AzTrials
AzTrials

Seborrheic DermatitisPhase 2NCT04091646

Safety and Efficacy of ARQ-154 Foam in Subjects With Seborrheic Dermatitis

A Phase 2 study testing Roflumilast Foam 0.3% in people with Seborrheic Dermatitis, run by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. at 24 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This was a parallel group, double blind, vehicle-controlled study assessed the safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam (ARQ-154) vs placebo foam in participants with seborrheic dermatitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Seborrheic Dermatitis
What is being tested?
Roflumilast Foam 0.3%
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
226 participants
Where
24 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
4 Dec 2019to 21 Aug 2020
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants legally competent to sign and give informed consent.
  • Males and females ages 18 years and older (inclusive) at the time of consent.
  • Clinical diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis of at least 3 months duration as determined by the Investigator. Stable disease for the past 4 weeks.
  • Seborrheic dermatitis of the scalp and/or face and/or trunk and/or intertriginous areas.
  • An Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of disease severity of at least Moderate ('3') at Baseline.
  • Overall Assessment of Erythema and Overall Assessment of Scaling scores of at least Moderate ('2') at Baseline.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Females of childbearing potential (FOCBP) must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening (Visit 1) and a negative urine pregnancy test at Baseline (Visit 2).
  • Females of non-childbearing potential must either be post-menopausal with spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 12 months or have undergone surgical sterilization.
  • Subjects in good health as judged by the Investigator, based on medical history, physical examination, vital signs, serum chemistry labs, hematology values, and urinalysis.
  • Subjects are considered reliable and capable of adhering to the Protocol and visit schedule according to the Investigator judgment.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who cannot discontinue treatment with therapies for the treatment of seborrheic dermatitis prior to the Baseline visit and during the study according to Excluded Medications and Treatments.
  • Planned excessive exposure of treated area(s) to either natural or artificial sunlight, tanning bed or other LED.
  • Subjects who cannot discontinue the use of strong P-450 cytochrome inhibitors e.g., indinavir, nelfinavir, ritonavir, clarithromycin, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, saquinavir, suboxone and telithromycin for two weeks prior to the Baseline visit (Visit 2) and during the study.
  • Subjects who cannot discontinue the use of strong P-450 cytochrome inducers e.g., efavirenz, nevirapine, glucocorticoids, barbiturates (including phenobarbital), phenytoin, rifampin, and carbamazepine for two weeks prior to the Baseline visit (Visit 2) and during the study.
  • Subjects with PHQ-8 ≥10 at Screening or Baseline visits.
  • Previous treatment with ARQ-151 and ARQ-154.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Subjects who have received oral roflumilast (Daliresp®, Daxas®) or other PDE-4 inhibitors (apremilast) within the past 4 weeks.
  • Known allergies to excipients in ARQ-154 foam.
  • Known or suspected: severe renal insufficiency or moderate to severe hepatic disorders; hypersensitivity to component(s) of the investigational products; or history of severe depression, suicidal ideation, or Baseline/Screening C-SSRS indicative of suicidal ideation, whether lifetime or recent/current.
  • Subjects with a history of a major surgery within 8 weeks prior to Baseline (Visit 2) or has a major surgery planned during the study.
  • Subjects with any condition on the treatment area which, in the opinion of the Investigator, could confound efficacy measurements.
  • Subjects unable to apply product to the scalp due to physical limitations.
  • Females who are pregnant, wishing to become pregnant during the study, or are breast-feeding.
  • A clinically relevant history of abuse of alcohol or other drugs, at the discretion of the Investigator.
  • Subjects who are unable to communicate, read or understand the local language, or who display another condition, which in the Investigator's opinion, makes them unsuitable for clinical study participation.
  • Subjects who are family members of the clinical study site, clinical study staff, or sponsor, or family members of enrolled subjects.
  • Any condition that in the Investigator's assessment would preclude the subject from participating in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

24 sites in 2 countries.

24 sites in 2 countries

United States22 sites
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 13

    Arlington, Texas, 76011

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 11

    Austin, Texas, 78759

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 18

    Bexley, Ohio, 43209

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 40

    Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 41

    College Station, Texas, 77845

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 42

    Coral Gables, Florida, 33134

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 20

    Detroit, Michigan, 48202

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 19

    Fremont, California, 94538

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 14

    Fridley, Minnesota, 55432

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 23

    High Point, North Carolina, 27262

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 25

    Houston, Texas, 77056

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 15

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40217

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 24

    Miami, Florida, 33144

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 17

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 26

    Pflugerville, Texas, 78660

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 27

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 22

    Plainfield, Indiana, 46168

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 29

    Portland, Oregon, 97210

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 28

    Rockville, Maryland, 20850

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 10

    Rolling Meadows, Illinois, 60008

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 21

    Santa Monica, California, 90404

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 12

    Tampa, Florida, 33613

Other trials in United States

Canada2 sites
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 31

    Markham, Ontario, L3P 1X2

  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics Clinical Site 30

    Windsor, Ontario, N8W 1E6

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2b, 8-Week, Parallel Group, Double Blind, Vehicle-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of ARQ-154 Foam 0.3% Administered QD in Subjects With Seborrheic Dermatitis

This was a parallel group, double blind, vehicle-controlled study assessed the safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam (ARQ-154) vs placebo foam in participants with seborrheic dermatitis.

Being tested
Roflumilast Foam 0.3%, Vehicle foam
Medical subject headings
Dermatitis, Seborrheic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Drug

    Also called ARQ-154

    Roflumilast foam for topical application.

  • Vehicle foamDrug

    Also called Placebo

    Vehicle foam for topical application.

Study groups in NCT04091646
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Roflumilast Foam 0.3%Active comparatorParticipants apply roflumilast foam 0.3% once daily (QD) to all areas of seborrheic dermatitis once daily for 8 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Roflumilast Foam 0.3%
Vehicle FoamPlacebo comparatorParticipants apply inactive vehicle foam matched to roflumilast foam QD for 8 weeks.
Receives: Drug: Vehicle foam

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Achievement of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 8

    The number of participants achieving "success" in IGA assessment of disease severity at Week 8 is presented for each arm. Success was defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 ('completely clear') or 1 ('almost clear'), accompanied by a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline IGA score. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of Seborrheic Dermatitis, with scores ranging from 0 ('completely clear') to 4 ('severe'), and higher scores indicate greater severity. The IGA scores are based on observed data, whereas odds ratio and p-values were calculated using multiple imputation of missing values.

    Measured: Week 8

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Achievement of IGA Success at Weeks 2 and 4

    The number of participants achieving "success" in IGA assessment of disease severity at Weeks 2 and 4 is presented for each arm. Success was defined as achievement of an IGA score of 0 ('completely clear') or 1 ('almost clear'), accompanied by a ≥2-grade improvement from baseline IGA score. The IGA is 5-point scale assessing the severity of Seborrheic Dermatitis, with scores ranging from 0 ('completely clear') to 4 ('severe'), and higher scores indicate greater severity. The IGA scores are based on observed data, whereas odds ratio and p-values were calculated using multiple imputation of missing values.

    Measured: Weeks 2 and 4

  2. Change From Baseline in Overall Assessment of Erythema Score

    The mean (SD) change from baseline in Overall Assessment of Erythema score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 is shown. The Erythema Assessment is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("None: no evidence of erythema.") to 3 ("Severe: Intense [fiery red] erythema."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  3. Achievement of Overall Assessment of Erythema Success

    The number of participants achieving "success" in Overall Assessment of Erythema at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 is presented for each arm. Success was defined as achievement of an overall score of 0 or 1 plus a ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline. The Overall Assessment of Erythema is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("None: no evidence of erythema.") to 3 ("Severe: Intense [fiery red] erythema."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  4. Change From Baseline in Overall Assessment of Scaling Score

    The mean (SD) change from baseline in Overall Assessment of Scaling score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 is shown. The Overall Assessment of Scaling is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("No scaling: No scaling evident on lesions.") to 3 ("Severe: Coarse, thick scales, with flaking into clothes or skin."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  5. Achievement of Overall Assessment of Scaling Success

    The number of participants achieving "success" in Overall Assessment of Scaling score at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 is presented for each arm. Success was defined as achievement of an Overall Assessment of Scaling score of 0 or 1 plus a ≥2 grade improvement from Baseline. The Overall Assessment of Scaling is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("No scaling: No scaling evident on lesions.") to 3 ("Severe: Coarse, thick scales, with flaking into clothes or skin."). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  6. Change From Baseline in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) Score

    The change from baseline in WI-NRS is shown. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the subject experienced in the previous 24 hours. Negative values represent a decrease in worst itch from baseline, and positive values indicate an increase.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

  7. Achievement of WI-NRS Success

    The number of participants achieving WI-NRS "success" at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 is presented. Success was defined as achievement of a ≥4-point improvement from baseline WI-NRS score. The WI-NRS is a simple, single-item scale to assess the subject-reported severity of this symptom, on a scale ranging from 0 ("no itch") to 10 ("worst imaginable itch") the subject experienced in the previous 24 hours.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, and 8

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Sep 2019
  2. Study start4 Dec 2019
  3. Primary completion18 Aug 2020
  4. Study completion21 Aug 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
226 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04091646
Sponsor's protocol ID
ARQ-154-203
Status last verified
Jun 2023
First submitted
13 Sep 2019
Last updated
3 Jul 2023
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Zirwas MJ, Draelos ZD, DuBois J, Kircik LH, Moore AY, Stein Gold L, Alonso-Llamazares J, Bukhalo M, Bruce S, Eads K, Green LJ, Guenthner ST, Ferris LK, Forman SB, Kempers SE, Lain E, Lynde CW, Pariser DM, Toth DP, Yamauchi PS, Higham RC, Krupa D, Burnett P, Berk DR. Efficacy of Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, in Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jun 1;159(6):613-620. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0846.

    PubMed 37133856

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Roflumilast Foam 0.3% in people with Seborrheic Dermatitis, run by Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. at 24 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jul 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jul 2023). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Achievement of Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Success at Week 8 (time frame: Week 8). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04091646, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jul 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in