AzTrials
AzTrials

Prostatic NeoplasmsNCT04093375

Radical Prostatectomy Versus Radical Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer

A study testing Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Radiotherapy in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Tongji Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective, open randomized clinical trial seeks to investigate whether radical prostatectomy with androgen deprivation therapy improves prostate-cancer specific survival and quality of life in comparison with radical radiation treatment with androgen deprivation therapy among patients diagnosed locally advanced… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Prostatic Neoplasms
What is being tested?
Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Radiotherapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Nov 2019to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18≤Age ≤75, at the time of randomization.
  • Confirmed as non-metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma by transrectal ultrasound biopsy in six months before enrollment and untreated.
  • Tumor stage (T, M, N): according to 2018 NCCN prostate cancer guidelines T3 stage Significant extra-capsular tumor extension M0 (no sign of distant metastases) Nx (regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed). For patients with T4, the tumor should be confined to the bladder neck, and bilateral ureters should not be invaded.
  • WHO score 0-1, ECOG score 0-2, and ASA grade I-III.
  • At least 5 years life expectancy.
  • The general condition and mental status of patients shall permit observation in accordance with the study protocol.
  • Signed Informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Concomitant with other malignancies.
  • With severe systemic disease (cardio-cerebrovascular disease, etc.) cannot tolerate surgery or radiotherapy.
  • Clinical significant abnormal laboratory values at the discretion of the investigator, e.g. severe kidney function GFR < 30 ml/ml or elevated liver transaminases above > 10 ULN.
  • Involved in other clinical trials simultaneously.
  • Any medical condition which, in the opinion of the investigator, might interfere with the evaluation of the study objectives.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Zhihua Wang, M.D ass. prof contact

8613607195518

zhwang_hust@hotmail.com

About this study

Official title: Primary Radical Prostatectomy Versus Primary Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer: an Open Randomized Clinical Trial

This prospective, open randomized clinical trial seeks to investigate whether radical prostatectomy with androgen deprivation therapy improves prostate-cancer specific survival and quality of life in comparison with radical radiation treatment with androgen deprivation therapy among patients diagnosed locally advanced prostate cancer. Lack of extensive PSA screening in mainland China, many new cases of prostate cancer are LAPCa. Surgery and/or radiation plus attempted chemotherapy are curative treatment for advanced solid malign tumors to control and eliminate the local and micro metastases. LAPCa is easy to metastasis, relapse and has a poor prognosis. For LAPCa, a single RP approach is generally not the preferred option because it is generally considered that radical surgery is difficult to completely remove the lesion and the long-term prognosis is not ideal. However, androgen deprivation therapy promotes the prognosis of LAPCa with lymph nodes or seminal vesicle metastases and improves the local control rate of tumor. What is more, for early localized prostate cancer, RT has similar efficacy to RP, for advanced tumor RT can not only relieve urinary tract obstruction and other symptoms, but also improve biochemical progression free survival and local oncological control. A randomized clinical trial comparing two multimodal treatment including RP or RT with ADT regimens is therefore warranted.

Being tested
Radical Prostatectomy, Radical Radiotherapy
Medical subject headings
Prostatic Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radical ProstatectomyProcedure or surgery

    Radical prostatectomy with or without androgen deprivation therapy

  • Radical RadiotherapyOther

    Radical Radiotherapy with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy

Study groups in NCT04093375
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Radical ProstatectomyExperimentalPatients with locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma receives Radical Prostatectomy with or without enlarged lymph node dissection
Receives: Procedure: Radical Prostatectomy
Radical RadiotherapyActive comparatorPatients with locally advanced prostate adenocarcinoma receives Radical Radiotherapy with adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy
Receives: Other: Radical Radiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cause-specific survival

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  2. Overall survival

    Measured: Up to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Sep 2019
  2. Study start1 Nov 2019 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
600 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04093375
Sponsor's protocol ID
2019CR101
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
16 Sep 2019
Last updated
24 Oct 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Radical Prostatectomy and Radical Radiotherapy in people with Prostatic Neoplasms, run by Tongji Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Zhihua Wang, M.D ass. prof (8613607195518, zhwang_hust@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cause-specific survival (time frame: Up to 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in