AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisNCT04097418

Aerobic Training Effects on Motor and Cognitive Performances in MS: an Exploratory Study With Structural and Functional MRI

A study testing Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aerobic training (AT) induces cardiovascular, metabolic and muscular changes and has been proposed as a promising rehabilitative approach in elderly adults and in neurological patients to improve both motor and cognitive performances. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
13 Jun 2015to 31 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 65 years;
  • Native italian language speaking;
  • Right-handed;
  • No particular motor skills;
  • No additional neurologic, psychiatric, orthopaedic or rheumatologic diseases;
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision;
Show all 14Show fewer
  • No contraindications to MRI;
  • Ability to understand the purpose of the study and provide signed informed consent.
  • For MS patients, the following additional inclusion criteria will be applied:
  • Patients with a diagnosis of MS, regardless of sex, duration and course of the disease;
  • EDSS score ranging from 0 to 6.0 (included);
  • Stable treatment for MS from at least 1 month prior to study enrolment;
  • Relapse- and steroid-free from at least 3 months before screening visit;
  • An indication to perform a physiotherapy treatment by the treating physician.

Who cannot join

  • Persons who perform regularly a structured training;
  • Patients who performed a physiotherapy treatment for at least 3 months;
  • Concomitant therapy with antidepressant, baclofen, psychoactive, and steroids drugs as well as symptomatic treatment for fatigue;
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Massimo Filippi, MD contact

00390226433054

filippi.massimo@hsr.it

Maria Assunta Rocca, MD contact

00390226433019

rocca.mara@hsr.it

Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
  • IRCCS San Raffaele

    Milan, 20132

    Massimo Filippi, MD, 00390226433054, filippi.massimo@hsr.it

    Maria Assunta Rocca, MD, 00390226433019, rocca.mara@hsr.it

    Recruiting

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Effects of Aerobic Training on Motor and Cognitive Performances in Patients With MS: an Exploratory Study With Structural and Functional MRI

Aerobic training (AT) induces cardiovascular, metabolic and muscular changes and has been proposed as a promising rehabilitative approach in elderly adults and in neurological patients to improve both motor and cognitive performances. The Investigators wish to explore the role of AT in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients on physical and neuropsychological functions and its underlying anatomical and functional substrates, using advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods.

In this project, the Investigators wish to apply aerobic training in right-handed MS patients and healthy controls to assess:

  1. the effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on motor and cardio-vascular parameters;
  2. the effect of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on cognitive performance, depression and fatigue;
  3. the modifications of functional activations during a cognitive task and of functional connectivity in motor and cognitive networks during resting state following aerobic training and conventional motor training (functional plasticity);
  4. the regional variations of gray matter (GM) volumes and white matter (WM) architecture after aerobic training and conventional motor training (structural plasticity);
  5. the correlations between the changes detected with structural and functional MRI and clinical, motor and neuropsychological scales.
Read the detailed description

This study is a monocentric, non-pharmacological, longitudinal, randomized, blind, controlled study.

Subjects The Investigators will study 40 right-handed MS patients with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ≤6 and an indication to perform a physiotherapy treatment by the treating physician. Patients will be recruited from the Department of Neurology, San Raffaele Hospital. Forty sex- and age-matched right-handed healthy individuals (HC) will also be enrolled. The HC will be recruited from the patients' relatives or acquaintances of the study personnel. The enrolment of HC is crucial to define whether post-treatment changes observed in MS patients are adaptive or maladaptive and to estimate the magnitude of these alterations.

Subjects who will satisfy the inclusion criteria will then be randomized through a sequence generated by the computer to determine their assignment to the conventional motor rehabilitation therapy group (control group) or to the aerobic training (experimental group). The computerized randomization software will generate personal codes to allocate every patient to a treatment arm. These codes will be placed in opaque envelopes and delivered to the patient by an operator external to the study.

Thus, participants will be split into 4 groups of 20 subjects per group:

  1. Experimental group of HC: aerobic training by treadmill at moderate intensity;
  2. Control group of HC: training of passive mobility, stretching and balance;
  3. Experimental group of MS patients: aerobic training by treadmill at moderate intensity;
  4. Control group of MS patients: training of passive mobility, stretching and balance. Inclusion criteria (All)
  • Age: 18-65 years;
  • Native italian language speaking;
  • Right-handed;
  • No particular motor skills;
  • No additional neurologic, psychiatric, orthopaedic or rheumatologic diseases;
  • Normal or corrected-to-normal vision;
  • No MRI contraindications;
  • Ability to understand the purpose of the study and provide signed informed consent. For MS patients, the following additional inclusion criteria will be applied:
  • Patients with a MS diagnosis;
  • EDSS ≤6.0;
  • Stable MS treatment from ≥1 month prior to study enrolment;
  • Relapse- and steroid-free from ≥3 months before screening visit;
  • An indication to perform a physiotherapy treatment by the treating physician. Exclusion criteria
  • Persons who perform regularly a structured training;
  • Patients who performed a physiotherapy treatment for at least 3 months;
  • Concomitant therapy with antidepressant, baclofen, psychoactive, and steroids drugs as well as symptomatic treatment for fatigue;
  • History of alcohol or substance abuse;
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Clinical and functional assessment All subjects will undergo a screening questionnaire and a cardiologic evaluation, including electrocardiogram, followed by a graded exercise test, in order to exclude possible contraindications to the inclusion in the study. The graded exercise test will permit to measure the following parameters:
  • peak oxygen consumption (VO2);
  • maximum wattage;
  • heart rate (isolabour and maximum);
  • rate of perceived exertion (Borg scale of rating of perceived exertion (RPE)). Subjects who will satisfy the inclusion criteria will be randomized to the four groups previously described. All the subject will be assessed with clinical, cardiologic, neuropsychological and MRI evaluations at:
  • baseline (before the start of the rehabilitation treatment) - T0,
  • Week 4 - T1,
  • Week 8 (end of the study) - T2. A clinical follow-up has been planned 3 months after the end of the treatment. At each time-point, MS patients will be evaluated with the following assessments:
  • Graded exercise test;
  • Complete neurological evaluation by a neurologist with the definition of the EDSS score and the MS Functional Composite (MSFC);
  • Assessment of autonomy in daily life activities, through the "Functional Independence Measurement" (FIM);
  • Spasticity, evaluating the modified Ashworth scale;
  • Fatigue, through the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS);
  • Depression, using the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II);
  • Perceived quality of life, through the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale (MSQOL-54). HC will be evaluated with the MSFC, MFIS and BDI-II. All subjects will also be evaluated on additional motor aspects by the "6 minutes walking test" and the "Time up and go" test. Finally, participants will undergo a neuropsychological assessment, using the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests, the Digit Span (forward and backward) and the Brief Test of Intelligence. At the same time-points, all subjects will perform a MR scan, using a 3.0 Tesla scanner, available at the San Raffaele Hospital. The following brain MRI sequences will be acquired:
  1. Dual-echo (DE) turbo spin echo (SE);
  2. 3D T1-weighted fast field echo;
  3. Pulsed-SE gradient echo planar imaging (EPI) with SENSE (acceleration factor=2) and diffusion gradients applied in 35 non-collinear directions;
  4. functional MRI (fMRI) in Resting State (RS) condition;
  5. fMRI with an active cognitive task (Stroop task): using an event-related design, it will be proposed different type of stimuli, i.e. congruent, incongruent and neutral stimuli. Participants will be asked to respond to the color of the ink through four buttons (red, green, yellow, blue) of a fMRI compatible response-box, which will record reaction times and accuracy. Assessors of clinical, neuropsychological and MRI evaluations will be blind with respect to participants allocation. Safety Possible fatigue, dyspnea, pain in the lower limbs. Subjects with possible contraindications to the execution of an aerobic training (belonging to risk classes according to World Health Organization (WHO) classification and to the American College of Sports Medicine) and the execution of the MR (e.g., claustrophobia, pacemakers, pregnancy, etc.) will not be enrolled in the study. The occurrence of side effects will be recorded at each clinical visit or treatment session. Treatment For each subject, the treatment will lasts 8 weeks. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week. Both experimental and control treatment will be performed by two experienced physiotherapists (different from those involved in clinical and functional evaluations). Subjects of the experimental groups (both patients and HC) will carry out an aerobic training of moderate intensity (fixed time and variable intensity) on a treadmill. The training will be set individually via direct method: during the first session, the subject will be trained at an intensity that gets the heart rate (HR) corresponding to 46-63% of VO2 peak measured during the exercise test; in subsequent sessions the intensity will increase to maintain the same HR, which will be always monitored. The intensity workout identified will be maintained for 30 minutes each session, preceded and followed by a few minutes of warm-up and cool-down. Control groups of both patients and HC will follow a conventional non-aerobic physiotherapy training, structured in: 15 minutes of passive mobilization of upper and lower limbs and spine, 5 minutes of stretching of the upper and the lower limbs and 10 minutes of balance training. Duration The treatment period for each patient is 8 weeks. Follow-up visits will occur at 3 months after the end of treatment. MRI analysis All anonymized MRI data will be saved on a Linux workstation and coded with letters (A,B,C,D) according to the study group (to preserve blindness). All image post-processing will be performed by an experienced observer unaware of subjects identity and type of treatment. At baseline, T2 lesion volumes (LV) will be measured. New T2-visible lesions at follow up will be counted. On 3D T1 images, the normalized brain volume, as well as the normalized WM and GM volumes will be quantified using the cross-sectional version of the software Structural Imaging Evaluation of Normalized Atrophy (SIENAx). Longitudinal changes of brain volumes will be evaluated with the longitudinal version of the software Structural Imaging Evaluation of Normalized Atrophy (SIENA). Definition of the patterns of GM volume changes Voxel-based Morphometry (VBM) with Diffeomorphic Image Registration Algorithm (DARTEL) method will be applied to determine the differences of GM volumes between different subgroups of patients and controls at baseline. Tensor-based Morphometry (TBM) will be applied to map the longitudinal regional variations of GM volume at T1 and T2. Tract-based Spatial Statistics (TBSS) will be used to define the patterns of the microstructural WM abnormalities at baseline and their variations during the follow up. Analysis of fMRI data Active and RS fMRI data will be pre-processed using SPM12. Activations during the Stroop task will be estimated using SPM12. An independent Component Analysis (ICA) will be used to decompose RS fMRI data into spatially independent maps and time courses, using the Group ICA Of fMRI Toolbox (GIFT) software. Statistical analysis Demographic, clinical, functional and neuropsychological variables, as well as MRI measures at baseline will be compared using Chi-Square, t-test or ANCOVA models as appropriate. The condition of a normal distribution will be verified using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk, as well as with the visual assessment of the estimated non-parametric Kernel density and Q-plot. To assess changes over time of clinical measures, functional and Z-score average of RS fluctuations, longitudinal linear models will be applied using a statistical design that takes into account the repeated measures in the context of a bivariate model. The correlations in each patient will be quantified with a matrix of correlations unstructured. The dependent variable will be the vector of the assessment from all participants at each time point (before and after treatment). Considering the two groups of patients together, the effects of different treatment will be evaluated considering the cross-interaction "treatment x time" in the linear model. A p value <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses of the VBM, the TBM and the fMRI active task will be performed using the SPM12 software (whole brain analysis, p <0.05, family-wise error [FWE], corrected for multiple comparisons). Voxelwise differences of mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy values between treatment and control groups at baseline, and their within-group changes at follow up will be tested, using a permutation method ("Randomize" program within FSL) and two-sample and paired t tests, as appropriate (p<0.05 FWE). Linear regression analysis (using SPM12) will be used to assess the correlations between fMRI activations and clinical and neuropsychological data. Sample size calculation Given the exploratory nature of the project, the sample size of the study has been calculated also taking into account its feasibility. The power's study showed that, for two continuous variables, with n=40 subjects and a type I error alpha= 0.05, we will able to detect a significant Pearson correlation at least equal to 0.48 with a power of 0.90 and a standardized difference between balanced groups equal to 0.8 with a power of 0.90. Furthermore, the sample size planned in this project is usually considered adequate for the performance of a fMRI analysis. Ethical and regulatory considerations This clinical study will be conducted in accordance with the principles laid down by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki, 1964) and all applicable amendments laid down by the World Medical Assemblies, and the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. This clinical study will be conducted in compliance with all international laws and regulations, and national laws and regulations of the country(ies) in which the clinical trial is performed, as well as any applicable guidelines.
Being tested
Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Aerobic Training, rehabilitation
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aerobic training compared to conventional motor trainingBehavioural

    Also called Conventional motor training

    Aerobic training: aerobic training by treadmill at moderate intensity. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week, for 8 weeks.

    Conventional motor training: 15 minutes of passive mobilization of upper and lower limbs and spine, 5 minutes of stretching of the upper and the lower limbs and 10 minutes of balance training, administered 3 times per week, for 8 weeks.

Study groups in NCT04097418
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aerobic training in healthy subjectsExperimentalFor each healthy subject, the treatment will lasts 8 weeks. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week. Subjects of the experimental groups (both patients and healthy controls) will carry out an aerobic training of moderate intensity (fixed time and variable intensity) on a treadmill. The training will be set individually via direct method: during the first session, the subject will be trained at an intensity that gets the heart rate (HR) corresponding to 46-63% of VO2 peak measured during the exercise test; in subsequent sessions the intensity will increase to maintain the same HR, which will be always monitored. The intensity workout identified will be maintained for 30 minutes each session, preceded and followed by a few minutes of warm-up and cool-down.
Receives: Behavioral: Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training
Conventional motor training of healthy subjectsActive comparatorFor each healthy subject, the treatment will lasts 8 weeks. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week. Control groups of both patients and healthy subjects will follow a conventional non-aerobic physiotherapy training, structured in: 15 minutes of passive mobilization of upper and lower limbs and spine, 5 minutes of stretching of the upper and the lower limbs and 10 minutes of balance training.
Receives: Behavioral: Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training
Aerobic training in MS patientsExperimentalFor each MS patient, the treatment will lasts 8 weeks. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week. Subjects of the experimental groups (both patients and healthy controls) will carry out an aerobic training of moderate intensity (fixed time and variable intensity) on a treadmill. The training will be set individually via direct method: during the first session, the subject will be trained at an intensity that gets the heart rate (HR) corresponding to 46-63% of VO2 peak measured during the exercise test; in subsequent sessions the intensity will increase to maintain the same HR, which will be always monitored. The intensity workout identified will be maintained for 30 minutes each session, preceded and followed by a few minutes of warm-up and cool-down.
Receives: Behavioral: Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training
Conventional motor training of MS patientsActive comparatorFor each MS patient, the treatment will lasts 8 weeks. Each treatment will consists of 35 minutes of training, administered 3 times per week. Control groups of both patients and healthy subjects will follow a conventional non-aerobic physiotherapy training, structured in: 15 minutes of passive mobilization of upper and lower limbs and spine, 5 minutes of stretching of the upper and the lower limbs and 10 minutes of balance training.
Receives: Behavioral: Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Longitudinal changes of brain GM volumes following aerobic training or conventional motor training

    Tensor-Based Morphometry will be applied on 3D T1-weighted sequence to evaluate regional GM volume changes that will be reported as t values, ranging from 0 (no statistically significant changes) to infinity (highly statistically significant changes).

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Longitudinal changes of WM microstructural abnormalities following aerobic training or conventional motor training

    Tract-based Spatial Statistics will be applied on diffusion-tensor MRI sequence to evaluate longitudinal changes of fractional anisotropy (a dimensionless quantity ranging from 0 [more severe damage] to 1 [less severe damage]), mean diffusivity (expressed in [(mm^2)/s]×10^-3 and ranging from 0 [less severe damage] to infinity [more severe damage]), axial diffusivity (expressed in [(mm^2)/s]×10^-3 and ranging from 0 [less severe damage] to infinity [more severe damage]) and radial diffusivity (expressed in [(mm^2)/s]×10^-3 and ranging from 0 [less severe damage] to infinity [more severe damage]). Longitudinal WM microstructural changes will be reported as t values, ranging from 0 (no statistically significant changes) to infinity (highly statistically significant changes).

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Resting State Functional Connectivity MRI changes following aerobic training or conventional motor training

    Group independent component analysis Of fMRI Toolbox (GIFT) software will be applied to evaluate the modifications of resting state functional connectivity. This will be reported as z-scores, ranging from minus infinity (reduced connectivity) to infinity (increased connectivity).

    Longitudinal changes in resting state functional connectivity will be obtained subtracting baseline z-score to z-score at follow-up. A positive score means increased connectivity, a negative score, a decreased connectivity.

    Measured: 2 months

  4. Functional MRI changes following aerobic training or conventional motor training

    Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 will be applied to functional MRI sequence acquired during the Stroop task to evaluate the modifications of functional activations during this cognitive task. They will be reported as t values, ranging from 0 (no statistically significant changes) to infinity (highly statistically significant changes).

    Measured: 2 months

  5. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on global clinical disability

    Rating of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score changes: EDSS is a scale ranging from 0 (no disability) to 10 (death due to multiple sclerosis). Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline EDSS to EDSS at follow-up. A positive score means disability worsening, a negative score, an improvement in disability.

    Measured: 2 months

  6. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on clinical disability

    Rating of Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) score changes: the MSFC a composite score ranging from minus infinity (worse performances) to infinity (better performances) obtained from the sum of the z-scores derived from 1) Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) to evaluate cognitive functions, 2) timed 25-foot walk test to evaluate walking speed, and 3) nine-hole peg test to evaluate arm and hand dexterity. Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline MSFC to MSFC at follow-up. A positive score means disability improvement, a negative score, a worsening in disability.

    Measured: 2 months

  7. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on behavioural measures

    Rating of functional Independent measurement (FIM) scale changes: the FIM scale is an 18-item of physical, psychological and social functions, ranging from 18 (worse disability) to 126 (total autonomy) and obtained from the sum of 18 items, each of them ranging from 1 to 7. Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline FIM to FIM at follow-up. A positive score means behavioural improvements, a negative score, a worsening in behavioural functions.

    Measured: 2 months

  8. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on spasticity

    Rating of Modified Ashworth Scale changes: the Modified Ashworth Scale is a 6-point scale, ranging from 0 to 4, where lower scores represent normal muscle tone and higher scores represent spasticity or increased resistance to passive movement.

    Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline Modified Ashworth scale to Modified Ashworth scale at follow-up. A positive score means spasticity worsening, a negative score, an improvement in spasticity.

    Measured: 2 months

  9. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on walking ability

    Assessment of Six minutes walking test changes: this is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. It is expressed in meters and ranges from 0 (worse performance) to infinity (better performance).

    Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline distance to distance walked at follow-up. A positive score means walking improvement, a negative score, a worsening of walking ability.

    Measured: 2 months

  10. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on person's mobility

    Assessment of Time up-and-go test changes: this is test assessing both static and dynamic balance. It uses the time (expressed in seconds) that a person takes to rise from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. It ranges from 0 (better performance) to infinity (worse performance).

    Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline seconds to seconds needed at follow-up. A positive score means performance worsening, a negative score, an improvement in the performance.

    Measured: 2 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on cognitive functions

    Longitudinal changes of the performances at the Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests and Digit Span (forward and backward): Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline z-scores to z-scores at follow-up. A positive score means cognitive improvement, a negative score, a worsening of cognitive performance.

    Measured: 2 months

  2. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on fatigue

    Assessment of Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) changes: The MFIS score is a composite score that can range from 0 (no fatigue) to 84 (highest fatigue) and that is computed by adding sub-scores from physical, cognitive, and psychosocial subscales. Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline MFIS to MFIS at follow-up. A positive score means fatigue worsening, a negative score, an improvement in fatigue.

    Measured: 2 months

  3. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on depression

    Assessment of Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) changes: the BDI-II is a 21-question multiple-choice self-report inventory ranging from 0 (no depression to 63 severe depression). The MFIS score is a composite score that can range from 0 (no fatigue) to 84 (highest fatigue) and that is computed by adding sub-scores from physical, cognitive, and psychosocial subscales. Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline BDI-II score to BDI-II score at follow-up. A positive score means depression, a negative score, an improvement in depression.

    Measured: 2 months

  4. Effects of aerobic training compared to conventional motor training on quality of life

    Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale (MSQOL-54) changes: the MSQOL-54 is a 54-item scale generated from 12 subscales and two additional single-item measures and ranging from 0 (worse quality of life) to 100 (better quality of life). Longitudinal changes will be obtained subtracting baseline MSQOL-54 to MSQOL-54 at follow-up. A positive score means quality of life improvement, a negative score, a worsening of quality of life.

    Measured: 2 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Sep 2019
  2. Study start13 Jun 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study is a monocentric, non-pharmacological, longitudinal, randomized, blind, controlled study. Subjects The Investigators will study 40 MS patients and 40 HC. Subjects will then be randomized through a sequence generated by the computer to determine their assignment to the conventional motor rehabilitation therapy group (control group) or to the aerobic training (experimental group). The computerized randomization software will generate personal codes to allocate every patient to a treatment arm. Participants will be split into 4 groups of 20 subjects per group: 1. Group of aerobic training of healthy subjects: aerobic training by treadmill at moderate intensity; 2. Group of conventional motor training of healthy subjects: training of passive mobility, stretching and balance; 3. Group of aerobic training of MS patients: aerobic training by treadmill at moderate intensity; 4. Treatment group control of MS patients: training of passive mobility, stretching and balance.
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04097418
Sponsor's protocol ID
Training aerobico-SM 2015
Status last verified
Sep 2023
First submitted
17 Sep 2019
Last updated
28 Sep 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The dataset including all the data obtained from this study will be available from the Principal Investigator upon reasonable request.

Publications

  • Motl RW, Pilutti LA. The benefits of exercise training in multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Sep;8(9):487-97. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2012.136. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

    PubMed 22825702
  • Prakash RS, Snook EM, Motl RW, Kramer AF. Aerobic fitness is associated with gray matter volume and white matter integrity in multiple sclerosis. Brain Res. 2010 Jun 23;1341:41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.06.063. Epub 2009 Jun 25.

    PubMed 19560443
  • Ashburner J. A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage. 2007 Oct 15;38(1):95-113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007. Epub 2007 Jul 18.

    PubMed 17761438
  • Leow AD, Klunder AD, Jack CR Jr, Toga AW, Dale AM, Bernstein MA, Britson PJ, Gunter JL, Ward CP, Whitwell JL, Borowski BJ, Fleisher AS, Fox NC, Harvey D, Kornak J, Schuff N, Studholme C, Alexander GE, Weiner MW, Thompson PM; ADNI Preparatory Phase Study. Longitudinal stability of MRI for mapping brain change using tensor-based morphometry. Neuroimage. 2006 Jun;31(2):627-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.013. Epub 2006 Feb 15.

    PubMed 16480900
  • Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, Rueckert D, Nichols TE, Mackay CE, Watkins KE, Ciccarelli O, Cader MZ, Matthews PM, Behrens TE. Tract-based spatial statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 15;31(4):1487-505. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024. Epub 2006 Apr 19.

    PubMed 16624579
  • Calhoun VD, Adali T, Pearlson GD, Pekar JJ. A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum Brain Mapp. 2001 Nov;14(3):140-51. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1048.

    PubMed 11559959
  • Nichols TE, Holmes AP. Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jan;15(1):1-25. doi: 10.1002/hbm.1058.

    PubMed 11747097
  • Hayasaka S, Peiffer AM, Hugenschmidt CE, Laurienti PJ. Power and sample size calculation for neuroimaging studies by non-central random field theory. Neuroimage. 2007 Sep 1;37(3):721-30. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.009. Epub 2007 Jun 18.

    PubMed 17658273
  • Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Price CJ, Buchel C, Worsley KJ. Multisubject fMRI studies and conjunction analyses. Neuroimage. 1999 Oct;10(4):385-96. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0484.

    PubMed 10493897

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aerobic training compared to conventional motor training in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Massimo Filippi, MD (00390226433054, filippi.massimo@hsr.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Longitudinal changes of brain GM volumes following aerobic training or conventional motor training (time frame: 2 months). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04097418, which also lists 9 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in