
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
ODRC Enterprises, LLC dba Oregon Dermatology and Research Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Clinical Research Partners, LLC
Richmond, Virginia, 23220
Quinn Healthcare/SKYCRNG
Ridgeland, Mississippi, 39157
TCR Medical Corporation
San Diego, California, 92123
Spartanburg Medical Research
Spartanburg, South Carolina, 29369
Premier Clinical Research
Spokane, Washington, 99202
IMA Clinical Research, LLC
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33709
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.
Tampa, Florida, 33603
Noble Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Rophe Adult and Pediatric Medicine/SKYCRNG
Union City, Georgia, 30291
Australia2 sites
Sinclair Dermatology
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Premier Specialists PTY LTD
Kogarah, New South Wales, 2217
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled 16-Week Study (With a 52-Week Open-Label Extension) to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
The purpose of this study is to determine whether etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Being tested
- Etrasimod 1 mg, Etrasimod 2 mg, Etrasimod matching placebo
- Keywords
- Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, Etrasimod, APD334
- Medical subject headings
- Dermatitis, Atopic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Etrasimod 1 mgDrug
Also called APD334
Etrasimod 1 mg tablet taken by mouth, once daily
Etrasimod 2 mgDrug
Also called APD334
Etrasimod 2 mg tablet taken by mouth, once daily.
Etrasimod matching placeboDrug
Etrasimod matching placebo tablet by mouth, once daily.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 1 milligrams (mg) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Etrasimod 1 mg |
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 2 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Etrasimod 2 mg |
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Etrasimod matching placebo |
| 52-Week Open-Label Extension Period: Etrasimod 2 mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Etrasimod 2 mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD based on severity of AD clinical signs and percent (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring assessment of the affected area in 4 specific disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification), which was each assessed on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). The EASI Area Score is documented for 4 regions of the body. Region 1: head and neck; Region 2: trunk (including genital area); Region 3: upper limbs; and Region 4: lower limbs (including buttocks), with the area of AD involvement assessed as a percentage by body area and converted to a score of 0 to 6. Total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72; higher score indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Secondary outcomes (16)
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-75
EASI-75 is defined as a 75% reduction or greater in EASI score from Baseline to Week 12. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA) 0 or 1 Score and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points
The vIGA scale for AD is a 5-point scale to measure disease severity. The vIGA score was selected using descriptors that best described the overall appearance of skin lesions at a given time point using the following scoring: 0 = clear (no inflammatory signs of AD); 1 = almost clear (barely perceptible erythema and papulation); 2 = mild (slight but definite erythema and papulation); 3 = moderate (clearly perceptible erythema and papulation); and 4 = severe (marked erythema and papulation); Higher score indicated greater severity. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Weekly Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From an Itch Daily Diary
Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch). The scale for the pruritus NRS ranged from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "the worst itch imaginable; higher scores indicated greater severity. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Peak Pruritus NRS Greater Than or Equal to (>=)3 From an Itch Daily Diary
Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch). The scale for the pruritus NRS ranged from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "the worst itch imaginable; higher scores indicated greater severity. Percentage of participants with improvement (reduction) in peak pruritus NRS >=3 from an itch daily diary is presented. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-50
EASI-50 is defined as a 50% reduction or greater of EASI from Baseline to Week 12. Percentage of participants achieving EASI-50 is presented. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90
EASI-90 is defined as as a 90% reduction or greater of EASI from Baseline to Week 12. Percentage of participants achieving EASI-90 is presented Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA)
BSA affected by AD were assessed for each section of the body. The possible highest score for each region was: head and neck (9%), anterior trunk (18%), back (18%), upper limbs (18%), lower limbs (36%), and genitals (1%) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined; higher % BSA indicated greater severity. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Open-label Extension (OLE) Period: Percent Change in EASI
EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD based on severity of AD clinical signs and percent (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring assessment of the affected area in 4 specific disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification), which was each assessed on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). The EASI Area Score is documented for 4 regions of the body. Region 1: head and neck; Region 2: trunk (including genital area); Region 3: upper limbs; and Region 4: lower limbs (including buttocks), with the area of AD involvement assessed as a percentage by body area and converted to a score of 0 to 6. Total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72; higher score indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Number of Participants Achieving a EASI-75 Score
EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD based on severity of AD clinical signs and percent (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring assessment of the affected area in 4 specific disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification), which was each assessed on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). The EASI Area Score is documented for 4 regions of the body. Region 1: head and neck; Region 2: trunk (including genital area); Region 3: upper limbs; and Region 4: lower limbs (including buttocks), with the area of AD involvement assessed as a percentage by body area and converted to a score of 0 to 6. Total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72; higher score indicated greater severity of AD. EASI-75 is defined as a >=75% reduction or greater of EASI from Baseline.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Number of Participants Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA) 0 or 1 Score and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points
The vIGA scale for AD is a 5-point scale to measure disease severity. The vIGA score was selected using descriptors that best described the overall appearance of skin lesions at a given time point using the following scoring: 0 = clear (no inflammatory signs of AD); 1 = almost clear (barely perceptible erythema and papulation); 2 = mild (slight but definite erythema and papulation); 3 = moderate (clearly perceptible erythema and papulation); and 4 = severe (marked erythema and papulation); Higher score indicated greater severity.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score
The SCORAD is a validated measure of the extent and severity of AD using 3 components: A = extent or affected BSA, B = severity and C = subjective symptoms. The extent of AD was assessed as percentage of each defined body area and reported as the sum of all areas, with a maximum score of 100%. The severity of 6 specific symptoms was assessed using the following scale: none (0), mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) (for a maximum of 18 total points, assigned as "B" in the overall SCORAD calculation). Subjective assessment of itch and sleeplessness was recorded for each symptom by the participant or relative on a Visual Analogue Scale, where 0 is no itch (or sleeplessness) and 10 is the worst imaginable itch (or sleeplessness), with a maximum possible score of 20. This parameter is assigned as "C" in the overall SCORAD calculation. The total SCORAD ranged from 0 (no disease) to 103 (severe disease); higher score indicated more severe AD.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in Percent BSA
BSA affected by AD were assessed for each section of the body. The possible highest score for each region was: head and neck (9%), anterior trunk (18%), back (18%), upper limbs (18%), lower limbs (36%), and genitals (1%) and were reported as a percentage of all major body sections combined; higher % BSA indicated greater severity. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in Weekly Peak Pruritus NRS From an Itch Daily Diary
Pruritus NRS is an assessment tool that was used to report the intensity of a participant's pruritus (itch). The scale for the pruritus NRS ranged from 0 to 10 with 0 being "no itch" and 10 being "the worst itch imaginable; higher scores indicated greater severity. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 28
OLE Period: Change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
The POEM is a participant-derived validated tool used for monitoring atopic eczema severity. The POEM consisted of 7 questions asking participants to rank how many days over the past 7 days they had experienced specific AD-related symptoms. Each of the 7 questions carried equal weight and was scored from 0 to 4 as follows: No days = 0; 1-2 days = 1; 3-4 days = 2; 5-6 days = 3; Every day = 4. The scores from the 7 questions were added up to give an overall POEM score as: 0-2 = 'clear/almost clear', 3-7 = 'mild', 8-16 = 'moderate', 17-24 = 'severe', and 25-28 = 'very severe atopic eczema'; higher scores indicated worse atopic eczema severity. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
The DLQI is a validated 10-item questionnaire designed to measure the impact of skin disease on the Quality of Life (QoL). DLQI is a response to 10 items, which assessed QoL over the past week. For each item, the scale was rated as follows: 0 = "not at all"; 1 = "a little"; 2 = "a lot"; 3 = "very much," with an overall scoring system of 0 to 30; higher scores indicated a poor QoL. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Change in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease
PGA is an assessment tool that was used by participant to rate the disease and disease severity. Participants rated their overall well-being based on a 5-point Likert scale from poor to excellent. Response choices were: 1- 'Poor', 2- 'Fair', 3- 'Good', 4- 'Very Good,' or 5- 'Excellent'; higher scores indicated better well-being. For the 5-point Likert scale, a positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. Baseline is defined as the last measurement prior to the first etrasimod dose started at Week 16.
Measured: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Nov 2019
- Study start4 Oct 2019
- Primary completion9 Sep 2020
- Study completion11 Oct 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Atopic DermatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Arena Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Arena CT.gov Administrator, Study director, Arena Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04162769
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APD334-201
- Acronym
- ADVISE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2022
- First submitted
- 12 Nov 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Dubinsky MC, Wu J, McDonnell A, Lazin K, Goetsch M, Branquinho D, Modesto I, Armuzzi A. Low Incidence of Macular Edema and Other Ocular Events in the Etrasimod Development Program. J Crohns Colitis. 2025 May 8;19(5):jjae173. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae173.
PubMed 39575597
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled 16-Week Study (With a 52-Week Open-Label Extension) to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etrasimod in Subjects With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04162769
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ADVISE / APD334-201
- Conditions
- Atopic Dermatitis
- Keywords
- Moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, Etrasimod, APD334
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 140 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Arena PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 4 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Sep 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Oct 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Nov 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Posted 4 Nov 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether etrasimod is a safe and effective treatment for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 1 milligrams (mg) | Experimental | Drug: Etrasimod 1 mg |
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 2 mg | Experimental | Drug: Etrasimod 2 mg |
| 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Etrasimod matching placebo |
| 52-Week Open-Label Extension Period: Etrasimod 2 mg | Experimental | Drug: Etrasimod 2 mg |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participants with chronic atopic dermatitis, defined by Hanifin and Rajka criteria, that has been present for at least 1 year prior to the Screening Visit
- Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 12 at the Screening Visit and ≥ 16 at the Baseline Visit
- Participants with validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA) score ≥ 3 (on the 0 to 4 vIGA scale, in which 3 = moderate and 4 = severe) involvement at the Screening and Baseline visits
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Presence of skin comorbidities that would interfere with study assessments of the underlying disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Etrasimod 1 mgAlso: APD334Etrasimod 1 mg tablet taken by mouth, once daily | Drug | 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 1 milligrams (mg) |
| Etrasimod 2 mgAlso: APD334Etrasimod 2 mg tablet taken by mouth, once daily. | Drug | 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Etrasimod 2 mg, 52-Week Open-Label Extension Period: Etrasimod 2 mg |
| Etrasimod matching placeboEtrasimod matching placebo tablet by mouth, once daily. | Drug | 12-Week Double-Blind Treatment Period: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
EASI evaluates severity of participant's AD based on severity of AD clinical signs and percent (%) of body surface area (BSA) affected. EASI is a composite scoring assessment of the affected area in 4 specific disease characteristics (erythema, thickness [induration, papulation, edema], scratching [excoriation], and lichenification), which was each assessed on a scale of "0" (absent) through "3" (severe). The EASI Area Score is documented for 4 regions of the body. Region 1: head and neck; Region 2: trunk (including genital area); Region 3: upper limbs; and Region 4: lower limbs (including buttocks), with the area of AD involvement assessed as a percentage by body area and converted to a score of 0 to 6. Total EASI score ranged from 0 to 72; higher score indicated greater severity of AD. Baseline is defined as Day 1 pre-randomization assessments.
16 secondary outcomes
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-75
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA) 0 or 1 Score and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Weekly Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) From an Itch Daily Diary
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Improvement (Reduction) in Peak Pruritus NRS Greater Than or Equal to (>=)3 From an Itch Daily Diary
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-50
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants Achieving EASI-90
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Percent Body Surface Area (BSA)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12
Open-label Extension (OLE) Period: Percent Change in EASI
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Number of Participants Achieving a EASI-75 Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Number of Participants Achieving a Validated Investigator Global Assessment (vIGA) 0 or 1 Score and a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Total Score
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in Percent BSA
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Percent Change in Weekly Peak Pruritus NRS From an Itch Daily Diary
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 28
OLE Period: Change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
OLE Period: Change in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease
Time frame: Baseline (Week 16) and Week 68
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39575597Dubinsky MC, Wu J, McDonnell A, Lazin K, Goetsch M, Branquinho D, Modesto I, Armuzzi A. Low Incidence of Macular Edema and Other Ocular Events in the Etrasimod Development Program. J Crohns Colitis. 2025 May 8;19(5):jjae173. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae173.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
RecruitingObservational study
Blood, Urine, and Tissue Collection for Cutaneous Lymphoma, Eczema, and Atopic Dermatitis Research
Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma, Sezary Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study of HSK60002 Tablets in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Dermatitis Atopic
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called Tilrekimig in People With Moderate-to Severe Eczema
Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Arena CT.gov Administrator study director
Arena Pharmaceuticals
38 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Etrasimod 1 mg and Etrasimod 2 mg in people with Atopic Dermatitis, run by Arena Pharmaceuticals at 38 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in United States, Australia, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 4 Nov 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percent Change in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04162769, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2022.