AzTrials
AzTrials

Vision Satisfaction in Bright LightNCT04116736

ACUVUE® OASYS With Transitions™ Light Intelligent Technology™ Clinical Performance Registry

An observational study of Vision Satisfaction in Bright Light, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 22 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This registry study is a one-year, one-visit, observational, prospective, open-label, two-arm, multi-center, multi-national, post-market study of approximately 300 patients who have recently been fitted with the ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ and approximately 300 patients who have recently been fitted with spherical… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Vision Satisfaction in Bright Light
What is being tested?
ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ and Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
146 participants
Where
22 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
19 Oct 2019to 10 Mar 2023
How long will I take part?
12 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Study subjects will be recruited from the clinical site's subject database and/or utilizing Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) or Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved materials. Within the sites, subjects that have received a prescription of either Intervention within the last 2 months will be invited to participate without regard to any demographic or other ocular features.

Who may be able to join

  • Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:
  • Contact lens neophytes or those who have recently (i.e. within last 2 months) begun the use of a new lens type and have purchased a supply of lenses.
  • A minimum age of 18 years, with no maximum age.
  • The registrant must read and sign the Informed Consent form.
  • The registrant must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.

Who cannot join

  • Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:
  • Current participant in another research study.
  • Employee or relative of site, or family member of Recruiting Practitioner or Johnson \& Johnson.
  • Non-spherical contact lens wearers, i.e. toric or multifocal lenses.

Trial locations and contacts

22 sites in 2 countries.

22 sites in 2 countries

Spain11 sites
  • Sanchez Rubal Ltd. - Sanchez Bregua

    A Coruña, 15004

  • Sanchez Rubal Ltd - Finisterre

    A Coruña, 15005

  • Optica Ronda

    Almería, 04009

  • Natural Optics Balaguer

    Balaguer, 25600

  • Centro Optico Raga

    Linares, 23700

  • Centro Optico Montero

    Madrid, 20832

  • Centro Boston de Optometria

    Madrid, 28010

  • Cirugia Ocular de Madrid

    Madrid, 28015

  • Opticalia Real Villa

    Madrid, 28600

  • Opticas ClaraVision

    Ontinyent, 46870

  • Centro Optico

    Seville, 41702

Other trials in Spain

United Kingdom11 sites
  • Chalmers Opticians Ltd

    Cardiff, Wales, CF243RQ

  • First Contact Opticians Ltd.

    Eastcote, Middlesex, HA5 1RJ

  • Auckland Opticians

    Horbury, Wakefield, WF4 5AB

  • Urquhart Opticians Ltd

    Kilmarnock, Scotland, KA1 2BS

  • P Shah Opticians

    London, England, EC1V 2NP

  • Eyes On the Common Ltd.

    London, England, W5 3LD

  • Hodd Barnes Dickens Ltd

    London, England, WC1V 6LF

  • Leightons Insight Marlow

    Marlow, Buckinghamshire, SL7 1AE

  • Eyesite Opticians

    Reading, Berkshire, RG1 1EX

  • Eyesite Opticians

    Weybridge, Surrey, KT13 8DL

  • Eyesite Opticians

    Winchester, Hampshire, SO23 9BX

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

This registry study is a one-year, one-visit, observational, prospective, open-label, two-arm, multi-center, multi-national, post-market study of approximately 300 patients who have recently been fitted with the ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ and approximately 300 patients who have recently been fitted with spherical nonphotochromic reusable marketed silicone hydrogel contact lenses (of any brand). Eligible subjects will be asked to complete a Patient Registration Questionnaire several times throughout the year.

Being tested
ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™, Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™Device

    Also called TEST Lens

    JJVC Marketed Contact Lens

  • Silicone Hydrogel Contact LensDevice

    Also called CONTROL Lens

    Any reusable spherical silicone hydrogel brand that is approved and marketed in the country conducting the study.

Study groups in NCT04116736
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
TEST LensEligible subjects that are at least 18 years old, who have been recently fitted (within the last 2 months) with the ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™ will be asked to complete follow-up assessments performed online at approximately 2-weeks, 4-months, and 12-months following Visit 1.
Receives: Device: ACUVUE® OASYS with Transitions™
CONTROL LensEligible subjects that are at least 18 years old, who have been recently fitted (within the last 2 months) with spherical non-photochromic reusable marketed silicone hydrogel contact lenses (of any brand) will be asked to complete follow-up assessments performed online at approximately 2-weeks, 4-months, and 12-months following Visit 1.
Receives: Device: Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting - 2-Week Questionnaire

    Subjects will be asked to evaluate their vision satisfaction in bright lighting by rating their level of agreement with the statement "I am satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting with these contact lenses" using a 5-point agreement Likert scale (Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree). In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for the primary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 2-week questionnaire follow-up

  2. Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting - 4-Month Questionnaire

    Subjects will be asked to evaluate their vision satisfaction in bright lighting by rating their level of agreement with the statement "I am satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting with these contact lenses" using a 5-point agreement Likert scale (Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree). In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for the primary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 4-month questionnaire follow-up

  3. Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting - 12-Month Questionnaire

    Subjects will be asked to evaluate their vision satisfaction in bright lighting by rating their level of agreement with the statement "I am satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting with these contact lenses" using a 5-point agreement Likert scale (Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree). In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for the primary endpoint data summary.

    Measured: 12-month questionnaire follow-up

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Overall Quality of Vision - 2-Week Questionnaire

    Overall quality of vision was assessed subjectively using the item "I am satisfied with the overall quality of my vision with these contact lenses". The item used a 5-point agreement scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 2-week questionnaire follow-up

  2. Overall Quality of Vision - 4-Month Questionnaire

    Overall quality of vision was assessed subjectively using the item "I am satisfied with the overall quality of my vision with these contact lenses". The item used a 5-point agreement scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 4-month questionnaire follow-up

  3. Overall Quality of Vision - 12-Month Questionnaire

    Overall quality of vision was assessed subjectively using the item "I am satisfied with the overall quality of my vision with these contact lenses". The item used a 5-point agreement scale: Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neither Agree Nor Disagree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 12-month questionnaire follow-up

  4. Overall Comfort - 2-Week Questionnaire

    Overall comfort was assessed using the item "How would you rate the overall comfort of these contact lenses?". The item used the 5-point excellence scale, Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 2-week questionnaire follow-up

  5. Overall Comfort - 4-Month Questionnaire

    Overall comfort was assessed using the item "How would you rate the overall comfort of these contact lenses?". The item used the 5-point excellence scale, Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 4-month questionnaire follow-up

  6. Overall Comfort - 12-Month Questionnaire

    Overall comfort was assessed using the item "How would you rate the overall comfort of these contact lenses?". The item used the 5-point excellence scale, Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair, and Poor. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary. The number of missing responses in each lens group was reported.

    Measured: 12-month questionnaire follow-up

  7. Pulfrich Effect

    Pulfrich effect was assessed subjectively using the item "While wearing these lenses, my depth perception of moving objects has NOT been impacted". Subjects who disagreed or strongly disagreed with the statement were considered to have experienced the Pulfrich effect. In the Control group 4 subjects were identified as ineligible after the screening visit because they were wearing ineligible Control lenses. Therefore, only 54 subjects were included in the Control group for this secondary endpoint data summary.

    Measured: 2-week, 4-month, and 12-month questionnaire follow-up

  8. Serious or Significant Adverse Events

    A serious adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence that is potentially sight-threatening, requires hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, or requires intervention to prevent permanent damage.

    Significant adverse events are usually symptomatic and warrant discontinuation (temporary or permanent) of the test article (excluding serious adverse events).

    Measured: Throughout the duration of the study, up to 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Oct 2019
  2. Study start19 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion10 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion10 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
146 participants (actual)
Target duration
12 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04116736
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR-6334
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
3 Oct 2019
Last updated
23 May 2025
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Vision Satisfaction in Bright Light, run by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. at 22 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 22 sites in Spain, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting - 2-Week Questionnaire (time frame: 2-week questionnaire follow-up). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in