Infantile Spasms, Non-IntractableNCT04086992
Decreasing Parental Stress of Caregivers of Infants With Infantile Spasms by Using Telemedicine Technology
A study testing Remote monitoring in people with Infantile Spasms, Non-Intractable, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study plans to learn more about how the use of new telemedicine technology can help with parental stress, costs, and overall satisfaction in care. Investigators are studying this in families who have children with a specific seizure type called infantile spasms and being treated with a medication called ACTH… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 31 days to 30 months
- Conditions the study is for
- Infantile Spasms, Non-Intractable
- What is being tested?
- Remote monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 10 Oct 2019to 30 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 31 days to 30 months
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Patients admitted to CHCO, Anschutz and Colorado Springs hospitals, under the age of 30 months with a primary diagnosis of Infantile Spasms and started on first-time ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
Who cannot join
- Infants with recurrent Infantile Spasms and retreatment with ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants with existing home health nursing services and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants with prolonged inpatient admissions beyond 7 days after initiation on ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants whose caregivers do not read, write, and/or speak English with sufficient proficiency to provide informed consent and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Neonates less than 31 days old and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants that have been hospitalized since birth and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants that are wards of the state and their primary caregiver (guardian).
- Infants that reside in a geographic location with no major network cell service and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Jennifer D Coffman, BSN, 720-777-6915, jennifer.coffman@childrenscolorado.org
Jennifer D Coffman, BSN
About this study
Official title: Decreasing Parental Stress and Costs While Improving Overall Satisfaction of Caregivers of Infants With Infantile Spasms on ACTH Therapy Utilizing Innovative Telemedicine Technology: A Randomized Study
This study plans to learn more about how the use of new telemedicine technology can help with parental stress, costs, and overall satisfaction in care. Investigators are studying this in families who have children with a specific seizure type called infantile spasms and being treated with a medication called ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone). Infantile spasms is a rare epileptic encephalopathy that occurs within the first two years of life. It is associated with complicated and expensive treatment and poor developmental outcomes. Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups. The first group will continue with the traditional monitoring practices primarily performed by their pediatrician. The second group will use telemedicine technology to be monitored. Investigators will then compare the two groups to see if there are any differences in parental stress, costs of care, and/or overall satisfaction with care.
The primary hypothesis is that compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will report less parenting stress at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment.
Read the detailed description
Infantile Spasms, historically call West Syndrome, is an infantile epileptic encephalopathy, typically occurring within the first two years of life. Infantile Spasms is often characterized by hypsarrhythmia on encephalogram (EEG) and developmental plateau or regression. It is estimated that Infantile Spasms affects 2 to 5 per 10,000 live births. The etiology of Infantile Spasms is varied and often unclear at the time of diagnosis. In almost half of cases it is linked to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, chromosomal abnormalities, perinatal stroke, tuberous sclerosis complex, or periventricular leukomalacia or hemorrhage.
While historically treatment options have been widely variable, over the past several years three pharmacologic therapies have been adopted, including ACTH, oral corticosteroids (OCS), and vigabatrin.
ACTH was approved for use for multiple neurologic conditions in 1952 and specifically for Infantile Spasms in 2010. Unfortunately, as a hormone therapy, ACTH carries several potentially severe side effects including adrenal insufficiency, immunosuppression, electrolyte imbalances, and more commonly elevated blood pressure thought to lead to serious cardiac changes.
Complexity of ACTH therapy requires close monitoring. ACTH is administered intramuscularly twice a day for the initial two weeks with a complicated weaning schedule over the subsequent 2 weeks. Between the required monitoring and complicated administration regimen, ACTH therapy is often overwhelming and confusing for caregivers, and can lead to medication errors.
Unfortunately, primary care (PCP) monitoring for ACTH has proved to be inconsistent. Barriers for families have included: families without an identified PCP, families without the means to get to their PCP at the recommended intervals (rural location or inadequate transportation), PCP's without the correct equipment to monitor infants, limited office hours, and PCP with little comfort in managing side-effects when they present. This has resulted in disjointed care, and last-minute attempts to obtain needed monitoring in less-than-ideal settings (e.g., urgent care, hospital, neurology clinic) - all with additional expense to families.
Treatment with ACTH is associated with high direct and indirect costs. Treatment of Infantile Spasms with ACTH carries a significant financial burden for families. In August 2007, the cost for one vial of ACTH, then manufactured by Questcor Pharmaceuticals and now by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, increased from $1650 to $23,000. Current, non-discounted pricing is $34,400 per vial. The average therapy calls for 3-4 vials, with a total price tag between $103,200 and $137,600. Any potential for medication error further exacerbates costs of therapy.
Consumer-incurred costs of ACTH therapy have not previously been reported. Direct costs of ACTH therapy for caregivers include, at a minimum, the out-of-pocket expense for the drug as well as required PCP, neurology, and EEG follow-up. It is not uncommon, due to complications of monitoring, that caregivers sustain additional direct costs seeking monitoring in unplanned ways (e.g., urgent care/ED visits). In addition, prophylactic treatment with antibiotics and H2 blockers to combat potential side effects is necessary and adds to caregiver expense. Indirect costs include loss of productivity due to work absences and non-paid loss of productivity (e.g., homemaker). Expense of transportation and travel can also be significant.
Considering the potential severe side-effects of ACTH, the complicated medication regime, the rigorous required follow-up, the costs inherent in the therapy alone and those due to complications, it is hypothesized that parenting stress for parents of babies with IS is high. Support for these families is critical to successful ACTH therapy. Historically at Children's Hospital Colorado, there has been no structured support outside of the initial admission for diagnosis/start of therapy and follow-up neurology appointments. This study is intended to explore and compare parenting stress of parents/caregivers caring for babies with IS being treated with ACTH and secondarily, overall treatment satisfaction.
Remote biometric monitoring led by highly skilled registered nurses could offer a novel, feasible, cost-effective strategy to support families of infants with IS during treatment with ACTH. Although there is currently no published literature exploring the use of telehealth or remote monitoring in the specific treatment of Infantile Spasms, its successful use in other complex conditions underscores its potential for benefit. In addition to optimization of disease-related outcomes, remote monitoring has high potential to reduce financial burden and parenting stress on parent/caregivers.
This proposed study will utilize a prospective randomized clinical trial design. - Infants and caregivers of infants who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. They will be randomized to the intervention or usual care group in accordance with a random number generator program through the Biostatistics Core at CHCO. Randomization will be stratified by payor source.
The study hypotheses include:
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will report less parenting stress at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment.
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with 4 weeks of ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will experience a decrease in direct (including travel) and indirect cost of care.
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will experience greater overall satisfaction with treatment.
All caregivers will be given the standard education on Infantile Spasms, ACTH and ACTH administration.
The control group will continue to receive standard care for ACTH monitoring and follow-up, which includes:
- Blood pressure monitoring by PCP recommended to occur a minimum of two times per week. Depending on the results and PCP's comfort in managing any aberrant results, the PCP may or may not share them with the patient's primary neurologist.
- Nurse follow-up phone call at 1 week of therapy to assess spasm frequency, monitoring and medication adherence, side-effects, complications of therapy, validate the dosing schedule, confirm required follow-up appointments (Neurology and EEG), answer any questions, and provide support. Data collected during these calls is routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review.
- EEG follow-up at 2 weeks of therapy - results are sent to primary neurologist.
- Neurology appointment at 2 weeks of therapy
The intervention group will receive and be instructed on the use of a re-useable digital health kit that will include an electronic tablet with integrated monitoring and telehealth software and manual or automatic blood pressure machine with appropriate sized cuff. The software utilized is web-based and has the capability to integrate into an organization's electronic health record. It allows for the real-time monitoring by healthcare professionals and the establishment of alerts. Appropriate research personnel will be responsible for this monitoring. In addition to biometric monitoring, the software allows for individualized health and other surveys to gain immediate patient feedback. Finally, the tablet and software support video telemedicine visits in the patient home.
The following interventions will be utilized in the intervention group:
- Caregivers will take blood pressure three times per week (ideally, Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and will uploaded into the monitoring software/tablet. A neurology nurse will monitor these results, transcribe them into the patient's medical record, and route them to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- Caregivers will complete a twice-a-week side-effect and adherence survey in the software/tablet. The results of this survey will be transcribed into the patient's medical record and routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- A neurology nurse will conduct a video telehealth visit with the caregiver to assess spasm frequency, monitoring and medication adherence, side-effects, complications of therapy, validate the dosing schedule, confirm required follow-up appointments (Neurology and EEG), answer any questions, and provide support between days 7-10 and again between days 21-24 of therapy. This will be documented as a telehealth nurse-visit and routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- EEG follow-up at 2 weeks of therapy - results are sent to primary neurologist.
- Neurology appointment at 2 weeks of therapy
- Conditions
- Infantile Spasms, Non-Intractable
- Being tested
- Remote monitoring
- Keywords
- Infantile Spasms, parental stress, ACTH, remote monitoring
- Medical subject headings
- Spasms, Infantile
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Remote monitoringOther
Caregivers will be able to monitor blood pressure from home and upload in a cloud-based application on a hand-held tablet. In addition, this technology will administer surveys to the caregiver to assess for therapy side effects and adherence. Nurse-led telemedicine visits will also be utilized. The healthcare team will be able to monitor these parameters remotely.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | This group will continue to receive standard care for ACTH monitoring and follow-up with includes blood pressure by the patient's PCP while on therapy, a one week nursing follow-up phone call, and a two-week EEG and Neurology appointment. |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | This group will be provided remote monitoring technology where they will be able to monitor blood pressure at home. In addition, they will receive a nurse-led telemedicine visit at one week and three weeks of therapy. Like the control group, they will still receive a two-week EEG and Neurology appointment. Receives: Other: Remote monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Measured: At study enrollment (prior to hospital discharge)
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Measured: Mid-therapy (between week 2 and 3 of therapy)
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Measured: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Compare overall satisfaction with treatment between intervention group and control group
Overall treatment satisfaction will be measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications, version 9 (TSQM v9) survey. This is a previously validated survey. The scores for the TSQM v9 can range from 1-100, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction.
Measured: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Compare expenses between intervention group and control group
Caregivers will be asked to provide details on both direct and indirect costs incurred during therapy. This will be measured by collecting both healthcare utilizations rates, actual out-of-pocket expenses, and lost productivity measures. Combined direct and indirect expenses will be combined and compared.
Measured: At mid-therapy (between week 2 and 3 of therapy)
Compare expenses between intervention group and control group
Caregivers will be asked to provide details on both direct and indirect costs incurred during therapy. This will be measured by collecting both healthcare utilizations rates, actual out-of-pocket expenses, and lost productivity measures. Combined direct and indirect expenses will be combined and compared.
Measured: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Sep 2019
- Study start10 Oct 2019
- Primary completion30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infantile Spasms, Non-IntractableStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Colorado, DenverThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Patients with infantile spasms will be randomized into either the control group that will receive traditional follow-up or the intervention group that will receive remote monitoring for follow-up. Both groups will complete surveys to collect data on parental stress, direct and indirect costs, and overall satisfaction with therapy.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, Denver
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mallinckrodt
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jennifer D Coffman, BSN, Principal investigator, Children's Hospital Colorado
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086992
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 18-0579
- Status last verified
- May 2022
- First submitted
- 27 Aug 2019
- Last updated
- 4 May 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: There is no plan to share IPD.
Publications
Knupp KG, Coryell J, Nickels KC, Ryan N, Leister E, Loddenkemper T, Grinspan Z, Hartman AL, Kossoff EH, Gaillard WD, Mytinger JR, Joshi S, Shellhaas RA, Sullivan J, Dlugos D, Hamikawa L, Berg AT, Millichap J, Nordli DR Jr, Wirrell E; Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium. Response to treatment in a prospective national infantile spasms cohort. Ann Neurol. 2016 Mar;79(3):475-84. doi: 10.1002/ana.24594. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
PubMed 26704170Osborne JP, Lux AL, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy CR, Newton RW, Verity CM, O'Callaghan FJ. The underlying etiology of infantile spasms (West syndrome): information from the United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) on contemporary causes and their classification. Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):2168-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02695.x. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
PubMed 20726878Iype M, Saradakutty G, Kunju PA, Mohan D, Nair MK, George B, Ahamed SM. Infantile spasms: A prognostic evaluation. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):228-35. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.173314.
PubMed 27293335Widjaja E, Go C, McCoy B, Snead OC. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infantile spasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2015 Jan;109:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
PubMed 25524855Kossoff EH, Hartman AL, Rubenstein JE, Vining EP. High-dose oral prednisolone for infantile spasms: an effective and less expensive alternative to ACTH. Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Apr;14(4):674-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.01.023. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
PubMed 19435579Lux AL, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy CR, Newton RW, O'Callaghan FJ, Verity CM, Osborne JP; United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study. The United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) comparing hormone treatment with vigabatrin on developmental and epilepsy outcomes to age 14 months: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2005 Nov;4(11):712-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70199-X.
PubMed 16239177Go CY, Mackay MT, Weiss SK, Stephens D, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal S, Snead OC 3rd; Child Neurology Society; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: medical treatment of infantile spasms [RETIRED]. Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2012 Jun 12;78(24):1974-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e2cf.
PubMed 22689735Wray CD, Benke TA. Effect of price increase of adrenocorticotropic hormone on treatment practices of infantile spasms. Pediatr Neurol. 2010 Sep;43(3):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.04.005.
PubMed 20691936Ibrahim A, Umar UI, Usman UM, Owolabi LF. Economic evaluation of childhood epilepsy in a resource-challenged setting: A preliminary survey. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Nov;76:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
PubMed 28917500Burton WN, Chen CY, Conti DJ, Pransky G, Edington DW. Caregiving for ill dependents and its association with employee health risks and productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;46(10):1048-56. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000141830.72507.32.
PubMed 15602179Bator EX, Gleason JM, Lorenzo AJ, Kanaroglou N, Farhat WA, Bagli DJ, Koyle MA. The burden of attending a pediatric surgical clinic and family preferences toward telemedicine. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Oct;50(10):1776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
PubMed 26195452Wirrell EC, Wood L, Hamiwka LD, Sherman EM. Parenting stress in mothers of children with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Jul;13(1):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
PubMed 18337182Chiou HH, Hsieh LP. Parenting stress in parents of children with epilepsy and asthma. J Child Neurol. 2008 Mar;23(3):301-6. doi: 10.1177/0883073807308712. Epub 2008 Jan 8.
PubMed 18182646Modi AC. The impact of a new pediatric epilepsy diagnosis on parents: parenting stress and activity patterns. Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Jan;14(1):237-42. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
PubMed 18977459Ong MK, Romano PS, Edgington S, Aronow HU, Auerbach AD, Black JT, De Marco T, Escarce JJ, Evangelista LS, Hanna B, Ganiats TG, Greenberg BH, Greenfield S, Kaplan SH, Kimchi A, Liu H, Lombardo D, Mangione CM, Sadeghi B, Sadeghi B, Sarrafzadeh M, Tong K, Fonarow GC; Better Effectiveness After Transition-Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) Research Group. Effectiveness of Remote Patient Monitoring After Discharge of Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure: The Better Effectiveness After Transition -- Heart Failure (BEAT-HF) Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Mar;176(3):310-8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7712.
PubMed 26857383
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 May 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Decreasing Parental Stress and Costs While Improving Overall Satisfaction of Caregivers of Infants With Infantile Spasms on ACTH Therapy Utilizing Innovative Telemedicine Technology: A Randomized Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT04086992
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 18-0579
- Conditions
- Infantile Spasms, Non-Intractable
- Keywords
- Infantile Spasms, parental stress, ACTH, remote monitoring
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Colorado, DenverUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Mallinckrodt
- Study start
- 10 Oct 2019 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study plans to learn more about how the use of new telemedicine technology can help with parental stress, costs, and overall satisfaction in care. Investigators are studying this in families who have children with a specific seizure type called infantile spasms and being treated with a medication called ACTH (adrenocorticotropic hormone). Infantile spasms is a rare epileptic encephalopathy that occurs within the first two years of life. It is associated with complicated and expensive treatment and poor developmental outcomes. Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups. The first group will continue with the traditional monitoring practices primarily performed by their pediatrician. The second group will use telemedicine technology to be monitored. Investigators will then compare the two groups to see if there are any differences in parental stress, costs of care, and/or overall satisfaction with care.
The primary hypothesis is that compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will report less parenting stress at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment.
Detailed description
Infantile Spasms, historically call West Syndrome, is an infantile epileptic encephalopathy, typically occurring within the first two years of life. Infantile Spasms is often characterized by hypsarrhythmia on encephalogram (EEG) and developmental plateau or regression. It is estimated that Infantile Spasms affects 2 to 5 per 10,000 live births. The etiology of Infantile Spasms is varied and often unclear at the time of diagnosis. In almost half of cases it is linked to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, chromosomal abnormalities, perinatal stroke, tuberous sclerosis complex, or periventricular leukomalacia or hemorrhage.
While historically treatment options have been widely variable, over the past several years three pharmacologic therapies have been adopted, including ACTH, oral corticosteroids (OCS), and vigabatrin.
ACTH was approved for use for multiple neurologic conditions in 1952 and specifically for Infantile Spasms in 2010. Unfortunately, as a hormone therapy, ACTH carries several potentially severe side effects including adrenal insufficiency, immunosuppression, electrolyte imbalances, and more commonly elevated blood pressure thought to lead to serious cardiac changes.
Complexity of ACTH therapy requires close monitoring. ACTH is administered intramuscularly twice a day for the initial two weeks with a complicated weaning schedule over the subsequent 2 weeks. Between the required monitoring and complicated administration regimen, ACTH therapy is often overwhelming and confusing for caregivers, and can lead to medication errors.
Unfortunately, primary care (PCP) monitoring for ACTH has proved to be inconsistent. Barriers for families have included: families without an identified PCP, families without the means to get to their PCP at the recommended intervals (rural location or inadequate transportation), PCP's without the correct equipment to monitor infants, limited office hours, and PCP with little comfort in managing side-effects when they present. This has resulted in disjointed care, and last-minute attempts to obtain needed monitoring in less-than-ideal settings (e.g., urgent care, hospital, neurology clinic) - all with additional expense to families.
Treatment with ACTH is associated with high direct and indirect costs. Treatment of Infantile Spasms with ACTH carries a significant financial burden for families. In August 2007, the cost for one vial of ACTH, then manufactured by Questcor Pharmaceuticals and now by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, increased from $1650 to $23,000. Current, non-discounted pricing is $34,400 per vial. The average therapy calls for 3-4 vials, with a total price tag between $103,200 and $137,600. Any potential for medication error further exacerbates costs of therapy.
Consumer-incurred costs of ACTH therapy have not previously been reported. Direct costs of ACTH therapy for caregivers include, at a minimum, the out-of-pocket expense for the drug as well as required PCP, neurology, and EEG follow-up. It is not uncommon, due to complications of monitoring, that caregivers sustain additional direct costs seeking monitoring in unplanned ways (e.g., urgent care/ED visits). In addition, prophylactic treatment with antibiotics and H2 blockers to combat potential side effects is necessary and adds to caregiver expense. Indirect costs include loss of productivity due to work absences and non-paid loss of productivity (e.g., homemaker). Expense of transportation and travel can also be significant.
Considering the potential severe side-effects of ACTH, the complicated medication regime, the rigorous required follow-up, the costs inherent in the therapy alone and those due to complications, it is hypothesized that parenting stress for parents of babies with IS is high. Support for these families is critical to successful ACTH therapy. Historically at Children's Hospital Colorado, there has been no structured support outside of the initial admission for diagnosis/start of therapy and follow-up neurology appointments. This study is intended to explore and compare parenting stress of parents/caregivers caring for babies with IS being treated with ACTH and secondarily, overall treatment satisfaction.
Remote biometric monitoring led by highly skilled registered nurses could offer a novel, feasible, cost-effective strategy to support families of infants with IS during treatment with ACTH. Although there is currently no published literature exploring the use of telehealth or remote monitoring in the specific treatment of Infantile Spasms, its successful use in other complex conditions underscores its potential for benefit. In addition to optimization of disease-related outcomes, remote monitoring has high potential to reduce financial burden and parenting stress on parent/caregivers.
This proposed study will utilize a prospective randomized clinical trial design. - Infants and caregivers of infants who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate. They will be randomized to the intervention or usual care group in accordance with a random number generator program through the Biostatistics Core at CHCO. Randomization will be stratified by payor source.
The study hypotheses include:
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will report less parenting stress at 2 and 4 weeks of treatment.
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with 4 weeks of ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will experience a decrease in direct (including travel) and indirect cost of care.
- Compared to those utilizing usual monitoring, parents/caregivers of infants with IS treated with ACTH utilizing nurse-led remote biometric monitoring will experience greater overall satisfaction with treatment.
All caregivers will be given the standard education on Infantile Spasms, ACTH and ACTH administration.
The control group will continue to receive standard care for ACTH monitoring and follow-up, which includes:
- Blood pressure monitoring by PCP recommended to occur a minimum of two times per week. Depending on the results and PCP's comfort in managing any aberrant results, the PCP may or may not share them with the patient's primary neurologist.
- Nurse follow-up phone call at 1 week of therapy to assess spasm frequency, monitoring and medication adherence, side-effects, complications of therapy, validate the dosing schedule, confirm required follow-up appointments (Neurology and EEG), answer any questions, and provide support. Data collected during these calls is routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review.
- EEG follow-up at 2 weeks of therapy - results are sent to primary neurologist.
- Neurology appointment at 2 weeks of therapy
The intervention group will receive and be instructed on the use of a re-useable digital health kit that will include an electronic tablet with integrated monitoring and telehealth software and manual or automatic blood pressure machine with appropriate sized cuff. The software utilized is web-based and has the capability to integrate into an organization's electronic health record. It allows for the real-time monitoring by healthcare professionals and the establishment of alerts. Appropriate research personnel will be responsible for this monitoring. In addition to biometric monitoring, the software allows for individualized health and other surveys to gain immediate patient feedback. Finally, the tablet and software support video telemedicine visits in the patient home.
The following interventions will be utilized in the intervention group:
- Caregivers will take blood pressure three times per week (ideally, Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and will uploaded into the monitoring software/tablet. A neurology nurse will monitor these results, transcribe them into the patient's medical record, and route them to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- Caregivers will complete a twice-a-week side-effect and adherence survey in the software/tablet. The results of this survey will be transcribed into the patient's medical record and routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- A neurology nurse will conduct a video telehealth visit with the caregiver to assess spasm frequency, monitoring and medication adherence, side-effects, complications of therapy, validate the dosing schedule, confirm required follow-up appointments (Neurology and EEG), answer any questions, and provide support between days 7-10 and again between days 21-24 of therapy. This will be documented as a telehealth nurse-visit and routed to the patient's primary neurologist for review and potential follow-up.
- EEG follow-up at 2 weeks of therapy - results are sent to primary neurologist.
- Neurology appointment at 2 weeks of therapy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients with infantile spasms will be randomized into either the control group that will receive traditional follow-up or the intervention group that will receive remote monitoring for follow-up. Both groups will complete surveys to collect data on parental stress, direct and indirect costs, and overall satisfaction with therapy.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –This group will continue to receive standard care for ACTH monitoring and follow-up with includes blood pressure by the patient's PCP while on therapy, a one week nursing follow-up phone call, and a two-week EEG and Neurology appointment. |
| Intervention Group | Experimental | Other: Remote monitoringThis group will be provided remote monitoring technology where they will be able to monitor blood pressure at home. In addition, they will receive a nurse-led telemedicine visit at one week and three weeks of therapy. Like the control group, they will still receive a two-week EEG and Neurology appointment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 31 days to 30 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients admitted to CHCO, Anschutz and Colorado Springs hospitals, under the age of 30 months with a primary diagnosis of Infantile Spasms and started on first-time ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Infants with recurrent Infantile Spasms and retreatment with ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants with existing home health nursing services and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants with prolonged inpatient admissions beyond 7 days after initiation on ACTH and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Infants whose caregivers do not read, write, and/or speak English with sufficient proficiency to provide informed consent and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
- Neonates less than 31 days old and their primary caregiver (parent/guardian).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Remote monitoringCaregivers will be able to monitor blood pressure from home and upload in a cloud-based application on a hand-held tablet. In addition, this technology will administer surveys to the caregiver to assess for therapy side effects and adherence. Nurse-led telemedicine visits will also be utilized. The healthcare team will be able to monitor these parameters remotely. | Other | Intervention Group |
Primary outcome
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Time frame: At study enrollment (prior to hospital discharge)
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Time frame: Mid-therapy (between week 2 and 3 of therapy)
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group
Time frame: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Parental stress will be measures by the Pediatric Inventory for Parents (PIP), a previously validated survey. The PIP is scored separately for each of the 4 domains (Communication, Emotional Distress, Medical Care, Role Function), across 2 scales: Frequency (F) and Difficulty (D). The range for each of the scales is 42-210, with a higher score on either scale indicating more stress.
Compare overall satisfaction with treatment between intervention group and control group
Time frame: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Overall treatment satisfaction will be measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medications, version 9 (TSQM v9) survey. This is a previously validated survey. The scores for the TSQM v9 can range from 1-100, with a higher score indicating greater satisfaction.
Compare expenses between intervention group and control group
Time frame: At mid-therapy (between week 2 and 3 of therapy)
Caregivers will be asked to provide details on both direct and indirect costs incurred during therapy. This will be measured by collecting both healthcare utilizations rates, actual out-of-pocket expenses, and lost productivity measures. Combined direct and indirect expenses will be combined and compared.
Compare expenses between intervention group and control group
Time frame: At therapy completion (end of week 4, with 7 days to complete)
Caregivers will be asked to provide details on both direct and indirect costs incurred during therapy. This will be measured by collecting both healthcare utilizations rates, actual out-of-pocket expenses, and lost productivity measures. Combined direct and indirect expenses will be combined and compared.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 May 2022.
- Background: PubMed 26704170Knupp KG, Coryell J, Nickels KC, Ryan N, Leister E, Loddenkemper T, Grinspan Z, Hartman AL, Kossoff EH, Gaillard WD, Mytinger JR, Joshi S, Shellhaas RA, Sullivan J, Dlugos D, Hamikawa L, Berg AT, Millichap J, Nordli DR Jr, Wirrell E; Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium. Response to treatment in a prospective national infantile spasms cohort. Ann Neurol. 2016 Mar;79(3):475-84. doi: 10.1002/ana.24594. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
- Background: PubMed 20726878Osborne JP, Lux AL, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy CR, Newton RW, Verity CM, O'Callaghan FJ. The underlying etiology of infantile spasms (West syndrome): information from the United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) on contemporary causes and their classification. Epilepsia. 2010 Oct;51(10):2168-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02695.x. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
- Background: PubMed 27293335Iype M, Saradakutty G, Kunju PA, Mohan D, Nair MK, George B, Ahamed SM. Infantile spasms: A prognostic evaluation. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2016 Apr-Jun;19(2):228-35. doi: 10.4103/0972-2327.173314.
- Background: PubMed 25524855Widjaja E, Go C, McCoy B, Snead OC. Neurodevelopmental outcome of infantile spasms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res. 2015 Jan;109:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2014.11.012. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
- Background: PubMed 19435579Kossoff EH, Hartman AL, Rubenstein JE, Vining EP. High-dose oral prednisolone for infantile spasms: an effective and less expensive alternative to ACTH. Epilepsy Behav. 2009 Apr;14(4):674-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2009.01.023. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
- Background: PubMed 16239177Lux AL, Edwards SW, Hancock E, Johnson AL, Kennedy CR, Newton RW, O'Callaghan FJ, Verity CM, Osborne JP; United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study. The United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) comparing hormone treatment with vigabatrin on developmental and epilepsy outcomes to age 14 months: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2005 Nov;4(11):712-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)70199-X.
- Background: PubMed 22689735Go CY, Mackay MT, Weiss SK, Stephens D, Adams-Webber T, Ashwal S, Snead OC 3rd; Child Neurology Society; American Academy of Neurology. Evidence-based guideline update: medical treatment of infantile spasms [RETIRED]. Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society. Neurology. 2012 Jun 12;78(24):1974-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e2cf.
- Background: PubMed 20691936Wray CD, Benke TA. Effect of price increase of adrenocorticotropic hormone on treatment practices of infantile spasms. Pediatr Neurol. 2010 Sep;43(3):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2010.04.005.
- Background: PubMed 28917500Ibrahim A, Umar UI, Usman UM, Owolabi LF. Economic evaluation of childhood epilepsy in a resource-challenged setting: A preliminary survey. Epilepsy Behav. 2017 Nov;76:84-88. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 15602179Burton WN, Chen CY, Conti DJ, Pransky G, Edington DW. Caregiving for ill dependents and its association with employee health risks and productivity. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Oct;46(10):1048-56. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000141830.72507.32.
- Background: PubMed 26195452Bator EX, Gleason JM, Lorenzo AJ, Kanaroglou N, Farhat WA, Bagli DJ, Koyle MA. The burden of attending a pediatric surgical clinic and family preferences toward telemedicine. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Oct;50(10):1776-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2015.06.005. Epub 2015 Jun 20.
- Background: PubMed 18337182Wirrell EC, Wood L, Hamiwka LD, Sherman EM. Parenting stress in mothers of children with intractable epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2008 Jul;13(1):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2008.02.011. Epub 2008 Mar 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. There is no plan to share IPD.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jennifer D Coffman, BSN principal investigator
Children's Hospital Colorado
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remote monitoring in people with Infantile Spasms, Non-Intractable, run by University of Colorado, Denver at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Clinical Practice Specialist (720-777-6915, jennifer.coffman@childrenscolorado.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare parental stress between intervention group and control group (time frame: At study enrollment (prior to hospital discharge)). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT04086992, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2022.