AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseNCT04122248

M6-C Post Approval Study (PAS)

An observational study of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease and Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Spinal Kinetics at 21 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The M6-C Post Approval Study is a long term follow-up study of subjects previously enrolled and treated in the M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc IDE Study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 68 years
What is being tested?
standard radiographic imaging and cervical total disc replacement
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
152 participants
Where
21 sitesUnited States
Study dates
30 Nov 2019to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 68 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Subjects eligible for study enrollment will include subjects implanted in the M6-C™ IDE pivotal study

Who may be able to join

  • Since the subjects have already been screened as part of the IDE's pivotal study, and only subjects that participated in that study make up the subject cohort for this long-term follow-up study, there are no additional inclusion criteria

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who were withdrawn or withdrew consent to participate in the investigation
  • Subjects who do not consent to participate in long-term follow-up or provide personal contact information to the sponsor (solely for the purposes of tracking subjects to help ensure follow-up compliance)
  • Patients with terminal failures (SSI or device- or procedure-related SAE) by Month 24 and all known patient deaths in the M6-C IDE study are excluded for enrollment into the PAS

Trial locations and contacts

21 sites in 1 country.

21 sites in 1 country

United States21 sites
  • University of Colorado School of Medicine

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Spine MD

    Beverly Hills, California, 90210

  • Indiana Spine Group

    Carmel, Indiana, 46032

  • CNSA

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204

  • OrthoCarolina Research Institute

    Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207

  • Center for Sports Medicine & Orthopedics

    Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404

  • Midwest Orthopedics

    Chicago, Illinois, 60612

  • The Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43202

  • EmergeOrtho

    Durham, North Carolina, 27704

  • ClinTech Center for Spine

    Johnstown, Colorado, 80534

  • Memorial Orthopedic Surgical Group

    Long Beach, California, 90806

  • West Virginia University

    Morgantown, West Virginia, 26506

  • Yale University School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06519

  • HSS

    New York, New York, 10021

  • Desert Institute for Spine Care

    Phoenix, Arizona, 85020

  • Texas Back Institute

    Plano, Texas, 75093

  • Spine Institute of Lousianna

    Shreveport, Louisiana, 71101

  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305

  • The CORE Institute

    Sun City West, Arizona, 85375

  • Upstate Medical University

    Syracuse, New York, 13057

  • Medstar Hospital/Georgetown University

    Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc IDE Post Approval Study

The M6-C Post Approval Study is a long term follow-up study of subjects previously enrolled and treated in the M6-C Artificial Cervical Disc IDE Study.

Read the detailed description

A prospective, concurrently controlled, multi-center pivotal study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) was performed in the United States under IDE #G050254. To fulfill the concurrent control design of the study, there were clinical sites that evaluated the safety and effectiveness of the M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc and there were other clinical sites that evaluated ACDF. Subjects in the study were treated between May 2014 and June 2016 and remain in follow-up. The M6-C™ Artificial Cervical Disc received FDA approval to market on February 6, 2019. As a condition of approval, the FDA requested that the sponsor perform a post market approval study (PAS). The subjects enrolled and remaining in the M6-C IDE pivotal study are the prospective patient population for the PAS.

Being tested
standard radiographic imaging, cervical total disc replacement
Keywords
artificial cervical disc arthroplasty
Medical subject headings
Radiculopathy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • standard radiographic imagingOther

    standard radiographic imaging

  • cervical total disc replacementDevice

    Also called cervical disc arthroplasty, cervical artificial disc replacement

    Artificial disc replacement (ADR) in the cervical spine is a minimally invasive procedure that involves removing diseased disc tissue and replacing it with an artificial disc. The artificial disc is designed to preserve the spine\'s natural motion while remaining securely attached to the surrounding vertebral bones. The goal of ADR is to help preserve the motion of the cervical spine or spinal segment after surgery, which can improve the quality of life for patients.

Study groups in NCT04122248
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
M6-CSubjects treated with an M6-C device
Receives: Other: standard radiographic imaging; Device: cervical total disc replacement
ACDFSubjects treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
Receives: Other: standard radiographic imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall subject success

    A study subject will be considered an overall success if he/she meets the following criteria:

    • No serious adverse event(s) classified as device or device procedure related (as determined by the CEC), and
    • No subsequent surgical procedure at the index level (including revision, removal, reoperation, or supplemental fixation), and
    • Maintenance or improvement in neurological function, and
    • Improvement on the NDI of at least 15 points.

    Measured: 10 year follow-up

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    The NDI is a patient reported outcome questionnaire for the measurement of pain and function related to cervical spine problems. A total NDI score is determined by adding the scores of the individual questions and dividing that total by the maximum possible score (i.e., 50 if all questions are answered) to yield a percentage. Therefore, the NDI score ranges from 0% to 100%. A lower score represents less pain and dysfunction.

    Measured: annually to 10 years

  2. Neck and arm pain

    A visual analogue scale is a patient reported outcome measure utilized to determine neck and arm pain on a zero to ten scale with zero being the least amount of pain and 10 the most possible pain.

    Measured: annually to 10 years

  3. SF-36 Health Survey

    The SF-36 is a patient reported outcome questionnaire to measure health-related Quality of Life. An increase in score from baseline represents an improvement in health.

    Measured: annually to 10 years

  4. Patient Satisfaction

    The following 5 point Likert Scale will be used to further assess subject satisfaction:

    1. How satisfied are you with the results of your surgery? Very Satisfied; Satisfied; Neutral; Unsatisfied; Very Unsatisfied
    2. All things considered, would you have the surgery again? Very likely; likely; not sure; Unlikely; Very Unlikely
    3. Would you recommend the surgery to a friend or family member? Very likely; likely; not sure; Unlikely; Very Unlikely

    Measured: annually to 10 years

  5. Odom's Criteria

    At the 5, 7 and 10 year follow-up visits, the Investigator will rate the clinical disposition of each study subject according to Odom's Criteria[18] as follows:

    Excellent: No symptoms related to cervical disease. Able to perform daily activities without limitations.

    Good: Moderate symptoms related to cervical disease. Able to perform daily activities without significant limitations.

    Satisfactory: Slight improvement is symptoms related to cervical disease. Significant limitations in daily activities.

    Poor: No improvement in, or aggravation of, symptoms related to cervical disease. Not able to perform daily activities.

    Measured: annually to 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Oct 2019
  2. Study start30 Nov 2019
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
152 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04122248
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA-C004
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
8 Oct 2019
Last updated
30 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease and Cervical Radiculopathy, run by Spinal Kinetics at 21 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 21 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall subject success (time frame: 10 year follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2025.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in