AzTrials
AzTrials

AtaxiaSCA02NCT04153110

Cerebello-Spinal tDCS as Rehabilitative Intervention in Neurodegenerative Ataxia

A study testing Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS in people with Ataxia and Spinocerebellar Ataxias, run by Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a group of disabling disorders which currently lack effective therapies. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
61 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
1 Dec 2018to 1 Jan 2021
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with a cerebellar syndrome and quantifiable cerebellar atrophy

Who cannot join

  • Severe head trauma in the past
  • History of seizures
  • History of ischemic stroke or hemorrhage
  • Pacemaker
  • Metal implants in the head/neck region
  • Severe comorbidity
  • Intake of illegal drugs
  • Pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • AO Spedali Civili

    Brescia, BS, 25100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Cerebello-Spinal tDCS as Rehabilitative Intervention in Neurodegenerative Ataxias: a Randomized, Double-blind, Sham-controlled Trial Followed by an Open-label Phase

Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a group of disabling disorders which currently lack effective therapies. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar ataxias. In this randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study followed by an open-label phase, the investigators will evaluate whether a repetition of two-weeks' treatment with cerebellar anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS, after a three months interval, may further outlast clinical improvement in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia and can modulate cerebello-motor connectivity, at short and long term.

Read the detailed description

Neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxias represent a heterogeneous group of disabling disorders in which progressive ataxia of gait, limb dysmetria, oculomotor deficits, dysarthria and kinetic tremor are the prominent clinical manifestations. Both the hereditary and sporadic forms usually present in young adulthood, and are characterized by atrophy of cerebellar or brainstem structures. Currently, cerebellar ataxia lack effective disease-modifying therapies.

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique, which has been demonstrated to modulate cerebellar excitability and improve symptoms in patients with cerebellar ataxias. The present randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study followed by an open-label phase will investigate a repetition of two-weeks' treatment with cerebellar anodal tDCS and spinal cathodal tDCS, after a three months interval, may further outlast clinical improvement in patients with neurodegenerative cerebellar ataxia and can modulate cerebello-motor connectivity, at short and long term. In addition the investigators will evaluate if tDCS intervention might improve cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome in patients with ataxia.

Being tested
Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS, Sham cerebellar and sham spinal tDCS
Keywords
Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial magnetic stimulation, Spinocerebellar ataxia, Cerebellar ataxia
Medical subject headings
Ataxia, Spinocerebellar Ataxias, Machado-Joseph Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, Spinocerebellar ataxia, autosomal recessive 1, Cerebellar Ataxia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCSDevice

    10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)

  • Sham cerebellar and sham spinal tDCSDevice

    10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)

Study groups in NCT04153110
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Real tDCS - Real tDCSExperimental10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks)
Receives: Device: Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS
Sham tDCS - Real tDCSSham comparator10 sessions of sham cerebellar and sham spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks) followed by an open-label 10 sessions of anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal transcranial direct current stimulation (5 days/week for 2 weeks).
Receives: Device: Anodal cerebellar and cathodal spinal tDCS; Device: Sham cerebellar and sham spinal tDCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline

    International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks

  2. Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline

    Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks

  3. Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline

    CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale: 120 point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (most severe cognitive impairment) to 120 (no cognitive impairment).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) Score From Baseline

    International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS): semi-quantitative 100-point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 100 (most severe ataxia).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months

  2. Change in the Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) Score From Baseline

    Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): 8-item performance based scale, yielding a total score of 0 (no ataxia) to 40 (most severe ataxia).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months

  3. Change in the Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome (CCAS) Scale From Baseline

    CCAS/Schmahmann syndrome scale: 120 point scale, yielding a total score of 0 (most severe cognitive impairment) to 120 (no cognitive impairment).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months

  4. Change in Cerebellar Brain Inhibition (CBI) Measurements From Baseline

    Cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI) is expressed as motor evoked potential amplitude (average of 10 recordings). Lower values reflect higher inhibition and thus reduced impairment.

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months

  5. Change in the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF36) Score From Baseline

    The Italian version of the Short-Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36): consists of 36 scaled score, yielding a total score of 0 (more disability) to 100 (less disability).

    Measured: Baseline - 2 weeks - 3 month - 6 months - 9 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2019
  2. Study start1 Dec 2018
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2020
  4. Study completion1 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04153110
Sponsor's protocol ID
NP3244
Acronym
SCA02
Status last verified
Mar 2021
First submitted
29 Oct 2019
Last updated
19 Mar 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Benussi A, Dell'Era V, Cantoni V, Bonetta E, Grasso R, Manenti R, Cotelli M, Padovani A, Borroni B. Cerebello-spinal tDCS in ataxia: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover trial. Neurology. 2018 Sep 18;91(12):e1090-e1101. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006210. Epub 2018 Aug 22.

    PubMed 30135258
  • Benussi A, Dell'Era V, Cotelli MS, Turla M, Casali C, Padovani A, Borroni B. Long term clinical and neurophysiological effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia. Brain Stimul. 2017 Mar-Apr;10(2):242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.

    PubMed 27838276
  • Benussi A, Koch G, Cotelli M, Padovani A, Borroni B. Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with ataxia: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled study. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1701-5. doi: 10.1002/mds.26356. Epub 2015 Aug 14.

    PubMed 26274840
  • Bikson M, Grossman P, Thomas C, Zannou AL, Jiang J, Adnan T, Mourdoukoutas AP, Kronberg G, Truong D, Boggio P, Brunoni AR, Charvet L, Fregni F, Fritsch B, Gillick B, Hamilton RH, Hampstead BM, Jankord R, Kirton A, Knotkova H, Liebetanz D, Liu A, Loo C, Nitsche MA, Reis J, Richardson JD, Rotenberg A, Turkeltaub PE, Woods AJ. Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016. Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):641-661. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 15.

    PubMed 27372845
  • Rossini PM, Burke D, Chen R, Cohen LG, Daskalakis Z, Di Iorio R, Di Lazzaro V, Ferreri F, Fitzgerald PB, George MS, Hallett M, Lefaucheur JP, Langguth B, Matsumoto H, Miniussi C, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Rossi S, Rothwell JC, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Walsh V, Ziemann U. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord, roots and peripheral nerves: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical and research application. An updated report from an I.F.C.N. Committee. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun;126(6):1071-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

    PubMed 25797650
  • Miranda PC, Salvador R, Wenger C, Fernandes SR. Computational models of non-invasive brain and spinal cord stimulation. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:6457-6460. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7592207.

    PubMed 28269725
  • Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

    PubMed 27866120
  • Fiocchi S, Ravazzani P, Priori A, Parazzini M. Cerebellar and Spinal Direct Current Stimulation in Children: Computational Modeling of the Induced Electric Field. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Oct 17;10:522. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00522. eCollection 2016.

    PubMed 27799905
  • van Dun K, Bodranghien F, Manto M, Marien P. Targeting the Cerebellum by Noninvasive Neurostimulation: a Review. Cerebellum. 2017 Jun;16(3):695-741. doi: 10.1007/s12311-016-0840-7.

    PubMed 28032321

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in