AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal AtresiaRestriMISNCT04136795

Evaluation of the Respiratory Impact After Conventional or Minimally Invasive Esophageal Atresia Surgery

An observational study of Esophageal Atresia and Oesophageal Atresia, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Right thoracotomy, conventional approach to esophageal atresia repair, leads to up to 60% radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies. The impact of these anomalies on the patient's respiratory function remains unknown. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery considerably reduces this rate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
How many people
500 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2020to Dec 2020
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All the patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO) having had an operation for type III esophageal atresia, as defined by the Ladd classification between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2013 and being followed up with thoracic X-rays and PFTs.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO)
  • Operation for type III esophageal atresia (Ladd classification)
  • Between 01/01/2008 and 31/12/2013.

Who cannot join

  • Long gap esophageal atresia
  • Patients lost to follow up
  • Deceased
  • No PFTs or X-rays between 6 and 9 years of follow up
  • Patients having had thoracic surgery before the esophageal atresia repair

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CRACMO - centre de référence des atrésies de l'oesophage

    Lille, 59000

    Rony Sfeir, MD, +33 3 20 44 59 62, Rony.SFEIR@CHRU-LILLE.FR

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Respiratory Impact of Post-operative Chest Wall Anomalies After Conventional or Minimally Invasive Esophageal Atresia Surgery

Right thoracotomy, conventional approach to esophageal atresia repair, leads to up to 60% radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies. The impact of these anomalies on the patient's respiratory function remains unknown. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery considerably reduces this rate.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).

The primary endpoint will be he occurrence of restrictive lung disease , objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines (PNDS = protocole national de diagnostic et de soins).

Read the detailed description

Right thoracotomy, conventional approach to esophageal atresia repair, leads to up to 60% radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies. The impact of these anomalies on the patient's respiratory function remains unknown. Minimally invasive thoracic surgery considerably reduces this rate.

The primary objective of this study is to assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).

The primary endpoint will be the occurrence of restrictive lung disease, as assessed by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines (PNDS = protocole national de diagnostic et de soins).

The secondary endpoints will be to measure the severity of the restrictive disease, to look for other respiratory alterations, to correlate radiological chest wall sequelae anomalies with the impact on respiratory function and to look for a causal relationship between the surgical technique used and the respiratory impact.

The methodology used will be a retrospective non interventional study on the cohort of patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille University Hospital) between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013.

All the patients included in the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO) having had an operation for type III esophageal atresia (long gap esophageal atresia excluded), as defined by the Ladd Classification, will be included in this study.

The exclusion criterion will be patients lost to follow up or deceased, patients having had no pulmonary function tests (PFTs) or no thoracic X-Ray during the first 6 to 9 years of follow up and patients having had thoracic surgery before the esophageal atresia repair.

The number of patients expected in the national esophageal atresia registry over the 6 years excedes 500. The number of thoracoscopy repairs should be about 50.

This study should allow us to determine if minimally invasive surgery is beneficial on mid-term respiratory function in children, related to possible post-operative chest wall sequelae.

The results obtained from this study should lead to recommendations concerning the surgical approach to esophageal atresia repair to improve the prognosis of chest wall anomalies and respiratory function in these patients. It should also help to identify patient subgroups which would benefit from a reinforced respiratory follow up. This could then lead to a hospital clinical research program (PHRC)

Keywords
esophageal atresia, thoracoscopy, rib fusion, scoliosis, Respiratory function
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Atresia, Scoliosis, Respiratory Aspiration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT04136795
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional surgeryPatients having had esophageal atresia (type III, long gap excluded) repair by conventional surgery (right thoracotomy) or patients having had minimally invasive surgery converted to thoracotomy between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013 and registered on the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille university hospital)
Minimally invasive surgeryPatients having had esophageal atresia (type III, long gap excluded) repair through minimally invasive surgery between the 1st of january 2008 and the 31st of December 2013 and registered on the national esophageal atresia registry (CRACMO, Lille university hospital)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive).

    Objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines. Restrictive lung disease defined by: FEV1/FVC ratio > -1.64 Z-score and CVF < -1.64 Z-score according to ATS/ERS-GLI (American Thoracic Society \& European Respiratory Society - Global Lungs Initiative) recommendations.

    Measured: 6 to 9 years of age.

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Severity of restrictive lung disease

    Depending on Z-score value

    Measured: 6 to 9 years of age

  2. Assesse the occurrence of obstructive or mixed lung disease

    Objectified by pulmonary function tests (PFTs), carried out according to the current national guidelines. Mixed lung disease defined by: FEV1/FVC ratio < -1.64 Z-score and CVF < -1.64 Z-score and obstructive lung disease

    Measured: 6 to 9 years

  3. Mortality rate

    Percentage of mortality in each group, cause of death linked directly to surgery or not

    Measured: Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation

  4. Percentage of post-operative complications depending on the type of surgery

    Bleeding, infection, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic leak

    Measured: Time of surgery to 6 to 9 years consultation

  5. Chest wall anomalies detected on thoracic X-rays

    Hemivertebra, rib fusion, intercostal abnormalities, scoliosis

    Measured: 6 to 9 years of age

  6. Correlation between post-operative chest wall anomalies and restrictive lung disease

    In each group, comparison of the percentage of chest wall anomalies detected on the X-rays and the percentage of restrictive lung disease cases

    Measured: 6 to 9 years of age

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Oct 2019
  2. Study start1 Jan 2020 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionAug 2020 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2020 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
500 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04136795
Sponsor's protocol ID
49RC19_0185
Acronym
RestriMIS
Status last verified
Dec 2019
First submitted
21 Oct 2019
Last updated
20 Dec 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Bastard F, Bonnard A, Rousseau V, Gelas T, Michaud L, Irtan S, Piolat C, Ranke-Chretien A, Becmeur F, Dariel A, Lamireau T, Petit T, Fouquet V, Le Mandat A, Lefebvre F, Allal H, Borgnon J, Boubnova J, Habonimana E, Panait N, Buisson P, Margaryan M, Michel JL, Gaudin J, Lardy H, Auber F, Borderon C, De Vries P, Jaby O, Fourcade L, Lecompte JF, Tolg C, Delorme B, Schmitt F, Podevin G. Thoracic skeletal anomalies following surgical treatment of esophageal atresia. Lessons from a national cohort. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):605-609. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.07.013. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

    PubMed 28778692
  • Chansou MA, Sfeir R, Bonnard A, Rousseau V, Gelas T, Guinot A, Habonimana E, Micheau P, Ranke A, Talon I, Irtan S, Lamireau T, Rabattu PY, Elbaz F, Kalfa N, Panait N, Fouquet V, Lardy H, Scalabre A, Buisson P, Margaryan M, Auber F, Grosos C, Borderon C, Tolg C, Goulin J, Podevin G, Gottrand F, Schmitt F. Retrospective case-control study of nutritional and respiratory status in children with type III esophageal atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2026 Jan;82(1):184-193. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.70238. Epub 2025 Oct 17.

    PubMed 41104659

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Esophageal Atresia and Oesophageal Atresia, run by University Hospital, Angers at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact François Bastard, MD (+33 2 41 35 42 90, francois.bastard@chu-angers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To assess the occurrence of restrictive lung disease in patients with type III esophageal atresia depending on the type of surgical approach (Conventional or minimally invasive). (time frame: 6 to 9 years of age.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04136795, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in