NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MICMR-OBSERVENCT04140019
Early Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction
An observational study of NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI and ACS - Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Background and rationale: Evaluating patients with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), i.e. suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), is a daily challenge. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI, ACS - Acute Coronary Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- CMR
- How many people
- 87 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2018to Mar 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients presenting to the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ERCG, elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria, and who are admitted and scheduled for an ICA, will be eligible to participate in this study.
Who may be able to join
- Acute onset (>1 hour) chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) suspected of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
- Hospital admission and scheduling for ICA
- Hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria (figure 2, p17)
- Age between 18 years - 85 years old
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Refractory angina or on-going severe ischemia requiring immediate ICA
- Patients requiring ICA < 24 hours after admission (see previous bullet)
- Hemodynamic instability and/or cardiogenic shock (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg)
- Heart failure (Killip Class ≥ III) requiring intravenously medication (nitroglycerine, diuretics, etc.)
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads: ≥0.2mV in men or ≥0.15 mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads or new left bundle branch block)
- Symptoms highly suggestive of non-cardiac origin at presentation (as judged by the cardiac ED physician/cardiologist)
Show all 34Show fewer
- Symptoms highly suggestive of AAD, PE, or acute peri-myocarditis
- Inability to organize ICA and CMR <72 hours after admission (especially for patients admitted on Friday evenings/nights (logistic restrictions).
- Life threatening arrhythmias prior to or during presentation (sustained ventricular tachycardia, repetitive non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, sinoatrial or atrio-ventricular block)
- Atrial fibrillation with persistent ventricular rate ≥100 beats per minute (bpm) after treatment
- Ongoing tachycardia (≥100/bpm)
- Angina pectoris secondary to anemia (<5.6 mmol/L), untreated hyperthyroidism, or severe hypertension (>200/110 mmHg)
- More than mild aortic and mitral valve calcification or stenosis by latest echocardiography
- Recent revascularization or ACUTE MI (<6 months)
- Known CAD not suitable for further interventions (PCI or CABG)
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding women
- Life expectancy <1 year (malignancy, etc.)
- Refusal of data storage until 15 years after end of study
- Participation in another investigational study that has not reached its primary endpoint
- Contraindications to CMR:
- ODIN-protocol: "Uitvoering van MRI-onderzoek bij patiënten met een cardiaal implanteerbaar elektronisch device (CIED), waaronder een pacemaker en ICD"; ODIN-protocol: "Voorbereiding klinische patiënten voor MRI-onderzoek"
- Metallic implant (vascular clip, neuro-stimulator, cochlear implant)
- Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)
- Claustrophobia
- Body weight >130 kg or body habitus that does not fit into the gantry
- Renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≤30 mL/min/1,73m2) / chronic renal failure stage 4-5
- Known severe allergy to gadolinium contrast agents (patient with mild allergy is eligible for inclusion when pre-medication according to hospital guidelines can be administered)
- Contraindications to adenosine:
- High degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree)
- Severe bronchial asthma
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD >=III
- Concomitant use of Dipyridamole (Persantin®)
- Long QT syndrome (congenital)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Maastricht UMC
Maastricht
Sebastiaan Bekkers, MD, PhD
About this study
Official title: Early Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Two-Center Study
Background and rationale: Evaluating patients with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), i.e. suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), is a daily challenge. Although contemporary hs-cTn assay-based algorithms have greatly facilitated clinical decision-making, still one-quarter of patients is categorized as 'observe' group and in whom a diagnosis initially remains unknown. Although routinely treated as acute (MI) with referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), up to one-third does not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been shown to be a very useful diagnostic tool in this setting but is not part of routine clinical care in every patient.
Objectives: To investigate in patients with suspected non-ST elevation MI meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA: 1) the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases by adding CMR early in the diagnostic pathway, and 2) the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year. These objectives allow an accurate estimate of the number of potentially avoidable ICA in the future and whether early CMR could be a safe gatekeeper for inappropriate ICA.
Read more
Study population and design: In this prospective, observational two-center study in The Netherlands (MUMC+ and VieCuri Medical Center), 87 consecutive patients with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the observe criteria and scheduled for ICA, will be investigated. Patients will undergo a comprehensive CMR examination prior to ICA and will be followed-up at one month and one year. After completion of follow-up, an independent clinical diagnosis committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis: at discharge and after one year. The final diagnosis at discharge will be adjudicated twice: once with and once without considering the results of CMR. For the diagnosis at one-year, all clinical variables and CMR results will be considered. MACE and complications will be scored after 30 days and one year.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases. The secondary (safety) endpoint is the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
CMR is an accepted and safe imaging modality in patients with (suspected) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Read the detailed description
- OBJECTIVES 1.1 Primary Objective To investigate the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria by using CMR early in the diagnostic pathway and at least prior to intended invasive coronary angiography. 1.2 Secondary Objective To investigate in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA:
- The number of MACE and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year.
- The diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD (i.e. stenosis ≥70%)
- STUDY DESIGN This prospective, two-center observational study will be performed in Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands. Patients visiting the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA are eligible. After written informed consent, patients will be included. They will be treated according to current guidelines and undergo a comprehensive CMR investigation as soon as possible after inclusion but at least prior to an intended ICA (taking into account the guideline requirement of performing ICA <72 hours after admission). Early CMR will not interfere with routine clinical care and was previously shown to be feasible.(16) The interventional cardiologists and treating physicians will be blinded for the CMR results since this is not part of current clinical practice. All CMR studies will be analyzed in MUMC+ (i.e. core lab) as soon as possible after ICA is performed. Only incidental extra-cardiac findings that may significantly change clinical management will be reported to the treating physician (i.e. malignancy, massive pulmonary embolism, acute aortic dissection, etc.). Also, when a clinical diagnosis remains unknown after ICA and only if clinicians explicitly request to perform additional CMR as a clinical routine, the results of the early CMR will be provided. Patients will be followed at least after 30 days and one-year and normal clinical variables, final diagnosis, total number of ICA and outcome (MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events) will be collected in each patient. After all patients have completed their one-year follow-up, an independent final diagnosis committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis. This committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis: 1) after the index discharge, and 2) after one year. The final diagnosis at discharge will be adjudicated twice by the committee: once with and once without considering the results of CMR. For the adjudicated final diagnosis at one-year, all clinical variables including the results of CMR will be considered.
3 STUDY POPULATION
3.1 Population Patients presenting to the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ERCG, elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are admitted and scheduled for an ICA, will be eligible to participate in this study.
In MUMC+, approximately 4000 patients visit the cardiac ED every year of whom half present with acute chest pain.(25) After excluding 15% of patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), 1700 patients with acute chest pain need further evaluation. Approximately one-quarter (n=425) meet the 'observe' criteria.(8) Although a rather conservative estimate, based on pilot data and previous study results (25), the investigators expect that at least 20% of patients (n=90) will be eligible or willing to participate in a similar research trial per center. Because the number of cardiac ED visits in VieCuri Medical Center is comparable to MUMC+, it is expected that all 87 patients can be included within one year after start of the study.
The study will be performed according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and the data will be analyzed and reported in accordance with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials) guidelines. Prior to inclusion, patients will be asked to give written informed consent.
3.2 Inclusion criteria
- Acute onset (>1 hour) chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) suspected of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
- Hospital admission and scheduling for ICA
- Hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria
- Age between 18 years - 85 years old
- Written informed consent 3.3 Exclusion criteria
- Refractory angina or on-going severe ischemia requiring immediate ICA
- Patients requiring ICA < 24 hours after admission (see previous bullet)
- Hemodynamic instability and/or cardiogenic shock (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg)
- Heart failure (Killip Class ≥ III) requiring intravenously medication (nitroglycerine, diuretics, etc.)
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads: ≥0.2mV in men or ≥0.15 mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads or new left bundle branch block)
- Symptoms highly suggestive of non-cardiac origin at presentation (as judged by the cardiac ED physician/cardiologist)
- Symptoms highly suggestive of AAD, PE, or acute peri-myocarditis
- Inability to organize ICA and CMR <72 hours after admission (especially for patients admitted on Friday evenings/nights (logistic restrictions).
- Life threatening arrhythmias prior to or during presentation (sustained ventricular tachycardia, repetitive non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, sinoatrial or atrio-ventricular block)
- Atrial fibrillation with persistent ventricular rate ≥100 beats per minute (bpm) after treatment
- Ongoing tachycardia (≥100/bpm)
- Angina pectoris secondary to anemia (<5.6 mmol/L), untreated hyperthyroidism, or severe hypertension (>200/110 mmHg)
- More than mild aortic and mitral valve calcification or stenosis by latest echocardiography
- Recent revascularization or ACUTE MI (<6 months)
- Known CAD not suitable for further interventions (PCI or CABG)
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding women
- Life expectancy <1 year (malignancy, etc.)
- Refusal of data storage until 15 years after end of study
- Participation in another investigational study that has not reached its primary endpoint
- Contraindications to CMR:
ODIN-protocol: "Uitvoering van MRI-onderzoek bij patiënten met een cardiaal implanteerbaar elektronisch device (CIED), waaronder een pacemaker en ICD"; ODIN-protocol: "Voorbereiding klinische patiënten voor MRI-onderzoek"
- Metallic implant (vascular clip, neuro-stimulator, cochlear implant)
- Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)
- Claustrophobia
- Body weight >130 kg or body habitus that does not fit into the gantry
- Renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≤30 mL/min/1,73m2) / chronic renal failure stage 4-5
- Known severe allergy to gadolinium contrast agents (patient with mild allergy is eligible for inclusion when pre-medication according to hospital guidelines can be administered)
- Contraindications to adenosine:
- High degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree)
- Severe bronchial asthma
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD >=III
- Concomitant use of Dipyridamole (Persantin)
- Long QT syndrome (congenital)
3.4 Patient inclusion process Eligible patients need to have acute chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) for at least one hour, a non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and need to be admitted and scheduled for ICA. The physician working on the cardiac ED will screen patients. When eligible, patients will be informed about the study and asked for oral permission to be approached by a member of the research team. Two hours after written information is given, the patient is asked to participate. After written informed consent, the patient is included in the study.
3.5 Sample size calculation This is an observational study primarily aiming to investigate the prevalence of non-coronary artery and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria (i.e. patients with suspected NSTEMI) and who are scheduled for ICA. Knowing this prevalence will help to determine the number of potentially avoidable ICA in the future.
Based on studies performed in comparable but not similar patients in the conventional troponin assay (non-hs-cTn) era, the investigators transpose a prevalence of at least 20% having non-obstructive CAD to the current population. This is a rather conservative estimation and the prevalence is expected to be even higher in the current high-sensitive troponin assay era. Similarly, the investigators transpose the results of additional CMR in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-obstructive CAD where CMR was helpful providing a diagnosis in 70%. Using follow-up CMR in this setting, myocarditis can be diagnosed in 34%, (stress) cardiomyopathy in 15%, PE or AAD in 1%, and other diseases in 2% of patients. Interestingly, MI or myocardial ischemia can still be diagnosed in 20% of patients in the absence of obstructive CAD. CMR is expected to be normal in 25% and non-diagnostic in 5%.
ICA will be considered appropriate when obstructive CAD is found at ICA and, for safety reasons, when CMR shows MI or myocardial ischemia despite non-obstructive CAD at follow-up ICA (in 20%) or when CMR is non-diagnostic (in 5%). The total proportion of appropriate ICA is thus expected to be 85% (i.e. patients with obstructive CAD at ICA [80% of total] + 25% of 20% of patient with non-obstructive CAD [5% of total]).
To accurately estimate this proportion of appropriate ICA the investigators aim to include a sample large enough so that the total width of the 95% confidence interval does not exceed 15%, and thus the maximum margin of error (i.e., the half-width of the confidence interval) does not exceed 7.5%. Assuming a proportion of 85%, the investigators need to include at least 87 patients.
4 TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS Patients will be treated according to current international guidelines and local practice. CMR will be performed as soon as possible prior to ICA (taking into account the requirement of ICA <72 hours after admission) and does not interfere with routine clinical care.
- Being tested
- CMR
- Keywords
- NSTEMI, NSTE-ACS, CMR, Troponin T, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Medical subject headings
- Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Acute Coronary Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CMRDiagnostic test
Early CMR with adenosine stress/rest perfusion before invasive coronary angiography.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NSTEMI | Not described Receives: Diagnostic Test: CMR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases
The prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria by using CMR early in the diagnostic pathway and at least prior to intended invasive coronary angiography
Measured: Throuhgout study completion, an expected average of one year
Secondary outcomes (3)
MACE
The number of MACE after 30 days and one year
Measured: 30 days and one year after inclusion
Composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events
The number of a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year.
Measured: 30 days and one year after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD.
The diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD (i.e. stenosis ≥70%) by means of specificity and sensitivity.
Measured: One year after inclusion
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Oct 2019
- Study start1 Oct 2018
- Primary completionMar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2024 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (31)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MIStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Maastricht University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- VieCuri Medical Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04140019
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL65125.068.18
- Acronym
- CMR-OBSERVE
- Status last verified
- Sep 2021
- First submitted
- 13 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 4 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Sep;(43):1-8.
PubMed 20854746Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, Jorgensen F, Petri A, Eiken P, Aggestrup S, Elsborg L, Mellemgaard K. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996 Jul;17(7):1028-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014998.
PubMed 8809520Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1187-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421607. No abstract available.
PubMed 10770985Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.
PubMed 10770981Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998 Jul;6(1):63-74. doi: 10.1023/A:1008876322599.
PubMed 10751787Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, Bickel C, Baldus S, Warnholtz A, Frohlich M, Sinning CR, Eleftheriadis MS, Wild PS, Schnabel RB, Lubos E, Jachmann N, Genth-Zotz S, Post F, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Lackner KJ, Munzel TF, Blankenberg S. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):868-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903515.
PubMed 19710485Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, Biedert S, Schaub N, Buerge C, Potocki M, Noveanu M, Breidthardt T, Twerenbold R, Winkler K, Bingisser R, Mueller C. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):858-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900428.
PubMed 19710484Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Gimenez MR, Bergsma N, Haaf P, Druey S, Puelacher C, Moehring B, Freese M, Stelzig C, Krivoshei L, Hillinger P, Jager C, Herrmann T, Kreutzinger P, Radosavac M, Weidmann ZM, Pershyna K, Honegger U, Wagener M, Vuillomenet T, Campodarve I, Bingisser R, Miro O, Rentsch K, Bassetti S, Osswald S, Mueller C. Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. CMAJ. 2015 May 19;187(8):E243-E252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141349. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
PubMed 25869867Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordonez-Llanos J, deFilippi C, McCord J, Body R, Panteghini M, Jernberg T, Plebani M, Verschuren F, French J, Christenson R, Weiser S, Bendig G, Dilba P, Lindahl B; TRAPID-AMI Investigators. Multicenter Evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):76-87.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
PubMed 26794254Rubini Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Jaeger C, Schindler C, Puelacher C, Wildi K, Reichlin T, Haaf P, Merk S, Honegger U, Wagener M, Druey S, Schumacher C, Krivoshei L, Hillinger P, Herrmann T, Campodarve I, Rentsch K, Bassetti S, Osswald S, Mueller C. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):861-870.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.046. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
PubMed 25840034Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax JJ, Borger MA, Brotons C, Chew DP, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey RF, Windecker S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 26320110Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 25260718Kim HW, Farzaneh-Far A, Kim RJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction: current and emerging applications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 29;55(1):1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.059.
PubMed 20117357Melki D, Lugnegard J, Alfredsson J, Lind S, Eggers KM, Lindahl B, Jernberg T. Implications of Introducing High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T Into Clinical Practice: Data From the SWEDEHEART Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Apr 28;65(16):1655-1664. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.02.044.
PubMed 25908071Plein S, Greenwood JP, Ridgway JP, Cranny G, Ball SG, Sivananthan MU. Assessment of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Dec 7;44(11):2173-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.056.
PubMed 15582315
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Early Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Observational Two-Center Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04140019
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMR-OBSERVE / NL65125.068.18
- Keywords
- NSTEMI, NSTE-ACS, CMR, Troponin T, Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 87 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- VieCuri Medical Centre
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background and rationale: Evaluating patients with acute chest pain, elevated high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) levels and non-diagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG), i.e. suspected non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (MI), is a daily challenge. Although contemporary hs-cTn assay-based algorithms have greatly facilitated clinical decision-making, still one-quarter of patients is categorized as 'observe' group and in whom a diagnosis initially remains unknown. Although routinely treated as acute (MI) with referral to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), up to one-third does not have obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has been shown to be a very useful diagnostic tool in this setting but is not part of routine clinical care in every patient.
Objectives: To investigate in patients with suspected non-ST elevation MI meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA: 1) the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases by adding CMR early in the diagnostic pathway, and 2) the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year. These objectives allow an accurate estimate of the number of potentially avoidable ICA in the future and whether early CMR could be a safe gatekeeper for inappropriate ICA.
Study population and design: In this prospective, observational two-center study in The Netherlands (MUMC+ and VieCuri Medical Center), 87 consecutive patients with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the observe criteria and scheduled for ICA, will be investigated. Patients will undergo a comprehensive CMR examination prior to ICA and will be followed-up at one month and one year. After completion of follow-up, an independent clinical diagnosis committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis: at discharge and after one year. The final diagnosis at discharge will be adjudicated twice: once with and once without considering the results of CMR. For the diagnosis at one-year, all clinical variables and CMR results will be considered. MACE and complications will be scored after 30 days and one year.
Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary endpoint is the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases. The secondary (safety) endpoint is the number of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
CMR is an accepted and safe imaging modality in patients with (suspected) non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Detailed description
- OBJECTIVES 1.1 Primary Objective To investigate the prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria by using CMR early in the diagnostic pathway and at least prior to intended invasive coronary angiography. 1.2 Secondary Objective To investigate in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA:
- The number of MACE and a composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events after 30 days and one year.
- The diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD (i.e. stenosis ≥70%)
- STUDY DESIGN This prospective, two-center observational study will be performed in Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+) and VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands. Patients visiting the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are scheduled for ICA are eligible. After written informed consent, patients will be included. They will be treated according to current guidelines and undergo a comprehensive CMR investigation as soon as possible after inclusion but at least prior to an intended ICA (taking into account the guideline requirement of performing ICA <72 hours after admission). Early CMR will not interfere with routine clinical care and was previously shown to be feasible.(16) The interventional cardiologists and treating physicians will be blinded for the CMR results since this is not part of current clinical practice. All CMR studies will be analyzed in MUMC+ (i.e. core lab) as soon as possible after ICA is performed. Only incidental extra-cardiac findings that may significantly change clinical management will be reported to the treating physician (i.e. malignancy, massive pulmonary embolism, acute aortic dissection, etc.). Also, when a clinical diagnosis remains unknown after ICA and only if clinicians explicitly request to perform additional CMR as a clinical routine, the results of the early CMR will be provided. Patients will be followed at least after 30 days and one-year and normal clinical variables, final diagnosis, total number of ICA and outcome (MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events) will be collected in each patient. After all patients have completed their one-year follow-up, an independent final diagnosis committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis. This committee will adjudicate a final diagnosis: 1) after the index discharge, and 2) after one year. The final diagnosis at discharge will be adjudicated twice by the committee: once with and once without considering the results of CMR. For the adjudicated final diagnosis at one-year, all clinical variables including the results of CMR will be considered.
3 STUDY POPULATION
3.1 Population Patients presenting to the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ERCG, elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and who are admitted and scheduled for an ICA, will be eligible to participate in this study.
In MUMC+, approximately 4000 patients visit the cardiac ED every year of whom half present with acute chest pain.(25) After excluding 15% of patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), 1700 patients with acute chest pain need further evaluation. Approximately one-quarter (n=425) meet the 'observe' criteria.(8) Although a rather conservative estimate, based on pilot data and previous study results (25), the investigators expect that at least 20% of patients (n=90) will be eligible or willing to participate in a similar research trial per center. Because the number of cardiac ED visits in VieCuri Medical Center is comparable to MUMC+, it is expected that all 87 patients can be included within one year after start of the study.
The study will be performed according to Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines and the data will be analyzed and reported in accordance with the CONSORT (Consolidated Standard of Reporting Trials) guidelines. Prior to inclusion, patients will be asked to give written informed consent.
3.2 Inclusion criteria
- Acute onset (>1 hour) chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) suspected of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
- Hospital admission and scheduling for ICA
- Hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria
- Age between 18 years - 85 years old
- Written informed consent 3.3 Exclusion criteria
- Refractory angina or on-going severe ischemia requiring immediate ICA
- Patients requiring ICA < 24 hours after admission (see previous bullet)
- Hemodynamic instability and/or cardiogenic shock (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg)
- Heart failure (Killip Class ≥ III) requiring intravenously medication (nitroglycerine, diuretics, etc.)
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads: ≥0.2mV in men or ≥0.15 mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads or new left bundle branch block)
- Symptoms highly suggestive of non-cardiac origin at presentation (as judged by the cardiac ED physician/cardiologist)
- Symptoms highly suggestive of AAD, PE, or acute peri-myocarditis
- Inability to organize ICA and CMR <72 hours after admission (especially for patients admitted on Friday evenings/nights (logistic restrictions).
- Life threatening arrhythmias prior to or during presentation (sustained ventricular tachycardia, repetitive non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, sinoatrial or atrio-ventricular block)
- Atrial fibrillation with persistent ventricular rate ≥100 beats per minute (bpm) after treatment
- Ongoing tachycardia (≥100/bpm)
- Angina pectoris secondary to anemia (<5.6 mmol/L), untreated hyperthyroidism, or severe hypertension (>200/110 mmHg)
- More than mild aortic and mitral valve calcification or stenosis by latest echocardiography
- Recent revascularization or ACUTE MI (<6 months)
- Known CAD not suitable for further interventions (PCI or CABG)
- Pregnancy
- Breast feeding women
- Life expectancy <1 year (malignancy, etc.)
- Refusal of data storage until 15 years after end of study
- Participation in another investigational study that has not reached its primary endpoint
- Contraindications to CMR:
ODIN-protocol: "Uitvoering van MRI-onderzoek bij patiënten met een cardiaal implanteerbaar elektronisch device (CIED), waaronder een pacemaker en ICD"; ODIN-protocol: "Voorbereiding klinische patiënten voor MRI-onderzoek"
- Metallic implant (vascular clip, neuro-stimulator, cochlear implant)
- Pacemaker or implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD)
- Claustrophobia
- Body weight >130 kg or body habitus that does not fit into the gantry
- Renal failure (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) ≤30 mL/min/1,73m2) / chronic renal failure stage 4-5
- Known severe allergy to gadolinium contrast agents (patient with mild allergy is eligible for inclusion when pre-medication according to hospital guidelines can be administered)
- Contraindications to adenosine:
- High degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree)
- Severe bronchial asthma
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease GOLD >=III
- Concomitant use of Dipyridamole (Persantin)
- Long QT syndrome (congenital)
3.4 Patient inclusion process Eligible patients need to have acute chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) for at least one hour, a non-diagnostic ECG and hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria and need to be admitted and scheduled for ICA. The physician working on the cardiac ED will screen patients. When eligible, patients will be informed about the study and asked for oral permission to be approached by a member of the research team. Two hours after written information is given, the patient is asked to participate. After written informed consent, the patient is included in the study.
3.5 Sample size calculation This is an observational study primarily aiming to investigate the prevalence of non-coronary artery and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria (i.e. patients with suspected NSTEMI) and who are scheduled for ICA. Knowing this prevalence will help to determine the number of potentially avoidable ICA in the future.
Based on studies performed in comparable but not similar patients in the conventional troponin assay (non-hs-cTn) era, the investigators transpose a prevalence of at least 20% having non-obstructive CAD to the current population. This is a rather conservative estimation and the prevalence is expected to be even higher in the current high-sensitive troponin assay era. Similarly, the investigators transpose the results of additional CMR in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and non-obstructive CAD where CMR was helpful providing a diagnosis in 70%. Using follow-up CMR in this setting, myocarditis can be diagnosed in 34%, (stress) cardiomyopathy in 15%, PE or AAD in 1%, and other diseases in 2% of patients. Interestingly, MI or myocardial ischemia can still be diagnosed in 20% of patients in the absence of obstructive CAD. CMR is expected to be normal in 25% and non-diagnostic in 5%.
ICA will be considered appropriate when obstructive CAD is found at ICA and, for safety reasons, when CMR shows MI or myocardial ischemia despite non-obstructive CAD at follow-up ICA (in 20%) or when CMR is non-diagnostic (in 5%). The total proportion of appropriate ICA is thus expected to be 85% (i.e. patients with obstructive CAD at ICA [80% of total] + 25% of 20% of patient with non-obstructive CAD [5% of total]).
To accurately estimate this proportion of appropriate ICA the investigators aim to include a sample large enough so that the total width of the 95% confidence interval does not exceed 15%, and thus the maximum margin of error (i.e., the half-width of the confidence interval) does not exceed 7.5%. Assuming a proportion of 85%, the investigators need to include at least 87 patients.
4 TREATMENT OF SUBJECTS Patients will be treated according to current international guidelines and local practice. CMR will be performed as soon as possible prior to ICA (taking into account the requirement of ICA <72 hours after admission) and does not interfere with routine clinical care.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NSTEMI | – | Diagnostic Test: CMR |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients presenting to the cardiac ED with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ERCG, elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria, and who are admitted and scheduled for an ICA, will be eligible to participate in this study.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Acute onset (>1 hour) chest pain (or angina pectoris equivalent) suspected of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)
- Hospital admission and scheduling for ICA
- Hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria (figure 2, p17)
- Age between 18 years - 85 years old
- Written informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (34 listed)
- Refractory angina or on-going severe ischemia requiring immediate ICA
- Patients requiring ICA < 24 hours after admission (see previous bullet)
- Hemodynamic instability and/or cardiogenic shock (mean arterial pressure <60 mmHg)
- Heart failure (Killip Class ≥ III) requiring intravenously medication (nitroglycerine, diuretics, etc.)
- ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (ST-elevation in 2 contiguous leads: ≥0.2mV in men or ≥0.15 mV in women in leads V2-V3 and/or ≥0.1 mV in other leads or new left bundle branch block)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CMREarly CMR with adenosine stress/rest perfusion before invasive coronary angiography. | Diagnostic test | NSTEMI |
Primary outcome
Prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases
Time frame: Throuhgout study completion, an expected average of one year
The prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases in patients presenting with acute chest pain, a non-diagnostic ECG and elevated hs-cTn levels meeting the 'observe' criteria by using CMR early in the diagnostic pathway and at least prior to intended invasive coronary angiography
3 secondary outcomes
MACE
Time frame: 30 days and one year after inclusion
Composite of MACE and major (non-cardiac) adverse events
Time frame: 30 days and one year after inclusion
Diagnostic accuracy of CMR for the diagnosis of obstructive CAD.
Time frame: One year after inclusion
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Oct 2021.
- Background: PubMed 20854746Bhuiya FA, Pitts SR, McCaig LF. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008. NCHS Data Brief. 2010 Sep;(43):1-8.
- Background: PubMed 8809520Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, Jorgensen F, Petri A, Eiken P, Aggestrup S, Elsborg L, Mellemgaard K. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996 Jul;17(7):1028-34. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a014998.
- Background: PubMed 10770985Lee TH, Goldman L. Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1187-95. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421607. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10770981Pope JH, Aufderheide TP, Ruthazer R, Woolard RH, Feldman JA, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 20;342(16):1163-70. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200004203421603.
- Background: PubMed 10751787Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Beshansky JR, Griffith JL, Selker HP. Clinical Features of Emergency Department Patients Presenting with Symptoms Suggestive of Acute Cardiac Ischemia: A Multicenter Study. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1998 Jul;6(1):63-74. doi: 10.1023/A:1008876322599.
- Background: PubMed 19710485Keller T, Zeller T, Peetz D, Tzikas S, Roth A, Czyz E, Bickel C, Baldus S, Warnholtz A, Frohlich M, Sinning CR, Eleftheriadis MS, Wild PS, Schnabel RB, Lubos E, Jachmann N, Genth-Zotz S, Post F, Nicaud V, Tiret L, Lackner KJ, Munzel TF, Blankenberg S. Sensitive troponin I assay in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):868-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0903515.
- Background: PubMed 19710484Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, Biedert S, Schaub N, Buerge C, Potocki M, Noveanu M, Breidthardt T, Twerenbold R, Winkler K, Bingisser R, Mueller C. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 27;361(9):858-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0900428.
- Background: PubMed 25869867Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Gimenez MR, Bergsma N, Haaf P, Druey S, Puelacher C, Moehring B, Freese M, Stelzig C, Krivoshei L, Hillinger P, Jager C, Herrmann T, Kreutzinger P, Radosavac M, Weidmann ZM, Pershyna K, Honegger U, Wagener M, Vuillomenet T, Campodarve I, Bingisser R, Miro O, Rentsch K, Bassetti S, Osswald S, Mueller C. Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. CMAJ. 2015 May 19;187(8):E243-E252. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.141349. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
- Background: PubMed 26794254Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordonez-Llanos J, deFilippi C, McCord J, Body R, Panteghini M, Jernberg T, Plebani M, Verschuren F, French J, Christenson R, Weiser S, Bendig G, Dilba P, Lindahl B; TRAPID-AMI Investigators. Multicenter Evaluation of a 0-Hour/1-Hour Algorithm in the Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T. Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;68(1):76-87.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
- Background: PubMed 25840034Rubini Gimenez M, Twerenbold R, Jaeger C, Schindler C, Puelacher C, Wildi K, Reichlin T, Haaf P, Merk S, Honegger U, Wagener M, Druey S, Schumacher C, Krivoshei L, Hillinger P, Herrmann T, Campodarve I, Rentsch K, Bassetti S, Osswald S, Mueller C. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med. 2015 Aug;128(8):861-870.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.046. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
- Background: PubMed 26320110Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax JJ, Borger MA, Brotons C, Chew DP, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey RF, Windecker S; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25260718Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ. 2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI
RecruitingObservational study
Breisgau PHENO-HEART MI
Myocardial Infarction, STEMI
Active, not recruiting
Physiology-guided vs Angiography-guided Non-culprit Lesion Complete Revascularization for Acute MI & Multivessel Disease
Acute Myocardial Infarction, Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruitingObservational study
AI-ECG Detection of Occlusion Myocardial Infarction at Emergency Department Triage (TRIACS)
Acute Coronary Syndromes, Chest Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Analysis of Life-threatening ARrhythMias After Acute Coronary Syndrome
Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS), Ventricular Tachycardia (VT)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Germany on Target Registry
Myocardial Infarction (MI), Dyslipidemias
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI and ACS - Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 34 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sebastiaan Bekkers, MD PhD (0031-43-3877097, s.bekkers@mumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Prevalence of coronary artery disease as well as non-coronary artery disease related and extra-cardiac diseases (time frame: Throuhgout study completion, an expected average of one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04140019, which also lists 31 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Oct 2021.