AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Failure, SystolicMETEOR-CRTNCT04083690

Multi-lead ECG to Effectively Optimize Resynchronization Devices: New CRT Recipients

A study testing Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony in people with Heart Failure, Systolic, run by Allina Health System at 2 sites in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), or atrial-synchronized biventricular (BiV) pacing, is an FDA-approved device therapy option for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure, Systolic
What is being tested?
Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
11 Oct 2019to 1 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients (or their legal guardian) must be willing to provide informed consent and sign a data privacy authorization (HIPAA) form
  • Age greater than or equal 18 years
  • Pre-CRT EF less than or equal 40%
  • Patients will be receiving or have received a first-time CRT device for standard clinical indications within ~2 months of study enrollment
  • Adequate echocardiographic images for LV EF and LV ESV determination
  • On optimal medical therapy

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are pregnant or may become pregnant
  • Patient has a history of severe allergic reactions from ECG gel/ electrode adhesives
  • Patient has a His Bundle pacing lead
  • Patient has right bundle branch block (RBBB)
  • Patient is enrolled in concurrent research study that would potentially confound the results of this study
  • Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) burden greater than or equal to 10%

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Minneapolis Heart Institute (Abbott Northwestern Hospital)

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407

    Peter M Eckman, MD, 612-863-9000, peter.eckman@allina.com

    Christopher D Brown, 651-241-2806, christopher.brown2@allina.com

    Recruiting
  • United Heart & Vascular Clinic

    Saint Paul, Minnesota, 55102

    Christopher D Brown, BA, 651-241-2806, christopher.brown2@allina.com

    Alan J Bank, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), or atrial-synchronized biventricular (BiV) pacing, is an FDA-approved device therapy option for heart failure (HF) patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony. A traditional CRT device has pacing leads implanted within the right atrium (RA), the right ventricle (RV), and within a coronary vein overlying the lateral or posterior left ventricle (LV). Within the past decade, various multi-center randomized controlled trials have reported improved quality of life, aerobic exercise capacity, LV systolic function and structure, as well as decreased hospitalization rates and mortality among patients with HF. Despite improvements in CRT technology with multipoint pacing, quadripolar leads, and adaptive pacing algorithms, approximately 30% of patients do not clinically benefit and are considered non-responders. This study looks to optimize new CRT device recipients using information obtained from standard ECG machines.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized study designed to evaluate if CRT device optimization, guided by electrocardiography, improves echocardiographic and clinical outcomes among HF patients with a CRT device implanted for standard indications. All patients will have measurement of electrocardiograms at a range of device settings. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the active comparator arm (standard CRT programming), or the experimental arm (CRT device programmed by the information obtained by ECGs). Standard CRT programming used in this study is simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing with a fixed atrioventricular delay. At 6 months, control patients who were initially randomized to standard programming will have programming changed based on the ECG optimization information. Patients will be blinded to randomization. Change of LV size and function will be performed prior to randomization, and again ~6 and ~12 months following CRT implant in both subgroups.

Being tested
Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony
Keywords
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Pacing, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Optimization, Heart Failure
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Systolic, Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical SynchronyDevice

    Reprogramming of CRT device to maximize the benefit based on the ECG CRT optimization information.

Study groups in NCT04083690
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard CRT Programming, then ECG CRT OptimizationActive comparatorThe control arm patients will have standard CRT programming for the first 6 months, and then will be reprogrammed based on the ECG CRT optimization information for the following 6 months
Receives: Device: Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony
ECG CRT OptimizationExperimentalThe experimental arm patients will have CRT device reprogrammed based on the ECG CRT optimization information for 12 months.
Receives: Device: Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in left ventricular size

    Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), measured by echocardiogram, in patients in the experimental arm vs active comparator arm

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in left ventricular function

    Change left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), measured by echocardiogram, in patients in the experimental arm vs active comparator arm

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Change in left ventricular size

    Change in LVESV, measured by echocardiogram, in the subset of patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) or intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) in the experimental arm vs the active comparator arm

    Measured: 6 months

  3. Change in left ventricular size

    Change in LVESV, measured by echocardiogram, in the subset of patients with complete heart block (CHB) or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in the experimental arm vs the active comparator arm

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Change in left ventricular size

    Change in LVESV, measured by echocardiogram, in patients in the active comparator arm (crossed-over to optimization device settings at 6 months) at 12 months vs 6 months

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Sep 2019
  2. Study start11 Oct 2019
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2023 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2024 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
1:1 randomization - active comparator and experimental arm (note: at 6 months the control arm will crossover)
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT04083690
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRBnet#: 1455594
Acronym
METEOR-CRT
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
30 Aug 2019
Last updated
9 Jun 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: We do not plan to share IPD with other researchers

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Reprogramming of CRT Device Settings to Optimal Electrical Synchrony in people with Heart Failure, Systolic, run by Allina Health System at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Jun 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Christopher D Brown (651-241-2806, christopher.brown2@allina.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in left ventricular size (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Jun 2022.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in