AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiac ArrhythmiaPhase 2CARAPACENCT04154982

N-Acetylcysteine Protection Against Radiation Induced Cellular Damage

A Phase 2 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Cardiac Arrhythmia, run by Centro Cardiologico Monzino at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Catheter ablation procedures (CAPs) are first line treatment for a great variety of cardiac arrhythmias. CAPs require X-Ray imaging; consequently, CAPs cause ionizing radiation (IR) exposure for patients. Exposure to IR, even at low-doses, increases individual risk of developing cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiac Arrhythmia
What is being tested?
Acetyl cysteine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
181 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
2 Sep 2020to 2 Dec 2024
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient's age >18 years.
  • Negative hCG pregnancy test (if appropriate).
  • Indication to perform CAP guided by fluoroscopy (IR imaging).
  • Ability and willingness to give informed consent and to comply with protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Any contraindication to CAP (such as, pregnancy and breastfeeding).
  • Hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients.
  • Enrollment in another study that may interfere with CARAPACE study.
  • Administration of an experimental drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the investigational drug.
  • Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dl).
  • Acute/Chronic inflammatory disease.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Antioxidant drugs intake over the previous 2 weeks.
  • History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy in the last year.
  • Any documented condition that, in PI's motivated judgement, makes the patient a poor candidate for the study.
  • Computed tomography and/or coronary angiography within 5 days prior to baseline analysis.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • Centro Cardiologico Monzino

    Milan, MI, 20138

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Cardiac Arrhythmia Catheter Ablation Procedures Guided by x-Ray Imaging: N-Acetylcysteine Protection Against Radiation Induced Cellular damagE (CARAPACE Study)

Catheter ablation procedures (CAPs) are first line treatment for a great variety of cardiac arrhythmias. CAPs require X-Ray imaging; consequently, CAPs cause ionizing radiation (IR) exposure for patients. Exposure to IR, even at low-doses, increases individual risk of developing cancer. IR cause DNA damage directly and, mostly, indirectly by formation of cellular free radicals. Furthermore different response to IR results from inherited variants in genes involved in DNA damage repair. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is an aminoacid that can directly neutralize free radicals and increase antioxidant systems. Our preliminary data suggest that IR exposure in patients undergoing CAP deranges the oxidative stress status and the pre-procedure intravenous administration of NAC could decrease such abnormality.

Read the detailed description

CARAPACE is a prospective, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-arm monocenter study. Eligible patients undergoing CAP at the Arrhythmology Unit of Centro Cardiologico Monzino will be enrolled.

The hypothesis driving our study, based on published literature and our preliminary data, is that administration of antioxidant agents, before cardiac procedures involving IR exposure, might prevent IR harmful effects on human tissues in terms of reduction of systemic oxidative stress status and, in parallel, of oxidative DNA damage.

The antioxidant agent tested in our study is NAC. NAC is a well-tolerated and safe medication and it has antioxidant properties is based on three main mechanisms: 1) direct antioxidant effect, 2) glutathione (GSH) precursor action, and 3) its activity in breaking thiolated proteins.

Another hypothesis to be tested is whether genes involved in DNA damage repair could explain the great variability in patient radiosensitivity to IR exposure and whether these genes could affect NAC protective/healing effects.

Being tested
Acetyl cysteine
Keywords
Electrophysiology, Arrhythmias, Arrhythmia ablation, Ionizing radiation risk, Oxidative stress, DNA damage biomarkers
Medical subject headings
Arrhythmias, Cardiac

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acetyl cysteineDrug

    1200 mg of NAC are intravenously administrated 1 hour prior to carrying out CAP.

Study groups in NCT04154982
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Pharmacological treatmentExperimentalPatients are treated with NAC prior to carrying out CAP.
Receives: Drug: Acetyl cysteine
Standard procedureNo interventionPatients are not treated with NAC. No placebo treatment is performed.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Measurement of change in systemic oxidative stress (ratio between GSH oxidized form (GSSG) and GSH, 8-iso-prostaglandinF2α (8-iso-PGF2α) and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)) and genomic DNA oxidative damage (percentage of DNA present in the tails).

    Measurement of change in systemic oxidative stress (GSSG/GSH, 8-iso-PGF2α and 8-OHdG) and genomic DNA oxidative damage (% DNA present in the tails of the comet assay) between the two groups (NAC versus no NAC) at the different time-points (T0 = before CAP, T1 = 3h after CAP, T2 = 24h after CAP, T3 = 48h after CAP).

    Measured: 48 hours

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Measurement of change in systemic oxidative stress (GSSG/GSH, 8-iso-PGF2α and 8-OHdG) and genomic DNA oxidative damage (% DNA present in the tails) related to IR dose (fluoroscopy time (FT), Dose Area Product (DAP) and effective dose (ED)).

    Measurement of change in systemic oxidative stress (GSSG/GSH, 8-iso-PGF2α and 8-OHdG) and genomic DNA oxidative damage (% DNA present in the tails) related to IR dose (FT, DAP and ED) between the two groups (NAC versus no NAC).

    Measured: 48 hours

  2. Measurement of change in genomic DNA oxidative damage (% DNA present in the tails) related to IR dose (FT, DAP and ED) and inherited variants in genes involved in DNA damage repair.

    Measurement of change in genomic DNA oxidative damage (% DNA present in the tails) related to IR dose (FT, DAP and ED) and inherited variants in genes involved in DNA damage repair between the two groups (NAC versus no NAC).

    Measured: 48 hours

  3. Measurement of change in the response to NAC administration related to inherited variants in genes involved in DNA damage repair.

    Measured: 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Nov 2019
  2. Study start2 Sep 2020
  3. Primary completion2 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion2 Dec 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
181 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04154982
Sponsor's protocol ID
CCM1006
Acronym
CARAPACE
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
17 Oct 2019
Last updated
22 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Turnu L, Porro B, Alfieri V, Di Minno A, Russo E, Barbieri S, Bonomi A, Dello Russo A, Tondo C, D'Alessandra Y, Cavalca V, Tremoli E, Colombo GI, Casella M. Does Fluoroscopy Induce DNA Oxidative Damage in Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation? Antioxid Redox Signal. 2018 Apr 20;28(12):1137-1143. doi: 10.1089/ars.2017.7334. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

    PubMed 28938845
  • Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FH, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, Mont L, Jais P, de Bono J, Piorkowski C, Saad E, Femenia F. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace. 2014 Jul;16(7):946-64. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut409. Epub 2014 May 2.

    PubMed 24792380
  • Evans MD, Dizdaroglu M, Cooke MS. Oxidative DNA damage and disease: induction, repair and significance. Mutat Res. 2004 Sep;567(1):1-61. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2003.11.001.

    PubMed 15341901
  • Andreassi MG, Foffa I, Manfredi S, Botto N, Cioppa A, Picano E. Genetic polymorphisms in XRCC1, OGG1, APE1 and XRCC3 DNA repair genes, ionizing radiation exposure and chromosomal DNA damage in interventional cardiologists. Mutat Res. 2009 Jun 18;666(1-2):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.04.003. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

    PubMed 19393248
  • Huang A, Glick SA. Genetic susceptibility to cutaneous radiation injury. Arch Dermatol Res. 2017 Jan;309(1):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00403-016-1702-3. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

    PubMed 27878387
  • Cervelli T, Panetta D, Navarra T, Gadhiri S, Salvadori P, Galli A, Caramella D, Basta G, Picano E, Del Turco S. A New Natural Antioxidant Mixture Protects against Oxidative and DNA Damage in Endothelial Cell Exposed to Low-Dose Irradiation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:9085947. doi: 10.1155/2017/9085947. Epub 2017 Aug 9.

    PubMed 28852434
  • Aldini G, Altomare A, Baron G, Vistoli G, Carini M, Borsani L, Sergio F. N-Acetylcysteine as an antioxidant and disulphide breaking agent: the reasons why. Free Radic Res. 2018 Jul;52(7):751-762. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2018.1468564. Epub 2018 May 9.

    PubMed 29742938
  • Mu H, Sun J, Li L, Yin J, Hu N, Zhao W, Ding D, Yi L. Ionizing radiation exposure: hazards, prevention, and biomarker screening. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018 Jun;25(16):15294-15306. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2097-9. Epub 2018 Apr 29.

    PubMed 29705904
  • Squellerio I, Caruso D, Porro B, Veglia F, Tremoli E, Cavalca V. Direct glutathione quantification in human blood by LC-MS/MS: comparison with HPLC with electrochemical detection. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2012 Dec;71:111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Aug 23.

    PubMed 22947504
  • Turnu L, Di Minno A, Porro B, Squellerio I, Bonomi A, Manega CM, Werba JP, Parolari A, Tremoli E, Cavalca V. Assessing Free-Radical-Mediated DNA Damage during Cardiac Surgery: 8-Oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine as a Putative Biomarker. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:9715898. doi: 10.1155/2017/9715898. Epub 2017 Jun 4.

    PubMed 28660009
  • Cavalca V, Minardi F, Scurati S, Guidugli F, Squellerio I, Veglia F, Dainese L, Guarino A, Tremoli E, Caruso D. Simultaneous quantification of 8-iso-prostaglandin-F(2alpha) and 11-dehydro thromboxane B(2) in human urine by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Biochem. 2010 Feb 15;397(2):168-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2009.10.014. Epub 2009 Oct 13.

    PubMed 19825360
  • Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D, Maller J, Sklar P, de Bakker PI, Daly MJ, Sham PC. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75. doi: 10.1086/519795. Epub 2007 Jul 25.

    PubMed 17701901
  • Amadio P, Colombo GI, Tarantino E, Gianellini S, Ieraci A, Brioschi M, Banfi C, Werba JP, Parolari A, Lee FS, Tremoli E, Barbieri SS. BDNFVal66met polymorphism: a potential bridge between depression and thrombosis. Eur Heart J. 2017 May 7;38(18):1426-1435. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv655.

    PubMed 26705390
  • Casella M, Dello Russo A, Russo E, Catto V, Pizzamiglio F, Zucchetti M, Majocchi B, Riva S, Vettor G, Dessanai MA, Fassini G, Moltrasio M, Tundo F, Vignati C, Conti S, Bonomi A, Carbucicchio C, Di Biase L, Natale A, Tondo C. X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 22;7(11):e008233. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008233.

    PubMed 29789334
  • Catto V, Stronati G, Porro B, Fiorelli S, Ricci V, Vavassori C, Russo E, Guerra F, Gasperetti A, Ribatti V, Sicuso R, Dello Russo A, Veglia F, Tondo C, Cavalca V, Colombo GI, Tremoli E, Casella M. Cardiac arrhythmia catheter ablation procedures guided by x-ray imaging: N-acetylcysteine protection against radiation-induced cellular damage (CARAPACE study): study design. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021 Sep;61(3):577-582. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00853-4. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

    PubMed 32833109

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Acetyl cysteine in people with Cardiac Arrhythmia, run by Centro Cardiologico Monzino at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Measurement of change in systemic oxidative stress (ratio between GSH oxidized form (GSSG) and GSH, 8-iso-prostaglandinF2α (8-iso-PGF2α) and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG)) and genomic DNA oxidative damage (percentage of DNA present in the tails). (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04154982, which also lists 15 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in