Heart DiseasesROMA:WomenNCT04124120
Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women
A study testing Single arterial graft and Multiple arterial grafting in people with Heart Diseases and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 146 sites in 26 countries.
Trial summary
The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
- What is being tested?
- Single arterial graft and Multiple arterial grafting
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 2,300 participants
- Where
- 146 sitesin 26 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Apr 2023to Mar 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women patients ≥18 years old.
- Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Primary (first time) cardiac surgery procedure.
- Significant disease of the left main coronary artery or of the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary system with or without disease of the right coronary artery.
Who cannot join
- Male gender
- Single graft
- Emergency operation
- Myocardial infarction within 72 hours of surgery
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%
- Any concomitant cardiac or non-cardiac procedure
Show all 11Show fewer
- Previous cardiac surgery
- Preoperative severe end-organ dysfunction (dialysis, liver failure, respiratory failure), cancer or any co-morbidity that reduces life expectancy to less than 5 years.
- Inability to use the saphenous vein or to use both radial and right internal thoracic arteries
- Anticipated need for coronary thrombo-endarterectomy
- Planned hybrid revascularization
Trial locations and contacts
146 sites in 26 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
146 sites in 26 countries
United States42 sites, 41 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104
Robert Hawkins, MD
- Recruiting
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
John Puskas, MD
- Recruiting
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Jessica Rove, MD
- Recruiting
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21218
Jennifer Lawton, MD
- Recruiting
NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital
Brooklyn, New York, 11215
Sandhya Balaram, MD
- Recruiting
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Hasam Balkhy, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Faisal Bakaeen, MD
- Recruiting
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Jovan Bozinovski, MD
- Recruiting
Baylor Scott & White Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75204
Michael DiMaio, MD
- Recruiting
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Brittany Zwischenberger, MD
- Recruiting
Englewood Health
Englewood, New Jersey, 07631
Molly Schultheis, MD
- Recruiting
The University of Texas Medical Health Branch at Galveston
Galveston, Texas, 77550
Andre Son, MD
- Recruiting
East Carolina University
Greenville, North Carolina, 27858
Benjamin Degner, MD
- Recruiting
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106
David Yaffee, MD
- Recruiting
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
Lauren Barron, MD
- Recruiting
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Lola Chabtini, MD
- Recruiting
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Mohammad Bashir, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Nebraska Heart Hospital
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526
Omar Nass
- Recruiting
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Joanna Chikwe, MD
- Recruiting
Yale University Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
Roland Assi, MD
- Recruiting
Weill Cornell Medicine
New York, New York, 10021
Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD, 212-746-1812, mfg9004@med.cornell.edu
- Recruiting
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Koji Takeda, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, 10075
Nirav Patel, MD
- Recruiting
Newark Beth Israel Medical Center
Newark, New Jersey, 07112
Arash Salemi, MD
- Recruiting
Methodist Physicians Health
Omaha, Nebraska, 68118
HelenMari Merritt-Genore, DO
- Recruiting
University of Nebraska Medical Center
Omaha, Nebraska, 68198
Aleem Siddique, MD
- Recruiting
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Marisa Cevasco, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Allegheny General Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
Scott Halbreiner, MD
- Recruiting
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
Pomona, California, 91767
Christine Montesa, MD
- Recruiting
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Neel Sodha, MD
- Recruiting
New York Presbyterian Queens
Queens, New York, 11355
Charles Mack, MD
- Recruiting
The Valley Hospital
Ridgewood, New Jersey, 07450
Juan B Grau, MD
- Recruiting
Corewell Health William Beaumont University Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, 48073
Thomas Schwann, MD
- Recruiting
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Matthew Goodwin, MD
- Recruiting
UT Health San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Dawn Hui, MD
- Recruiting
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94118
Elaine Tseng, MD
- Recruiting
Baystate Health
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01199
Daniel Engelman, MD
- Recruiting
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Puja Kachroo, MD
- Recruiting
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27106
Bart Imielski, MD
- Completed
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01655
- Recruiting
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, 19096
Gianluca Torregrossa, MD
- Recruiting
Genesis Healthcare System
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701
Surender Neravetla, MD
United Kingdom18 sites, 18 recruiting
- Recruiting
Blackpool Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Blackpool, Lancashire, FY3 8NR
Grzegorz Laskawski, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Papworth NHS Foundation Trust
Cambridge, CB2 0A
Ravi De Silva, MD
- Recruiting
NHS Golden Jubilee
Clydebank, G81 4DY
Nawwar Al-Attar, MD
- Recruiting
The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
Edinburgh, EH16 4SA
Vipin Zamvar, MD
- Recruiting
Hull University Hospitals
Hull
Mahmoud Loubani, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospitals of Leicester
Leicester
Mustafa Zakkar, MD
- Recruiting
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Foundation Trust
Liverpool, L14 3PE
Bil Kirmani, MD
- Recruiting
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, SE1 7EH
Cesare Quarto, MD
- Recruiting
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
London, W2 1NY
Prakash Punjabi, MD
- Recruiting
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust - St Thomas' Hospital
London
Gianluca Lucchese, MD
- Recruiting
St George's University Hospitals
London
Marjan Jahangiri, MD
- Recruiting
Manchester University NHS Trust
Manchester, M13 9WL
Nnamdi Nwaejike, MD
- Recruiting
South Tees Hospitals NHS Trust
Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW
Ralph White, MD
- Recruiting
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Multiple Locations, Oxford
Antonios Kourliouros, MD
- Recruiting
Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Sheffield, S10 2SB
Govind Chetty, MBBS
- Recruiting
University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust
Stoke-on-Trent, Staffordshire, ST4 6QG
Longnathen Balacumaraswami, MD
- Recruiting
Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust
Westcliff-on-Sea
Arvind Singh
- Recruiting
Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Giuseppe Rescigno, MD
Canada16 sites, 16 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
Edmonton, Alberta
Steven Meyer, MD
- Recruiting
Health Sciences North
Greater Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5J1
Bindu Bittira, MD
- Recruiting
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, L8L 2X2
Andre Lamy, MD
- Recruiting
London Health Sciences
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
David Nagpal, MD
- Recruiting
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 1C8
Philippe Demers, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Montreal
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 3E4
Jessica Forcillo, MD
- Recruiting
Royal Victoria Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 3J1
Kevin Lachapelle, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Sacre-Coeur
Montreal
Hugues Jeanmart, MD
- Recruiting
Fraser Clinical Trials
New Westminster
Hossein Shayan, MD
- Recruiting
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
Ottawa, Ontario, K1Y 4W7
Marc Ruel, MD
- Recruiting
Horizon Health Network - Saint John Regional Hospital
Saint John, New Brunswick, E2L 4L2
Craig Brown, MD
- Recruiting
Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services
St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, A1B 3R4
Janet Ngu, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec
Ste Foy, Quebec, G1V 4G5
Mohamed Marzouk, MD
- Recruiting
Sunnybrook Health Sciences
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Stephen E Fremes, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
Vivek Rao, MD
- Recruiting
St. Boniface General Hospital
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2H 2A6
Nitin Ghorpade, MD
Germany16 sites, 15 recruiting
- Recruiting
Universitäts-Herzzentrum Bad Krozingen Freiburg
Bad Krozingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79189
Martin Czerny, MD
- Recruiting
HDZ NRW Bad Oeynhausen Germany
Bad Oeynhausen, 32545
Marcus-Andre Deutsch, MD
- Recruiting
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charite
Berlin
Stephan Jacobs, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Duisburg Heart Center
Duisburg, 47137
Jochen Börgermann, MD
- Recruiting
Dusseldorf University
Düsseldorf, 40225
Alexander Assmann, MD
- Completed
University Hospital Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
- Recruiting
Essen University
Essen, 45147
Matthias K Thielmann, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Frankfurt University
Frankfurt, 60323
Thomas Holubec, MD
- Recruiting
University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg
Giessen, 35385
Andreas Boening, MD
- Recruiting
University Medical Center of Göttingen
Göttingen, 37075
Bernd Danner, MD
- Recruiting
Heidelberg University
Heidelberg
Rawa Arif, MD
- Recruiting
Jena University Hospital
Jena, 07743
Torsten Doenst, MD
- Recruiting
Heart Center Herzzentrum, Leipzig
Leipzig, 04289
Michael Borger, MD
- Recruiting
TUM University Hospital German Heart Center
Munich
Keti Vitanova, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Robert-Bosch-Hospital Stuttgart Germany
Stuttgart, 70376
Marc Albert, MD
- Recruiting
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier
Trier, 54292
Terrence J Donovan, MD
Italy8 sites, 8 recruiting
- Recruiting
Anthea Hospital
Bari, 70124
Giuseppe Speziale, MD
- Recruiting
Humanitas Gavazzeni of Bergamo
Bergamo, 24125
Alfonso Agnino, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Fondazione Poliambulanza
Brescia, 25124
Gianni Troise, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Maria Cecilia Hospital GVM
Cotignola, 48033
Alberto Albertini, MD
- Recruiting
Careggi University Hospital
Florence, 50134
Massimo Bonacchi, MD
- Recruiting
European Hospital
Roma, 00149
Ruggero De Paulis, MD
- Recruiting
Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore
Roma, 00168
Massimo Massetti, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Ospedale Le Molinette, Torino
Torino, 10126
Mauro Rinaldi, MD
Austria5 sites, 5 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medical University of Graz
Graz, 8010
Igor Knez, MD
- Recruiting
Innsbruck Medical University
Innsbruck, 6020
Elfriede Ruttmann-Ulmer, MD
- Recruiting
Kepler University Hospital
Linz
Andreas F Zierer, MD
- Recruiting
Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, 1090
Sigrid Sandner, MD
- Recruiting
Krankenhaus Nord Vienna North Hospital
Vienna, 1210
Berhard Winkler, MD
China4 sites
- Completed
Fuwai Hospital China
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037
- Completed
Jilin Heart Hospital China
Changchun, Jilin, 130052
- Completed
Ruijin Hospital Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200025
- Completed
Teda Hospital Tianjin China
Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, 300456
Spain4 sites, 4 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
Barcelona, 08036
Jorge Alcocer, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Universitario del Vinalopo
Elche, Alicante, 03293
Jose Albors Martin, MD
- Recruiting
Hospital Clinico de San Carlos
Madrid
Paula Campelos, MD
- Recruiting
NavarraBiomed
Pamplona
Javier De Diego Candela, MD
Brazil3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Institute of Cardiology Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, 9062000
Renato Kalil, MD
- Recruiting
Heart Institute University of São Paulo
São Paulo, 05508
Fabio B Jatene, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia
Vila Mariana, 04012-909
Renato T Arnoni, MD
Netherlands3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333
Arend de Weger, MD
- Recruiting
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, 6229
Roberto Lorusso, MD
- Recruiting
Erasmus Medical Center
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3015
Sabrine Siregar, MD
Poland3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medical University Gdansk
Gdansk, 80-210
Andrezj Łoś, MD
- Recruiting
Medical University of Silesia
Katowice, 40-055
Radosław Gocol, MD
- Recruiting
Zbigniew Religa Lower Silesian Heart Disease Centre
Zabrze, 41-800
Romuald Cichon, MD
Portugal3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Coimbra
Coimbra, 3004-561
Manuel Antunes, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental
Lisbon, 1300-598
Miguel Sousa Uva, MD
- Recruiting
Centro Hospitalar e Universitário Sao Joao
Porto, 4200-072
Adelino Leite-Moreira, MD
Australia2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Victorian Heart Hospital
Clayton, 3168
Jayme Bennetts, MD
- Recruiting
The University of Melbourne
Melbourne
Alistair Royse, MD
Czechia2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hradec Králové
Hradec Králové, 500 03
Jan Vojacek, MD
- Not yet recruiting
General University Hospital, Prague
New Town, 128 08
Tomas Prskavec, MD
Denmark2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Aalborg University Hospital
Aalborg, 9000
Gennady V Atroshchenko, MD
- Recruiting
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100
Christian Carranza, MD
India2 sites
- Completed
G Kuppuswamy Naidu Memorial Hospital (GKNM)
Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, 641037
- Completed
Star Hospitals - Hyderabad, India
Hyderabad, Telangana, 500034
Japan2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Tokyo Medical and Dental University
Bunkyō-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510
Hirokuni Arai, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Saitama Medical University Japan
Saitama, 350-0451
Hiroyuki Nakajima, MD
South Korea2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine
Seoul, 03722
Kyung-Jong Yoo, MD
- Recruiting
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
Ho Younh Hwang, MD
Sweden2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg
Anders Jeppsson, MD
- Recruiting
Karonlinska University Hospital
Stockholm, 171 76
Janice Kallonen, MD
Croatia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University Hospital Dubrava
Zagreb, 10000
Igor Rudez, MD
North Macedonia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Acibadem-Sistina Hospital
Skopje
Aleksandar Nikolikj, MD
Russia1 site
- Completed
National Research Medical Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences - Tomsk, Russia
Tomsk
Serbia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute
Belgrade, 11000
Milan Milojevic, MD
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
National University of Singapore
Singapore, 119077
Theodoros Kofidis, MD
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Zhongzheng, Taipei, 100229
Yih-Sharng Chen, MD
About this study
Official title: Randomized Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women (ROMA:Women) Trial
The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG).
The specific aims of ROMA:Women are:
Read more
Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time.
Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.
Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated.
Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG.
Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG.
Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.
Read the detailed description
ROMA:Women will leverage the infrastructure and the existing women population of the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women has two key Aims. In Aim 1, the investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. In Aim 2, the investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated.
ROMA:Women is a two-arm, international, multi-center, randomized clinical trial nested in the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women will include all the women enrolled in the parent ROMA trial and will leverage the existing ROMA infrastructure including clinical trial unit, database, case report forms (CRF), randomization system, site training resources, informed consent forms (ICF), regulatory approvals, Central Events Review Committee (CEC) processes/personnel, network of participating sites, site PIs, and study coordinators. The planned randomization procedure, interventions and treatment arms, outcome assessments and follow-up protocol of ROMA:Women are identical to those of the currently ongoing parent ROMA trial. The sites participating in ROMA will continue enrollment of women after the completion of the ROMA trial and additional sites will also be opened to reach the target sample size of ROMA:Women.
- Being tested
- Single arterial graft, Multiple arterial grafting
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Single arterial graftProcedure or surgery
This interventions consists of patients receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. In addition to the left internal thoracic artery patients will receive venous grafts for all additional grafting.
Multiple arterial graftingProcedure or surgery
This intervention consists of the patient receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. The second arterial graft (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery) will be directed to the major branch of the circumflex. Additional grafts will include saphenous veins or arterial conduits.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group | Experimental | Patients in this group will receive a single arterial graft which will be the left internal thoracic artery. Additional grafts used in this group will all be venous grafts. Receives: Procedure: Single arterial graft |
| Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group | Experimental | Patients in the group will receive multiple arterial grafts. All patients will receive at least two arterial grafts, the left internal thoracic artery with the addition of either the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery as the second conduit. Some patients may receive additional arterial grafts consisting of the radial artery, the right internal thoracic artery, or the right gastroepiploic artery. Receives: Procedure: Multiple arterial grafting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary outcome for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
The primary outcome for aim 1 will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (>48 hours after surgery), repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Primary outcome for aim 2: Disease-specific quality of life
Assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated 19-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to coronary disease: angina frequency, physical limitations, quality of life, angina stability, and treatment satisfaction. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health status. The minimum clinically important difference on the SAQ is 5 points.
The primary endpoint for aim 2 is the absolute change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at 12 months compared to baseline.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Secondary outcomes (11)
Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.
One of the secondary outcomes for aim 1: It will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (>48 hours after surgery), and repeat revascularization.
This is the primary outcome of the parent ROMA trial.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Death from cardiac cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: It will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from cardiac cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (>48 hours after surgery), repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Death from any cause
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Death will be considered to be cardiac unless a definite non-cardiac cause is identified.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Stroke
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Based on the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Expert Consensus stroke definition, stroke will be identified in case of:
- pathological, imaging, or other objective evidence of cerebral ischemic injury in a defined vascular distribution; OR
- clinical evidence of cerebral ischemic injury based on symptoms persisting ≥24 hours or until death, and other etiologies excluded.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Non-procedural myocardial infarction
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Based on the 4th Universal Definition, non-periprocedural myocardial infarction will be identified in case of detection of rise and/or fall of cardiac biomarkers with at least one value above the 99th percentile of the upper reference limit together with evidence of myocardial ischemia with at least one of the following:
- symptoms of ischemia
- electrocardiogram changes indicative of new ischemia (new ST-T changes or new left bundle branch block)
- development of pathological Q waves in the electrocardiogram
- imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium or new regional wall motion abnormality.
Measured: > 48 hours postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Repeat revascularization
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Repeat revascularization will include any percutaneous or surgical revascularization on a grafted coronary artery after the initial operation.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Readmission for acute coronary syndrome
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: Prolonged ischemic symptoms at rest (usually ≥10 minutes in duration), or accelerating pattern of chest pain that occurs with a lower activity threshold (CCS class III or IV) considered to be myocardial ischemia upon final diagnosis resulting in an unscheduled visit to a healthcare facility resulting in an overnight stay generally within 24 hours of the most recent symptoms, cardiac biomarkers not meeting MI criteria, and ECG or angiographic evidence of ischemia.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Readmission for heart failure
Another secondary outcome for aim 1: While patients may have multiple simultaneous disease processes, for the outcome event of heart failure requiring hospitalization, the diagnosis of congestive heart failure would need to be the primary process. Heart failure (HF) requiring hospitalization is defined as an event that meets the following criteria:
- Requires hospitalization AND ii. Clinical symptoms of heart failure AND iii. Physical signs of heart failure AND iv. Need for additional/increased therapy AND v. No other non-cardiac etiology (such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hepatic cirrhosis, acute renal failure, or venous insufficiency) and no other cardiac etiology (such as pulmonary embolus, cor pulmonale, primary pulmonary hypertension, or congenital heart disease) for signs or symptoms are identified.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Generic quality of life according to the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2)
Secondary outcomes for aim 2: The SF-12v12 measures eight dimensions of health: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, vitality, general health perception, social function, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating better health status.
The SF-12v2 has two summary measures: physical and mental self-perceived health with norm-based methods that standardize the score to a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Generic quality of life according to EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D)
Secondary outcomes for aim 2: EQ-5D is a five-item instrument to assess health status in the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Individual domain scores will be converted to a summary index representing utility weights, which allow conduct of cost-effectiveness analyses.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Mental and physical health symptoms according to PROMIS instruments
Secondary outcomes for aim 2: Physical and mental health symptoms and physical functioning will be measured with standardized PROMIS instruments, including: Pain interference, Neuropathic Pain, Fatigue, Sleep disturbance, Depression, Anxiety, and Physical Function. A mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10 represent the general population in the US.
Measured: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Oct 2019
- Study start17 Apr 2023
- Primary completionMar 2030 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery will be in one of two groups. One group will receive a single arterial graft and the second group will receive two or more arterial grafts.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 2,300 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University, Duke University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityStephen Fremes, MD, Principal investigator, Sunnybrook Health Sciences CentreRuth Masterson Creber, RN, PhD, Principal investigator, Columbia UniversityC. Noel Bairey Merz, MD, Principal investigator, Cedars-SinaiKarla Ballman, PhD, Principal investigator, Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversitySean O'Brien, PhD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04124120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1703018094-ROMA-Women
- Acronym
- ROMA:Women
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2019
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Primary outcome data under request
Publications
Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 2;314(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101.
PubMed 3484393Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01331-6.
PubMed 14726042Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R, McCarthy PM, Cosgrove DM. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 May;117(5):855-72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70365-X.
PubMed 10220677Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001 Sep 15;358(9285):870-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X.
PubMed 11567701Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014 Aug 12;130(7):539-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
PubMed 24916209Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, Disesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr, Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, Lange RA, London MJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC, Winniford MD; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e123-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.
PubMed 22070836Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 25173339Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, Fremes S, Head SJ, Sabik J, Rosengart T, Kappetein AP, Thourani VH, Firestone S, Mitchell JD; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):801-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
PubMed 26680310Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Frati G. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):59-65; discussion 65. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu111. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
PubMed 24686003
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Comparison of the Outcomes of Single vs Multiple Arterial Grafts in Women (ROMA:Women) Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04124120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ROMA:Women / 1703018094-ROMA-Women
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,300 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- New York Presbyterian Hospital, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Columbia University, Duke University
- Study start
- 17 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The central hypothesis of ROMA:Women is that the use of multiple arterial grafting (MAG) will improve clinical outcomes and quality of life (QOL) compared to single arterial grafting (SAG).
The specific aims of ROMA:Women are:
Aim 1: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events in women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important clinical and surgical subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated. The women enrolled in the ongoing ROMA trial (anticipated to be approximately 690) will be included in ROMA:Women, increasing efficiency and reducing enrollment time.
Hypothesis 1.0. MAG will reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.
Hypothesis 1.1. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.
Aim 2: Determine the impact of MAG vs SAG on generic and disease-specific QOL, physical and mental health symptoms in women undergoing CABG. The investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG (including those enrolled in ROMA:QOL). Differences by important subgroups (as defined above) will also be evaluated.
Hypothesis 2.0. MAG will improve generic and disease-specific QOL compared to SAG.
Hypothesis 2.1. MAG will improve physical and mental health symptoms compared to SAG.
Hypothesis 2.2. The improvement with MAG will be consistent across key subgroups.
Detailed description
ROMA:Women will leverage the infrastructure and the existing women population of the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women has two key Aims. In Aim 1, the investigators will compare major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (death, stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure) in a cohort of 2,300 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. In Aim 2, the investigators will compare generic (SF-12, EQ-5D) and disease-specific (Seattle Angina Questionnaire) QOL and physical and mental health symptoms (PROMIS-29) in a sub-cohort of 500 women randomized 1:1 to MAG or SAG. Differences by important subgroups (patients younger or older than 70 years, diabetics, racial and ethnic minorities, on vs off pump CABG, type of arterial grafts used) will also be evaluated.
ROMA:Women is a two-arm, international, multi-center, randomized clinical trial nested in the ROMA trial. ROMA:Women will include all the women enrolled in the parent ROMA trial and will leverage the existing ROMA infrastructure including clinical trial unit, database, case report forms (CRF), randomization system, site training resources, informed consent forms (ICF), regulatory approvals, Central Events Review Committee (CEC) processes/personnel, network of participating sites, site PIs, and study coordinators. The planned randomization procedure, interventions and treatment arms, outcome assessments and follow-up protocol of ROMA:Women are identical to those of the currently ongoing parent ROMA trial. The sites participating in ROMA will continue enrollment of women after the completion of the ROMA trial and additional sites will also be opened to reach the target sample size of ROMA:Women.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery will be in one of two groups. One group will receive a single arterial graft and the second group will receive two or more arterial grafts.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group | Experimental | Procedure: Single arterial graftPatients in this group will receive a single arterial graft which will be the left internal thoracic artery. Additional grafts used in this group will all be venous grafts. |
| Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group | Experimental | Procedure: Multiple arterial graftingPatients in the group will receive multiple arterial grafts. All patients will receive at least two arterial grafts, the left internal thoracic artery with the addition of either the right internal thoracic artery or the radial artery as the second conduit. Some patients may receive additional arterial grafts consisting of the radial artery, the right internal thoracic artery, or the right gastroepiploic artery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Women patients ≥18 years old.
- Isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
- Primary (first time) cardiac surgery procedure.
- Significant disease of the left main coronary artery or of the left anterior descending and the circumflex coronary system with or without disease of the right coronary artery.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Male gender
- Single graft
- Emergency operation
- Myocardial infarction within 72 hours of surgery
- Left ventricular ejection fraction < 35%
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Single arterial graftThis interventions consists of patients receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. In addition to the left internal thoracic artery patients will receive venous grafts for all additional grafting. | Procedure or surgery | Single Arterial Graft (SAG) group |
| Multiple arterial graftingThis intervention consists of the patient receiving the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending coronary artery of the heart. The second arterial graft (right internal thoracic artery or radial artery) will be directed to the major branch of the circumflex. Additional grafts will include saphenous veins or arterial conduits. | Procedure or surgery | Multiple Arterial Graft (MAG) group |
Primary outcome
Primary outcome for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
The primary outcome for aim 1 will be a composite of the first occurrence of death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction (>48 hours after surgery), repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Primary outcome for aim 2: Disease-specific quality of life
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Assessed using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), a validated 19-item questionnaire that measures five domains related to coronary disease: angina frequency, physical limitations, quality of life, angina stability, and treatment satisfaction. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating fewer symptoms and better health status. The minimum clinically important difference on the SAQ is 5 points. The primary endpoint for aim 2 is the absolute change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at 12 months compared to baseline.
11 secondary outcomes
Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization.
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Death from cardiac cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure.
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Death from any cause
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Stroke
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Non-procedural myocardial infarction
Time frame: > 48 hours postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Repeat revascularization
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Readmission for acute coronary syndrome
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Readmission for heart failure
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Generic quality of life according to the Short Form Health Survey (SF-12v2)
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Generic quality of life according to EuroQuol-5D (EQ-5D)
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Mental and physical health symptoms according to PROMIS instruments
Time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 3484393Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LA, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986 Jan 2;314(1):1-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198601023140101.
- Background: PubMed 14726042Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA. Patencies of 2127 arterial to coronary conduits over 15 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):93-101. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01331-6.
- Background: PubMed 10220677Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD, Houghtaling PL, Arnold JH, Akhrass R, McCarthy PM, Cosgrove DM. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 May;117(5):855-72. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(99)70365-X.
- Background: PubMed 11567701Taggart DP, D'Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet. 2001 Sep 15;358(9285):870-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)06069-X.
- Background: PubMed 24916209Yi G, Shine B, Rehman SM, Altman DG, Taggart DP. Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation. 2014 Aug 12;130(7):539-45. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.004255. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 22070836Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, Disesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr, Jessen ME, Keeley EC, Lahey SJ, Lange RA, London MJ, Mack MJ, Patel MR, Puskas JD, Sabik JF, Selnes O, Shahian DM, Trost JC, Winniford MD; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines; American Association for Thoracic Surgery; Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Dec 6;58(24):e123-210. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Nov 7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 25173339Authors/Task Force members; Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014 Oct 1;35(37):2541-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26680310Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, Fremes S, Head SJ, Sabik J, Rosengart T, Kappetein AP, Thourani VH, Firestone S, Mitchell JD; Society of Thoracic Surgeons. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;101(2):801-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 24686003Benedetto U, Raja SG, Albanese A, Amrani M, Biondi-Zoccai G, Frati G. Searching for the second best graft for coronary artery bypass surgery: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsdagger. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;47(1):59-65; discussion 65. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu111. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Primary outcome data under request
Related trials for Heart Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
RecruitingObservational study
AI-powered ECG Analysis Using Willem™ Software in High-risk Cardiac Patients (WILLEM)
Cardiomyopathies, Cardiac Arrest
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD principal investigator
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Stephen Fremes, MD principal investigator
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Ruth Masterson Creber, RN, PhD principal investigator
Columbia University
146 sites in 26 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Single arterial graft and Multiple arterial grafting in people with Heart Diseases and Coronary Artery Disease, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 146 sites in 26 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 146 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, Italy and 21 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mario Gaudino, Prof/PhD/MD (212.746.1812, mfg9004@med.cornell.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary outcome for aim 1: Death from any cause, any stroke, non-procedural myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization and hospital readmission for acute coronary syndrome or heart failure. (time frame: Postoperatively, minimum 2.5 year follow-up). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04124120, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2026.